RADIO

Pro-lifers face 10 YEARS IN PRISON for PRAYING?!

"Our churches and our pulpits must wake up," Glenn says. 6 pro-life protesters now face up to 10.5 years in prison for violating the controversial FACE Act by just praying and singing near an abortion facility. Glenn believes it's people like these who are the true heroes among us. "We love Jesus, we take the hits, and then we win," one of the protesters said. But what does this say about our country? Glenn reviews this story and others that show how corrupted our system has become.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: America.

Our churches and our pulpits must wake up.

Six pro-lifers who were convicted of charges, related to the Face Act, earlier on Tuesday, gathered alongside their friends and family. Outside of the federal courthouse, in Nashville, Tennessee. To sing and pray just minutes after being found guilty.

The six -- I should give their name. Chet Gallagher of Tennessee.

Coleman Boyd of Mississippi. Heather Idoni of Michigan. Carl Zastro of Michigan. Paul Vaughn of Tennessee. And Dennis Green of Virginia.

They all face up to 10.5 years in prison, and fines worth 260,000 dollars, after being convicted of conspiracy, against the rights and violation of the face act. A federal law criminalizing the use of force or threats of force, that prevent someone from ascending into an abortion facility.

Let me just tell you something, I saw the video. There were no threats. And there was no force. They were standing on the side of the hallway. Praying!

Despite the steep punishment they face after the convictions.

The six remained in good spirits.

These are the kind of people, that will bring blessings from heaven.

These are the kinds of people, that you -- when all is said and done, the next generation goes, that person was a hero.

Despite the steep punishment they face after the conviction, the six remained in good spirits.

And proceeded to sing and pray outside of the Fred Thompson courthouse, immediately after the verdict was announced.

The jury composed of eight women and four men, took just under four hours to find all six defendants of all charges brought against them by the Biden administration.

They said, quote, this is just normal Christianity. We love Jesus. We take the hits. And then we win.


STU: Hmm.

GLENN: As he spoke to the crowd, many family members were fighting back tears. That it gathered outside the courthouse.

He urged those present to write letters to the convicted, including Idoni, who is being held in a Washington, DC, prison over a similar case.

The group sang hymns like Holy, Holy, Holy, All Is Well With My Soul, and Amazing Grace, and also read passages like Psalm 91.

This is in Nashville, Tennessee. While this is going on, somebody who I don't condone this at all. But somebody who chopped the head off of the devil statue, a Satan statue, is also being tried and convicted and going to prison.

Hmm. They say it was a hate speech. Or a hate -- a hate act. A hate crime.

Well, seeing that Satan is the father of all hatred, he was just following through. And just following Satan, by sharing his hatred, I guess.

We have got to wake up.

Our system has been so corrupted, because we have allowed it to be this way.

New York City countless men, Yousef Salaam, a member of the Central Park five was pulled over in Harlem by police on Friday. Just days ahead of council vote on legislation, that would bury police and paperwork, over low-level stops.

Salaam complained about the traffic stop, suggesting he had been pulled over without a reason, and that racial bias was a factor. However, the cop was wearing a body cam.

He -- apparently, he was stopped.

And you see on the body cam. He said, I don't even know why he was pulled over.

He said, instead of answering my question, the officer stated, we're done here.

And he proceeded to walk away. The fact the officer did not provide a rationale for the stop. The only legal stop at a level three reasonable suspicion, or higher for a vehicle stop. Calls into question how the NYPD justifies its stops of New Yorkers. And highlights the need for greater transparency, to ensure they're all constitutional.

Yeah. Unfortunately, for him. Why did the cops stop him.

Because he had an out of date license plate from a different state, that was three years out of step.

He had moved to New York, three years before, never changed it.

I don't know. You get stopped for that?

I would. Then when he was stopped.

Now, remember, this -- this guy said, you know, we know the danger that is out there, every time -- a single time a black man, in particular, gets behind the wheel of a car.

The other reason why the cop stopped him. Is because his windows were tinted so heavily. That it couldn't see the -- you want to stop for race.

He couldn't see through the window, to what the driver was.

When he approached the car. He said, could you roll down the back window please. Because a cop had been shot by somebody with tinted windows like that, in the backseat.

Then he looks in. No threats lurking behind.

He identifies himself. And Salaam interrupts him, saying, I'm council member, Salaam.

This district. District nine.

What did the cops say back to him?

See, this is where the racial bias really comes in.

He said, oh, okay. Have a good one. You're working, right?

Yeah. Take care, sir.

That's what happened.

If this guy stays on the council in New York City, write it off.

If you can get away with besmirching, and probably would have gotten this guy fired. Had it not been for his body cam.

And he was this polite, what will these people do to you?

Nothing matters, to them.

Nothing matters.

Look at all the crime, that is happening.

And what are they doing?

They're going after religious people that are singing hymns.

This is such an important election.

You've got to sign up to make sure that you are on the board, so you can see and you can be somebody who is watching the polls.

Watch the counting.

I want Republicans there.

I want Democrats there.

I want independents there.

I don't want just one side.

I want honest brokers.

I don't know. Because I think that's what most people in America want.

It's got to be 90 percent of the people say. I just -- I don't care if my side loses, if it is fair!

But I don't want any corruption.

Well, unfortunately, all the people of power want that corruption.

Because they can use it to divide us and to control us.

By the way, more news on Michelle Obama. And I'm telling you, I think this is going to happen. Sources now claim, money men, behind Michelle could be the best candidate against Donald Trump. Money men have been contacted.

By apparently, in 2022, a trial balloon by Michelle Obama and her husband, to test if they can get support from Wall Street, et cetera.

She said, if I'm running, and I ask for your support, what would you -- would you -- would you back me?

Apparently. Apparently.

Then, she has just gone on to podcast. She admitted her concerns on Jay Shetty's podcast, on purpose.

Telling him, what's going to happen in this next election?

I'm terrified what could possibly happen. Who we select. Who speaks for us. Who holds that bully pulpit?

It affects us in ways sometimes I think people take for granted. The fact that people think that the government, does it really even do anything?

And I'm like, oh, my God. Our government does everything for us.

And we can't take this democracy for granted. I worry sometimes that we do. These are the things that keep me up at night.

Now, as Megyn Kelly mentioned. She doesn't have a book out. She doesn't have anything that she was promoting. Who called and said, hey. You should do this podcast with Michelle Obama.

What happened there?

And why is she saying this?

I don't know. Could be nothing. But I just want to point out to Stu, who likes to lose money in bets.

STU: My gambling record is incredible.

I mean, I don't even think, it's not even gambling for me.

I just win.

That's all. That's how it works.

GLENN: Really. Wow. Wow. Why are you still working here then?

STU: I need to get enough money, to get into the big bets.

I don't have a -- I'm working on it, though.

GLENN: Okay. So I see the market here.

Joe Biden has an implied probability of 80 percent.

But he is -- you have to -- how does this work?

Is this negative 400.

STU: Negative 400, you bet $400 to win $100.

In other words, you -- the overwhelming favorite, if you're minus 400.

GLENN: Okay. So Hillary Clinton, plus 5,000, Gretchen Whitmer. Plus 10,000.

Robert Kennedy, plus 6600. Tulsi Gabbard, plus 6600.

Elizabeth Warren, plus 5,000.

Kamala Harris, 1900.

Dean Phillips. Up --

STU: Plus 1900?

That means basically 19 to one.

GLENN: Yeah. Gavin Newsom, 800. To one.

And Michelle --

STU: Like eight to one.

GLENN: I -- I don't --

STU: So you bet $10, you get $80.

GLENN: Okay. Michelle Obama, plus 400.

STU: Bet $10, get $40 if you win.

GLENN: Okay. And Joe Biden, negative 400.

STU: Bet $40, get $10.

GLENN: So Michelle Obama was nowhere on this list, until recently. She's now popped up.

STU: I mean, look, people like you, are going to spend their money on people like Michelle Obama to win the nomination.

GLENN: You want to make a bet?

STU: Sure.

GLENN: What would you like to bet?

STU: What would you like to bet?

GLENN: Well, the last time we made a bet was years and years ago, where you had to go on the steps of the Philadelphia Art Museum.

STU: Wow. You remember that?

GLENN: Oh, I do. I do.

STU: Mid-2000s. Eagles' Super Bowl. I really wanted the day off to go to the game.

GLENN: Right. Right.

STU: You made me wager with you, that if the Eagles lost, I had to stand on the steps of the Rocky Museum, and say, Rocky was a loser too.

GLENN: Yeah

STU: That was...

GLENN: "Like all of Philadelphia, Rocky was a loser too."

And it made you very popular.

STU: I was very popular, and somehow made it out of their alive. But lived to enjoy an actual Super Bowl championship, so I don't know what kind of precedent you're setting here with this wager.

Look, do you actually -- what you've outlined with Michelle Obama is a plausible theory of something that could theoretically happen. Do you actually believe that it would happen.

GLENN: I do.

STU: More than 50 percent?

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: What -- give me a number, 75 percent?

GLENN: Sixty.

STU: 60 percent. We'll do 50/50. We'll have even odds. And I'll say, it will be Joe Biden.

You say, it will be Michelle Obama.

GLENN: So what does that mean. Even odds.

STU: Yeah. Ten dollars. Win $10.

GLENN: Okay. So let's bet a thousand bucks. Put your money where your mouth is.

STU: You're saying, you will give me a thousand dollars, if Joe Biden is the nominee for the Democrats?

GLENN: No. Wait. Wait. Wait. If he is the guy running when the election happens.

STU: When the election happens?

GLENN: Yeah. If he's the guy running when the election happens.

STU: Like, he's the guy on the ballot, he's the guy we're voting for or against on that day.

GLENN: And it's not some technicality. Like he's still on the ballot.

STU: Right. I'm willing to be totally -- yes. I'm in, 100 percent.

GLENN: All right. A thousand bucks. You've got it. It's a public bet. You can't back out of it. I, of course, can always say, that's not what America heard.

STU: That is what you'll say.

GLENN: I will not. I will not welch on that bet. I think there is a very strong chance that she is -- she is the one.

STU: I think it's plausible. I just think my value here is really good.

GLENN: Now, here's the thing.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: I think she's the one that could change everything. So am I doing -- is this a well-spent thousand dollars? Because if I'm saying, yeah. It's going to happen. It's not going to happen. We've learned that --

STU: You're hedging your life. I love that.

GLENN: It's worth a thousand dollars to me, that she doesn't run.

STU: Right. Tempt the fates.

GLENN: Tempt the fates.

RADIO

WARNING: This British FAILURE could spread across the Western world

The United Kingdom is now arresting over 12,000 people a year for "speech crimes" and is debating doing away with trial by jury for many crimes. Glenn Beck warns that if this can be done in the birthplace of these principles (under the Magna Carta), it can happen to the entire West if we don't END this insanity now!

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me just start here. Because there is -- there is another story that is out in our newsletter today, that talks about how people of college age are freaking out, after Charlie Kirk's death. They don't want anything controversial on campus.

I mean, that's the reason why colleges and universities had protection of free speech, in the first place.

Was to be controversial. To be able to say the things that nobody wants you to say.

And it's really important.

But let me -- let me first remind people of what the Magna Carta is.

It's 1215? The Magna Carta is Latin for the great chart.

Had it not some magnanimous gift from the king.

The king. King John from England. He was -- he was losing a battle. France was just cleaning England's clock.

The baryons and all the lords and the ladies. Said, you know, this king sucks a lot. This king sucks a lot.

And we've got to stop him. Because he's destroying everything.

And he -- he had lost most of the land, to France. And then he started just imposing huge taxes on everybody. And -- and because nobody in the lower class had any -- this all happened with the lords and the ladies. And they were like, enough. Enough. Enough.

You're abusing your royal power.

Well, nobody had ever said that before. That just didn't happen. He had a divine right. He's the king. But in England, they said, no.

You still have to be moral. You have certain laws, and you can't just do these things.

And so what they did, is they got him to agree to the great charter, the Magna Carta. And it placed the king under the law. Before that, the king was the law. So now the king is under the law: It created the principle of due process. Never before did we have that.

You can't be imprisoned, punishment or stripped of property, except by the lawful judgment of your peers or the law of the land. So this creates jury trials. It creates habeas corpus. Protection from arbitrary arrests. All of these things. The government now has to justify itself in a court of law.

That's revolutionary, okay? It also limited taxation without consent. Which we interpreted later as no taxation without representation. Rule of law. Jury trials. Rights of the accused.

Limits on government. Protection of property. Accountability of leaders. All of that comes from the Magna Carta. Okay?

That gave birth, 500 years later, to us and our ideas. Okay?

Now, England, the birthplace of the Magna Carta is now thinking about getting rid of jury trials and arresting more than 12,000 people every year for what they call speech crimes. 12,000!
Now, I want you to think about that.

In Russia, in the same year this stat came out. The latest year that we have, 2023. In 2023, Russia arrested 4,000 people for speech crimes against the Russian military for Ukraine.

4,000 in Russia, 12,000 in England.

The number I saw. We don't have all the numbers. But the number I saw that were arrested for speech crimes in China was 120.

Okay?

Not for violence. Not for theft.

Not for treason.

12,000 in England for words.

Okay. Now, well, that's going on, now the Prime Minister is floating the idea of eliminating, if not most, many jury trials.

It will only be for murder, manslaughter, oh, and something else like that.

Okay?

So, in other words, if you're like, I believe you should be able to read the Bible in your own language, in your own home, Tisdale.

You don't get any hope. You don't get a jury trial. You get the court. You get the king trying you, not a jury of your peers.

This goes against the Magna Carta, the lawful judgment of your peers. Okay?

That's the safeguard that stands between you and an out-of-control state. This is the first and ancient firewall against tyranny. It is what makes England, England.

And if England of all places, tosses that aside, what does the word "free" mean anymore?

Okay? What does it mean? You can't speak, and then you have no jury -- trial of your peers. Wait. What? First of all, understand this: A nation that polices speech is not free!

A nation that dissolves juries is not just unfree, it's prepping for something worse!

Because the entire architecture of the western world, the liberty that we have, rests on a single radical belief.

The truth does not need a king. The truth shall set you free. Who? Is it not what. Who is the truth? Okay.

No king, but Christ. Because Christ is the truth. That's the Western world!

A person's conscience does not need a permit. Speech does not need a bureaucrat's approval before it leaves your lips! That's the West.

That's what built the world. What took it from darkness, to today.

Freedom is not granted we the state. Freedom preexists government.

Government's only legitimate job is to protect it!

Now, here's the dark little secret, that every single tyrant, and every politician knows today. If you control speech, you control thought. If you control thought, you control people.

If you control people, you don't ever have to worry about controlling the government because no one will ever challenge you again!

This is why it is so essential for any side to go, you can't talk to them.

Don't talk to them. Don't listen. Don't question.

You can't hear that. No. They can say whatever they want. But I have a right to refute it. That's why free speech has to be absolute. Not mostly free.

Not free unless it makes Billy over there cry and uncomfortable.

No. I'm sorry, Billy. You don't like it. Refute it.

Freedom that depends on somebody else's freedoms is not freedom!

Freedom that requires government approval is not freedom! Freedom that can be revoked because a bureaucrat doesn't like your tone is not freedom. Once speech becomes conditional, everything become conditional. Your rights, your property, your conscience, your place in society. Because you only live by permission! Never by principle!

We live by principles. Not people!

Who is actually free?

Who is actually free?

The England that once declared the king himself to be subject of law, or the England that now arrests a man because he's posted the wrong meme?

12,000 people!

Can't find one in 2023 that was arrested for that in America. Not one. The England that gave us John Locke, the philosopher of natural rights. Is that person free?

Or the England that now warns citizens that context doesn't matter, if their words cause someone, anyone, emotional harm.

Britain is about loss. But this is not just a British problem. This is the canary in the coal mine for the entire west.

Because these are the people that came up with it. When the mother country forgets its own legacy, jury trials and freedom of speech. When the random that once stared down monarchs now cowers before hashtags and activists and speech tribunals, than somewhere deep inside the Western soul, a light is flickering.

We must remember here, before that same darkness reaches our shores. Because it's already coming on to our beaches. It's already there. There is no such thing as partial liberty. Freedom of speech is the First Amendment for a reason!

It is the guardrail for every other right!

If you lose the First Amendment, you've lost freedom. And if you lose the Second Amendment, you've lost the ability to defend that first freedom.
It's number one for a reason!

You must be allowed to speak, to gather.

To have a free press!

To question your government. You must have those abilities. You must be able to say, especially about government, the worst things about your government! And question them.

And demand answers. To petition them.

That's all in the First Amendment.

It is the pressure valve that prevents so it's from blowing itself up.

The more we contain speech. The more we say, don't talk about. Don't talk about. Can't say that. Can't say that.

The more the pressure builds up. The more likely we blow ourselves up.

It's the mechanism where the powerless can speak to the powerful.

It's the shield that protects dissenters. Unpopular thinkers, prophets, reformers. And, yes, even the offensive.

Look, there are, quote, unquote, historians now who are getting all kinds of bullcrap about Hitler and everything else.

None of that is true. I don't want to silence them. They have a right to say it.

I have a right to say you're wrong! And show you the evidence of what makes them wrong.

That's the way it works. England is about to forget all of this!

They are truly the birthplace of these kinds of ideas, and those ideas led to our idea of real freedom!

No king!

If they forget this, we cannot -- we believe so -- because there won't be anywhere else in the world to go.

The lesson of history, the lesson that history whispers quietly at first. Then louder. And then finally. And we're about at this point, with a scream!

Is that when a state describes which words are allowed, it will eventually decide which thoughts are allowed. Which beliefs are allowed.

Which citizens are allowed.

In the end, in the end, the prisons don't need bars.

The cell will be in your own mind!

Do you understand that, America?
Do your kids understand that?

We don't even know what it means to be free. I thought this weekend, a lot about as opposed to truth shall set you free.

Thought about a lot. In fact, maybe I'll talk to you about it in a minute or so.

Because I don't think people understand what it means to be free.

We think everybody in the world is free. They're not!

And you're about to really find that out!

You want to be tree, or do you want to be safe? Because you cannot have both.

When safety is defined by those who fear your liberty. It's over!

We used to be people who would explore. We were people that crossed the oceans when everyone said we couldn't. We -- we went to space when everyone said, it's impossible. We crossed mountains that no one had ever crossed. We forged -- we forged a nation of really different people. And lived side by side for so long, yes. With bloodshed from time to time. But generally, in ways that nobody had ever done before. Freedom. Freedom is grand. But it's really dangerous. It's messy. Freedom offends you, a lot. Get over it.

Real freedom, real freedom is the only thing that has ever allowed the human spirit to rise above a king. Above a tyrant. Above the mob. Above the bureaucrats. Real freedom that belongs to you. Given to you by God. And that's what they're about to lose in England. The Magna Carta. The simple idea. No man. Not even a king. No man is above the law. Do we have that here?

Do you think no man is above the law? Or do you think there is a class up in the political range, somewhere, that if you're on the right side, don't worry about jail. That's what the Magna Carta tried to stop. That's what we have forgotten even, and they're about to get rid of it entirely.

The modern west is drifting into far more -- far more sinister creed. No man is above offense.

And that is how civilizations fall.

BLOG

Puttin' the Christ Back in Christmas (Lyric Video)

This song was produced by Glenn Beck using his AI tools.

Lyrics:

Verse 1:

Well, the season's here, and the lights are bright, but they tell me, I can't say Merry Christmas tonight.

They want RamaHanuKwanzMas all in one breath.

Buddy, that phrase is gonna bore me to death.

So, grab some Coco. Let's reclaim this place.

It's the birthday of the baby.

Yeah, remember who that is.

Chorus:

So, I'm putting the Christ back in Christmas.

No microaggression here.

My friend, if words can break you, I'll bless your heart, because that's a battle we can't defend.

Yeah, I'm putting the Christ back in Christmas.

Let common sense unfold. Out with the new, in with the old.

Merry Christmas. Let the truth be told.

Verse 2:

And hey baby, it's cold outside, relax.

It's flirting, not a federal crime.

We used to laugh and dance in snow.

Now they fact-check mistletoe.

They say intent don't matter.

Well, sure it does, ask Santa.

He's judging hearts, not Twitter buzz.

Chorus:

So I'm putting the Christ back in Christmas.

You can keep your outrage warm.

If every jingle is problematic, buddy, that's the real snowstorm.

Yeah, I'm putting the Christ back in Christmas.

Not buying what they sold.

Out with the new, in with the old.

Merry Christmas. Let the truth be told.

Bridge:

They say that greeting is oppressive.

Well, bless my soul.

Who knew if Merry Christmas makes you tremble, the problem ain't the phrase, it's you.

I'll question with boldness. I'll reason with grace, but don't rewrite my holiday to make it a safe space.

So, here's to the manger.

The star in the sky.

The angels who sang up that holy night.

Here's to the story that still brings hope

Even when cultures lost the remote.

Raise your voice, let the bells all ring.

This season was always about one king.

Chorus:

Yeah, I'm putting the Christ back in Christmas.

Let the real good news unfold.

The world may chase the wrapping paper, but the manger holds the gold.

So, I put the Christ back in Christmas from the young to the gray and old.

Out with the new, in with the old.

Merry Christmas. Let the truth be told.

RADIO

Is Europe’s Future ALREADY Decided... Or is a Civil War Coming?

Europe’s future isn’t being shaped by politics or ideology... it’s being shaped by math. Glenn Beck and UK insider Peter McIlvenna break down the explosive demographic shift transforming Britain and Europe, where Muslim population growth has surged 111% in 15 years while native birthrates continue to collapse. The result is a predictable, unstoppable replacement of cultural and political power, created not by conquest but by birthrates and the West’s loss of confidence in its own heritage. And the same demographic pattern is now emerging in the United States.

RADIO

Sharia Courts & Demographic Takeover - America's Growing Problem with Political Islam

Political Islam is expanding into the West through demographic pressure, parallel legal systems, exclusive community structures, and a belief that Western nations are too naïve to stop it — and Glenn Beck breaks down the evidence. From Marco Rubio’s warning that Islamic political movements openly seek dominance over the United States, to a Texas developer boasting about “manipulating kafirs,” to archived footage of imams defending Sharia punishments on American soil, the signs are no longer subtle. Many Muslims reject political Islam and flee from these systems — but by ignoring what is happening in our own backyard, America risks repeating Europe’s collapse. The question isn’t whether Political Islam exists; it’s whether we’re willing to confront what it demands.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me start first. Interview yesterday with Sean Hannity. Here's Rubio, talking about the dangers of radicalized Islam.

VOICE: Ultimately, armed radical Islamic movements in the world, identify the West at large, but the United States in particular, as the greatest evil on earth. And every chance they have -- the notion that somehow radical Islam would be comfortable with simple controls and progress in Iraq and Syria is not born out by history.

Radical Islam has shown that their desire is not simply to occupy one part of the world and be happy with their own little caliphate. They want to expand. It's revolutionary in its nature. It seeks to expand and control more territories and more people. And radical Islam has designs openly on the West, on the United States, on Europe. We've seen that for the rest there as well, and they are prepared to conduct acts of terrorism. In the case of Iran, nation state actions, assassinations, murders, you name it.

Whatever it takes for them to gain their influence, and ultimately, their domination in different cultures and societies.

That's a clear and eminent threat to the world and to the broader west, especially to the United States who they identify as the chief source of evil on the planet. Okay?

The reason why they hate the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the leadership of the UAE and Bahrain, is because they've allowed the United States to partner with them. That's why they hate them. They consider them infidels for it. They hate Israel.

But they also hate America. And they hate anyone in the world, that we have influence, they seek to attack, including here in the homeland.

If you look at the domestic terrorists, the attacks that have happened here domestically, the overwhelming majority of them have been inspired by radical Islamic viewpoints. That includes the shooting in the Pulse Night Club in Orlando, Florida. That includes the Saudi pilot in Pensacola, my home state. Two attacks.

GLENN: Okay.

So I -- I would like to propose we stop calling it radical Islam. Because it's not radical Islam. It's political Islam. There is religious Islam, and I know a lot of religious Muslims that are good people. Okay? I don't put them in the same category because I don't want Sharia law.

That's political Islam. It's not radical. It's what happens all over the world.

It's not radical, it's political.

You remember, if you're my age. When the wall came down. And we finally got to converse with Russians.

And we always thought -- me growing up. I always thought the Russians.

It's Vladimir. Vladimir. Look, he's spying.

Natasha. He's spying.

Okay. That's what we thought when we were kids.

That's not who the Russians were. The Russians were good people. They were decent people.

They wanted the same kind of things we wanted. We don't agree on everything.

They want to be left alone. Raise their kids. Have a chance at some success and retirement.

Just leave me alone.

Most of us are like that. What happens is, our politicians get in the way. The politicians. The political systems are the ones that are the problem. We don't call it radicalized communism.
It's communism. Okay? It's a political philosophy.
This is a political philosophy.

Political Islam -- it's not radical.

It's just a political philosophy, and that political philosophy, just like communism, wants to dominate the world. Unlike communism, political Islam is so incredibly arrogant. It's inevitable to them. Why? Birthrates.

That's why! Birthrates. And they think we're stupid. And, you know what, so do I! I think we're stupid too. Come on, man. Right? Are we not stupid? We look over at Europe. Are the grand Europeans, that colonized the whole world and are abusing everyone, because they're so sophisticated and so powerful, and everything else. Really are they?

Because look at how dumb they are being right now with their own countries in Europe. They're committing suicide. And so are we.

Now, there's this development that is happening in Texas. Let me -- let me give you an interview, a piece of an interview done by a Muslim developer, of Muslim communities, and -- and how -- and how it actually works.

Listen to these 35 seconds of this interview.

VOICE: The way -- like, you can't make it exclusive, like non-Muslims are not allowed. What we're doing, there's something called a secession fee. I don't know what it's called in Dubai. Like your maintenance fee -- the service fee, to cut the grass, to remove the snow, and whatnot. So that service fee will put that 75 percent of the service fee you're paying, close to (another language).

VOICE: Automatically, if you are a practicing Christian, I would advise you, why help the Muslims? You know. They do their own thing.

Right? So this is the way we're going to put the costs, and our attorney already put it in there.

GLENN: This is the way they manipulate the kafirs. The kafirs are you. The non-Muslim people. The infidels.

And they -- they are manipulating. Because, ha, ha, ha. And why would you do that? That's how they make it an exclusive Muslim community. Okay. And what do you get in those Muslim communities? I want to take you back to 2015.
I had been in Irving, Texas. My studios are in Irving, Texas. And I had been there for maybe three years. And it is the most diverse ZIP code in all of America. Which is a great thing. Except, it's also becoming very, very Islamic.

And that is totally fine, as long as we're not talking political Islam.

Unfortunately, we are. And the religion teaches that you can lie, to an infidel. You can lie if it helps Islam.

Okay.

So I had a couple of imams from the Dallas area, come in, from -- from, you know, where all of this is happening. And I just -- I sat them down. And we just had a great conversation.

I want you to listen to this, what finally came out of the mouth of one of the imams. Listen to this.

VOICE: I'm here. I'm sorry to say, back to the first point. I'm here to discuss an issue with the Islamic Tribunal.

So please, don't -- allow us to have a situation. Maybe, we are ready for any discussion.

VOICE: No. I know that.

VOICE: We are ready for any point to lead the discussion. But the main point here, we are -- the reason we are here to discuss this issue. What kind of cases, Islam tribunal have.

And we start with the Sharia.

And why the people are afraid from Sharia.

I'm sorry to say, at one point related to this.

It's not just in Sharia law. Not just in Islamic law. It's everywhere.

Who said that just in Islamic law?

That's even Sharia, in Jewish Sharia, in Christian Sharia. In America here, we cut -- we -- we -- we cut it for some reason. So I'm asking you an easy question.

If anyone kill another, he should have got killed by a law, by Islamic law, by -- by -- by governor. By -- he should have got killed.

What is wrong with that?

If a thief, jump to go back house. Scare your wife. Scare your children. Scare your neighbor.

And they did that with our stores, this is the law. The law to cut his head.

Because if he feels my hands were cut because of that. He will think about this 100 times. He will never do it.

And if you do that one time, they will never do it again.

Look at how many millions of dollars Americans here or other states or other -- outside has been for the -- to keep, the criminal in -- in jail. A lot of millions of -- we can see that just -- that's it. Because he did something good in the whole community. And they scare the whole community.

Why not. Back please to the point. Islamic tribunal.

Yes. We never deal with anything of that. We don't have authority for that. We don't have power for that.


GLENN: But you're okay. You seem to be okay with that. If you had the power for that happen.

No. You don't --

JASON: Absolutely not. Absolutely not. We -- as imam said, we have system. We are very organized people.

GLENN: Right.

VOICE: Sorry, for this example. Somebody can -- might add. I should have killed him.

GLENN: Right.

VOICE: I had to take this case to the judge, and the judge have to -- to the governor. There's a system, a procedure, that I have to follow.

So it's not like this -- this guy gets killed. No, no. We have -- I -- I give you just an easy example for leader. This is after prophet Mohammed, peace be upon him. He sent one to Yemen. And he told him, before he leaves, he ask him, almost as a habit. What did you do if the people bring a thief for you?

He said, I will cut his hand. Okay. He said, you do that. Okay. He said, after -- after -- he said, okay. If one person came with me, without work, and I blew it. And I blew it. I will cut your head. Because he has no job. So he -- if you run from the sword or grab something from here, to eat. Nothing happened to you. So but if you have your job and enough income, and you took -- a bunch of children and you have house and you have car. And you -- or a thief from here or there. So this is the law. Not to please, the point with Sharia. I ask people. We are not here to do that at all.

It is not our authority. It's not our power. It's not our job. We have --

GLENN: You've got to stop. You've got to stop. Okay. This is amazing to me. Because you hear how passionate he is, about how logical that is. Okay? I mean, you just have to do it, it just makes sense to everybody, we just cut your hands off.

And the Prophet Muhammad, peace upon him, and he he's preached this forever. I mean, it just works. It just works.

Of course, we wouldn't want to do that. But it just works. I mean, let me tell you about it again. Really?

Really? You don't want that to happen. Because you're in the United States, but you're cool with it everywhere else. Everywhere else.

But here it's different!

But my religion, which requires me to say, peace upon him, after I mention the prophet Muhammad, my religion, which is extraordinarily well-defined.

It has these raise. In political Islam.

That must be done. Because the Koran requires it, in political Islam.

But we're not going -- yeah. We've got our own little laws going on now.

We have our courts.

Who we're never going to go that far. Wait. Wait. You believe in political Islam? Of course I do. But you're not going to do it?

Of course not. But the Koran commands you to do it?

Of course it does.

You follow every dictate in the Koran? Of course I do.

But not that one? Come on. Come on. Does anybody really believe that?

Now, that does not mean Muslims believe that. Many do. Many do not. The ones who do not are the ones who have lived under it, and have escaped here. And want a different kind of Islam.

And by just turning a blind eye to this, because they know how it happens. They saw it in their company. They don't want it happening here.

You know, we just take care of things like marriages. Oh, so when a guy says, I divorce you. I divorce you. I divorce you. You're divorced, and she loses everything. Oh, you mean the kind, if she wants to testify against her husband on adultery, she has to have two witnesses, plus her, because her voice and one other person as a witness does not equal him, because she's not equal to a man. Oh. Okay. All right.

But you have that one. And that's okay. No. It's not okay. It's not okay.

It shouldn't be okay in any western country, period. Should not be okay.

Unfortunately, we're all turning a blind eye to it.