RADIO

THIS is why we should LEAVE the United Nations

The United Nations has been covering up scandals connected to its Peacekeepers for decades and NOBODY has done anything about it. On top of this, the U.N. has clearly become a tool for global elites to force their agendas on the rest of the world. So, maybe it's time that the United States cuts ties with the globalist group. That's what Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and Representatives Chip Roy (R-TX) and Mike Rogers (R-AL) are now proposing. Glenn reviews their plan to not just defund the U.N., but cut ties with it and its affiliated entities, like the W.H.O.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I don't know if you saw this story about the UN.

Borjo was earning $7,000 a month, as the head of logistics in the peacekeeping commission in Goma. I don't even know where Goma is, do you?

PAT: No.

GLENN: He was getting locals to procure children for him. He had two assets that ensured children trusted him: He was white, and he worked for the United Nations.

PAT: Oh, you can always trust white people. Right?

GLENN: Sure. Always.

PAT: Isn't that a pretty hard-core rule of thumb.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah. He said the sex was consensual. But was unsure if the children were afraid of saying no. I'm not sure. I don't think so. But I'm not sure. Could be.

PAT: Oh, my gosh.

GLENN: After the Congolese police arrested him, and the French authorities jailed him for nine years in 2008, the UN made a public promise to help his victims. That promise was never kept. The UN said, it could never find the victims.

PAT: I'll bet they tried really hard. Really, really hard. They're probably still looking right now.

GLENN: Well.

PAT: No? Oh.

GLENN: No.

Fortunately, Channel 4, I don't know where Channel 4 is. Maybe this is Channel 4 from the BBC. Fourteen years on, we investigated sex abuse for Channel 4.

It took only one afternoon for my producer to find four women, who he had raped when they were children.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: The hunting ground was the slums. And the airport where barefoot children in ragged clothes scamper through the alleyways.

Adults remember the rapes well. One girl was 14, when she used to sell bananas by the side of the road to pay for her education. Luring her with promises of help, for six months, he took her to a hotel where he abused her.

He was so old, as old as my father.

He was a civilian, part of the culture of UN personnel having sex with prostitutes, including children. More than a decade on.

That culture still persists. This story goes on to say how horrible these peacekeepers are from the United Nations.

We have known this story forever, Pat.

We've heard about the blue helmets going in. And raping women and children, for decades. Decades

PAT: True. Yeah.

GLENN: And nobody has done anything about it.

PAT: Yeah. And they're not just inept, or ineffective.

They're evil.

GLENN: They're evil. They're evil.

Mike Lee, Chip Roy, and representative Mike Rogers of Alabama, now are pushing paper that would cut all of our ties to the UN. And all of its affiliated entities, including the World Health Organization.

The UN doesn't deserve a single dime of American taxpayer money or one bit of our support.

PAT: That's for sure.

GLENN: We should defund it, and leave it immediately.

And I'm proud to leave this critical effort alongside with Mike Lee and Mike Rogers.

This is Chip Roy. No more blank checks from the United Nations.

America's hard-earned dollars have been funneled in the initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry.

With the Defund Act, we're stepping away from this debacle.

If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate. And the ironclad escape clause. This is fantastic.

PAT: And not only should we leave it. We should force them to leave us. Get off our continent.

GLENN: This is not our continent.

What about Canada and Mexico

PAT: Okay. Well, get off our mainland. Get out of our country

GLENN: Get off our island. Yeah!

That will show you.

PAT: Seriously, doesn't that belong in Europe? Shouldn't they be in Belgium, just like the European Union is, and every other one world organization, known to man, including NATO.

Get them over there. They would love them over there.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: Well, they do love them.

GLENN: I don't know if the people love them anymore.

PAT: Not the people, but certainly the European bureaucrats love them.

GLENN: The bureaucrats over here love them

PAT: Thank you.

GLENN: I've never seen a time where our bureaucrats are more out of step, all over the world.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: I said this, I don't know.

Four or five years ago.

This is not a war against Republican and Democrat.

This is truly between the elites, and the people.

And that's what's happening all over the world.

That's what's happening in China.

That's what's happening in France.

And the Scandinavian. Countries. And Germany.

PAT: I wonder if that's why, people who are similar to Donald Trump, at least in rhetoric, or in delivery.

GLENN: It is.

PAT: Are winning, all over the world.

GLENN: Yes. It is.

PAT: Yeah. Argentina. The Netherlands. I mean, did you ever think Geert Wilders would be elected?

GLENN: No.

No.

PAT: The head of the Netherlands. No way. No way.

GLENN: Is he? Is he?

Did he make it to Prime Minister?

PAT: They thought he was going to.

GLENN: But he didn't. He just missed it. Just shy of it.

PAT: That was really amazing.

GLENN: Yeah. We were advised by everybody. Not to have him on.

He came to America. He came into the studios

We had him on. And everybody was like, you can't have him on.

He's a racist, radical, big on the.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: No. Not so far.

I mean, you know, doesn't have enough power, to really show it.

But doesn't seem to be in any way, shape, or form

PAT: No. Yeah.

GLENN: And the same thing with the guy in Argentina.

That guy looks great.

PAT: He does. He does. He's just outspoken.

And people for some reason recoil at that.

They don't -- they don't like outspoken leaders, I guess.

People who just -- who are sick and tired of pussy-footing around.

And just tell it like it is.

And that's what he does.

GLENN: But that's not -- the people are not tired of that at all.

They're not that at all.

PAT: No. They're not. The left is tired. The left certainly doesn't want that.

GLENN: Correct. They don't want anyone speaking out.

Because they are the fascists.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: And this was brought up yesterday by a few people.

We talked about it yesterday. When Joe Biden says he's going to just take the -- the formulas, and just take the --

PAT: Can you believe that?

From the drug companies. And we're supposed to be okay with that. Because the pharmaceuticals are all evil giants, who make too much money. And charge us too much.

But I'm sorry. This is about freedom. This can't be about the government just seizing control of everything they want.

GLENN: Beyond that, they don't think they're bad.

PAT: That's very true.

They're in bed with Pfizer, and Moderna.

GLENN: Yes. Yes. I was never against big pharmaceutical. I thought big pharmaceutical, you know, it's a giant corporation.
Yes, it's probably not doing things.

But this is redistribution of wealth. This is, you know, to give to the -- give to the have-nots, and screw the haves. We've always paid more here in America for our drugs. So people who don't have as much, will pay less all around the country.

I've always thought, well, I don't like it. But okay.

Well, now you see the government and pharmaceutical companies have been in bed for a long time.

And all of a sudden, the left, who has been saying that forever.

PAT: They love those.

GLENN: Yeah, they love them.

PAT: They're best friends with the pharmaceuticals.

GLENN: Right. And now he's saying, screw the pharmaceutical companies. I'll just take their patents. You can't do that!

PAT: No.

They're doing so many things they can't do though. It's amazing. I don't think "can't" means what we thought it meant.

GLENN: I know. I know.

PAT: The other story that was really big yesterday, was -- was the FBI may be being thwarted in their civil asset forfeiture.

Civil asset forfeiture problem. Which happened in Los Angeles.

Remember that one, from two years ago?

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

PAT: They stole anywhere from 85 to $100 million worth of cash and goods from people.

GLENN: They went into this. I think it was Beverly Hills, wasn't it?

PAT: Yeah. It was.

GLENN: Kind of like mailboxes, et cetera.

Kind of vault. It's not a bank. It's just this giant vault. And people would rent safety-deposit boxes.

Well, there was one guy, who -- did they prove that he was doing things or not?

PAT: No. And it wasn't. I don't think it was an individual at all. It was the company supposedly that operated or owned the safety-deposit boxes.

And so they had the warrant to go look at the company's safety deposit boxes.

GLENN: Because they thought there might be illegal ill-gotten goods in their safety-deposit box

PAT: And they didn't find anything illegal there

But they were also ordered not to touch anybody else's safety deposit box. Any of the individuals there, not fair game.

They're off-limits, leave it alone. So what they did instead was get into all 1400 safety-deposit boxes. And took it.

GLENN: They took everything.

PAT: They took gold coins. They took jewelry. They took cash. To the tune of 85 to 100 million-dollars worth. And they didn't charge anybody with anything.

GLENN: And they said to the people, well, go ahead and fight us on this. You are part of it?

Are you part of the problem?

I mean, they threatened them with prosecution, if they said, hey. I want my stuff back.

So a lot of people were just like, I'm not going to fight with the United States government.

PAT: And in a lot of cases, they were wealthy people, and it didn't hurt them that bad. But that's beside the point. It's the principle of this thing.

You can't just steal from people. But they do.

GLENN: They do all the time. And it's not just the FBI. It's all the way down to our local police.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: I mean, it's -- we have become Mexico.

Unless this stuff is stopped, when you put AI together, with the federal government and all of its private/public partnerships. There ain't nothing left.

There's nothing left. What do you think of the story today, that the Democrats are coming out, and they're saying, companies like BlackRock can't own private houses. They can't invest in private homes. And just buy them all up.

Wait a minute.

What?

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Why? What is that all about?

Why would the Democrats be leading that charge?

PAT: And I didn't know that was happening in the first place. Did you?

Were you aware of that. The investment from BlackRock. In individual homes.

GLENN: Vanguard and everything else. That's what is driving our property prices so high. They go in and buy entire neighborhoods.

Sometimes two and three times above the asking price.

So they just come in, and they buy everything, and then they hold it.

It is part of the you'll own nothing. You'll rent from us.

And so they're going in, and --

PAT: And how hard would that be, to turn that down?

Even if you're a big critic of BlackRock or Vanguard. They come in and say, I'll give you three times the market value. Uh, okay.

GLENN: Most people would not say no.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: I mean, I know a guy who is selling his house. Somebody from California came in. Some rich person from California came in.

And said, what are you asking for your house?

And he said, it's not for sale. And he said, well, we've looked at the houses. And, you know, your house is probably worth X amount. He put a million dollars on that amount, plus. And the guy --

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: And the guy went, wait. What?

And he said, and I'll give you another million if you're out by the end of the month. He was out. He was just out. He was like, buh-bye. You got it.

I'll load my car up starting right now.

PAT: Wow. If that's the case, I'm calling BlackRock to say, have you considered living in this neighborhood?

GLENN: I know. I know. I mean, it's crazy.

PAT: That is crazy.

GLENN: But I'm -- first of all, I don't like the government saying what investors can and can't invest in.

PAT: Right. A dangerous precedent.

TV

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

RADIO

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

RADIO

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

TV

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.