RADIOAugust 28, 2024

Tulsi Gabbard: I'm STILL on a Harris/Biden watchlist after Trump endorsement

Former Democratic Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard recently exposed that she had been put on the TSA’s “Quiet Skies” watchlist, which is often used for tracking potential domestic terrorists. Now, she tells Glenn that she’s STILL on that watchlist! Tulsi joins Glenn to discuss this, as well as her endorsement of Donald Trump. She tells Glenn that the Harris/Biden “neocon elitist warmongers” have gotten us dangerously close to war … but seem to be more focused on diversity of skin color and gender identity than diversity of thought and actual military readiness. And as the woman who destroyed Kamala Harris in a 2020 election debate, Gabbard also details her advice to Donald Trump ahead of his first debate with Harris.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: We welcome to the program now, Tulsi Gabbard. The author of For Love of Country, which really, took on a whole new meaning, Tulsi. Yesterday, when you endorsed Donald Trump. Welcome.

TULSI: Yes. Good morning, Glenn, it's great to be with you.

GLENN: Yes. Did you realize how much you looked like Wonder Woman? I'm just pointing that out there.

TULSI: No. Hey, I'll take that compliment any day of the week.

GLENN: So tell me, why it is so important for you to now take the step that will make you even less popular with people, on the left.
(laughter)
And put a target on your back, honestly. Because they think he is absolute Hitler.

Why are you joining the campaign?

TULSI: I mean, the title of my book says it all.

It is truly for love of country.

And because I know, first hand, what's at stake, in this election.

You know, so often, we have elections that are kind of reduced to partisan differences, of, well, you know, Democrats think this, and Republicans think that. But this election is very different. It's much bigger than one party versus another. What's at stake here is freedom.

And the fact that we have a candidate, in Donald Trump, who believes in freedom. And the Constitution.

And who -- and I've had personal conversations with him. Who understands the cost of war. And the seriousness of the fact that because of Kamala Harris and Joe Biden, we are closer to the brink of nuclear war, now, than ever before.

That's a serious issue, that he looks forward to, as president. Commander-in-chief. To taking on. Walking us back from the brink of war.

And you contrast that with Kamala Harris. Who in so many ways. Over the last three and a half years.

Has shown, she will not hesitate to under mine our freedoms.

We just saw Mark Zuckerberg come out, publicly. And say, yeah. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris essentially bullied Facebook into censoring Americans free speech.

We have seen the political retaliation against Donald Trump. We have seen the political retaliation against the free speech of everyday Americans. And I'm the most recent target for the Kamala Harris administration, for criticizing Kamala Harris.

They put me on a secret domestic terror watch list, which I'm told is still operational and still going on.

And on the issue of war and peace, which doesn't get talked about often enough, in these presidential elections. But really is core to our ability to live in a free and peaceful and prosperous society. Kamala Harris and Joe Biden have gotten us embroiled in multiple wars, in different parts of the world.

And it is directly because of their foreign policy, that we sit here, one spark away from nuclear war.

GLENN: So are you -- were you shocked?

Because I was shocked.

It was almost like part of her acceptance speech, at the convention, was written by John Bolton.

She was -- I mean, she sounded like an absolute hawk, like Lindsey Graham, when it comes to war.

Did you feel that way?

TULSI: I did. I did very much so. But it didn't surprise me.

Because it was just another proof point, showing that, you know, people -- Joe Biden hasn't been calling the shots and making the decisions over the last three and a half years.

If Kamala Harris is elected president, neither will she. She is the latest figurehead for the military industrial complex, the Deep State, national security state. All of those who derived the mainstream propaganda media. Those who derive power or profit, from us being in a constant state of war, wrote those talking points.

And that script that was fed into that teleprompter. And Kamala Harris declared it loud and proud. So we know exactly who she will be working for.

Not from the American people. Not for our national security. Nor, quite frankly, does she care one iota, about those of us who wear the uniform and those who serve.

And this is very compelling, especially yesterday, that I made this announcement on the third anniversary of the Abbey Gate bombing in Paris. Biden's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. So who is running the country?

And, you know, I saw. Who was it?

Some Hollywood celebrity came out, it doesn't matter if she doesn't give an interview. It doesn't matter if she doesn't articulate her platform. She just has to win. And I thought, you know, that is voting for an oligarchy.

That's -- because we don't know who is running the country right now. It's obviously somebody, or a group of people.

They have an agenda. None of us have voted for those people.

We don't even know who it is. We're an oligarchy.

TULSI: That's exactly right.

And this is -- this is important for voters to recognize.

And, you know, the more these Hollywood celebrities, and other people say those kinds of things. It just reinforces that fact.

And also, the fact that they think, that we as voters are so stupid, as to fall for it.

To fall for the lie. The facade, that they are -- that they are creating.

Yes. It is Tony Blinken, who has turned the State Department, which is supposed to be the department that is responsible for diplomacy, and preventing more into what is essentially a war department.

And we see Jake Sullivan, president, who is a national security adviser in the White House. And we see people like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, who still are calling the shots. And many others, whose faces and names. Will not be on the front page.

Or on your television any time soon. Both in the government. And outside of the government.

In the military-industrial complex. Who -- who are -- they are a part of this. They are this cabal of neocon elitist warmongers. Who will put their power and their profits ahead of people, every day of the week.

GLENN: Let me -- let me play a couple of things for you.

Because Donald Trump, I think would be wise to have you in his Department of Defense.

And there's a lot of work to do. Here's Susan rice in 2016, on the imperatives of national security.

VOICE: For starters. A diverse national security workforce, enables us to unlock all of our nation's talent.

There's some 320 million people, in the United States.

Nearly 40 percent are minorities.

And an increasing number of them are earning college and graduate degrees.

As America becomes more diverse, so too, do our best people.

The next Colin Powell, or Madeleine Albright. Or Bill Richardson.

GLENN: Stop.

I don't want to waste your time. She goes on, and she says that, inclusion is a national security imperative.

Now I want you to listen to the lieutenant colonel, who is a man, posing as a woman, who is with space force. Listen to this.

VOICE: So inclusion is a national security imperative.

We fight today, and we are going to fight in the future, using brain power.

And if that brain, who is going to revolutionize the way we fight in space. We fight in cyber, just happens to be in a trans body. You should want them all serving alongside me. And for your organizations, it's the same way.

Those perspectives that we get from a diverse set of individuals. It's been talked about on stage, a lot, regarding the science behind high-performing teams. We need those perspectives.

But it's inclusion that actually drives that. Because you can bring people in. And if they don't feel safe, to speak up. If they don't feel safe to bring their full selves to work, you're not going to get the value of the diversity.

GLENN: Okay. So, Tulsi, the kind of inclusion that I look for, and I think most Americans are for.

Is diversity of thought. Somebody at the table who has the guts to say, general. Mr. President, please do not do that. And here's why.

We don't -- we are focused on all the wrong kind of inclusion. That means nothing, to people.

Where does this fit on a priority list for you?

TULSI: Well, the fact that they care more about the color of your skin. Or how you identify, or your sexuality.

Then they do about your capability, and what you bring to the table, in service to our country. Is -- is really indicative of their entire philosophy, of their identity politics. And it's put our country in a dangerous place. I served in the Army for over 21 years, and I can tell you, having people surrounding myself with people in different positions. I started as a -- as a private. I'm now lieutenant colonel. I tell my soldiers.

Now, I'm a battalion commander. I tell them, if you disagree with my plans, or my positions, I want you to tell me.

That you disagree. And tell me why. Because you may have a better idea.

That's exactly what we should be looking. That diversity of thought, that environment. That is inclusive of people, who have a -- a -- a different way of cooling do go things.

So that we can come up with the best plan. The best course of action.

The best outcome.

And that's true of the military.

And every agency outside the government.

That to me, is what real leadership is about.

And that is essential, that changes. Another reason it's important that Donald Trump wins this election.

GLENN: So a couple of other questions, then I'll let you go.

You debated Kamala. And you pretty much wiped the floor with her.

What advice are you going to Donald Trump, if any, and what do you think about the attempt to change the rules now? By Kamala, in the debate?

TULSI: Yeah. You know. Donald Trump is not a politician. I think that's what people really, really love about him.

It wouldn't surprise you to know, again. He wouldn't do debate press like a typical politician would.

So it -- but it's been great to be able to spend some time with him. And his team.

Really for me. If there's anything I can help at all.

Why it's the fact that I shared a stage with Kamala Harris.

I know how she thinks and how she is going to -- how she's going to try to lay some traps. Try to bait Donald Trump into walking into the narrative, that she will try to push for the American people. And, quite frankly, how she's going to try, how she's -- how she will try to hide her record.

That to me, is the biggest thing. She says one thing, that is directly opposite to what her record shows. And this really will be an opportunity, for Donald Trump to expose that to the American people.

And to your second question about Kamala Harris is trying to change the rules now, less than two weeks before the debate. I think that points to that fact. That points to her weakness. That the American people need to see. She's demanding that the debate be seated. And that she be allowed to bring in notes into the debate.

Why does she need notes? If she knows the issues. If she knows the most important policies and the challenges the American people are facing today, why does she need notes?

Well, we know why. It goes back to the thing we started with, is because she needs somebody else to tell her, what to say.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

Okay. Last question. Yesterday, I had RFK Jr on at this time. And conservatives like me. People who have been waiting for people to wake up, and see the insanity in the country.

Are excited. Because you're now campaigning for Donald Trump. RFK is campaigning for Donald Trump.

And it seems like there are people waking up to see, this -- this party, that says that they are protecting democracy. Is the furthest thing from, you know, defenders of democracy.

Do you see people waking up.

Have you experienced -- do you think it's happening.

Or are we --

TULSI: No. It is. It is.

And I'll give you two brief anecdotes that happened within the last 24 hours.

I land in an airport, late last night. At about 11 o'clock at night.

Was walking off the plane. And a guy named Jake walked up to me.

Said, hey. I really appreciated what you did today, and he talked about his family. His family came from a long line of traditional Democrat, you know, construction union, hard-working American families. They have voted Democrat, almost their entire lives.

And it is not until just recently, just over these past few days, that they have -- he got calls from his dad yesterday, after I made my announcement. And he said, wait. Hang on a second.

What's going on here. I need to pay closer attention to this. And rethink the way that I thought I needed to vote. Second story. There's a teacher at a small private school. Who I met during my campaign of the presidency.

In 2020. Follows me on Instagram. He talks about real education. Not the broken education system. But he's always voted for a third party candidate. He voted for me. But he voted for third party candidates.

And that's what he was going to do, and his statement yesterday to me, and on his Instagram was, hey, I think we need to rethink things. If Bobby Kennedy and Tulsi Gabbard, and other common sense minded Americans who we support, are now endorsing Donald Trump.

He's like, I need to check myself. I need to look in the mirror and say, what am I doing to actually make a difference, rather than just make a statement?

GLENN: That is fantastic news.

SHOCK POLL: The % of Young People Who Support SOCIALISM is Insane

New polling reveals a shocking truth: young Americans aren’t just open to socialism... they overwhelmingly want a socialist president in 2028. Glenn Beck and Justin Haskins break down five alarming surveys showing massive ideological shifts among voters ages 18-39, including young Republicans. Why is socialism exploding in popularity, and what does this mean for the future of America? Are we on the brink of a political transformation or potentially even a national crisis?

Watch This FULL Episode of 'Glenn TV' HERE

Property Taxes are OUT OF CONTROL - And Here's Why! | Guest: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

Texas Governor Greg Abbott joins Glenn Beck to expose why Texans are being crushed by skyrocketing property taxes — and how local governments, not the state, keep driving homeowners deeper into financial distress. Gov. Abbott breaks down his five-point plan to impose strict spending limits, force voter approval for tax hikes, reform out-of-control appraisals, empower citizens to slash taxes themselves, and eliminate school district property taxes for homeowners altogether. Glenn argues that property tax is morally wrong because it prevents Texans from ever truly owning their land, and Abbott lays out his strategy to fight both parties in the legislature to finally deliver lasting relief.

Joe Rogan & Glenn AGREE: We just got CLOSER to civil war

Joe Rogan recently warned that we may have gotten to Step 7 of 9 in the lead-up to civil war. Glenn reviews the 9 Steps and explains why he believes Rogan nailed this one. But Glenn also lays out what Americans MUST do to reverse this trend...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So if you take what Fetterman said yesterday about how people are cheering for him to die on the left, and then you couple it with something that was on the Joe Rogan show on Tuesday. He was saying that the reaction to the death of Charlie Kirk makes him think that the US is closer to Civil War than -- than he thought.

Now, let me quote him. He said, after the Charlie Kirk thing. I'm like, oh, my.

We might be at seven. This might be he step seven on the way to a bona fide Civil War. Charlie Kirk gets shot, and people are celebrating.

Like, whoa. Whoa. Whoa.

You want people to die that you disagree with?

Where are we now on the scale of Civil War?

Well, let me go over the scale of Civil War, because it's sobering.

Now, none of this has to be true. If we wake up and decide, I don't want to do this anymore!

Okay?

Here's step one.

Step one. Loss of civic trust.

Every civil conflict begins when people stop believing that the system is fair. Are we there?

We're so far -- we're so far past the doorway, we are comfortably asleep on the couch on this one. Gallup and Pew both show trust in Congress, the media courts, and the FBI government are now at record lows.

The Edelman Trust Barometer classifies the US now as severely polarized. Majority of Republicans distrust federal elections. Majority of Democrats don't trust the Supreme Court.

Americans are really united on one thing, and that is the other side is corrupt!

When faith in the rules collapses, the republic begins to wobble. But that's step one. Step two, polarization hardens into identity!

Political disagreement is normal!

Identity conflict is fatal!

But that's what Marxists push. Identity politics. This is when politics stopped being about policy, and started being about who you are as a person.

Have we crossed this one into step two?

I mean, we're neck deep into this. A study on this, from PRRI.

It's a survey, found 23 percent of Americans believe political violence may be necessary to save the that I guess.

I think that's an old study. Americans now sort themselves by ZIP code into ideological enclaves. The big sort: Universities, activists, corporations. Everybody is promoting oppressor versus oppressed.

And that -- does what?

It puts us into incompatible tribes. Opponents aren't wrong anymore. The opponent is dangerous!

If I go back and you look at civil wars, Lebanon, before 1975. Yugoslavia, before 1991. That's -- we're doing that. Okay?

Step three. Breakdown of the gatekeepers. The gatekeepers are kind of like the referees of society. It's the media, political parties, churches, civic leaders.

When they fail, extremism fills the vacuum. Okay. Where are we on this? Have our gatekeepers failed us?

Yeah. I think both parties, especially the left, you know, everything I predicted that the left was going to be eaten by the extreme left, and then the communists and the socialists is now happening.

They've lost control of the fringe of each party. Media transformed, you know, from referees into team coaches. Tech platforms. It's outrage for profit. Universities are not there to cool things down. They heat them up.

Churches. Churches are useless. Useless.

When the referees leave the field, the game devolves into a brawl. And the refs are gone off the field. So there are only nine steps. We're at step four. Here's step four.

Are you ready for this one?

Parallel information realities.

Civil wars don't require different opinions. They require different realities.

I remember reading about Germany, at the beginning of, you know, the Nazi era. How the two new newspapers. One was propaganda for the government.

And the other one, it was the last one that was kind of the holdout.

And they said, you could read them, and they would cover the same thing.

But they had almost no information was the same. Except, that happened yesterday.

Here's what they said. And then everything else was different. That's exactly -- I mean, step four is complete!

We can't agree on facts, right?

Crime rates. Border numbers. Inflation. Election security.

Two Americans can watch the same video. And see opposite truths.

Social media algorithms are creating customized political universes.

Digital echo chambers. Deepfakes. We're just at the beginning of that. And both sides accuse the other of running disinformation machines.

Why? Because we don't have a shared reality. So if you don't have a shared reality. How do you settle any dispute?

On the nine steps, we're up to number five. Coming in at number five.

Loss of neutral rule of law.

This out of the nine steps with, five is the pivot point.

It's not corruption, it's the belief that the law is no longer neutral.

Are we there yet?

Let me tell you the CBS you.gov poll. 67 percent say the justice system is used for political purposes.

I think that's low. January 6 defendants given years in prison, 2020 rioters were released. High profile political figures, prosecuted or shielded based on party.

FBI whistle-blowers alleging pressure to inflate domestic extremism numbers. States like Texas, directly defying federal directives, on border enforcement.

And now, leading the way, with the federal government.

History is really cold and unforgiving on this point.

Once the people believe justice is political! Remember, this is the turning point.

The republic stands on borrowed time. Once you no longer believe that justice is achievable. Step six.

Are we there?

I think we are.

Step six. Normalization of political violence!

This is where violence stops shocking the system. Are we there?

Remember, where violence stops shocking the system. Look at evidence just from Virginia. What they just voted for.

He was calling for the death of a -- a political opposition.

Calling for his children to be killed.

Was called on it, never apologized.

Never said anything other than, yeah. I know. He dug it deeper.

Was anyone shocked by it? Apparently not. They elected him. Here's the evidence. 2020 riots.
574 events. $2 billion in damage. Was anybody outraged by that? Or was it downplayed and excused?
Assassination attempts. Assassination attempts against the president. Supreme Court justice.

Fistfights. And mob actions on college campuses. To silence speakers. Rising to do for punching a fascist or stopping genocide. Depending on the ideology. Online chatter discussing Civil War, national divorce, and revolution.

When violence becomes part of the political language, a nation crosses an invisible line. We're now up to step seven out of nine.

This is where Joe Rogan said, are we at step seven?

The rise of militias and parallel forces.

When a state loses he is monopoly on force.

Countdown accelerates. So where are we on this one?

I think we're seeing, maybe early signs of this.

You're starting to see the -- the states kind of organize these mobs, you know, to go after ICE.

Right?

Armed groups, right-wing, left-wing radical secessionists. Anyone.

Once they start forming their own police forces. Or their own option forces, then you have -- then you have everything really falling apart.

Entirely!

I don't think we're there, yet!

But we're starting to see the beginnings of this.

Step eight. The trigger event.

Civil Wars don't begin with a plan. They begin with a spark.

So where are we?

We're not here yet. The conditions are right. Potential triggers, disputed election in '26 or '28.

Political assassination or major attack.

Supreme Court decision that ignites mass unrest.

Financial crisis or dollar crisis.

A state federal standoff turning violent!

Nothing is ignited yet, but the room is soaked in gasoline. So we don't have seven. We're on the verge of eight, at any time. And here's nine.

This is the point of no return.

When police, military, or federal agencies split, even if no one calls it that, well, where are we?

Well, I just read a story about how with the Mamdani election in New York, a good number of the police force is going to leave. And they're going to go join police forces elsewhere. You also have the tension between the state National Guard, and the federal directives, the state guard and the state directives. Law enforcement recruitment is at crisis lows. The distrust of the FBI, DOJ, CIA. Tens of millions of Americans. I always really respected those institutions. I have no respect for them now. If you have states openly defying federal rules on immigration, drug laws, sanctuary policies.
Whistle-blower claims of internal politicization.

All of these things are in play for the first time in 150 years, people can imagine!

So I give this to you, not to be fearful of, but to know where you are. As a map!

Know where you are.

And hopefully, it might wake some people up, if you chart America on, on the nine step model of Civil War. Steps one through four, completed!

Step five, happening!

Step six, happening! Step seven, beginning! Step eight, just waiting for it. And step nine, avoidable, only if step eight, never happens. Again, I'm not telling you for doom purposes, this is diagnosis. This is a doctor going, I want you to look at the chart.

And this is a doctor saying, I want you to look at -- do you see what's happening to your body?

If you don't stop this habit, you are going to die. You don't have to die. You can stop smoking and drinking right now. You can start exercising. But if you don't, you are going to die.

The question is, are we the nation that says, nah, that's not going to happen to me. Or are we the nation that wakes up and sees our chart and says, good heavens, it's way far more gone than I thought it was. But I feel something in the air.

I'm going to change my behavior. The nation that refuses to look and wake up and stop calling their neighbors enemies, is the nation that fails!

We have to strengthen these things that have already fallen. And, you know what, the easiest one to do is?

Church. Where are you ministers and pastors priests and rabbis?

Where the hell are you?

I think there's going to be a special section for you, when you cross over to the -- because you're doing things in the name of God!

So when you get to the other side, I think there's going to be a special section for those who remained silent. While his rights were being taken away.

You don't own that right.

I don't own that right.

The Lord gave us those rights, and said, protect them!

By you, being the representative, the voice box, if you will, of the Lord, to shepherd his people. By you not standing up and saying, hey, by the way, we have -- we have a moral responsibility to protect these rights for the next generation! By you refusing because you're afraid. Because I think, there's no politics in the Bible! There's no politics in the Bible. Really?

The whole thing is about politics. Is about the moral way you have to live your life.

Calling things as you see them. Calling them back to eternal principles.

He didn't tell anybody how to vote. Render to Caesar what is Caesar's.

But there are certain principles that you have to have, or you lose not only this citizenship, but the next citizenship. The one that really matters. And, boy, if you are doing it because you're a coward, you are in the wrong business!

Get out of the pulpit, and go to work at Jack in the Box.

Democrat “SMOKING GUN” on Trump & Epstein gets DESTROYED by facts

The House Oversight Democrats recently released "new" emails allegedly proving President Trump lied about his knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. However, Glenn points out a glaring issue with these emails that destroys their entire narrative...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, let's dive right into the Epstein Maxwell emails. My gosh, Stu!

Why are they trying to cover up that Donald Trump had sex with children!

STU: I mean, it's just clear, as -- as day, in the emails!

GLENN: Yeah. No.

STU: He spent hours with one of the victims. What else could have possibly have occurred in that arrangement? We don't know!

GLENN: And it's -- it's one of the victims, Stu. One of the victims!

STU: One of the victims, that's all we know. One of the victims.

GLENN: Let me read what Jeffrey Epstein wrote. I want you to realize that the dog who hasn't barked is Trump. Victim redacted. Victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned. Police chief, et cetera.

Okay. New information, just released. Or is it?

Because in 2011, 2011, that was released and everybody knew it. It's been out floating around. Here's the change: In 2011, this is what it read.

I want you to realize that the dog hasn't barked is Trump. Virginia spent hours at my house with him.

Why would you redact a name that is already out in the public square!

It's already out!

The memo is already out. The email is already out. It's been out for years. Why would you redact that name now?

Well, because it makes it all of a sudden, new and shiny. Shiny and new. If you don't know who said it, you see victim, and you're like, oh, you see victim. Who is the victim?

I don't know. But when you know it's Virginia, you know this has already gone to court. This is -- she already testified about this!

He didn't partake in any of this, any sex with any of it. It's true. He didn't partake in any sex with us, and I'm quoting, this is from the testimony. But it's not true, that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me. Have you ever met him?

Yes, at Mar-a-Lago, my dad and him. I wouldn't say they were friends, but my dad knew him, and they would talk. Have you ever been in Donald Trump or Jeffrey Epstein's presence with one another? No!

What's the basis of your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey? Jeffrey has told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.

He didn't partake in any of -- any of the sex with any of it. He flirted with me.

It's true, that he didn't partake in any sex with us. But it's not true that he flirted with me.

So I don't understand that. But she goes on. Donald Trump never flirted with me!

Okay. So what -- what's new about this?

This is the same girl, this is the same person that -- didn't she work at Mar-a-Lago?

Or she was going to get a job at Mar-a-Lago.

STU: Yeah. I believe she did at one point.

GLENN: Yeah. So we know they know each other. We know they know each other.

We know that at Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey Epstein would come, and he was poaching the employees. The girls there. To go work for him.

And Donald Trump went to him. And said, "Hey, man. Stop it. Stop poaching people from me. That's not cool. Don't do it." And then he said, "Oh, yeah. All right." And then he did it a second time. And he's like, "You know what, you're out. I don't want you here anymore. I asked you not to do it, and you did it." Now, that doesn't mean that he knew what was happening to the girls or what was happening or anything else.

And even if it did mean something was happening with the girls, he was saying, "Hey. Stop it! Don't take any of the girls or the women here.
Don't do it." I don't believe he knew anything about any of this. But God only knows! And really, God only knows!

This is not new news. Donald Trump, he might end up beating Bezos as the richest man on the planet! When all is said and done!

Because, again, the -- they're presenting this as new fact, a giant scandal. Stu, I don't know if you know this. This is -- this breaking news is a giant scandal.

STU: Yeah. I've heard democratic representatives saying that over the past 24 hours. Yeah. We need to investigate this.

This is shocking stuff. It's a massive scandal. Even ABC News, I heard, pushed back against this. And said, well, what scandal? What are you implying occurred here?

We know who the victim was. We know the victim. Like why. Why did you even redact that name?

And they're like we always redact name of victims.

Do you really? When they're already out publicly?

Not to mention, this particular victim is not even alive.

You know, she sadly died. I mean, it's a terrible, terrible story.

GLENN: Terrible story.

STU: Yeah. She passed away.

A suicide. It was at least the report I believe. But she has a posthumous book coming out. But like a terrible, terrible story.

But, you know, to act as if you have to protect her identity when, number one, she's dead.

GLENN: Is ridiculous.

STU: Number two, everybody already knows who she was, including the news sources, who also have a policy, you would think.

And ABC has a policy. They redact, that was in this type of situation. But it's already been out. We already knew who it was.

So they redacted to make it look like he's with other people who have not already told us nothing bad occurred! You know, and it is an absolutely awful tactic. And at least --

GLENN: I think litigation should follow again. I think he should sue them again. Anyone who is presenting this as new information.

ABC did their job. Congratulations for ABC. They did their job.

They pointed out, this is not new information.

Why would you redact. Why are you releasing this now? And you're redacting a name this -- this email is already out!

You're presenting this as a new scandal.

And you redacted that name. This is completely dishonest. The news media shouldn't even run with it. They shouldn't even run with it. They should have said, old news. Old news. And if you did run with it, you should have handle it had like ABC handle it had. Wait a minute. Why did you redact name.

What do you mean that there's a new scandal. She already testified exactly opposite of what you're believing Jeffrey Epstein over the victim right now. I just want to make sure you understand the Democrats right here. You're taking the name of Epstein, over the victim.

Oh, okay. All right.

STU: And Epstein doesn't even say that anything occurred.

GLENN: No.

STU: There's not -- it's just -- it would be something you would have to jump to a conclusion, to accuse Donald Trump of something like this.

And we know what happened, because the victim said nothing!

Said, it was nothing!

GLENN: Right.

STU: In fact, it wasn't even a flirtation. Which, by the way, even that, you might have thought was creepy. It wasn't even a crime.

It wasn't even flirtation. So it's a disgrace in every single way.

GLENN: All right. So let me take you here. Let me take you here.

If you remember when the shutdown first started, what did the Democrats say, the reason why they did the shutdown?

Not them! Why Mike Johnson and everybody else wouldn't negotiate!

Why wouldn't -- why wouldn't the Republicans negotiate?

Because the heat was on, to release the Epstein files.

And they didn't want to have to do that. So they shut the government down!

Okay?

They wouldn't negotiate. You didn't hear any of this? Oh, it's so arrogant.

STU: It doesn't make any sense at all. That's probably what they said.

GLENN: I know. I know. So the government is open, and what does Mike Johnson do yesterday?

He said the House is going to vote on a bill to release all of the files related to the late financier, convicted child sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein next week. He said on Wednesday that a discharge position to bypass leadership and force a vote on the bill, hit the benchmark for needed signatures. It's been decided by him to expedite the vote for the bill, which under the current rules could have been delayed until at least early September.

So he says, as soon as that petition hit, the needed 218 signatures, I brought it up. Unanimous consent. Let's go! Release it.

So he's pushing this forward. Good, Mike!
Release all of it. Thank you!

Get it out. Lance this boil.

I mean, if anybody thinks that you're ever going to get the truth on this in the first place, it's madness. It's madness. Everybody -- I mean, so many important people were involved in this, and it was in the hands of the Democrats for the longest time. Okay?

So they had all of this information. You don't think it was all picked through? And if there was anything about Donald Trump, you don't think that would have come up between 2020 and 2024?

There's nothing in there about Donald Trump. These people are so stupid. This time, we've got him, boys. This time, we've got him.

No, you don't. This time, it's like Wile E. Coyote. This time, we've got the Roadrunner!

No. You're never going to catch him on this. It doesn't work. The guy was the most investigated person in the history of the world, and you've got nothing! Now, it's good to come out.

But if you think you're going to catch a bunch of people on the left, you're not going to. Because they had it, you know, in their possession.

You don't think all of the names were taken out? You don't think things were destroyed, if there was anything? I believe there was something. But I don't believe there's any names in it anymore. You're not going to get the truth on this one. You're just not going to get the truth, but release everything that we have. Everything!

Oh. Oh, by the way, also in the Epstein emails. How come nobody is talking about this one, Stu?

This one is from Michael Wolff, to Jeffrey Epstein. And then Jeffrey Epstein responds.

So Michael Wolff writes, "What's the thumbnail on Nes Baum (phonetic) Foster?"

And Jeffrey Epstein writes back, "Nes Baum White House Counsel, dot, dot, dot, Hillary doing naughties with Vince."

Now, Vince Foster killed himself, you know, and then killed himself at the White House. And then drug himself across the street to the park.

I mean, I don't know -- the Vince Foster thing is so old. And it doesn't -- but why is nobody talking about that one?

Why is no one talking about that?

Also, this the Jeffrey Epstein email bundle, ABC, you don't feel that's necessary to bring that one up?

Huh. Interesting.