RADIOSeptember 01, 2022

THIS bank's policy hints we learned NOTHING from 2008 crash

A new Bank of America policy designed to help certain Americans own homes hints that U.S. financial leaders have learned NOTHING from the 2008 crash. Carol Roth, ‘recovering investment banker’ and author of 'The War On Small Business,' joins Glenn to detail how policies like this one not only put our economy at risk of another financial crash but could wipe out the middle class as well. Plus, Roth and Glenn discuss signs that China — thanks to its bursting property bubble — is heading towards financial DEPRESSION...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

We have Carol Roth joining us now, the author of the war on small business. Former -- as she likes to say, recovering investment banker. And I want to get her on today, and ask her, what this means. This is according to the Wall Street Journal. The real estate giant in China has said, China's property market has slid into severe depression.

Hi, Carol, that sounds scary.

KENNEDY: Hi, Glenn. Happy September. What a great way to kick off the last four months of the year, with a big tee pregnancy in China.

GLENN: Right. Right. (?) what does it mean?

KENNEDY: So China is basically a giant mess. Obviously, outside of their demographic issues. Outside of the fact that they're not really an emerging market. And that's putting pressure on their manufacturing. They have sort of the confluence of things going on. The covid disruptions. They have heat and water power issues, that are basically rationing energy. They have youth unemployment, at 20 percent. And then they have this property bubble that has bursted. So basically China did something similar to what we did. It was a communist version of what we did here leading up to the great recession, financial crisis, where they just plowed a bunch of cheap money into creating lots of and lots of real estate.

GLENN: Like ghost cities. Not lots of real estate. Whole cities that had no one in them.

KENNEDY: Yeah. That literally in the middle of nowhere, that no one wanted to live in. And then the prices just started to get out of control. One of the things that are a little bit different -- well, there are a lot of things different about China. One of those things is that housing is about 70 percent of household wealth. People that have money, that the middle class, they don't trust the stock market. Which they should not. And over 90 percent of households in China actually own their residence. So that compares to about 65 percent of the United States. So a huge, huge alternate of the wealth of the middle class is tied up. Within real estate. And the property has gotten crazy. Like in the major cities, it's about 50 times the average income, in a -- in a crazy place in New York, it's about ten times the average income. So you can see that that has really gotten completely out of control. And we all knew that it was unsustainable. It was just sort of a question of when. Chinese policy and then all these other events kind of came together at the same time, and now like we suffered through 20 years ago, they are going to have to endure the same thing, but, you know, with a different tenure because it's a communist country. China owns the bank, they have -- the whole middle class is sort of involved, and their wealth is tied up in this. So this is a major issue for the Chinese economy.

GLENN: I will tell you, that this should strike everyone as more than a little odd. You know, it's not odd for us to see protests in front of banks.

KENNEDY: Yeah.

GLENN: In China, that is akin to protesting the Communist Party. They've rolled in with tanks and soldiers. And people are still protesting. That shows how unhappy people are, with what is going on.

Because in China, as I understand it, please correct me if I'm wrong. Here, we go out, find a house, then we go to a bank. In China, you go to a bank, you get a loan, you start paying on that loan. And then you go to a builder, and it might take five years. But you're paying on that. And what happened is, these builders (?) paying on this loan, and they, had a? Lose their money.

KENNEDY: Yeah. There's actually reports of people living in unfinished homes, so as you mentioned the middle class in China, they've started to band together, and they're basically saying, we're not paying our mortgages anymore. And you have to remember, that China has implemented their social credit system. And one of the dings for social credits is not paying your debts. Which your mortgage would obviously fall into. So the fact that they're willing to stand up against the Communist Party. Against the social credit pushback, just goes to show, as you said, just what a complete disaster this is for the Chinese people. And the governments.

GLENN: So President Xi, he is elected one more time. I think it's in November, isn't it?

KENNEDY: Mid-October. October 16th.

GLENN: So he's running for reelection, and he did change the Constitution that he could be dictator for life, but only after this election. When Pelosi went out, the word is from people that I know in China, that are high up in -- in the banking world, that do business in banking over there, that they've been watching their press very closely. Because there's a -- there's half of China, and the leadership. They don't want Xi.

And so some of the reports, that came out, when he -- when -- when Pelosi was going over, where they said, he's going to shoot that plane out of the sky. They made all of these -- you know, of these demands or expectations of Xi, knowing he couldn't do it, because humiliation is one of the worst things -- weakness is horrible in China. So they set him up to be weak. How does this play in his election?

KENNEDY: Well, you know, we would assume, that there would be fair elections. Obviously, that's in question, even in the United States. It certainly is not the case in communist China. And so I think that, you know, being entrenched in the party, even though there is pushback. I think it would be a giant surprise, if he wasn't elected again. And I do think that censorship has played a big issue, in this. You know, part of the reason, I've been told that they had these covid lockdowns, is because they're trying to control information -- not let people talk to each other. Not let people in the country, to let the real tenure of what is going on out into the broader population. So there are a lot of people in China, who even though they may be upset about this one particular thing, don't really have a scope on the real story, and who knows what they're being told.

GLENN: That's unbelievable. This story leads me to something. Bank of America has just started a policy that sounds very familiar, except race is involved now. Zero down payment, for mortgages for first time buyers. And I believe this is minorities. To help minorities -- black and Hispanics grow ownership of homes.

Zero down payment. Zero closing costs. So just come on in. It's like renting a house. Isn't this what caused 2008?

KENNEDY: You know, I know that history always repeats itself. And human beings have a hard time learning from the past. But really, this wasn't that long ago. You would think there would be some grace period. Where we would go, okay. This probably isn't a good thing to do.

And it's really frustrating. Because it's one of those things that sounds very nice on the surface. Oh, we'll help these underserved communities build wealth. That's a good thing. We want everybody in this country, to participate in wealth creation opportunities. The last way that you do that, is at a point where we're having a top in the housing market. The bed is raising rates. We're heading into a recession. Prices will come down. And then you take somebody, who can't afford a down payment. And you get them paying on a house, that you know they won't be able to afford over the long-term. That's basically stealing equity from them in the long-term, making them very afraid to continue to do that, in the future.

GLENN: This is -- this is what they called predatory lending.

And it's being pushed, I'm sure, by the government. It's being pushed by these big banks. They're all in collusion with the great reset. It's going to impoverish people, even more.

KENNEDY: Yeah. If you want to tie this to the ESG, right? This is part of the -- the social initiative, we have to make housing more affordable. But that doesn't do that. I mean, this creates more fees for banks, at a time when they may be losing fees in origination. Because the fed is raising interest rates. And that's flowing through the market. You know, it's not like they're creating a fund, and saying, we're going to buy up properties. And we're going to allow to you rent to loan. There are ways you can do this for underserved communities, that will be fantastic. But zero down mortgage -- and, by the way, it's not like a veteran zero down mortgage, where there's a strict underwriting process. This is a non-underwritten process. (?) we've seen how this has gone awry in college lending. Now they're bringing it back to the mortgage industry. Once again, because there wasn't enough damage the first time around.

GLENN: O they want to make sure that there's nothing (?) left for people to learn.

KENNEDY: Or. Or maybe they want the correspond to be able to have this, at the expense of the (?) middle class. And they'll just forgive those loans. Like, you know, they're on the kick of forgiving every other loan. There's a buffet of possible, fantastic --

GLENN: And none of them are good. None of them are honest. None of them are free market-based. None of them are ethical. None of them.

KENNEDY: No. It's picking winners and losers. It's letting the government and these big entities play venture capitalists in a way that she shouldn't.

And it's not teaching sort of the discipline, so that we allow for these broad creation opportunities. Which is the future of prosperity. Because we know at the end of the day, big business. Big government. Big special interest, doesn't want that. They want to gut the middle and working class. They want to consolidate power. So every one of these (?) ultimately ties back to that in some way.

GLENN: Energy prices. Goldman Sachs is now saying, just the energy prices will push the UK inflation to 22 percent.

That is a near post-war record of 22 percent inflation.

That's -- I mean, we -- let me get another story here. Because I read here, cost of living. Shoppers despair, at cost of staple foods, soar up to 20 percent in a year.

That's remarkable! I mean, we're all going to see this.

And it's -- a lot of this is coming from this craziness of ESG with the energy.

KENNEDY: Absolutely. This is entirely self-inflicted. That's the most frustrating part of this. It could have been avoided. But it was the liberty by policy. And who is going to pair the brunt of it. It is the small businesses. It is the million dollars and working class. It is the core to people, who really can't have this happen. I've seen this all over Twitter. I've been sharing all the stories coming out of Europe and the UK in particular. With small businesses who are getting their energy bills. And something like 10,000 euros, or, you know, like multiple tens of thousands of euros. And it's just completely non-sustainable. I mean, obviously nobody is going to be able to operate under those types of conditions. It's going to be a really ugly winter.

And as we're talking about, not learning. This should be a giant neon sign to say, okay. They made a mistake. Let's (?) they just passed the biggest climates bill. And are telling about what a great deal it is. As if there's not more pain and suffering on the other side.

GLENN: I know. I will tell you, Marx said for a Communist Revolution to happen, you need to have the working class rise up, and then they could close it down.

And that -- if you can't get them naturally, you have to create the conditions for that. And everything, including the IRS, all of these things are designed to abrupt the middle and lower class. (?) to wipe them out entirely. And when that happens, you will have revolution on the street. It is -- yeah. Go ahead.

KENNEDY: You will own nothing. And you will not be happy. Because as we've seen throughout history, those who do not own anything, are not the ones who are happy.

GLENN: Yes. Thank you very much, Carol. Appreciate it.

KENNEDY: Another uplifting segment, Glenn.

GLENN: One of these days it will turn around. One of these days. Yeah. Thank you so much. I appreciate it.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.