RADIO

Trump Jr. responds to rumors that RFK Jr. will endorse Trump, join the administration

There have been rumors lately that RFK Jr. is debating whether to suspend his presidential campaign and endorse Donald Trump in order to stop Kamala Harris from winning the White House. If so, he may also try and get a position in the Trump administration. Presidential transition team member Donald Trump Jr. joins Glenn with his thoughts: “I love the idea of giving him some sort of role in a major 3-letter entity and letting him blow it up.” Don Jr. also weighs in on the chaos at the DNC and why he believes Kamala Harris is “the most powerful VP we’ve had”.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Welcome to the program the Trump organization, vice president, and host of triggered with Don Jr.

Donald Trump Jr.

Hey, Don, how are you?

DONALD: How is it going? It's good to be with you guys.

GLENN: It's good to be with you. I just talked to your sister-in-law, Lara, last hour. And we got the take on the convention. I don't know what their bold vision is. But based on the number of times they talked about your father, I think the bold vision for America is Donald Trump. I think that's what they're selling. I don't know, appeal. Because I got --

DONALD: It's sort of hard to believe. I haven't heard a vision. I have seen a lot of projection. I mean, the one that really got me was watching this lady, she got up there. Hysterical, saying that, you know, if Donald Trump gets in there, he would do the unthinkable. And he would weaponize the Justice Department against his political enemies.
(laughter)

DONALD: To arrest him -- and I'm sitting there thinking, oh, my God. Honestly, Glenn. I don't know. Do they -- do they not know?

Have they not been watching for the last three years? I mean, it's really mind-boggling.

GLENN: It is.

DONALD: They think that they're doing the right thing, and that it's totally within the norm. And if we responded even remotely in kind, that that would be some sort of violation of the standards that they've been breaking for years now. It's mind-boggling to me, I can't figure it out.

GLENN: I know.

We think that they either think that they're invincible at this point, and they can say anything. Or they believe in the Hitler line.

Repeat a lie long enough. And it becomes the truth.

Or they're just -- they just think they're -- their voters are just dumb as a box of rocks.

But that's the only answers --

DONALD: I think they are. You have no choice but to believe that at this point. Just look at them. I'm looking at the DNC, both inside and out.

And I can't imagine too many Americans, you know, want their children growing up in a country like that. There's fires and looting and rioting.

They don't know what to agree upon, amongst themselves. They're supporting terror organizations.

And they're giving out. I made a joint on my podcast. On rumble. A couple of weeks ago.

About, hey, guys. The people who have been screaming about democracy there.

They're shoving into your face, putting in Kamala Harris. She got zero votes. They overwrote the process. They set up a coup. They really want to preserve democracy. Vote Donald Trump.

He will fix the economy. He will stop the wars. And, you know, in four short years, you can go back to trying to do your drive-through abortions and all the other nonsense.

And I said it, tongue-in-cheek. And there's literally an abortion and vasectomy. To be clear, I'm not entirely against the vasectomy ban for the people at the DNC that I've seen so far. You know, I have to be honest. It's probably a solid idea.

I think they should use it, and perhaps we should raise the money to make sure it's available to them at all times for free.

But immediately, they're literally trying to make a parody of some of these things. They're actually doing those things.

It's mind-boggling.

GLENN: I know. I know. I know.

And nobody is talking about what's outside, besides the vasectomy trucks. And that's the extremist groups.

There was some research that came out from Capitol Research Center. And they had a very, very tight description of terrorist groups.

It has to be somebody who has actually said or pledged support to one of these terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda.

They found 150 of these, that support terrorism, or identify as Marxists, communists, or -- I can't say it.

Somebody who is into anarchy. And have -- have said that they are coming out, to collapse the -- the government.

And you have -- you have these groups, passing things out. Armed resistance is the only answer. And Israel. Stand with Hamas.

They're standing with the Muslim Brotherhood. The Communist Party of the Philippines. The Taliban.

It's crazy, and nobody is talking about it

DONALD: Well, and no one is talking about the obvious, which is Kamala Harris hasn't done an interview in a month.

They are letting her run to Joe Biden. Hide her into a basement campaign.

To understand, she doesn't have, you know, the personality to actually do these things proper. But think of how insane that is.

They are then usurping some of our ideas. But they go totally contrary to everything that Kamala voted for. You know, she's not going to do taxes on tips now, but she was the tie-breaking vote in the Inflation Reduction Act, which usually put 86,000 IRS agents in there, who literally go after people, to make sure that their tips were being taxed.

You know, and no one -- no one says a word. You know, she said, she will shut down the border.

Well, what has she been doing? Glenn, I would argue, she's the most powerful vice president we've probably had, certainly in recent times.

Because she's serving under someone who we all acknowledge now, even the left acknowledges is totally inept.

He's been incapacitated for his entire presidency. She could have done any one of the things she's talking about doing. But it's -- it's insane. Why isn't she doing what she's doing? You could have done it over the last three and a half years.

Oh, you're going to do it now? Why don't you start today? You don't have to wait until January 20th. You are literally the most powerful person in government. Because it ain't Joe Biden. He's not even president.

GLENN: Yeah, I know. I know.

So you've been named to the transition team, for your father. And can you give me some idea? Are you looking for people, or will you put people in, that truly understand the depth of the Deep State, and people that are willing to fire all of these people? I mean, it's going to take -- excuse my expression -- balls of steel to do this.

DONALD: Yeah. Oh, yeah. That's literally why I wanted to be on transition. It's literally not to appoint actually a single person. It's to block all of the bad actors. And there's plenty of them.

That's the difference between now and '16. '16, we didn't know. At the time, there was 4,000 divisions in the book, and that's the book that the president assigns these roles. It's like, we didn't know any of them.

My father had spent 2 days in DC in his entire life, prior to winning the presidency. We had no idea, where to start.

Now we know, we have seen the bad actors. We have seen the ones who tell you they will be loyal. Five minutes after they win. They put out a nice tweet, negating seven years of hate. Those are the guys, the ones that are your supposed friends. They're actually much worse than the Democrats. Because you assume they're actually doing the right thing by you. Because they supposedly do these things. But even if they believe them, they're subverting you across the way. So -- but I got on there. My father got on there. The first thing he said, yeah. Those people aren't getting jobs. We don't want them in our administration. We don't need that.

We have four years to fix something. Now we have an understanding of how that works. We know who the good people are and the bad people are. So, you know, hey. Yeah, beyond the 4,000 jobs, there's tens of thousands of jobs. So I don't know they will be perfect -- as perfect as it possibly can be.

GLENN: Well, I am hoping that the price of housing in the DC area collapses, because you're -- your father has won. And everybody knows, oh, crap. They're just going to be cutting all these jobs. And there's plenty of housing for people, that are living around the Capitol.

The endorsement from RFK, do you think that's coming?

DONALD: I hope so. You know, I think RFK is a smart guy. I think he actually has very good views on certain things. There are some things we are going to disagree with him on. But I think it shows sort of a unity against literally -- you know, before I hopped on, the communism that we are up against. It's not hyperbole anymore. It's not you like, they're just a little more left than us. It's not -- you know, these people. She was talking about, we want -- she was saying, we want to set up this, and we will be auditing businesses. And we will take away your businesses. And we will take away your children if we can't do drive-through, you know, transgender surgeries for minors without parental consent. They've lost their minds!

And so you know, I love the idea, I love the idea of giving him some sort of role and some sort of major, you know, three-letter entity, or whatever it may be, and blow it up. I think that's what we need.

And so I think that kind of unity, even where there may be disagreements on certain things. I think it can be a really great asset for that. I think it could bring people together.

And I think it shows, a strong -- a strong opposition to what we're up against. Which is just abject insanity. And I think if we had real unity, across independence and others in America, to stand up for what we know is coming, what the media is doing a very good job, hiding from us. That is just the reality of the Kamala Harris platform.

GLENN: It's amazing.

DONALD: Which is just a continuation of the Biden administration's platform. You know, we don't need another four years at this.

What's unique with this election. We had four years under Trump. We had four years under Biden. When were you better off?

It's sort of a no-brainer. And yet, when you're up against the trillion dollar institution of ten trillion dollars of mainstream media, functioning as the marketing arm of the Democrat Party. You know, it's hard to get a fair shake. And so we have to expose that. And the more people that we had on board, the better. So I certainly would be open and welcome to the idea, frankly.

GLENN: I have to tell you, and I asked your sister-in-law this about an hour ago. You know, there are things coming out of the White House right now. For instance, new nuclear strategy, to go against China, Russia, and North Korea, at the same time.

Nuclear solutions.

And there's no way, this president got up in the morning, and said, you know what, I'm worried about this.

And we have to put these things. Who is the president of the United States? Because the person that is controlling it now. Is going to be the person that controls it, when Kamala gets in.

And it doesn't seem like it matters to anyone. That this guy isn't running the country right now. Who is?

DONALD: I couldn't tell you. I assume it's one of the Obama lackeys, Susan Rice or Valerie Jarrett, or some of the really bad actors that we've seen, you know, working abroad. You know, starting wars and, you know, continuing them forever.

But think about that. I mean, coming up with nuclear plans. Now, we are much closer to nuclear war, and that is even according to the Biden administration. And we have since the missile crisis, but we made that happen.

You know, we gave Putin every excuse he needed to invade Ukraine. I'm not saying he's a good guy. I'm not saying he wouldn't have done it maybe eventually, anyway.

But the deal breaker was always moving NATO into Ukraine, so we had a 500 -- you know, thousand-mile long buffer zone.

And said, you know what, we'll put NATO right on Russia's border. So if they were going to do it, we certainly gave them every excuse imaginable. You know, they had a peace deal ready, early on in this thing.

They would have signed it. But, no, no, no, we wanted to keep the war machine going.

The war machine watched, you know, Big Pharma get rich during COVID. And said, no, no, no. It's our turn back at the trough. We hadn't had a war in six weeks. You know, it's time to make some more money again. It's asinine.

But these people are morons, and they have no incentive to actually get to peace. Right?

You stop this war, by cutting off the money. The second that goes away, they're at the table in two seconds. Certainly, Zelinsky is. And that's how you will negotiate peace. My father understands that. Kamala Harris not only does not understand how to do it, but she has no desire to do it, because her friends are probably getting rich from it.

GLENN: Yeah.

It is -- it's a remarkable time that we live in. And we pray for you and your family, every day. And we pray for our country as well.

I am more convinced than ever, as you watch things unfold over in Europe, that this whole thing is a show.

Your father is, I believe, the only man that can make a difference and stop this global takeover of the West. But we're getting down to the wire.

What's happening over in Europe. Nobody is paying attention to.

But how did we get some of the same policies in every Western country. That is setting every Western country on fire.

And the America first agenda is the way to stop.

KAMALA: I'm watching what's going on over in the UK, where that clown police chief.

We're going to extradite and arrest people for breaking -- when you say a mean tweet, and they will arrest you in America? Extradite you into the UK and put you in jail? I'm saying, people, literally. We hate that these illegal immigrants are curb stomping us in the streets. We really think that's terrible.

How dare say that about the immigrants! You know what happens to the person actually doing the curb stomping? Nothing.

You know, they probably get a government voucher program, getting money to beat the crap out of the people in the country that took them in.

It's mind-boggling. And I'm watching these people. I'm watching the videos of the judges handing out these sentences for 20 months, 24 months. For people that are just like, hey, man. I'm sick of this crap. What's going on.

It's not even racist. It's not hate speech. It's just common sense.

It's basic vernacular. To say, hey. I don't want to get beat up in my streets. It's only happening because of immigration.

Of course, it is.

But it doesn't matter to them.

It's literally like, they're destroying their own civilization.

And they're just willingly doing it. I've never seen anything like it.

GLENN: Yeah. Don, always good to talk to you.

Thank you so much. Keep up the good work.

And we'll do anything we can to help.

Donald Trump Jr. You bet.

RADIO

"The Most Dangerous Place on Earth Right Now!" - SHOCKING Details of Nigeria's Christian Genocide

Across Nigeria, Christians are being hunted, churches burned, and entire communities wiped out — yet the world remains silent. In this powerful discussion, Glenn Beck and Rep. Riley Moore uncover the horrific truth behind Nigeria’s Christian genocide and the shocking indifference from global leaders. This silent war on faith is one of the greatest humanitarian and moral crises of our time. Will America stand up for its brothers and sisters in Christ before it’s too late?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. Riley, let me talk to you about Nigeria, and what's happening in Nigeria. It's the scariest, most deadly country in the world, if you happen to be a Christian. And nobody seems to -- to be talking about it. And, you know, you have been involved in, you know, urging Secretary Rubio to say Nigeria is a country of particular concern, which I don't what an that means exactly. What doors does that unlock?

RILEY: Yeah. So that is -- that designation actually fits in the U.S. Code. So it does unlock 15 different Levers for the President when a country is designated a country of particular concern. That could be holding development money, that could be going to international institutions to free assistance through there. That could also halt security assistance, which would be arms sales and training and things like that, that have been going on in Nigeria. We could sanction individuals. It gives the President the authority to do a number of different things that can really, I think, leverage the Nigerians to actually start caring about our brothers and sisters in Christ, who are getting murdered for the professions they're facing in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

So I think this is a good first step, and we're going to see how the Nigerians react to this now. I've been having meetings with Departments of State.

We are going to meet with the Nigerians here at some point as well, here in DC.

So we're going to see what they're going to bring to the table. But also the President, who always puts all options on the table, has said, if they don't start fixing this, they're there couldn't potentially be kinetic military actions on -- in Nigeria.

GLENN: What does that mean?

Boots on the ground?

RILEY: No. To me, it does not mean that. To me, you have -- you have complex issues that are going on, over there. Where you have in the middle band of the country. This is where the Fulanis are. And these are herdsmen. And this is where you get this radical strain, obviously. Islamic terrorists, these Fulanis. These are herdsmen, tribes, and they have been attacking Christians in that middle band. In the northern part of the country is mostly Muslim. Southern part of the country is mostly Christian.

So that middle part, where they graze their cattle and all that, is where you see a lot of these flash points and murdering going on. But then in the northern part of the country is where you have ISIS, Boko Haram. They are operating there. And where they're taking over towns and communities, as we saw in Syria, right? Previously. Same type of thing.

GLENN: Yeah.

RILEY: CAIR is enfranchising, going on over there, all through the Lake Chad region, actually. So that's where I think, if it made sense to have some type of military action in forms of an airstrike or something like that, to -- to be able to tamp down some of the leadership and break up some of that structure in there.

That's something that would make sense. But to me, just speaking for myself, I want to try to work with the Nigerians, for them to do the right thing here.

President Trump obviously I mentioned, on Truth Social. Needs to specifically look into this. Which we are doing here in Congress. I want them to do the right thing.

I think the Nigerians actually have the chance right now to actually strengthen their relationship with the United States, if they're going to do the right thing.

But we can't allow to continue the slaughter of Christians where we have over 7,000 just this year, have been killed, for being Christian.
We can't allow that to continue, as a Christian country ourselves, which we are.

I know we're -- you know, some may debate that. I promise you, and nobody knows more about the founding of the country than Glenn Beck. Is that this is a Christian nation, founded on Christian values.

And we have to stand up for these people. Because nobody else is paying attention to this. Other than you, and some folks at Fox news. And that's really about it.

GLENN: Oh, I tell you, you know, I was planning on bringing my cameras with me. And I was going to go to Nigeria in the first quarter. And I have had briefings and warnings from the highest levels. Do not go.

You are not going. And I said, yes, I am. I want to bring this story.

You can't go. I've been to war zones. And this one, they're like, this is the most dangerous place on earth right now!

That's pretty remarkable, that nobody is really talking about it.

RILEY: It really is, and it's this silent genocide, that has just continued on since 2009, where we've had in between 50 to 100,000 Christians murdered for their faith. Our brothers and sisters over there, suffering, and no one has done anything about it. You might remember the bring back our girls movement around 2012ish, '14.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

RILEY: Seventeen of those girls have still never been brought back. People forgot about it. It's fine. Boko Haram just has them. It's not fine.

It's not okay. And there are a lot of Levers that the administration is able to pull here, I think to get the Nigerians on the right course.

It's not that they don't have resources. This is an oil rich country. With a lot of critical minerals.

They have the means to be able to do this, at the end of the day, it's a question of prioritization. And what their goals actually are. And we need them to focus on this. Or the President will start to focus on it.

GLENN: Well, I will tell you, 19,000 churches have been burned.

And yet, from what I'm hearing, there are some in the Nigerian government that are like, no. This is not what's happening. This is not about genocide. It's not about Christians. It's just squabbles.

Really? Fifty to 100,000 people. And 19 thousands of individuals people have been burned in little squabbles, that don't have anything to do with radicalized Islam?

RILEY: Exactly. And this is the excuse I've gotten from people on the ground, look, do terrorists kill other people other than Christians? Yes, of course they do. But we're talking about five to one is the ratio, Christians versus non-Christians are being killed over there right now.

Secondly, I want to point out for everybody, President Trump has a designation in Nigeria. It means his first term.

It was taken off by the Biden administration. Because they claimed the killings had more to do with arable land and herders, and actually the root cause was climate change.

GLENN: Climate change.

RILEY: Yeah. That's why these killings were happening. Because of climate change. Where that's why we saw the murder rate just skyrocket during the Biden administration.

And President Trump, who cares very deeply about these issues, he's not going to allow that to persist anymore.

GLENN: He said, if there is an attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet. Just like the terrorist thugs that attack our cherished Christians.

I will tell you, I've -- you know, been reading up on it. And doing our homework.

And, you know, it reminded me of how the Germans went into Poland. Where they would just take whole communities. They would put them in the church. And lock the doors. And burn it to the ground.

That's what's happening in Nigeria. They're doing the same thing. They're burning churches. Not just burning churches. They're gathering Christians up. Putting them in, locking the doors, and then burning it down so that all of these women and children and men die in a fire in their church. And it's horrific. It's horrific.
What does the average person need to do?

RILEY: Yes. The average person needs to call their number of Congress and elevate this. And make this an issue that is on their radar, that they care about.

I'm introducing resolution which would be a sense of Congress, that we support the President. And we support the people and the Christians of Nigeria, and their plight.

And we condemn what the Nigerian government is doing, in action around this. That resolution should be getting introduced here soon.

So that would be something that would be hugely helpful.

GLENN: Wow.

It will be interesting to see who votes for that, and who doesn't.

That would have been -- that would have been a no-brainer 15 years ago. Just a no-brainer.

And now, I wonder if you can even get that passed. That's sad. Sad.

RILEY: It's sad. And I think we need to put it to the test. Put it to the test.

Certainly, if I'm whipping the votes, I don't have Ilhan Omar in my "yes" column.

But, you know, let's -- let's put it to the test here.

RADIO

The TRUTH about Zohran Mamdani and communism

Is New York City’s new mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani a socialist or a communist? Glenn Beck takes a look at history to explain why it doesn’t really matter: BOTH lead down the same road …

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: You know, we've been talking about socialism, and Donald Trump is getting pilloried in the press for calling Mamdani a communist. And I find this ritual here, that we're going through is just, you say the word socialist, and, you know, 25 years ago when I said that these people were socialist, everybody said, "Oh, my gosh. You can't call them socialists. That's an outrage." I said, "The mask is going to come off, that they can't wait to tell you they're socialists."

Now Donald Trump said, you know, Mamdani is a Communist. And everybody is like, oh, my gosh. Look at this hysteric from the Cold War. He's just -- he's out of the Cold War radio drama.

So let me just clear this here. Because the difference between the two terms, you know, is really not some great firewall of virtue here. As if one leads to like Scandinavian candles and the other leads to gulags. That's not what's happening.

What we've forgotten here is what always is forgotten. And that is how Karl Marx actually talked and saw the two. He didn't draw, you know, polite little distinctions. He described socialism as the transition. The necessary scaffolding that leads to communism. That's Karl Marx. So socialism for Karl Marx was the road, not the destination.

Communism is the end of that road. He wrote -- he wrote an essay, the Critique of Gotha Program. And Marx said, under socialism, from each according to his ability, to each according to his contribution. Under communism, to each according to his needs. The only difference here is timing. It's not philosophy.

It's not goals. It's just how far along the revolution you are, okay?

Socialism is the bridge to communism. According to Karl Marx, don't take it from me. Communism is the completion of socialism. It's -- it's the antithesis of a free market system. Even Lenin called socialism the first and necessary phase of communism. So it's not partisan rhetoric. Okay?

This is the literal architecture of Marxist thought. But can we get out of the theories of all of this?

I mean, history gives us warning. Much more vivid than any theory. You know, we would like to imagine that the worst horrors of the 21st century came from one beast alone.

And we think that's Hitler. But actually, a bigger beast was Stalin. But if you want to look at Germany from 1930 to 1945. You see something really uncomfortable.

A socialist movement that curdled into something monstrous, while it never called itself communist. In fact, the Nazi government. The national socialists. The Nazis were not communists. They were against the communists.

They killed communists!

But they shared the same foundational belief. That the rid is disposable, and that the state defines the truth.

They both believe that rights are not given by God, but administered by political power. And that dissent on any of this, has to be crushed for the good of the collective.

That is the -- that's the definition we should care about!

Socialism doesn't to give full marks communism to become catastrophic. It just has to replace the individual conscience with the will of the state. And don't you see, that's what's happening here? They'll crush you! They'll destroy you. You disagree with them, they'll destroy you. Even if you've been on their side. I am going to share eye story with you, from 1979 that happened. That I don't think most people understand. And in New York, you better understand it.

When a society accepts the premise, that premise, history shows the -- the slide can accelerate from a utopian promise to industrialized cruelty. Horror show.

Like that!

Germany saw it. Russia saw it. China saw it. Cambodia. North Korea.

Cuba. I mean, it's all right there, just different flags. Different slogans. But it's the same structural error.

So can we stop with this mocking of the language?

You know, people laughing. Oh, you said Mamdani is a communist, but he's just merely a socialist. You're missing the point entirely.

The issue is not whether the label is technically perfect. The issue is the philosophical DNA is exactly the same. Collectivism over the individual.

State control over personal agency. Central planning over free will.

And that the belief that human nature can be engineered by a political force. That's where it always goes wrong. It doesn't understand human nature. So you can argue all you want, about where socialism ends and where communism begins, but honestly, that's like, hey, kids, memorize the date of this war.

Why? Why? I'm never going to use that fact again. What difference does it make? The thing we should care about is, why was that war fought? What happened at the end of that war? When communism and socialism, we should be saying, where does that road lead?

I can tell you that the road always begins with the state controlling your choices. Okay?

It will control your choice of energy, money, your children's education. Your speech.

Your job. What you drive. And it always ends with never greater liberty. It always ends the same place. In a society that has forgotten that freedom is fragile.

That power concentrates. That people are the same over and over and over and over again!

Human beings. They go bad! Especially when you give them power, and they're told they're part of a grand collective. Humans are willing to commit horrors they would never do as an individual.

That's the biggest thing. You get these horror shows of 100 million dead, because it's a collective!

We're all doing it. I'm not doing it. Everybody is doing it. That's the warning.

That's historical. And we ignore it at our own peril. Now, the problem here is, is that socialism is on the rise. And communism will be next.

Remember, when I first started talking about Obama, they -- I was -- I was raked across the rolls -- the coals, every day for even suggesting he might kind of like socialism. Now, socialism is fine!

So that road is still going to -- we're going to continue rolling down that road. And any country that goes into socialism -- we're not talking about a capitalist. We're not talking about Sweden anymore.

In fact, we are actually talking about Sweden. Look at the road they're going down now.
I mean, they're going into their own kind of authoritarian rule with Sharia law.

That is coming to Sweden. We are not talking about this friendly socialism. We're talking about the complete abandonment of the free market entirely. We've been this stupid little hybrid, that doesn't work. It only causes misery. We've been this hybrid.

And it doesn't work in a country this large and a country this diverse.

But look if you're -- you know, if you grew up after 9/11, where have you seen capitalism work for you?

Okay? You've seen, I know I've seen it. I've seen the rich get richer. And I don't mean the rich.

I mean the really, really, really rich. The ones that the Democrats never really talk about. They say they hate the rich. The rich have to pay their fair share.

But they're hanging out with George Soros. They're hanging out with the Ford Foundation. They're hanging out with Bezos and all of these other people. Because that's -- that's -- that's real control! Okay?

They don't hate those guys. They never do anything to affect their taxes. They don't pay taxes. Because they have the money to put it into trusts and everything else.

You don't have that!

So when I say, I've seen it happen. I've seen the rich get richer.

You know who the rich are?

Citibank. These banks that have been taking our money through bailouts, when do we get that money back?

When do you get that money back?

You don't!

You don't. That's why this is working. That's why you can say, socialism is neat. Because nobody knows the killing machine that socialism actually is. Nobody has any idea. Look at the killing machine. Look at the killing machine that's being built in socialist Canada right now.

What is it? MAID is the third or fourth biggest killer. It kills one in every 20 Canadians. Why is that happening? That's not out of compassion. That's because they're running out of money for health care. That's what that's about. Get them off the dole! Stop it. Now, if they're earning a lot of money, get them in, because we can still get their money, but let's make sure they're making money. If they're getting old, if they are cripple, if they fought in a war and just can't has come it themselves, if they're super, super young, if they have an expensive cancer, let them die. Help them die!

That's because they're looking at the collective, not the individual. And that's -- that's the beginning of the dark killing machine in a socialist country. And Canada is -- is -- I mean, it has socialized medicine. The problem is, it's all failing. Socialism always fails.

Capitalism has -- has taken people out of poverty. Solved problems. Healed people. Given people heat and houses and cars and airplanes. All of that is because of the free market. All of that is the free market.

You get rid of the free market. You put it in the hands of governments. And you have monsters. Monsters. And we know it, because we've seen it over and over and over again.

But our -- if you're -- if you -- if -- if you don't remember, or barely remember 911, you've never been taught any of this.

You've never been taught what it actually means. So you're seeing this play out, over and over again. Look at that guy, look at, he's not going to have to pay a price. He's just going to get away with it. And he's taking all of our tax dollars. Okay. I hate all of that.

This capitalist system, it's corrupt!

You're seeing that play out in real time. You're not seeing anybody actually go to jail for these things.

Of course, you think that it doesn't. I don't think it works the way it is right now!

But then you're -- you're given this false utopian promise. Without any information.

Read the warning label on socialism!

Where has it ever worked?

Show me where it has worked!

And don't say Sweden. Sweden.

Sweden is falling apart right now. Do you know why?

Because Sweden, everybody was blond hair, blue eyed, they were all related to each other. It was a small, little country.

You can do it when everybody is the same, and it's small. It will work in -- to some degree!

But the minute you start going diverse, the whole thing falls apart. So you want to be Sweden?

Go ahead. Look at Sweden today.

I don't want to be Sweden.

Read the warning label. That's our job, to show that warning label.

It's our job to teach what's not being taught. This is a death cult.

Stay away from it. Warning. Warning.

RADIO

Could Comey FINALLY go to JAIL thanks to this smoking gun?

Is this the 'smoking gun' evidence that could put former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation James Comey behind bars? Just the News CEO John Solomon joined Glenn Beck to reveal some shocking new revelations, including Comey’s own emails allegedly authorizing anonymous leaks to the NYT on the Clinton case, potential handwritten notes proving he KNEW Hillary’s team approved the Russia collusion hoax, and a possible email from Comey referring to Hillary Clinton as “President-elect Clinton." Will a Northern Virginia jury hold the Deep State accountable? Or will politics bury the truth again?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: John Solomon is with us. He is the CEO and editor-in-chief. In chief of Just the News. If you don't check that every day, you're really missing out on a really great news site. Justthenews.com. John, I have made a promise with my audience a long time ago, I do my best not to waste their time.

And as I'm looking through the things I want to talk to you about, I have to start with this question: Is any of this going to mean anything in the end, or is this -- are we just spinning our wheels and wasting our time, talking about how the deep this scandal with James Comey is becoming?

JOHN: That's a great question. And I don't think history has an answer yet. It will really depend on the tenacity and the focus of the Justice Department, the prosecutors, and the jurors that are going to catch these cases. Right? Are they willing to rise above politics and say, "We don't want an FBI that goes after people based on their political color, not the quality of the evidence against them."

And that is what began on 2015 on James Comey's watch, a different type of FBI that seemed to go after Donald Trump and his associates, regardless of evidence, and protect Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Hunter Biden, even though the evidence against them was pretty strong, as we ultimately found out from the IRS whistleblowers. So we don't know yet. Listen, these are going to go to trial if the judge lets them go to trial.

The judge in the Comey case seems to be giving the prosecutors a hard time there already. But that's going to be litigated. I'm going to go up to the Supreme Court. It will be a long battle.

But the question is, is the fight worth it?

I think if you don't punish the people that created this mentality, you have deficits in America for a long time.

Banana republic, prosecution arc. And I think that's not what Americans want. They want to say, the FBI is above politics. It hasn't been in the last texted, until the last few months, under Kash Patel.

GLENN: Okay. So let's talk about what the new evidence is the -- the burn bags.

The hidden rooms. And the evidence that now has been found that -- that shows Comey looks like he was lying. To Congress. When he said, no.

I didn't know anything about it.

JOHN: Yeah. Yeah. So let's remind people what the alleged lie is, what he's been accused of and indicted of. He told Congress in '17, and then reaffirmed, unequivocally in 2020, that he never asked any of his staff to provide information to the news media. The government, Kash Patel found significant documents that go to the contrary. They chose not to go after James Comey. So in the Bill Maher administration, they knew the same evidence, but they didn't go after him. What is the lie?

He told Congress, I didn't -- one, I never authorized anyone to leak to the media anonymously about the Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump cases. And, two, I don't think I knew anything about an intelligence intercept that Hillary Clinton was setting up a fake Russian collusion hoax, that we ended up investigating.

Well, we now know, first, his own emails, with his own top lieutenant, Daniel Richmond. A former lawyer who he brought into the special government. The FBI. There's an FBI employee, showed that James Comey, told him, good job, and make them wiser as he was briefing them on how he was anonymously trying to spin the New York Times and provide information to the New York Times about the Hillary Clinton case.

So directly on point to the testimony he gave. I didn't authorize him to leak about Hillary Clinton in their emails. So this guy was leaking it. He was affirming it, and saying, go ahead. And he was encouraging him to make that reporter wiser. In other words, give them more information anonymously.
So that's the first lie. The second lie -- and, by the way, the grand jury bought that evidence, that we believed he lied.

GLENN: Okay.

JOHN: And that is what we call the Clinton planned intelligence. Was Comey, as John Brennan claimed. And as other evidence -- did Comey know, did he pay attention, did he have some awareness that as the FBI was starting to investigate the Russia collusion ruse, the hoax, that Hillary Clinton had been interpreted, or her people had been intercepted, showing that she approved the plan. He said, it doesn't ring true. I don't think I knew about it.

Well, in a locker, in a burn bag, they found some handwritten notes of James Comey, that appeared to include the briefing from John Brennan where he clearly knew, that Hillary Clinton had been intercepted -- or, her team had been intercepted, saying she approved this plan to hang a fake Russian shingle on Donald Trump's campaign house. Now, those are handwritten notes.

GLENN: Yeah. That is in his handwriting, that he clearly understood. And so now you've got him on -- on two really significant lies. That show that this whole thing was -- was -- they were in collusion with one another. And all of this was bogus.

And they knew it from the beginning.

JOHN: Yeah. That's exactly right. That's why, when you look at this. And then take the third bag of this. Those notes were never produced in earlier subpoenas to Congress or other investigations. They were found in a room, where it appears, according to the government, there is an effort to get rid of or hide this evidence.

So it hadn't been hidden from prior subpoenas, according to the government, according to Lindsey Halligan, the prosecutor. And then, two, it looked like they were in burn bags. Meaning, they would never be there.

Now, some other people said, oh, well, there's electronic records of it.

It turns out according to the government, there was no electronic record of the note. Meaning, if they had been burned or destroyed, it would have never happened.

Now, why would James Comey want to lie about this? Because as we see in these same emails, it appears he had a motive.

His motive, as he wrote, his colleague is, I fully expect to be working for president-elect Hillary Clinton. She's talking this way, before the election in 2016.

He thought Hillary was going to be his boss. And as he wrote Dan Richmond, he said, I think Hillary Clinton will be, quote, unquote, pleased by the way I handled her email chase. In other words, he reopened it and cleared her a second time.

And when the smoke cleared, Hillary would like to keep him out as FBI director. That's the insinuation of those notes. So --

GLENN: Yeah. I want to get the exact. I want to give the exact phrase he wrote. A president-elect Clinton will be very greatly.

JOHN: Yeah. Grateful, I'm sorry.

GLENN: Wow.

JOHN: Yeah. Grateful. So he expected it -- that's his mindset in the fall of 2016.

And he opens up an investigation on Hillary Clinton, what we now know to be a ruse. Bad evidence. An agency had to lie to the FISA courts to get the FISA warrants. If his motive was that, or his thinking was that. He probably does not want to admit that I was warned, that maybe this was all a joke before I allowed this investigation to go forward. Before I affixed my name to a FISA warrant that the courts have now said was misleading, false, and violated the law. So that is the context at which the prosecutors are going to try to bring this -- bring this case. Now, it's going to be in northern Virginia, where there are a lot of federal workers and a lot of anti-Trump sentiment.

Can they get a conviction? We don't know. But is it worth trying to do it? Most people I talk to said yes, because the alternative is you have by inaction a sanction, which is what Bill Maher and John Durham did by not bringing this in 2020.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah. All right. Can I switch topics. There's something that came out today. James Comey's daughter, and the Epstein case. Apparently, James Comey's daughter sent a message to Epstein, that if you don't have to prove it. But if you can show us anything that ties Donald Trump to this, it's going to go a lot easier for you.

Can you give me this story?

JOHN: Yeah. I've seen it. I've not been able to corroborate it. In this world of media today. I've been super careful. It's hard to know if things are true. I haven't found anyone yet who seems to know the proof on it.

It's possible. Who knows? I mean, prosecutors make these sort of deals all the time. And as we know, it seems in the last decade or two, I think when you have to go back to the era of the Ted Stevens prosecution. The IRS pursuit of conservative groups. And maybe the prosecution which turned out to be malicious and wrong of Virginia governor McDonald.

There is a culture that began at the beginning or around the time of the Obama era. Where winning for prosecutors is more important than winning fairly or on the face of the evidence.

And that's why these cases ultimately got overturned. That mentality exists in the Justice Department.

And then when you add the nature of politics, the Trump Derangement Syndrome that seems to come in, in 2015. You have a very dangerous prosecutorial and law enforcement system that's easily weaponized and can easily cheat.

And unless you got multi-million lawyers, you probably will get hosed, because very few people will find the grounds to overturn this.

And that it is crushing power of the state, that Jim Jordan talks about. Chuck Grassley talks about. That Donald Trump wants to reform.

And I don't know, in this case, whether Mr. Comey did this or not.

Because I can't confirm it yet. But if I knew, I'll come back to you.

GLENN: Right.

JOHN: The scenario does go on. And we've seen it. And it's very, very troubling.

There's a case coming up in New York, where the FCC has to admit that there were journalists writing fake stories that were then used to justify investigations of companies.

A system of cheating to get a consequence regardless of whether it's warranted, is something we all have to take a deep breath. We have to fix it. Or we won't be any the different than rectangles and Iran.

GLENN: I will tell you, that I am so glad to say, that you said, I can't confirm this.

I haven't found a source to confirm it.

Because when I read that story, it looks as though one of the people that is telling this story is the guy who was in jail, with Epstein, who would also have motive for making something like this up. So, you know, I don't want to exonerate her.

And I don't want to condemn her. I just want the truth.

And he doesn't seem like a reliable source.

JOHN: Yeah. I think we have to get the evidence, and try to -- listen if the lead is something -- let's check it out and true -- find out if it's true.

We learned that Russia collusion wasn't true. I think we'll learn that most of Ukraine impeachment wasn't true.

And I think today, we just have to dig in first. Get the facts.

But we will -- we will do that. I promise, I'll get back to you, as soon as I know what I can find out for the government.

GLENN: Yeah. Thank you, John. I appreciate all your hard work.

John Solomon from Just the News. Go to JusttheNews.com. Follow him. John Solomon. JSolomonReports on X. But he is an old school journalist. Investigative reporter. Has worked for everybody, until everybody was like, you can't say those things. That's our side!

And then he just left and did his own thing. And I'm very grateful for it.

Editor-in-chief of Just the News. John Solomon