RADIO

WARNING As Global Stock Markets Drop FAST

U.S. stock markets took a plunge Monday morning after a bad day on Friday. The Dow plummeted hundreds of points, Warren Buffett is selling stocks like crazy, and Japan's stock market recently had its worst day since 1987's Black Monday. So, are these signs of a coming recession? Financial expert Carol Roth joins Glenn to explain what's going on: Why are the stock markets crashing? What does Warren Buffett know that we don't? Are tech stocks like Apple and NVIDIA just going through a correction phase? Is the Federal Reserve to blame? And what can average Americans do to prepare?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Friday, we had a bad jobs report. We're still not in a recession, indicators are showing that we are headed towards one.

But, you know, the indicators have been wrong before.

We are headed towards one. We are headed towards a depression at some point. I just don't know when.

And we're headed for a massive, global collapse. Again, I just don't know when.

Nobody does. That's why I ask you, please, be prepared.

And please take my -- look, I'm not an expert in anything.

Nothing. I'm -- I'm a former DJ, that is a recovering alcoholic, and I'm a self-educated man. So take everything that you -- that I say, with a grain of salt.

I want, I need you to do your own homework.

I hope -- honestly, this hasn't happened yesterday yet. I hope that you do your homework. And you think, wait a minute.

Glenn, you're missing this. And you show that I'm wrong. Because I want to be wrong. But it is coming.

And we are in the birth pangs of the future. We are giving birth right now, to the future.

A baby is coming out. And I don't think -- I don't think we're going to like it.

I think it's one of those babies that comes out like, hey. Mom and dad.

You know, and guarded by Rottweilers. But we're -- we're approaching something.

And our Dow is down almost 1200 points in futures. The reason why this is so important, is because it's not alone. Friday, bad jobs numbers. We were down 611 points.

That's a pretty big at all. This morning, before we even open up. We're down almost 1200 points.

You know, that's almost 2,000 points, in two days.

But in Japan, stocks were wiped out. This happened while you were asleep.

The Nikkei 225 is falling 12 and a half percent. That is the biggest single day decline since Black Monday's collapse of 19 -- what?

'89 or '87, I think it was.

Also, if you read any financial news over the weekend. You saw that Warren Buffett is selling like everything.

He is having the biggest fire sale he's ever had. He's never sold stocks, dumped stocks like he's dumping them right now. That's what happened to Apple a couple of weeks ago. He said, yeah. I don't really feel comfortable with Apple. I'm going to sell. But what we didn't know, until he had to file was, he's selling everything.

And holding on to just the crème de la crème.

What does Warren Buffet know, that we don't know?

Nothing. The difference between Warren Buffet and you and me, is he trusts his gut.

He trusts what he reads. And he doesn't wait, for other people, to verify. His team verifies. And he trusts his team.

I just -- the words of my grandfather keep ringing in my head. If we only knew what the rich people knew, before the Great Depression, we would have been fine. Well, what are the rich people doing?

Also, China found out this weekend, they are buying -- I think it was 50 tons of gold, more, than they said they did.

They said they stopped buying gold. Now some sleuths have gone out and looked. Because something wasn't right. And all this gold was being shipped over to China.

And they realized, my gosh, China is still buying. They're telling people they're not, to try to keep the price down.

So what are the rich people doing?

What are the people in the know doing?

The VIX, which is the volatility, something that is really important if you watch stocks. But it's just important for you to know. And this is just off the top of my head. In 2008, the VIX, the index of volatility. How volatility are things right now? Was at I think 47. In 2008.

In COVID, it was like 56. And it's currently on a scale of one to 100, 65.

So that is an alarm bell that people watch, and say, what kind of -- what's the weather forecast?

What's the VIX say? Are we headed towards really choppy seas?

Yeah. More according to the VIX. According to them, more than 2008 or COVID.

Intel just announced they're cutting 15,000 jobs or 15 percent of its workforce.

Now, let me go and witch topics, to England. What you're seeing in England, is a -- a looksy into the things that are to come here in America. What's been happening in England? Well, for a long time, this is why Brexit happened. And, by the way, I don't think you're going to hear this analysis with -- with other people.

So take it for what it's worth. But as I read it, Brexit happened in a way we can relate to. Brexit happened because people were tired of being told by bureaucrats that they never elected, what they had to do. How they were going to live their life. And those same bureaucrats said, you know what, it's not that cool to be British. I mean, you have a really bad past, Great Britain, and so I wouldn't be so -- I wouldn't be so proud.

In fact, don't fly your flag. You should fly the European flag.

Okay. People didn't like that.

They want to have their own control.

Then, on top of that, you had wild, unfettered immigration.

Do either of these sound familiar to you? So they had wild unfettered immigration.

At the same time, they built on top of a house of cards, where they said they were taking Islamic terrorism seriously. But then they opened the borders. And the police never took them seriously. It was never taken seriously.

You could chop a guy's head off, in the streets of England. And what would people say?

Well, your officials would say, we've got it under control. It was just a misunderstanding. It didn't have anything to do with anything.

There's nothing to see here. Go back to your homes. Nothing to worry about.

Kids were being kidnapped by Islamic rings. And they were being sexually abused. And the police denied it. Denied it. Continued it.

Then when it couldn't be denied anymore, they did a little bit, very little bit. But then everybody in the neighborhood that was standing up, they were deemed the bad guy. So this is the Bubba Effect.

Three girls in a dance class. Just cute, cute little girls in a dance class, 17-year-old kid comes in, and stabs the three girls.

Now, he has a Somalian name. So everybody just assumed he was an immigrant. He's not an immigrant. Bubba Effect. Bubba Effect.

Remember what that was? I told you that in 2000 -- I don't know -- 4, I was talking to Special Forces. And I said, what is the thing that you're most concerned about? And they said the Bubba Effect. What is that?

When the government has lost all of its credibility. And, for instance, they say, we're serious about terror.

And they're not. And people keep pointing it out. And the government doesn't respond.

And then something bad happens. And Bubba, not really knowing anything about world religions or whatever. Will walk into a convenience store. And he will shoot a Sikh because he's got a turban, and he doesn't know.

He'll shoot a Sikh. And it's you people.

And everybody will know, that's wrong. But when the federal government believes in, the people will stand up and say, hey. We'll deal with Bubba. We know he was wrong. But he was acting because you refused to act. You are the -- the problem.

That's what's happened here. They were wrong.

And then on top of that, you have inside and outside, nefarious forces.

You have people who are white skinhead Nazis. You have people who are Islamists. You have people who are just power hungry.

You have people who just want to see the world burn.

And they're all on social media. And what is the government doing?

The government is blaming everything on the right. And social media.

Which will only make things worse. Because the forgotten man, is not a neo-Nazi.

The forgotten man is just the guy who just loves his country. Has gone to work every day.

Seems to be forgotten. Seems to be left behind.

Nobody ever seems to talk about him.

Unless it's to blame him for something that he had nothing to do with.

And, of course, everybody's lining up. To quash, freedom of speech.

They don't have it, like we have it here in America.

They already have speech laws. They're now talking about shutting everybody up.

That won't make things better. It will make things worse.

A Civil War in Great Britain, in a few minutes we'll tell you exactly what is also happening, in Israel, with Iran. And how Russia is now helping Anna Ann enemy of the United States.

GLENN: For anybody old enough to remember, I believe Stu has become Johnnie Carson. He's never working. He seems to always be on vacation.

And always sitting in for him, is Mr. Pat Gray as usual. Hello, Pat.

PAT: I guess somebody cares about the show, right?

GLENN: Yeah. If it's just really you. Just you and me. You and me.

Thanks for coming in again. This is double duty for you. So how are you feeling?

You just finished your show.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh. Oh, I feel great.

I think things are going perfectly. Don't you?

Yeah. Oh, yeah.

Nothing to worry about. Nothing to worry about.

GLENN: Yeah. I was in LA this weekend.

Unfortunately, this is my time in California. In I don't know how many years. Oh, man.

I don't like it. Anyway, I was in LA this weekend, doing some business.

And I didn't walk away, with a good feeling.

Now, it is California. But there are so many people that are just convinced that Kamala solves the problem.


They don't -- they won't even look at how radical she is.

PAT: Hmm.

GLENN: If she becomes our president, we are in deep, deep socialist trouble. You think the economy is bad now. This is like putting Chavez or Maduro in. She is as left as that. And everybody is -- at least in California, that I talked to, they're still just enamored with anybody, but Donald Trump. It's like, no, guys, voting for the enemy of the person and just blindly doing it is a very bad job. You must examine their record as well.

PAT: Uh-huh and people forget in 2019, she was the most liberal. The most progressive senator in the United States of America. Beyond Bernie Sanders. Beyond Elizabeth Warren.

She's the worst possible choice for president.

GLENN: Yep. Yep.

PAT: Worst possible.

GLENN: And the Democrats knew that.

PAT: Yeah. They did.

GLENN: I mean, that's why had to be voted for her. Nobody voted for her.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: And I'm growing more and more convinced this was a brilliant move by the Democrats, by the radical left in the Democratic Party. They got her to be vice president, because there's no way America would ever vote for her. So she could become the vice president. And at this point -- because Donald Trump is so unpopular, with the left, she's only a point and a point and a half behind him.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: That's insanity.

PAT: She's actually leading quite a few polls.

You know, despite her radicalism.

This is a person for abortion on demand.

GLENN: Because nobody is looking at it.

PAT: The border disaster that she's overseen.

She wants to ban fracking and offshore drilling.

She claims she didn't want to ban fracking, but she was all about it just four years ago. She wanted to ban the filibuster.

GLENN: She also wasn't just for the filibuster. But for the Supreme Court.

She's also for a guaranteed jobs program.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: That's the Soviet Union.

PAT: So bad.

GLENN: You can't get any more left than that.

It's really, really not good.

Nationalized health care. She wants the government to take it over.

Now, she said recently. But in 2020, when she was running, and this is who she is. This is what she believes.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: She's moderating because she has to now.

But this is what she believes. Government needs a wholesale takeover of medicine.

GLENN: Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program. I have to tell you, I really wish I could put you in my head space right now. It's almost like there's a hedge of protection, on my head space right now. Because it's -- the news that is coming you out is really, really dark, and we're getting closer to something.

And we're going to like it. The Dow is way down. Japan was almost wiped out. Twelve and a half percent.

They had to close the trading floor for a while in Japan. And that is happening in Europe, and now coming here, we had bad job numbers. Lots of layoffs. Intel laid off this morning, 15,000 jobs.

Looks like Chevron is moving to Texas from California. They just can't take California anymore.
And there's riots on the streets of the UK. And I want to get back to this story a little later in the program. But it is -- it's rage bait that is going on. And it -- people are now saying, Elon Musk said this weekend, that civil war is inevitable in the UK. But we also have some news.

Today, it looks like Iran is planning on attacking Israel. They announced this over the weekend.

Speculation was, that it would happen sometime today.

Remember, it's -- it's late in the afternoon.

In the Middle East now, on Monday.

And so, you know, usually if things happen, they happen by the time this show is over. It's usually started.

So we're watching that closely. Jason Buttrill is with us.

He is our chief researcher.

Also, head of watching over all global affairs.

On the program. When it comes to war. He is a former military intelligence.

And is here, to tell us, exactly what we're expecting.

Let's start with Iran, Jason.

JASON: Hey, Glenn, how are you doing? I'm actually surprised it hasn't happened yet. We were getting word that it was supposed to kick off sometime over the weekend. I think the biggest takeaway here, is there will be a response. Pretty much everyone expects it. It sounds like the Israeli military intelligence is expecting it, very imminently. There's a carrier battle group that's on its way from the US to the region, to support, if anything should kick off.

We know something is going to kick off. The question now is just how badly it's going to. And this is only the beginning stages of this larger regional war. And I'm going to say this.

I do believe, this is going to be a regional war, with multiple people. Countries involved. And it's going to mirror their regional war that's already going on in eastern Europe.

And that sounds interesting. Regional war is breaking out everywhere, and we're expected to respond to every single one of them. How is that going to happen?

GLENN: Okay. So the Mediterranean is the sixth fleet, right?

JASON: That sounds correct. I don't remember.

GLENN: I think it's the sixth fleet. You know, I'm sorry if I'm mistaken.

What I want to know, is this carrier group that's going on out, in addition to what we usually send in the sixth fleet, that's always there. Is this a replacement, or is this an addition? Because that's a huge addition.

JASON: I'm fairly positive, that this is an addition to what's going on out there.

GLENN: That's pretty significant, right? Carrier battle group.

JASON: It's especially significant, when you think of all the different theaters that we're guarding against right now.

And I got to tell you, Glenn. Looking at the state of our economy. Our adversaries. What they're trying to do with our economy. Organizations like BRICS. They also are the same people that are opposing us in Eastern Europe right now.

You've got, can I say it --

VOICE: And Israel.

JASON: And Israel. Can I say cascading protest movements that are going all the way through Europe and heading all the way to our own doorstep. Did I read that? Is that where it was?

GLENN: Yeah. That's where I think I got it, yeah. Sure.

And after it cascades, it comes to the United States, and all our enemies look at the West. And say, now, now, now.

And that's exactly what's happening. If you look at what's happening with the Middle East with the Houthis, those are funded by Iran. But now who has just been spotted on the ground and been -- been announcing that they are providing military advice, at least? That's Russia.

JASON: Yeah.

GLENN: Russia is now assisting the Houthis. So this is becoming a global war. Whether we like it or not.

It will.

JASON: Yeah. Everyone always analyzes this.

They say, oh, BRICS will never outdominate the dollar, you know, as the global reserve currency.

They'll never do it. They will never challenge the United States one-on-one. You know, the United States is too powerful. Agreed, one on one, but that's not what's being built here.

I have to tell you, when I was looking at all this information, all together, I kept thinking about the famous Paul Harvey monologue, you know, if I were the devil, what would I do to make change? And I'm not the devil. But I am saying that look at everything together, and connect all the dots. Who were the players that were involved in every single theater? Who were the ones? Who were the ones sowing discord, that is cascading all over the world?

Who were the ones?

Look at the places that haven't blown up yet, but are on the cusp of it. You look at Taiwan. You look at North Korea. That BRICS unit is involved in every single one of those. You cannot destroy the United States or defeat her one-on-one.

We are too powerful, but taken together, with all the different countries that they are building, by the way, and united all at the same time, what happens?

I don't know the answer to that. Because we've never been there. But we're going in that direction. And the people that are running this country, are driving us there in a Cadillac.

GLENN: I will tell you, the -- what happens, if it's World War II, America wins.

Because World War II, America was united.

JASON: Hmm.

GLENN: And we all came together, to fight against evil. That will not happen this time.

We are too divided, and the government has made so many mistakes. I'm really very concerned about England. Because England is the Bubba Effect. It's -- we don't even know the facts, and that's another problem.

But we don't even know the facts of what really happened, that started all of this stuff.

They haven't figured out this kid from last week. They still don't know, well, is he Muslim? Is he not Muslim?

You know, how is he -- we don't know any of that. But people are all assuming that this was a Muslim immigrant. It wasn't.

He was born in England. He's English. But the facts don't matter anymore. Because it appears as though the government is lying to the people in Great Britain. And so they've had enough.

And then you have outside forces, dare I say it, like Russia, again.

And the influence of those we have spoken about, many times on this program.

That want the West to collapse. And are sewing this -- this really demonic seed in not only England and France and all of Europe. But here in America, as well.

Unless we get transparency, we're -- we're -- we're in trouble. Unless somebody stands up and says, you know what, I'm going to open up all the books on this.

The -- the arguments that I'm hearing now, that Kamala is just so great. When this whole thing has been un-Democratic from the beginning. And nobody is really looking at her record. And everybody is saying, you know, well, Donald Trump, he's a bad guy. Where? On what?

On what?

I said to somebody, this weekend. You know, this has been the -- this is the one time, that you can look at a politician.

And I think they're all dirty. But I lived in New York City.

Pat, you remember this. We used to drive by the Trump apartments or hotels on the east side how.

And he was building like five of them, and including, you know, digging under the highway.

And he built five in the same time the city took to build one small building, right across the street from them.

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: And I would have said to you, six years ago, eight years ago, the guy is dirty as hell. He's got to be. Because you can't -- how is it he can get the unions to do everything he wants them to do? How is it he can build five buildings to every one that everybody else builds?

Well, I don't know. But he's the most investigated man, I don't know. In human history. And they've never found anything like that. And nobody will listen. Nobody will listen to that. Nobody will listen and say, they've just been trained, Trump bad. And if you're comparing, you know, anyone to Hitler, I mean, Charles Manson could look good.

Well, he only killed a few. Yeah, and he's got the Nazi swastika carved into his forehead. But he's not telling everybody to hang banners off of every building. You know, hello.

So they give you the worst possible look at somebody, and somebody who actually loves America.

And -- and here we stand, with everything in open flame. Jason, what are you expecting to happen today either in England?

Or -- do you agree with Elon Musk? That he says Civil War is inevitable in England?

JASON: Well, I mean, you've got to think -- what's happening in England, I feel like, can be copied in multiple western countries. Because the big behavior is the same. You talk about the non-transparency. Let's just talk about that for a second. And how this fuels this. If you look at any major mainstream outlet, over Europe and here, all you see is the same headline. Far right protests. Or rioters.

You know, truth -- based off of misinformation.

GLENN: Yeah. Misinformation. Disinformation or malinformation from social media.

JASON: Right. And then they won't even talk about the person that did this attack. They'll say, well, it wasn't an immigrant. Well, we know his parents are from Rwanda, we know that. Were they illegal? Do they talk about that at all, because I guarantee you that the people out there protesting in the street, the point is exactly the same.

Like, this is a crisis of the government's creation.

GLENN: But I think you are -- I think you are giving too much credit to -- look, they can completely wrong. These people were from Rwanda. Maybe they came here legally. And they've been great citizens. And their kid is a great citizen.

It has nothing to do with them, or the kid.

This is -- this is the frustration, of the English people saying, my government is not listening to us. That's the Bubba Effect.

We know he's wrong on that. We know.

But that's not the issue. The issue is, you've been lying to us. For too long.

So we'll take care of Bubba. You back off. That's the Bubba Effect, and I think that's what's happening.

Okay.
The worst-case scenario in Iran. They say this one is -- this attack is going to be expected and unlike anything the world has seen. They say, it's a new something.

I don't remember exactly how they said it. But it reminded me of one thing.

I would like to get your opinion. What do you think is coming?

JASON: I think that a similar attack involving a massive amount of drones and rockets is probable.

I think the addition of non-traditional warfare, armaments like those EMP, Electromagnetic pulse type weapons, I know can be launched from artillery or drones or rockets, as well. To knock out --

GLENN: You know they have that?

JASON: Well, I mean, we don't know for a fact. But Hezbollah has claimed they have gotten them. That wouldn't surprise me at all. Those weapons have been around since probably the '80s.

So we know they're out there. They're just rarely used. I think we used them in Kosovo. We've used them a few times. But think about Israel's ability to respond to a massive wave, coming from the Houthis, coming from Hezbollah.

Hamas. Iran, you know, herself.

And then with all of their electronic superiority knocked out. Yeah, we're looking at a much different battlefield, sure.

GLENN: I will tell you, I think -- I was thinking about this, this weekend.

That, I think we're in the same place we were at the end of World War I, and the end of World War II. New things are being -- or at the beginning of World War II.

New things are being invented, horses, instead of tanks.

Or tanks instead of horses.

Airplanes. It changed the battlefield.

And I really feel like our big, huge aircraft carriers, and everything else.

I think those things are a thing of the past, in warfare. I think we could be overwhelmed quickly.

And I think China, for one, knows that.


GLENN: Hello, America. Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program. We are going to talk about what is happening in the stock market today. We are on the edge of a very, very big abyss, and I hope we don't fall into it at this moment.

But some things are happening. And you need to be very well aware of them. And we need to go there, with Carol Roth in just about 60 seconds.

Speaking of the economy, it's just -- it's crimes of mismanagement, at this point.

It's impossible to keep track of everything they're doing, that is just absolutely suicidal.

But you can the raw draw a chalk outline around the US that are. And set up the police tape. There's been a murder here. Maybe after this next election.

Things are K start to get better. Nobody hopes that will get better more than you and I do. But you cannot count on that.

We are in a cycle where weak men have created hard times, and it remains to be seen, if we can pull out of this nose dive and become strong men.

All right. Carol Roth, welcome to the program.

CAROL: Glenn, you have to promise me, that one day, you will bring me on to talk about good news.

We'll talk about ice cream. We'll talk about puppy dogs. I feel like your audience, every time they see me, they're like, oh, no. Carol Roth is back again.

GLENN: I know. Carol, I was just thinking the same thing. We never talk when it's good times.

The stock market now. There's -- I have lots of questions, can you just give me the update on what's happened around the world, and then with the opening bell with the stock market?

CAROL: So last week, obviously, we saw some selling off in the stock market. It started with a repricing of the, quote, unquote, Magnificent Seven tech stocks that had been driving up the market. Taking everything else with them.

And, you know, there's -- I think there was an awakening that, oh, in order for AI to be a thesis, companies will actually have to spend a lot. And then that started kind of things.

A few weeks ago, kind of moving. Then in the middle of last week. We had the Fed, who did not -- excuse me, did not lower rates. But did signal, that that could be on the table for September.

And, you know, normally, you would say, okay. The market, wants the Fed to cut rates. What happened, then we got in weak job report. On Friday.

And while sometimes, the bad news can be good news for the market. In this case, they could take it for bad news. That potentially the Fed was behind the curve in terms of lowering rates. And then they felt like maybe this whole idea of a, quote, unquote, soft landing. The idea that you could get the economy as opposed to inflation down without wrecking the economy is off the table.

Then while all of this is going on. You have the Bank of Japan last week. That decided to do the opposite of the Fed.

They have been in 17 years of basically negative or zero interest rates. So they're amortization is going in the other direction. They are trying to raise rates. The first time in 17 years. About four months ago. And then they decided, because the yen, you know -- the yen against the dollar. They needed to fix that. That they were going to go ahead and raise their rates. And fortunately, they did not thread the needle perfectly on that, and that created implications for their markets.

So when Japan opened, you know, last night, our time -- their time in the morning, they saw this massive, massive sell-off. And what happens sometimes, when you get these massive sell-offs are these unwinding of trades. Because they have had zero to negative interest rates. You get a lot of people borrowing.

Those people who borrow, make bets on the yen, and on stocks.

Both in Japan, and in the US. And then they get the margin calls. And then they end up having to sell. And that begets more margin calls.

So you saw the Japanese Nikkei go down 12 and a half percent, in one day. It was their single worst day since 1987. That Black Monday day.

So now, as, you know, the market has opened here in the United States. You know, there's anticipation of, you know, do we get -- how much blowback do we get?

Especially since we had seen some weakness last week.

And obviously, things will shift during the trading day. As we talk here.

So this is kind of realtime. The market opened up, down, pretty significantly. Depending on the index. Somewhere between three and 5 percent.

And we have seen that come off a little bit, as we're talking realtime.

I think that has -- if there's any silver lining here. It's that night it opened. And it continued to fall. And continued to fall.

There was a little bit of support there. But still, as we're talking. We're still seeing the Dow, down almost 3 percent.

The NASDAQ, down almost 4 percent. So it's definitely an ugly day across the market.

GLENN: So how much of this has to do with technology. NVIDIA, which was the darling, just I don't know. A month ago. Everybody was like, you got to have NVIDIA. And maybe that's greed talking. And maybe that's why you shouldn't buy NVIDIA when everyone is saying that happen. But they're down almost 10 percent today. That's down 23 percent from their high, I think like a month ago. Artificial intelligence stocks are down. Tesla is down. Super micro computer down 9 percent.

They're -- is this just everybody down, and why are the tech stocks down?

Were they just too high? Do you know?

CAROL: Yeah.

So this is a bit of repricing in tech. And let's put this in perspective.

So the NASDAQ, which is very tech-heavy. Sort of a good proxy for what's going on, in the tech market.

The 52-week range, the low point, within the last year of where the NASDAQ has been, was 12,544. We're still today, at over 16,000.

So over the last 52 weeks, we still have these massive gains, and it got as high as 18,671.
And I think that's part of the catalyst here.

I mean, these prices, this, quote, unquote, bubble was not sustainable, a lot of people were talking about that.

And the fact that, you know, we see this over-exuberance in tech all the time. You know, first it was web three and the Internet of Things. And the metaverse, and now it's AI.

And all of those DCs have eventually come back down to reality. I'm not sure we're in reality yet. But, you know, as you have companies talking about their earnings, and talking about the spend.

I think there was just this insanity amongst investors. That they felt like AI was just going to take off. Without looking at the cost side.

And as companies are talking about, here's how much capital we will have to deploy, in order for this AI thesis to really work out. I think the market went, oh, okay. Maybe we're not pricing this correctly.

So I think that's part of it. Another catalyst that we've seen. Warren Buffet, noted that he had lessened his position in Apple by about 49 percent.

And obviously, that is --

GLENN: Yeah. That's not lessening. That's not lessening.

That's cutting it in half. That's significant.

CAROL: Cutting it in half.

GLENN: And he's doing this with a lot of his holdings. If I understand right.

He's making some of the biggest sales, he's ever made.

It's almost as if he's becoming bullish on America.

And is -- what does he know that we don't know again?

CAROL: This is a good question. And it's funny, we're having this discussion today.

If you go through his shareholder letter. His other -- one of his other big bets. That he talks about in the shareholder letter. Started in 2019. He doubled down in Japan. He has five really big companies. And really big positions in Japan. So the day that we're talking about Japan going down. And at the same time, the US is going down.

Obviously, Warren Buffet wasn't a catalyst for both of those things. He's still -- as far as we know, still bullish on the Japanese train. But it is interesting.

He has this massive cash pile, I mean, $276 billion, I think it is. Which is just almost impossible, to deploy.

I mean, to think about how, you know, as an investor, you even think about putting that to work and getting the appropriate returns.

So I don't know -- there could be several catalysts.

This is all very much speculation. Because we have not heard from Warren at this point.

I don't know if this is a signal. Where he felt like, hey.

Tech is just getting, you know, so froth peep this is a really good time for me to take profits.

Maybe a little bit of taking profits, ahead of the election.

Worry about an increase in capital gains, perhaps.

Under a potential new administration.

Although, I don't think he would have sold, you know, half of the position, because of that. But one never knows.

And, yeah. Just repositioning his portfolio. But certainly, given the fact that he's lauded as the best investor of all time.

When he does things, people have concern. And the fact that whether it's Bank of America. Or it's Apple. Or some of his other positions, you know, add the fact that he is going to cash -- certainly, I would imagine, on the retail side. And probably on the institutional side, to some extent, has an impact in terms of people's behavior.

RADIO

How a Scandalous Political "Reporter" REALLY Got Her Juicy Stories | Olivia Nuzzi Exposed

Washington’s media bubble is imploding after explosive revelations that reporter Olivia Nuzzi carried on an emotional affair with RFK Jr. while covering him during the presidential race. The scandal has spiraled into leaked love letters, a derailed engagement, allegations of multiple political affairs, and a sudden firing that exposes the collapse of journalistic ethics in D.C. As new details surface involving Mark Sanford and Keith Olbermann, the story reveals a deeper truth about how power, access, and media influence really work behind the scenes.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

STU: Okay. Olivia Nuzzi. Do you know who she is?

GLENN: She's a reporter, right?
STU: Okay. Yes. Reporter. Very famous, inside DC, New York circles famous reporter.

GLENN: Lover, intellectual lover of RFK, if I'm not mistaken. Intellectual lover.

STU: Okay. Exactly. Yeah. So you remember the story.

GLENN: Not a lover lover.

STU: The story you don't know -- if you don't remember this, Glenn is referring to, is she was engaged to another reporter, Ryan Lizza, and it was revealed during this most recent presidential campaign that she was having an emotional affair of sorts with RFK Jr. Who as we -- you know, certainly has meant much to him during his life, but he is also married.

So he is -- so, I mean, he's a Kennedy. What do you expect here?

GLENN: He's a Kennedy. Yeah. Yes.

STU: He apparently, they were going back and forth, they had some sort of emotional affair going on.

And this is after she had written a profile about him.

So obviously, journalistically, there are ethical problems. As if they cared about ethical problems in journalism anymore.

This one rose to the level where she was fired. She's canned from her job.

She had this stratospheric rise in the media. She was -- remembering the time line right. She was hired. She wrote -- she was working for a campaign at one point.

She then wrote kind of an exposé of that campaign, that she worked for. And it got published in the New York Daily News.

Based off of just that, she was elevated to the main, like, political reporter at the Daily Beast, which shows you their particular standards.

She was 22, at the time, Glenn. Like, super young. This does not happen.

She wrote for a while there. People kind of like her writing. She also has the sort of throwback style. Very pretty. Kind of -- she has that mystique about her. And it was to the extent that they brought her to, I think, it was New York magazine. She wound up getting the lead political reporter job at that -- or, lead political columnist. A job they created for her. A position that did not exist previously.

And she's like 24 years old.

How has this happened?

GLENN: I think RFK has probably came up with other positions for 24-year-olds that didn't exist as well.

STU: Certainly, factually, accurate. Whether you want to say it or not, is another story, I suppose.

So, anyway, she goes through, and she breaks a lot of big stories. She's always getting odd amount of access to politicians, that you don't understand. You know, all across the spectrum.

She breaks big stories. She always has these big details about it. She writes very colorfully about all these interactions with these politicians. Anyway, this whole scandal blows up with RFK Jr.

Her -- her engagement breaks off. She kind of goes into hiding. For a year.

In that year, she's apparently writing a book. And the book comes out today.

Now, all of this could be just already an amazing salacious story. However, on the day before her book release, her ex-fiancé, also a reporter, releases a story about how he found out about all of -- all of the nonsense. Okay?

GLENN: Oh, good.

STU: And he writes that she comes back from a trip. And he uncovers some napkins from a hotel with a bunch of writing on it. Which turn out to be a love letter to the politician.

Which, again, in her book.

GLENN: Written by her.

STU: Written by her. In her book, she never says RFK Jr's name. She describes his relationship in detail. Never says the name. Just calls him "the politician."

Because I assume, because he might sue or whatever. Who knows?

You know, she doesn't want to be -- she doesn't -- she doesn't want to call him out by name. Every detail is quite clear in the book. It's quite clear it's about him.

GLENN: Yeah. She might find him in the bottom of a river.
(laughter)

GLENN: I'm just -- I'm just saying. I don't know what else could happen.

STU: The thing I love about this particular segment is that I would love to give you this story at any time.

The fact that you're deep on back medication right now is the perfect time for you to --

GLENN: I'm not on medication. I'm actually not on medication.

I'm just in so much pain, I just don't care.

STU: Whatever is making you delirious, I love it.

GLENN: Right. Got it.

STU: So the Ryna Lizza piece comes out. It's called How I Found Out. He goes through the whole details. He finds the napkins, finds the love letter, written on the napkins.

Okay. And in the love letter, it says, if I swallowed every drop of water from the tower above your house, I would still thirst for you.

Now -- I just love it.

Now, they live in DC, Glenn.

As you may know, not a lot of water towers in their home in DC. She realized, this is not a love letter to me, but someone else.

Finally, she starts going in and realizing, this is about a famous politician.

We go through the same -- goes through the whole story and finds out, there's a lot of detail about everything.

This is going to blow up their life. He realizes, it's going to be a problem. He calls his publicist, of course. This is what you do when you're one of these DC insider reporters, you call your publicist. And he says, we have a big problem.

Olivia is sleeping with Mark Sanford, a totally different politician.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

STU: This is a totally different affair.

GLENN: Mark Sanford. Wasn't he -- he was in Virginia, wasn't he?

STU: No, South Carolina.

GLENN: South Carolina, that's right. That's right. Who went for a walk one day, and just never showed up.

STU: Yes! And remember, he was like, oh, he's out on the Appalachian Trail, and then they found out he was actually.

GLENN: That's right.

STU: He was actually hooking up --

GLENN: Yeah. Under a water tower.

STU: Right. With a person he called his soul mate. Which I guess that was true for a time. They got together after that old relationship got broken up. Then they got back together.

And he got together with the soul mate. Then that broke up. And then he's rerunning for president if you remember, Glenn, in 2020, against Donald Trump. And making the pitch that, you know, I'm -- I've turned my life around. At that time, apparently, allegedly, sleeping with this reporter who profiled him, same exact thing that happened with RFK Jr. Except that, you know, we don't know. At least, there's no allegations that they actually wound up consummating the RFK Jr relationship.

In the story, however, in addition to all of this, we also get additional details of a relationship that Olivia Nuzzi had when she was 21 years old with Keith Olbermann.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. Oh, my gosh.

STU: I mean, the story is almost too good to tell.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. So she's like -- what was the spy's name, you know, that was sleeping with everybody -- like Whory Harriet or something like that. I mean, is that how she gets the stories? She just sleeps with these people?

STU: I don't know. Seemingly, this does occur on a pretty regular basis in this situation.

GLENN: Wow.

STU: And, you know, we ran out of time. Tomorrow, we should do the Olbermann's part of the saga, which is absolutely fascinating.

GLENN: Oh, we must.

STU: They seem to be accusing him of something in this piece. Which is above and beyond just hooking up. So that's something we should talk about tomorrow as well.

GLENN: Oh, I will -- I'll just write it down now. I'm scheduling -- scheduling the Keith Olbermann segment for tomorrow.

TV

A Secret Cracker Barrel Warehouse Holds the Truth About the Remodel Scandal | Glenn TV | Ep 470

When Cracker Barrel began remodeling select locations and stripped away the nostalgic décor that defined its brand, customers erupted in outrage, asking: Has the poster child of Americana gone woke? The intense public backlash and financial fallout forced executives to pause their modernization plans. For the first time since the backlash, Glenn Beck gained exclusive access to the center of the controversy and Cracker Barrel’s massive warehouse of Americana antiques in Lebanon, Tennessee. There, Joe Stewart — the man tasked with telling America’s story through the chain’s iconic wall decorations — shares his reaction to the controversial remodel. Plus, Glenn unveils an exclusive first look at his no-holds-barred interview with Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Masino in her first on-camera appearance since her "Good Morning America" interview.

Watch the full interview Thursday, November 20, on BlazeTV and Glenn’s YouTube channel.

RADIO

Democrats' call for military defiance: Unveiling the real agenda

A group of prominent Democrats recently put out a video urging the military and CIA to defy any "unlawful" orders from President Trump. On the surface, Glenn agrees with their message. But he explains why he believes it was never meant for the military. It was part of a campaign to sow seeds of doubt into the minds of average Americans...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let's start with Venezuela. The New York Times is now reporting that Trump has been said to authorize CIA plans for covert action in Venezuela.

Now, when I read this story, I thought to myself, didn't I read this story about three or four weeks ago?

I think this is the exact story. Correct me if I'm wrong. Do you remember it?

I think this was the exact story that the New York Times or someone else came out with, about four weeks ago.

We have Jason here, who watches this kind of stuff. Am I right on thinking that, Jason?

JASON: Just heard this. Thirty-four weeks ago or a month ago.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. There's nothing new here.

So what exactly is the New York Times doing?

JASON: Uh-huh. They're parroting what they were slipped from their unnamed source. Imagine that!

GLENN: So what do you mean, they were slipped from an unnamed source? What do you mean by that?

JASON: There's no way this is a leak. Like, oh, we've got to get this out. Because it's like, atrocious that this was happening. This is approved.

GLENN: Yeah, this is something -- this is something that you're seeing the Deep State in action. Somebody wants to make sure that this is -- that this is -- circled around. So everybody is like, oh, my gosh. What are we doing in Venezuela?

What are we doing in Venezuela?

We already told you what we're doing in Venezuela. This is to secure the western hemisphere. To get China out of the western hemisphere.

This has everything to do with that little training island. That we told you about, a year or two ago. Where Hamas and Hezbollah are training people in Venezuela, just off the coast.

That's what this is about. This is to stop the infiltration of the Islamic radicals. In cahoots with Maduro. In Venezuela. That's what this is about.

And the Chinese are an extra added benefit. You know, don't believe the -- well, it's the drugs. If it was the drug thing, we would be going after Mexico.

I mean, not that that doesn't play a role. But it's only part of the story. And we've told you that. And now, you know, Trump authoring plans for the CIA. Yeah. We know that. You said that to us, long ago.

Now, at the same time that is happening, there was a video that was released from the Democrats. Now, these are Democrats that are currently, you know, in power.

Big name Democrats. And listen to what they're telling the troops and Intel officers. Listen to this.

VOICE: I'm Senator Alyssa Socket.

VOICE: Senator Mark Kelly.

VOICE: Representative Chris Deluzio.

VOICE: Congresswoman (inaudible).

VOICE: Representative Chrissy Houlahan.
VOICE: Congressman Jason Kraut. I was a captain in the United States Navy.

VOICE: Former CIA officer.

VOICE: Former Navy.

VOICE: Former paratrooper and Army Ranger.
VOICE: Former intelligence officer and former Air Force.

VOICE: We want to speak directly to members of the military.

VOICE: The intelligence community.
VOICE: Who take risks each day.

VOICE: To keep Americans safe.

VOICE: We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.

VOICE: Americans trust their military.

VOICE: But that trust is at risk.

VOICE: This administration is pitting our uniformed military.

VOICE: And intelligence community professionals.

VOICE: Against American citizens.

VOICE: Like us, you all swore an oath.

VOICE: To protect and defend this Constitution.

VOICE: Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.
VOICE: Our laws are clear: You can refuse illegal orders.

VOICE: You can refuse illegal orders.

VOICE: You must refuse illegal orders.

VOICE: No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution.

VOICE: We know this is hard. And that it's a till time to be a public servant.

VOICE: But whether you're serving in the CIA, the army, the Air Force.

VOICE: Your vigilance is critical.

VOICE: And know that we have your back.

VOICE: Because now, more than ever.
VOICE: The American people need you.

VOICE: We need to you stand up for our laws.

VOICE: Our Constitution. And who we are as Americans.
VOICE: Don't give up.
VOICE: Don't give up.
VOICE: Don't give up.
VOICE: Don't give up the ship.

GLENN: Hmm.

So I'm looking at this, and I'm thinking, I agree 100 percent with everything they just said. 100 percent.

My question is: Why are they saying?

What illegal orders?

And why now? Are you telling me that all of the stuff with USAID, all of the stuff that was going on with the FBI with our intelligence community. With Russia, Russia, Russia. All of that stuff was on the up and up? They had no concern about that?

When -- when Barack Obama was targeting US citizens to be droned.

US citizens to be droned. They had no problem with it?

And now all of a sudden, because of what? Venezuela?

Now, all of a sudden, they have a problem. No. I don't think so.

I think this is a -- this is the beginning of a campaign.

And again, all it does is sew seeds of doubt, not in the mind of the military.

Not in the mind -- well, maybe CIA. But I think CIA is off their own if territory, anyway.

This sows seeds of doubt in the mind of average Americans. They're now sewing seeds saying, Donald Trump is doing something unconstitutional with our military.

What is it?

Speak clearly. Don't say we're under pressure! Speak clearly.

What exactly is he doing that is unconstitutional, that they should -- that they should disobey. I would like to know what it is. Because all this is doing is undermining.

STU: Is it Venezuela?

Like, did they state --

GLENN: No. They didn't say that. No.

STU: Just generalized advice. Whatever you do -- don't -- like, that seems really sketchy. Because we were talking this a little bit off the air. That, like, there's a version of that, that is like treasonous. Right?

You're telling me, the military to not listen to the commander-in-chief. Now, I don't think that was the version of it, that is treasonous.

I think that was worded very carefully. And as you point out. I don't think anyone would disagree, that if there's something blatantly illegal, you shouldn't be doing it.

But I guess their idea is some of -- is that Venezuela.

Are they trying to encourage these people to not drone the ships.

What's the ask here?

GLENN: I don't know. They didn't mention -- I don't know. They're just sending out. That's why this seems so unbelievably calculated to cause chaos.

Because they're not sewing seeds in the doubt of the mind of the military. They are sewing the seeds of doubt in the mind of the US public.

This went out to everybody in the whole world.

And what it's sending is a message to the whole world.

Our president is so bad, that we in Congress, need to tell -- tell the military, do not obey him.

Well, can you be specific?

On what exactly? On what, exactly?

No. They -- they can't be specific. If you could be, I would have no problem.

If you came out with that message, and you said, look, we just want to restate the policy of the United States.

Whether the president is a Republican or a Democrat, you do not have to obey the commander of chief, if he is asking for things that are unconstitutional.

For instance, if he asks you to do X, Y, or Z.

They're not just talking about as well, as the military. What's intriguing to me is they're also including the CIA.

Who in their right mind today, thinks the CIA is under control?

Who in their right mind thinks the CIA is actually living within the Constitutional bounds. Because I don't. To a?

Do you know anybody who thinks that? Left or right?

Does anybody within the sound of my vice, thinks that the CIA is actually contained and living in its own little space, constitutionally, where it should be?

Does anyone actually believe that they answer to Congress?

Because I don't. Do you, Stu? Do you, Jason?

JASON: I -- I think the establishment of the CIA is actually anti-constitutional. To be perfectly honest, I don't think an organization like the CIA can operate within the bounds of disclosure, with, you know, letting Congress know everything that they're doing. It can't operate that way. So I think all too many times, they understand that. And they just do whatever the heck they want to do.

GLENN: Yeah. It's all black ops. It's all black ops stuff. And, you know, look at what -- where was this message when we found out from -- what was the guy who blew the whistle and went to Russia? What was his name?

STU: Snowden?

JASON: Snowden.

GLENN: Snowden. Where was this message with Snowden?

When that came out. Hey, if you're in the NSA, you're in the CIA, you can't be doing this stuff. So blow the whistle.

Where was that?

Where has this message been with any of the whistle-blowers have come out. Where was this with the whistle-blowers that were coming out today, about what the CIA has been doing. What the intelligence community has been involved in.

Where was this message?

This is not an honest message.

That's the problem with this. This is not an honest message. This is part of Colour Revolution. This is just, sew the seeds of doubt.

Make sure you are positioning the president as somebody who is so radical, and so unconstitutional. That they have to tell the military, not to obey his orders. Without any specifics, whatsoever.

That's pretty remarkable!

Because, again, I don't have a problem with saying that. We're one of the only countries. You do not answer to the president of the United States. You do not answer to your general.

You answer to the Constitution of the United States.

That's absolutely true!

So I have no problem with this message being taught. It should be taught by every single president. President!

But it's not. They have seen so many abuses under their rule, and now, all of a sudden, you get this?

Where -- where was this message when the president used the military as a prop? Behind him in the speech where it was blood red, and Biden was saying, these are enemies of the state!

You can't do that with the military. Where was this message, from anyone?

Hey. You cannot be used as a prop behind the president. You cannot do that.

I didn't hear anybody saying that. Because they don't have a problem with it.

If it's their side, they don't have a problem with it. I have a problem with it, on both sides. I want the military -- I want the military. Let me separate these.

I want the military to know. We have your back. If the president. Any president is ordering you to do things that are unconstitutional. Do not do them.

Do not do them. Blow the whistle and the American people should have your back. I know I will have your back.

To the -- to intelligence community, you better stop doing what you're doing.

Because I know the American people. And I don't know if you can be stopped. But I know the American people know that you're doing things that you should not be doing. And you're doing them under every president for God only knows how long.

Stop doing it. Because if we ever get into the position where we can stop you, we will.

And the American people will demand a trial for every single one of you that was breaking the Constitution.

Don't care who ordered you to do it.

It's your responsibility to say no.

And you haven't. You haven't.

Start saying no, to any president, any boss, anybody who is telling you to violate the US Constitution.

Don't do it. Don't do it!

But, but I don't think that's the reason why they're saying it.

JASON: No, and they know this. Because all of them are -- are -- are veterans of the military or the intelligence community. They know, and I've gone through these before. This is stating the obvious.

This is already taught within -- from the lowest enlistment ranks, all the way up to the top, you know, within officer school within the military. There are procedures, if you ever have an unlawful order, how to, you know -- you know, work through it. And report it.

GLENN: Stu, what do you think this is really about? What are they doing?

STU: It feels like it's about politics. Right? I mean, it feels like they are trying to build a case that the president is continually engaging in things that are illegal and unconstitutional. And like, you bring up Colour Revolution.

I think it's -- I think it's -- I think there's a political element to that. And I think they may very well be related. But if you think about -- it might be about Venezuela. But I don't think the American people really care about that story.

I don't know that that's necessarily healthy that we don't care about it. I think there are real questions about the process here. And how this all went down. I almost feel like it's more related to something like immigration enforcement.

Right? In the United States. And that's not. Because we've talked about the -- the military being involved in cracking down on cities. And -- and things of that nature. Where like, you know, we've talked about the questions around them. There are legitimate questions about how much can be done in that realm.

I wonder if they're trying to kind of set that precedent. This sort of tone, that the president is engaging in these things.

And slowly, over time, you can build to not only a political answer. Maybe the Colour Revolution angle. And also the chaos in the streets angle.

At some point, if you believe your president is doing unconstitutional things and forcing the military of the United States to engage in actions that are unconstitutional against the American people. Man, you're going to get a lot of people out on the streets for that one, if this thing were to be successful.

So I think that might be the path. Do you buy that?

GLENN: Yeah, I do. I just think that the main goal here is just to undermine credibility.

Undermine. Tear us apart even more. Undermine credibility, sow the sees of chaos once again.

RADIO

Did the FBI scrub Thomas Crooks' DISTURBING past to keep us in the dark?

New reports have dropped linking failed Trump assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks to a multitude of online accounts, including some that were deep into the “furry” community. Glenn Beck asks, how did the FBI miss all of this when they insisted the Butler, PA, shooter didn’t have much online presence or a clear motive?! Or did they purposefully scrub this information from their reports to keep us in the dark?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So there's a couple of things that are in the news. That Thomas Matthew Crooks thing.

You know, this is crazy. Went by they/them. Furry. I don't even -- I've been thinking about this a lot in the last 24 hours. You know, the kid that tried to take out Donald Trump back in July in the Butler rally.

It's a year later, okay? November 17, 2025. These new reports are dropping bombshells. It is the 17th, isn't it? 18th. Sorry. The 18th. These -- these new reports are dropping over and over and over and over and over again.

And there are things that nobody mentioned in the official investigations.

Independent researchers now are using the same kind of digital forensic tools that the Feds have. And they're piecing together a bunch of old online accounts, tied directly to Crooks' email. His real email and his name.

And one of the biggest ones was on Deviant Art. Okay. That sounds great. User names like Epic Microwave and The Epic Microwave.

Okay. This site -- apparently, a huge hub for artists. But also, ground zero for the furry community.

Now, we're going to get into this a little later. Because Stu is a big furry. And he will go right into it.

Where he likes to --

STU: Furries are not that large actually. More moderate sized.

Okay. All right. Well, this is where people get into the anthropomorphic animal thing. And they turn animals into half humans. And it turns sexual. And I don't even know.

So, anyway, this kid was not casually browsing. He was deep in that subculture, we find out now.

So that's two high-profile attempted assassination cases, or one attempted and one actual assassination case. And they're both tied to the same thing.

And nobody seems to be worried about that.

Nobody is talking about that. Imagine if we had two. One attempted and one actual assassination. And it was Charlie Kirk and president Biden.

Okay.

Anybody. And they both were deep into the GlennBeck.com subculture. Do you think the media would be like, what's going on there? But this thing, nobody cares. Okay? And when I say nobody cares, it seems like our FBI doesn't care either. Our DOJ doesn't care. The Trump case specifically blows a hole into the mysterious lone wolf with no known motive. Wait. What?

Now, this wasn't -- this wasn't Patel pushing this. This was the -- the Biden FBI that was pushing this. Christopher Wray went to Congress. And shrugged. And said, you know, we can't find any ideology. Or any online trail that explains this. What!

It's right here! What are you talking about? It's right here!

Crooks had at least 17 accounts across discord, YouTube, Gab, Deviant Art, all of it. Easily tracked to him!

And as we told you last week, he started cheering for Trump. And then went a die hard, you know, 180-degree turn around in 2020.

And then he started echoing anti-Semitic, anti-immigration rants, calling for political assassinations, repeating Maoist lines like, "Power grows at the barrel of a gun," and even chatting with sketchy European extremists, Nazis, who are linked to a designated terrorist group. He posted violent threats under his real name for years. Now, listen to this. He also got flagged by other users, who literally tagged law enforcement in their reply! And nothing happened. Nothing happened. They didn't know who this guy was. They didn't search for him. They didn't question him. Nothing happened until he climbed on to the roof and started shooting at Donald Trump. Excuse me?

Do you believe that? Stu, do you believe that?

They have people online, tipping the FBI off, and they didn't even who know this guy was.

They had no idea who he was.

STU: I mean, it seems impossible to believe.

You have one stray comment, that is taken the wrong way online. And, you know, Secret Service is calling you up. I mean, we've -- I don't want to bring up.

GLENN: We've personally gone through this.

STU: Exactly. This same thing.

GLENN: We said. I said -- I said it on one show.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Something about Donald Trump.

STU: No. No. No. No. I'm not going to let you get away with that.

No. I want to make sure that it's clear what occurred on the show was you essentially threatening my life!

And I want people to know. Where no. I was going to say. Right. I was saying something about Donald Trump.

And then Stu got in, and I said --

STU: I said --

GLENN: I will choke you to death. Or something. Yeah. I just need to choke you to death.

And people in the audience said, I was threatening Donald Trump.

No, I was clearly threatening, and nobody called about poor Stu. I was clearly threatening Stu's life.

STU: Yeah, think about that when you're driving in your car right now. You didn't call! You heard it. And you let my life be threatened. And you didn't care at all.

GLENN: That's right.

STU: None of you cared. But apparently people care --

GLENN: That's why I love this audience.

That's right. So, anyway, so, anyway, the -- the -- secret service was with us two hours later. Okay?

STU: Rightfully so.

GLENN: Yeah. Rightfully so. And we have no problem with it. You know, we were talking to them. They were like, Mr. Beck, we know -- we listened to the tape, we know what happened. We just have to dot all the I's, cross all the T's, and just get a statement. And I'm like, no, not a problem.

I was threatening to kill him. And, you know, they laughed and went, yeah, we understand that. And they left!

Okay. That's the way I remember it.

This guy threatens to kill the president and others! People tag him to the FBI and to law enforcement. And they never check into him?


STU: And, Glenn, I think people can say, well, you know, the thing we're talking about did happen on a national radio show. A lot of people heard it.

Maybe some of the comments on, what is it? Deviant Art are not as well picked up. And that's probably true.

Though, we've seen --
GLENN: They've sent it to them. They've sent it to them.

STU: Right. We've seen tons of examples of people making offhanded statements where this has happened.

You know, not just a threat. Which would be serious enough. But constant threats. Dozens of them, it seems.

We're still, I feel learning about all the details about this. A lot of threats from a specific person.

And it doesn't seem like their argument is, it wasn't even on their radar! I mean, that's unbelievable! It's --

GLENN: Here's -- here's bare minimum.
Everyone should be fired. Everyone should be fired!

Not just the top person. Everyone should be fired. I'm sorry. You can reapply, but we're cleaning house.

Because this is inexcusable. Inexcusable. Now, here's the other thing that's inexcusable. None of this stuff about the threats. None of the radicalization. None of the violent posts. None of the furry gender stuff even made it into the big congressional report that dropped December 2024.

None of this!

It was like they scrubbed the kid clean to keep the public in the dark. Let me say that again. It's like they scrubbed the kid clean, to keep the public in the dark.

Hmm. Let me go to the comment about -- from President Trump yesterday. We played it in the news a few minutes ago.

Where he was talking about the Epstein case. Listen to this.

DONALD: We have nothing to do with Epstein the Democrats do. All of his friends were Democrats. You look at this Reid Hoffmann. You look at Larry Summers. Bill Clinton. They went to his island all the time. And many of this, all Democrats.

All I want is I want for people to recognize the great job that I've done on pricing, on affordability, because we brought prices went way lower. On energy. On ending eight wars, and another one coming pretty soon, I believe.

We've done a great job. And I hate to see that deflect from the great job we've done. So I'm all for -- you know, we have given 50,000 pages. You do know that.

Unfortunately, like with the Kennedy situation, with the Martin Luther King situation, not to put Jeffrey Epstein in the same category, but no matter what we give, it's never enough. You know, with Kennedy, we gave everything, and it wasn't enough. With Martin Luther King, we gave everything, and it's never enough.

We've already given, I believe the number is 50,000 pages! 50,000 pages. And it's just a Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia hoax as it pertains to the Republicans.

GLENN: Okay. Stop. So why?

Why is it never enough? Why is it never enough?

Because the government has lied to us, over and over and over and over and over and over again.

Why is it never enough? Because what the hell happened here with this guy? What happened with these two shooters, and you're not telling us about the, you know, role-playing as a buff cartoon fox/wolf hybrid with they/them pronouns. And then being groomed by foreign edge lords, quoting Mao and terrorist manifestos. And then going out and trying to shoot somebody.

You don't mention that!

Yeah. That's why we don't believe the government. And until the government becomes fully clean, immediately, on everything, just, you know what, here it is.

Here it is!

Nobody is going to believe it. Now, what does this say about our kids. We have a whole generation now growing up the blued to these hyper niche, unmoderated corners of the internet, with fantasy and porn and identity confusion and hard-core political extremism. And all of it, just smashed together into one stream.

What do you think is going to happen? Family, school, real interactions with family. Real life friends. They don't touch these spaces.

You know, how's -- I feel weird about my body morph into, I need to commit mass violence against the world.

I mean, this is the five alarm tire. When you have two political assassinations. Two of them!

That trace back to the exact same subculture, you've got a real problem!

It's not like every furry is dangerous. Well, I know. I question every furry.

I mean, I don't even know what -- anyway!

There is some sort of radicalization pipeline that is happening. And we're raising our kids in digital petri dishes. Where mental illness and sexual confusion and violent ideology is all growing together!

And then we act shocked when one of our kids grab a rifle. America, wake up! Stop pretending this stuff is just a harmless little quirk. You know, or live and let live. Or we're just going to keep burying victims one after thorough. Parents and schools and tech companies. Law enforcement. Everybody dropped the ball on crooks.

For years! Red flags were out there, screaming about this guy.

And nobody in the government did anything. Nobody in law enforcement did anything? How many of our kids have to climb roofs, before we admit these dark corners of the internet are producing real monsters.

How many? How many?

And this is only the beginning of it.