RADIOMarch 04, 2022

Why today’s inflation is the greatest ROBBERY in the WORLD

Carol Roth, financial expert and author of ‘The War On Small Business,’ tells Glenn that today’s economic ‘mess’ was caused by ‘unprecedented intervention in [our] monetary policy, fiscal policy, and just general government policy.’ But still, huge, powerful entities — like the Fed, for example — can’t keep their greedy, corporate hands out of our market: ‘It's the looting of America, the looting of Main Street, and [of] the average American.’ Unfortunately, Glenn predicts, times will only get worse from here. So, in this clip, Glenn gives an important tip to help you PREPARE.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: We're going to talk to Carol Roth here in just a second, about how what we heard last night, the State of the Union, and what's going on.

How SWIFT is going to affect the fed, inflation, the printing of money. All of that. What it really means to you. First, I want to go to James in Florida. Hello, James.

CALLER: How are you doing, Glenn? It's a privilege to talk to you.

GLENN: Thank you, sir.

CALLER: Glenn, I'm calling because I have a difference of opinion, with some of the political pundits, and the military pundits, that I've seen in either of talk radio. Or heard on television.

GLENN: Okay.

CALLER: I lived through both the Cuban Missile Crisis. Vietnam.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

CALLER: And then Desert Storm one. Combat commander serving in Germany, northeast Asia.

GLENN: Thank you, sir.

CALLER: What we're doing with the Ukraine, as a nation. And policy currently. Militarily, politically, is absolutely disgraceful.

We should be providing those people. I bass American flags every morning, and I've taught my son and I -- who we passed the American flag.

We salute it. Because it stands for liberty. It stands for justice. It stands for peace.

It stands for prosperity. It stands for opportunity.

And what we're not doing is providing that those attributes. Characteristics, to the people of Ukraine.

In a meaningful way.

And a meaningful way. I mean, providing them, a no-fly zone.

Providing them combat air patrols.

Deterrence doesn't -- isn't effective, unless you have the willingness to use it. You know, Churchill said, right in the darkest hours, when he just took over, success is not failure. Failure is not fatal. It's the will to continue that counts. And one other motto that I've learned in my life, that was preached into us from the moment that we stepped into our first military leadership class at the Air Force Academy is, if you know what is right and not do it, it's cowardice. And that's what we're doing now, as a nation. That's what we're doing now, relatively. Politically.

GLENN: So, James, I really do appreciate your point of view. I appreciate your service.

And I hate to disagree with you. But I don't think it's cowardice to think strategically. A no-fly zone, one plane goes down, and we're in World War III with a guy we can't predict at this point, who has tons of nukes and says he'll use them.
I don't want to get into World War III. By the way, there is nothing wrong -- check your local attorney on this. But I don't believe there's anything wrong with a U.S. soldier taking off their uniform, you know, assuming they've retired.

And going over to Ukraine, and donning a Ukrainian uniform.

I think they're paying soldiers, to go over and fight.
I know a lot of soldiers, who are like, I'm going over.

I'm going to help fight.

That's good. That's good. We as individuals, should help them.

But, you know, getting into World War III, is not necessarily something I would like to jump to, in a two-week period.

Carol Roth is with us. Carol, are we doing everything we can, with these sanctions?

I mean, I -- I read conflicting reports.

That these sanctions are more than anything we've ever done. Because it's public/private, great reset kind of partnerships. Then I hear they're meaningless.

Which one is it?

CAROL: I really wish I had the answer for you, Glenn. I've been racking my brain. I've been reading all the reports. And they do somehow conflict with each other.

They say that they're going to cut Russians off, from payment systems.

But we're probably going to exempt the oil payments. Which is obviously 60 percent of their economy. Right.

So that's a challenge.

You know, I've heard about their freezing of the assets, at central banks. Including the fed. The ECB. Now the Japanese Central Bank is jumping on.

But in terms of, you know, how -- how strong that is, I think because these items are so complex, and because the White House has been fairly opaque, in terms of -- of trying to clarify them, we really don't have a good sense of -- you know, have they really gone, as far as they can?

Is there something else on the table?

And I will say, there's probably a middle ground here. You would have to thread the needle on this one.

Because going too light, creates a set of issues. But going heavy, creates a separate set of issues. All of which have reverberations here in the US.

So this is very challenging stuff.

And I'm not sure that we have the best minds, that we possibly could have.

GLENN: Yeah.

CAROL: Coming up with the strategy around this, unfortunately.

GLENN: All right. So let me ask you about. Let's just say inflation.

One of the things the fed wanted to do by raising interest rates, was to slow down, quote, I love this. It was laughable. An overheated economy.

The economy was not overheated. The stock market is overheated. Those people who got all these bailouts. They're spending money. And investing. And driving the prices of everything up.

The little guy is feeling everyday inflation of the consequence of printing that much money.

So they want to slow people down.

Doesn't this accomplish that, not at the higher level, but at the lower level?

The common person?

CAROL: This is such a mess. And it comes on the back of the unprecedented intervention that we've had in monetary policy, fiscal policy, and just general government policy.

So you have the fed intervening in the market. To the tune of trillions of dollars. You had the government doing this. You know, quote, unquote, relief spending. Which, as we know, most of that ended up, in the hands of the wealthy, and well-connected. And not the individuals that really needed it.

And then you had these policies, that said, oh, let's just, you know, turn off large swaths of the economy. And we'll just flip they believe back on. Like we're power cycling a modem. And that disrupted labor and supply chains. To the point, where it's difficult to come back. And it has reverberation through inflation.

Now you have people who have created this policy. And let me just be very clear, and underscore this.

This was not consumer driven. This was not demand driven.

This was not corporate greed driven. This was entirely policy driven.

And there were points along the way, where they could have dialed it back, and maybe, you know, still had some issues, but not the level that we're having today. And they have refused to do so, to the point, that the fed just finished -- I mean, they were in the market in February. Still providing support to the market.

So you have these people, who missed the call on inflation. Have told us everything under the sun. It's not going to happen. It was just going to be a little hot. It was just going to be transitory. Oh, it's good for you. Okay. Yeah. Maybe it's a bad thing.

Now thinking, that they can also thread the needle, perfectly, and bring the economy in, for a soft landing.

But what is monetary policy going to fix?

Even if we didn't have the Russia/Ukraine crisis. Is it going to fix the fact, that we have millions of people, who dropped out of the labor force. And that we're still going to have wage inflation.

Is it going to fix the fact that we still have all this money, in the financial system?
I'm just not sure what they think this policy is going to do.

So the concern for us, as -- again, even ex-Russia/Ukraine. But with that layered on. With the fed, who is now going through a period where we have potentially slowing growth. And rising inflation. Is going to try to come up with the perfect policy. And if you think these people, who have made every mistake in the book, over the past couple of years. And going back over the last even 15 years. Now all of a sudden, have the perfect policy.

Well, I have a bridge to sell you, at that point.

GLENN: Yeah. It's horrible.

I had a friend over at the house last night. And they said, Glenn, people like me.

Regular person, working, you know, come with the family. Said, Glenn, people like me. We're on the edge.

We're not -- we're not going to make it through all of this.
And I don't think there's a single elite -- you know, when the president says, I'm going to try to make this easier for you. And then he proposes gigantic packages, which will just mean trillions more in spending, which will mean inflation even higher. You know, and then he proposed a 15-dollar working wage. Carol, isn't that -- that's the death spiral. Right?

When prices are going up for inflation, and so then you hike wages, that will make prices go up even further. Then you have to hike wages.

I mean, that's the death spiral.

CAROL: Yeah. It was a very strange economic lesson, that we heard from the president, last night. During the State of the Union.

He wants everyone to buy American. Which we all know is more expensive.

But then he would like for companies, to keep costs down. But also, raise wages.

GLENN: Yeah.

CAROL: And then he tells you, how much he wants to tax the companies. So just the circular logic of all of that. Migraines.

It just went sort of cuckoo. I don't sort of know what's going on here. And I don't know if it made any sense. But we are living through, and are living through, the greatest transfer of wealth in history. From the average --

GLENN: No. Rephrase that. This is the largest robbery or theft ever in the history of the world.

That's really what happened.

CAROL: It's the looting of America. And it's a looting of Main Street. And the average American. The working American. For the benefit of the wealthy, and well-connected.

And this inflation, as I've been saying, all along, is a permanent task. On the average person.
And over time, supports the people who own the assets.
And it's going to be very, very -- continually very difficult, for the average person, to -- to survive. And when you hear things like, oh, well, you look at the -- the personal savings rate. Or you look at how much cash people have.

And the average American is doing well. It's because the people at the top, have so much money. They are distorting the averages. Look at the median.

Don't look at the average. And you will see a very different story.

GLENN: Carol Roth. The author of the war on small business.

She's a recovering investment banker. And really doing everything she can. To make sure the average person understands what's going on.

Carol, thank you as always. I appreciate it.

Let me -- let me say to you, what I said to my friend, last night. And I know this sounds trite. But I'm telling you, your money is not going to be worth what it is today, in three months. Six months. A year from now.

So if you buy something for a dollar, today, you -- let's just say your dollar of today is worth 100 cents.

Six months from now, it could be worth 90 cents.

So you're having to pay really, a dollar ten, for whatever it is, you could have used. You could have bought now, for a dollar.

And that's a just going to continue, until you have, you know, 60, 50, 40 cents on every dollar in buying power.

So when you -- if you are at the edge, when you go to the grocery store, when things are on sale, and you don't necessarily need that many boxes, buy them now. Because you will actually be saving money. You will actually be making money. Your -- the value of that box of hamburger helper or whatever it is. Will be worth more, than what you could buy it for, in the store. Please, there is real hardship. I believe Great Depression-style hardship. Coming soon.
I hope to God I'm wrong.
But please, prepare now.

SHOCK POLL: The % of Young People Who Support SOCIALISM is Insane

New polling reveals a shocking truth: young Americans aren’t just open to socialism... they overwhelmingly want a socialist president in 2028. Glenn Beck and Justin Haskins break down five alarming surveys showing massive ideological shifts among voters ages 18-39, including young Republicans. Why is socialism exploding in popularity, and what does this mean for the future of America? Are we on the brink of a political transformation or potentially even a national crisis?

Watch This FULL Episode of 'Glenn TV' HERE

Property Taxes are OUT OF CONTROL - And Here's Why! | Guest: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

Texas Governor Greg Abbott joins Glenn Beck to expose why Texans are being crushed by skyrocketing property taxes — and how local governments, not the state, keep driving homeowners deeper into financial distress. Gov. Abbott breaks down his five-point plan to impose strict spending limits, force voter approval for tax hikes, reform out-of-control appraisals, empower citizens to slash taxes themselves, and eliminate school district property taxes for homeowners altogether. Glenn argues that property tax is morally wrong because it prevents Texans from ever truly owning their land, and Abbott lays out his strategy to fight both parties in the legislature to finally deliver lasting relief.

Joe Rogan & Glenn AGREE: We just got CLOSER to civil war

Joe Rogan recently warned that we may have gotten to Step 7 of 9 in the lead-up to civil war. Glenn reviews the 9 Steps and explains why he believes Rogan nailed this one. But Glenn also lays out what Americans MUST do to reverse this trend...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So if you take what Fetterman said yesterday about how people are cheering for him to die on the left, and then you couple it with something that was on the Joe Rogan show on Tuesday. He was saying that the reaction to the death of Charlie Kirk makes him think that the US is closer to Civil War than -- than he thought.

Now, let me quote him. He said, after the Charlie Kirk thing. I'm like, oh, my.

We might be at seven. This might be he step seven on the way to a bona fide Civil War. Charlie Kirk gets shot, and people are celebrating.

Like, whoa. Whoa. Whoa.

You want people to die that you disagree with?

Where are we now on the scale of Civil War?

Well, let me go over the scale of Civil War, because it's sobering.

Now, none of this has to be true. If we wake up and decide, I don't want to do this anymore!

Okay?

Here's step one.

Step one. Loss of civic trust.

Every civil conflict begins when people stop believing that the system is fair. Are we there?

We're so far -- we're so far past the doorway, we are comfortably asleep on the couch on this one. Gallup and Pew both show trust in Congress, the media courts, and the FBI government are now at record lows.

The Edelman Trust Barometer classifies the US now as severely polarized. Majority of Republicans distrust federal elections. Majority of Democrats don't trust the Supreme Court.

Americans are really united on one thing, and that is the other side is corrupt!

When faith in the rules collapses, the republic begins to wobble. But that's step one. Step two, polarization hardens into identity!

Political disagreement is normal!

Identity conflict is fatal!

But that's what Marxists push. Identity politics. This is when politics stopped being about policy, and started being about who you are as a person.

Have we crossed this one into step two?

I mean, we're neck deep into this. A study on this, from PRRI.

It's a survey, found 23 percent of Americans believe political violence may be necessary to save the that I guess.

I think that's an old study. Americans now sort themselves by ZIP code into ideological enclaves. The big sort: Universities, activists, corporations. Everybody is promoting oppressor versus oppressed.

And that -- does what?

It puts us into incompatible tribes. Opponents aren't wrong anymore. The opponent is dangerous!

If I go back and you look at civil wars, Lebanon, before 1975. Yugoslavia, before 1991. That's -- we're doing that. Okay?

Step three. Breakdown of the gatekeepers. The gatekeepers are kind of like the referees of society. It's the media, political parties, churches, civic leaders.

When they fail, extremism fills the vacuum. Okay. Where are we on this? Have our gatekeepers failed us?

Yeah. I think both parties, especially the left, you know, everything I predicted that the left was going to be eaten by the extreme left, and then the communists and the socialists is now happening.

They've lost control of the fringe of each party. Media transformed, you know, from referees into team coaches. Tech platforms. It's outrage for profit. Universities are not there to cool things down. They heat them up.

Churches. Churches are useless. Useless.

When the referees leave the field, the game devolves into a brawl. And the refs are gone off the field. So there are only nine steps. We're at step four. Here's step four.

Are you ready for this one?

Parallel information realities.

Civil wars don't require different opinions. They require different realities.

I remember reading about Germany, at the beginning of, you know, the Nazi era. How the two new newspapers. One was propaganda for the government.

And the other one, it was the last one that was kind of the holdout.

And they said, you could read them, and they would cover the same thing.

But they had almost no information was the same. Except, that happened yesterday.

Here's what they said. And then everything else was different. That's exactly -- I mean, step four is complete!

We can't agree on facts, right?

Crime rates. Border numbers. Inflation. Election security.

Two Americans can watch the same video. And see opposite truths.

Social media algorithms are creating customized political universes.

Digital echo chambers. Deepfakes. We're just at the beginning of that. And both sides accuse the other of running disinformation machines.

Why? Because we don't have a shared reality. So if you don't have a shared reality. How do you settle any dispute?

On the nine steps, we're up to number five. Coming in at number five.

Loss of neutral rule of law.

This out of the nine steps with, five is the pivot point.

It's not corruption, it's the belief that the law is no longer neutral.

Are we there yet?

Let me tell you the CBS you.gov poll. 67 percent say the justice system is used for political purposes.

I think that's low. January 6 defendants given years in prison, 2020 rioters were released. High profile political figures, prosecuted or shielded based on party.

FBI whistle-blowers alleging pressure to inflate domestic extremism numbers. States like Texas, directly defying federal directives, on border enforcement.

And now, leading the way, with the federal government.

History is really cold and unforgiving on this point.

Once the people believe justice is political! Remember, this is the turning point.

The republic stands on borrowed time. Once you no longer believe that justice is achievable. Step six.

Are we there?

I think we are.

Step six. Normalization of political violence!

This is where violence stops shocking the system. Are we there?

Remember, where violence stops shocking the system. Look at evidence just from Virginia. What they just voted for.

He was calling for the death of a -- a political opposition.

Calling for his children to be killed.

Was called on it, never apologized.

Never said anything other than, yeah. I know. He dug it deeper.

Was anyone shocked by it? Apparently not. They elected him. Here's the evidence. 2020 riots.
574 events. $2 billion in damage. Was anybody outraged by that? Or was it downplayed and excused?
Assassination attempts. Assassination attempts against the president. Supreme Court justice.

Fistfights. And mob actions on college campuses. To silence speakers. Rising to do for punching a fascist or stopping genocide. Depending on the ideology. Online chatter discussing Civil War, national divorce, and revolution.

When violence becomes part of the political language, a nation crosses an invisible line. We're now up to step seven out of nine.

This is where Joe Rogan said, are we at step seven?

The rise of militias and parallel forces.

When a state loses he is monopoly on force.

Countdown accelerates. So where are we on this one?

I think we're seeing, maybe early signs of this.

You're starting to see the -- the states kind of organize these mobs, you know, to go after ICE.

Right?

Armed groups, right-wing, left-wing radical secessionists. Anyone.

Once they start forming their own police forces. Or their own option forces, then you have -- then you have everything really falling apart.

Entirely!

I don't think we're there, yet!

But we're starting to see the beginnings of this.

Step eight. The trigger event.

Civil Wars don't begin with a plan. They begin with a spark.

So where are we?

We're not here yet. The conditions are right. Potential triggers, disputed election in '26 or '28.

Political assassination or major attack.

Supreme Court decision that ignites mass unrest.

Financial crisis or dollar crisis.

A state federal standoff turning violent!

Nothing is ignited yet, but the room is soaked in gasoline. So we don't have seven. We're on the verge of eight, at any time. And here's nine.

This is the point of no return.

When police, military, or federal agencies split, even if no one calls it that, well, where are we?

Well, I just read a story about how with the Mamdani election in New York, a good number of the police force is going to leave. And they're going to go join police forces elsewhere. You also have the tension between the state National Guard, and the federal directives, the state guard and the state directives. Law enforcement recruitment is at crisis lows. The distrust of the FBI, DOJ, CIA. Tens of millions of Americans. I always really respected those institutions. I have no respect for them now. If you have states openly defying federal rules on immigration, drug laws, sanctuary policies.
Whistle-blower claims of internal politicization.

All of these things are in play for the first time in 150 years, people can imagine!

So I give this to you, not to be fearful of, but to know where you are. As a map!

Know where you are.

And hopefully, it might wake some people up, if you chart America on, on the nine step model of Civil War. Steps one through four, completed!

Step five, happening!

Step six, happening! Step seven, beginning! Step eight, just waiting for it. And step nine, avoidable, only if step eight, never happens. Again, I'm not telling you for doom purposes, this is diagnosis. This is a doctor going, I want you to look at the chart.

And this is a doctor saying, I want you to look at -- do you see what's happening to your body?

If you don't stop this habit, you are going to die. You don't have to die. You can stop smoking and drinking right now. You can start exercising. But if you don't, you are going to die.

The question is, are we the nation that says, nah, that's not going to happen to me. Or are we the nation that wakes up and sees our chart and says, good heavens, it's way far more gone than I thought it was. But I feel something in the air.

I'm going to change my behavior. The nation that refuses to look and wake up and stop calling their neighbors enemies, is the nation that fails!

We have to strengthen these things that have already fallen. And, you know what, the easiest one to do is?

Church. Where are you ministers and pastors priests and rabbis?

Where the hell are you?

I think there's going to be a special section for you, when you cross over to the -- because you're doing things in the name of God!

So when you get to the other side, I think there's going to be a special section for those who remained silent. While his rights were being taken away.

You don't own that right.

I don't own that right.

The Lord gave us those rights, and said, protect them!

By you, being the representative, the voice box, if you will, of the Lord, to shepherd his people. By you not standing up and saying, hey, by the way, we have -- we have a moral responsibility to protect these rights for the next generation! By you refusing because you're afraid. Because I think, there's no politics in the Bible! There's no politics in the Bible. Really?

The whole thing is about politics. Is about the moral way you have to live your life.

Calling things as you see them. Calling them back to eternal principles.

He didn't tell anybody how to vote. Render to Caesar what is Caesar's.

But there are certain principles that you have to have, or you lose not only this citizenship, but the next citizenship. The one that really matters. And, boy, if you are doing it because you're a coward, you are in the wrong business!

Get out of the pulpit, and go to work at Jack in the Box.

Democrat “SMOKING GUN” on Trump & Epstein gets DESTROYED by facts

The House Oversight Democrats recently released "new" emails allegedly proving President Trump lied about his knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. However, Glenn points out a glaring issue with these emails that destroys their entire narrative...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, let's dive right into the Epstein Maxwell emails. My gosh, Stu!

Why are they trying to cover up that Donald Trump had sex with children!

STU: I mean, it's just clear, as -- as day, in the emails!

GLENN: Yeah. No.

STU: He spent hours with one of the victims. What else could have possibly have occurred in that arrangement? We don't know!

GLENN: And it's -- it's one of the victims, Stu. One of the victims!

STU: One of the victims, that's all we know. One of the victims.

GLENN: Let me read what Jeffrey Epstein wrote. I want you to realize that the dog who hasn't barked is Trump. Victim redacted. Victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned. Police chief, et cetera.

Okay. New information, just released. Or is it?

Because in 2011, 2011, that was released and everybody knew it. It's been out floating around. Here's the change: In 2011, this is what it read.

I want you to realize that the dog hasn't barked is Trump. Virginia spent hours at my house with him.

Why would you redact a name that is already out in the public square!

It's already out!

The memo is already out. The email is already out. It's been out for years. Why would you redact that name now?

Well, because it makes it all of a sudden, new and shiny. Shiny and new. If you don't know who said it, you see victim, and you're like, oh, you see victim. Who is the victim?

I don't know. But when you know it's Virginia, you know this has already gone to court. This is -- she already testified about this!

He didn't partake in any of this, any sex with any of it. It's true. He didn't partake in any sex with us, and I'm quoting, this is from the testimony. But it's not true, that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me. Have you ever met him?

Yes, at Mar-a-Lago, my dad and him. I wouldn't say they were friends, but my dad knew him, and they would talk. Have you ever been in Donald Trump or Jeffrey Epstein's presence with one another? No!

What's the basis of your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey? Jeffrey has told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.

He didn't partake in any of -- any of the sex with any of it. He flirted with me.

It's true, that he didn't partake in any sex with us. But it's not true that he flirted with me.

So I don't understand that. But she goes on. Donald Trump never flirted with me!

Okay. So what -- what's new about this?

This is the same girl, this is the same person that -- didn't she work at Mar-a-Lago?

Or she was going to get a job at Mar-a-Lago.

STU: Yeah. I believe she did at one point.

GLENN: Yeah. So we know they know each other. We know they know each other.

We know that at Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey Epstein would come, and he was poaching the employees. The girls there. To go work for him.

And Donald Trump went to him. And said, "Hey, man. Stop it. Stop poaching people from me. That's not cool. Don't do it." And then he said, "Oh, yeah. All right." And then he did it a second time. And he's like, "You know what, you're out. I don't want you here anymore. I asked you not to do it, and you did it." Now, that doesn't mean that he knew what was happening to the girls or what was happening or anything else.

And even if it did mean something was happening with the girls, he was saying, "Hey. Stop it! Don't take any of the girls or the women here.
Don't do it." I don't believe he knew anything about any of this. But God only knows! And really, God only knows!

This is not new news. Donald Trump, he might end up beating Bezos as the richest man on the planet! When all is said and done!

Because, again, the -- they're presenting this as new fact, a giant scandal. Stu, I don't know if you know this. This is -- this breaking news is a giant scandal.

STU: Yeah. I've heard democratic representatives saying that over the past 24 hours. Yeah. We need to investigate this.

This is shocking stuff. It's a massive scandal. Even ABC News, I heard, pushed back against this. And said, well, what scandal? What are you implying occurred here?

We know who the victim was. We know the victim. Like why. Why did you even redact that name?

And they're like we always redact name of victims.

Do you really? When they're already out publicly?

Not to mention, this particular victim is not even alive.

You know, she sadly died. I mean, it's a terrible, terrible story.

GLENN: Terrible story.

STU: Yeah. She passed away.

A suicide. It was at least the report I believe. But she has a posthumous book coming out. But like a terrible, terrible story.

But, you know, to act as if you have to protect her identity when, number one, she's dead.

GLENN: Is ridiculous.

STU: Number two, everybody already knows who she was, including the news sources, who also have a policy, you would think.

And ABC has a policy. They redact, that was in this type of situation. But it's already been out. We already knew who it was.

So they redacted to make it look like he's with other people who have not already told us nothing bad occurred! You know, and it is an absolutely awful tactic. And at least --

GLENN: I think litigation should follow again. I think he should sue them again. Anyone who is presenting this as new information.

ABC did their job. Congratulations for ABC. They did their job.

They pointed out, this is not new information.

Why would you redact. Why are you releasing this now? And you're redacting a name this -- this email is already out!

You're presenting this as a new scandal.

And you redacted that name. This is completely dishonest. The news media shouldn't even run with it. They shouldn't even run with it. They should have said, old news. Old news. And if you did run with it, you should have handle it had like ABC handle it had. Wait a minute. Why did you redact name.

What do you mean that there's a new scandal. She already testified exactly opposite of what you're believing Jeffrey Epstein over the victim right now. I just want to make sure you understand the Democrats right here. You're taking the name of Epstein, over the victim.

Oh, okay. All right.

STU: And Epstein doesn't even say that anything occurred.

GLENN: No.

STU: There's not -- it's just -- it would be something you would have to jump to a conclusion, to accuse Donald Trump of something like this.

And we know what happened, because the victim said nothing!

Said, it was nothing!

GLENN: Right.

STU: In fact, it wasn't even a flirtation. Which, by the way, even that, you might have thought was creepy. It wasn't even a crime.

It wasn't even flirtation. So it's a disgrace in every single way.

GLENN: All right. So let me take you here. Let me take you here.

If you remember when the shutdown first started, what did the Democrats say, the reason why they did the shutdown?

Not them! Why Mike Johnson and everybody else wouldn't negotiate!

Why wouldn't -- why wouldn't the Republicans negotiate?

Because the heat was on, to release the Epstein files.

And they didn't want to have to do that. So they shut the government down!

Okay?

They wouldn't negotiate. You didn't hear any of this? Oh, it's so arrogant.

STU: It doesn't make any sense at all. That's probably what they said.

GLENN: I know. I know. So the government is open, and what does Mike Johnson do yesterday?

He said the House is going to vote on a bill to release all of the files related to the late financier, convicted child sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein next week. He said on Wednesday that a discharge position to bypass leadership and force a vote on the bill, hit the benchmark for needed signatures. It's been decided by him to expedite the vote for the bill, which under the current rules could have been delayed until at least early September.

So he says, as soon as that petition hit, the needed 218 signatures, I brought it up. Unanimous consent. Let's go! Release it.

So he's pushing this forward. Good, Mike!
Release all of it. Thank you!

Get it out. Lance this boil.

I mean, if anybody thinks that you're ever going to get the truth on this in the first place, it's madness. It's madness. Everybody -- I mean, so many important people were involved in this, and it was in the hands of the Democrats for the longest time. Okay?

So they had all of this information. You don't think it was all picked through? And if there was anything about Donald Trump, you don't think that would have come up between 2020 and 2024?

There's nothing in there about Donald Trump. These people are so stupid. This time, we've got him, boys. This time, we've got him.

No, you don't. This time, it's like Wile E. Coyote. This time, we've got the Roadrunner!

No. You're never going to catch him on this. It doesn't work. The guy was the most investigated person in the history of the world, and you've got nothing! Now, it's good to come out.

But if you think you're going to catch a bunch of people on the left, you're not going to. Because they had it, you know, in their possession.

You don't think all of the names were taken out? You don't think things were destroyed, if there was anything? I believe there was something. But I don't believe there's any names in it anymore. You're not going to get the truth on this one. You're just not going to get the truth, but release everything that we have. Everything!

Oh. Oh, by the way, also in the Epstein emails. How come nobody is talking about this one, Stu?

This one is from Michael Wolff, to Jeffrey Epstein. And then Jeffrey Epstein responds.

So Michael Wolff writes, "What's the thumbnail on Nes Baum (phonetic) Foster?"

And Jeffrey Epstein writes back, "Nes Baum White House Counsel, dot, dot, dot, Hillary doing naughties with Vince."

Now, Vince Foster killed himself, you know, and then killed himself at the White House. And then drug himself across the street to the park.

I mean, I don't know -- the Vince Foster thing is so old. And it doesn't -- but why is nobody talking about that one?

Why is no one talking about that?

Also, this the Jeffrey Epstein email bundle, ABC, you don't feel that's necessary to bring that one up?

Huh. Interesting.