RADIOMarch 07, 2024

What New York’s National Guard Subway Deployment is REALLY About

New York Governor Kathy Hochul is sending 750 National Guard troops to New York City’s subways to crack down on violence. But is a pseudo-military state really the best solution? How about New York just ENFORCE ITS LAWS and jail criminals instead? Glenn shares 2 stories to illustrate this: In New York, 4 people have been released back into their communities, despite being accused of hacking up human bodies. Meanwhile in Florida, cops are actually arresting and jailing criminals. Glenn also asks, will Biden talk about ANY of this during his State of the Union speech?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. So Kathy Hochul has decided that she's going to put a thousand National Guard troops, to check bags, in the New York City subway system.

Wow. That's wonderful. Crime in the subway, is up 45 percent, year on year.

45 percent increase. Okay. So that's probably not, you know, really that great.

So she sends 750 uniformed National Guard soldiers, with orders to search bags for weapons, and other dangerous stuff. So isn't that top and frisk, Stu?

Stu, I think that is. So you have the National Guard, in the subways of New York.

I don't know if you notice. But the National Guard comes with big weapons.

And uniforms. So they're in our subways.

And that's going to help on crime.

By showing a military presence in New York. You know, the first time I ever saw military presence in the United States, off of a base, was in New York, right after 9/11.

And there was marshal law, in the lower part of Manhattan.

You didn't go in or out.

And there were Humvees. And everybody was in uniform and had a machine gun.

It was ugly. It was ugly.

And it was so disturbing to see that on the streets of America. I had never seen it before. I don't know if people are just used to seeing this. In New York.

I know they wouldn't elsewhere.

But we're not used to seeing the military, policing in New York.

So they are going to be in the subways. And she says, that's going to help, you know, with the -- with -- with crime in the subways.

Okay. Well, there's another way to do that. I don't know if she thought of this.

Listen to this story.

Four people were arrested in connection to three incidents of human remains being found on Long Island.

Okay?

This is just outside of New York City.

Police made the arrest after performing a search warrant on an apartment in Amityville, shared by three of the suspects.

Forty-year-old Amanda Wallace, 44-year-old Steven Brown, 38-year-old Jeffrey Mackey. Investigations say they found human remains and cutting tools, including a used meat cleaver.

A fourth suspect was also identified as 33-year-old Alexis Nevus (phonetic), a homeless woman.

Now, the body parts, apparently, belonged to an unidentified, 59-year-old woman and a 53-year-old man.

The names of the victims have not been released. But what happened was these guys, somehow or another, got a hold of these bodies.

Oh. We just found two of the dead bodies. And hacked them all up, and then went around in parks. And just left a lake here. A hand here.

A head over here. Like Easter egg for crazy people. Easter hunting.

STU: What else are you supposed to do in that situation.

GLENN: Right.

STU: If you're just walking around. See a body somewhere. You will hack it up. And leave it various parts.

GLENN: All four. Now, remember, uncle is putting National Guard, kind of an extreme measure. In the subways.

All four were charged on Wednesday. With first degree hindering prosecution, tampering with physical evidence.

And concealment of a human corpse.

They all pleaded not guilty. However -- however, they have not been charged with a killing of the two victims, but in the investigation, it's pending. And more charges will be forthcoming.

So what happened?

They were charged, and then ordered to not leave Suffolk county.

And they're on supervised release now.

So...

So just people who are dismembering people.

STU: So they can still walk around Suffolk county. And do anything they can do. They just shouldn't leave Suffolk county.

GLENN: Right. And they're not going to.

STU: That's good. How else will you find these bodies?

You need some people out there looking for these bodies, to find them and hack them up and put them in different parks, if they happen to come across them.

GLENN: Right. Now, let me ask you.

Wouldn't it be better, to put the people, who are charged with crimes, even grisly heinous crimes, into jail, and not let them right back out on the street?

Just saying. That's an idea.

STU: Well, I think the problem with that idea, is that bodies will pile up everywhere.

We're already going to see this happen in Nassau County. Now that they can't cross the line, what will happen there?

GLENN: I don't know. I don't know.

Let me give another story. Florida sheriff says he found evidence that illegal aliens were using federal flight vouchers in order to aid human trafficking. Across the US border, during a law enforcement operation.

Polk County sheriff Grady Judd, applauded his deputies for arresting 228 people, during a massive multi-agency operation, named Operation March Madness -- sorry, Operation March Sadness, 2024.
Among those arrested in the operation were teachers, coaches, medical professionals, active military service members, and 21 illegal aliens.

So at least there weren't the four people that were chopping people up in the park.

He came out and said, we have a crisis at the border.

And because of the crisis at the border, we have people that are victimizing illegal folks. Forcing them into the sex trade. Because we allow these criminals into the country illegally, we all rail about it, but nobody does anything.

Judge said, one suspect had brought three female illegal aliens to Florida from New York. They said, when they came into the country, illegally, the DHS, Department of Homeland Security, gave them a form, an ID. Paperwork.

And allowed them to fly for free anywhere in America.

You know how Southwest Airlines will let your bags fly for free.

Federal government will let your immigrants fly for free said the sheriff.

The victim said, they were forced to pay back $3,000 to the female human trafficker, under the threat of violence.

They tell us that they fly into major metro centers for free on the federal government's dime.
Whether they set up their appointment -- then they set up their appointments for sex, all over the country.

So we know this is happening.

As I told you last hour.

We know fentanyl is coming in over the border.

And it's all done by China.

In fact, China just found this old recipe.

And they're making it. Now, it was discovered in the 1950s, as a pain relief agent. And doctors saw it. Because it is like first time addiction, and possible death. When it's made in the lab, under the right circumstances, they said there was no medical reason for this to ever be made.

And so they went back into the shelf of the pharmaceutical companies. Back in 1950 something.

And guess who just found it?

China. And so now they're making it. And so now they're making it. And they're making it for all of the lovely people, that are coming across from the drug cartels into our country. Isn't that great?

Is Biden going to talk about any of this. Any of of it?

He's going to talk about the border tonight, in the State of the Union address. And he's going to blame it on the Republicans.

They just didn't want to solve the problem. No. What you wanted to solve, was something we've debated about for decades now.

Do we just make everybody a citizen?

No. That's not what we -- what we were trying to solve

We're trying to solve the invasion from the southern, and now northern border.

From places like China.

But he's not going to talk about that.

He has to blame the Republicans. Because when you talk about drugs, and all the people that are dying of fentanyl, there's only one person to blame. The Chinese, getting into bed with the drug cartels, intentionally, doing an opium war on us.

And who is responsible for that happening? Anybody, who allows illegals and the drug cartels to rule our border.

That's the president. But he can't say anything.

Get this: Newly disclosed emails show a Chinese businessman, who partnered with Hunter Biden's Burnum Firm, was primarily motivated by access rather than financial considerations, bolstering the House Oversight Committee's contention that the Biden name was the commodity.

Now, this is quite amazing. It was found just the news, is reporting this.

And it was part of the testimony of the Oversight Committee. And Hunter Biden had business meetings with his firm.

And a -- another firm, run by, I think his name is Henry Zhao.

And they were looking to merge Burnum, that's his firm -- with Harvest, which is the Chinese Communist Party firm. And they were going to get all kinds of access to the markets. Okay?

Nobody has ever been given this kind of access to Chinese markets before. Ever. Not Goldman Sachs. No one.

He got it. And nobody was really asking why. How did that happen?

Okay. So the team, Hunter's team wanted to let Zhao know that we're on track, for some really good things, and a kind of a thank you, after this meeting.

Here is the letter. We're excited by the prospect of being able to work side by side with Harvest by way of a globally recognized platform.

Please, pass along my regards to Henry. And know that -- and tell him, what we discussed during our last lunch together in Beijing, still holds true.

And, Michael, please also remind Henry of our conversation about a board seat for a certain relation of mine.

Devon and I golfed with that relation, earlier last week. And we discussed this very idea again. And as always, he remains very keen on the opportunity.

Now, he also admitted under oath, this last week, that, yes. The big guy is his dad.

What -- this isn't -- this isn't some small crime.

There are 133 Chinese that have come across our border, in the last three years.

30,000 of them in -- since October. We don't know who they are. These are the ones we caught. All military-aged men. In fact, there are now more Chinese people, coming in. Not families. Chinese guys, coming in across the border, in California. Than Mexicans.

And are we doing anything to stop it?

No. No. The Biden administration for some reason said, look, we just got to shorten this. Forty-four questions that you have to ask.

You know, if you -- if you stop an illegal alien. Forty-four questions. Let's narrow that down. I think it's to seven. Seven questions.

From 44 to seven. But only for the Chinese.

What? Why?

You need to know that in the State of the Union tonight, he's not going to tell you anything that is real.

It's going to be blame.

But know that something is very, very wrong.

And when you talk about crime, he's probably going to say that crime has gone down. Remember, the national guard, that Hochul has just put into the subways.

Why would they do that? If crime was going down? If crime was fine?

Who is -- what Republican has had anything to do with New York or Chicago, in forever?

So how does that work?

How are -- how are cities collapsing, under the weight, because they are sanctuary cities. How is that the fault of the Republican Party?

I'm not looking for fault.

I'm looking for someone to, actually, fix it.

And this administration is doing nothing, but empowering all the people that would love to see us live in chaos.

This AI could change EVERYTHING by next year

With Elon Musk’s announcement of Grok 4, humanity is closer than ever before to creating AGI – artificial general intelligence – which would change everything. Glenn Beck breaks down what’s coming in the next year with AI, which even Elon Musk called “terrifying.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me tell you the biggest story of the day.

And I think it is the biggest story possibly of all mankind, as of today.

It's going to change rapidly.

I don't know if anybody -- did either of you guys watch the Elon Musk thing last night?

STU: No, I did watch a few minutes of it.

GLENN: Okay. Did you, Jason?

JASON: No. I sure didn't.

GLENN: Okay. So the xAI team was there to unveil Grok 4. This is the latest intelligence, and let me be very, very clear.

Last night was not your typical tech launch. This is a moment that demands everyone's full attention.

We are now at the crossroads, where promise and peril are going to collide. Okay?

I have explained to you, for years, AGI.
AI. AGI. And ASI. Narrow intelligence is what we've always had.

General intelligence is the next step. And that is, it's better that man, one -- one, you know, like Grok. Can do everything. That you can do.

Better that you can do.

Okay?

And then there's super intelligence. ASI.

Artificial super intelligence.

That's when things get really, really creepy.

When you hit AGI, the road to ASI could be overnight.

Okay?

We need to understand what's at stake here. Because Grok four brought us closer to that second stage, than ever before.

Grok four is a powerhouse. They demonstrated it last night.

It surpasses the expertise of Ph.D.-level sailors in all fields.

It can get 100 percent on any -- any test for any field, mathematics, physics. Engineering.

You name it.

This is not a search engine.

This is a system that tackles problems, so intricate, they -- they go beyond our existing knowledge base.

Okay?

Let's say there is -- let's say, we have a fusion reactor. And the magnetic containment system goes down. I don't even know what I'm talking about at this point.

But it goes down.

And the top minds all on earth are like, I don't know what to do. Grok 4 can step in, model the physics, design new material, stabilize the system, and avert catastrophe. And it can do it about that fast. Now, this is the capability, that Musk says is just around the corner.

Mark my words. You know, how many -- how many years did I say, between 2027 and 2030, we would start to see this?

STU: Oh, a million times.

That was always --

GLENN: For years. Right? Yeah, always the window.

And everybody, even Ray Kurzweil said, oh, that's way too optimistic. We may be 2050.

And then people started going, 2040, 2030.

Grok shows us 2026 or 2027 is when we're going to hit it. This is the last year, that we have, before things get really weird.

Okay?

Last night, Elon Musk is touting this -- this AI.

And all of the solutions.

And then he says.

Hmm. Probably three times.

Something like this.

And I'm quoting. This is one of them.

It's somewhat unnerving to have created intelligence that's greater than our own.

He then goes on to call it terrifying, twice.

Now, this is a man who has launched rockets, you know, into orbit.

Going to Mars.

And he says, twice!

You know, after he sees the results of it. He says, you know, it's really -- in a way, quite terrifying to see what it's doing.

But we just have to make sure that it remains good!

Oh, okay.

All right. Sure.

Now, the key point in the announcement was the mention of ARC-AGI.

I had never heard of ARC-AGI. I had no idea what it was. But I noticed AGI. And I went, uh-oh. That sounds important. So this is the gold standard. The bench mark testing for artificial general intelligence.

Okay.

As I've said before, AGI. Artificial General Intelligence is a machine that matches all human cognition, across all domains.

Reasoning, creativity.

Problem solving. Not just specialized tasks like playing Go or analyzing x-rays. Everything. For instance, Musk said by mid-next year to the latest end of next year, it will be able to create a full length movie, just from a text prompt.
And do it all at once!

So, in other words, it will say, create a movie, and you just explain the Godfather.

It will do the casting. It will do the writing. It will do the filming, if you will. It will -- score the music, and it will happen that fast.

Almost in realtime. We are nowhere near the computational power now, to do that separately.

But this will do it all at once. It will make a movie with all of it, simultaneously.

So the arc AGI system is the benchmark on how close we are to AGI. Remember, scary things happen at AGI.

Terrifying things happen at ASI. ASI could be a matter of hours, or days after we hit AGI.

Grok 4 scored 16.2 percent on the ARC-AGI scale.

Why is that important? You're like, well, only 16 percent away.

Because last time, it barely broke 8 percent.

And that -- they took that test, last time with Grok three.

And it took us forever to get to 8 percent.

Now, what is it? A year later.

We're at 16 percent. Remember, these things are not linear. The next time, we could be at 32, we might be at 64.

We are on the verge. This is the last year of -- I can't believe I'm saying this. Of normalcy. Okay?

This year is -- we're going to look back at this year, probably two years ago, gosh, remember the good old days, when everything was normal.

And you could understand everything.

This is how close we are!

Everything you and I talked about last night, Stu, about what we're doing in January, make -- put -- does it make it even more critical that that happens like, oh, I don't know.

Right now.

STU: Yeah. For sure.

GLENN: You are going to need to know your values, your ethics, your rights.

You are going to need to know absolutely everything.

Now, Grok 4 is not true AGI yet.

It lacks the full autonomy and the generalized reasoning of a human mind. But it is the closest that we've come.

It's a system that can adapt, innovate, at a level that outpaces specialized AIs by a wide margin.

This is a milestone. This is not a destination, but it's something that should jolt everybody awake. So here's what's coming over the next six months. By December 2025, that's this Christmas!

December 2025, he believes, Musk, that Grok 4, will drive breakthroughs in material sciences.

So, in other words, imagine a new -- brand-new alloy, that is lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel.

And it revolutionizes aerospace and everything else, or a drug that halts Alzheimer's progression, tailored to a person's DNA.

Grok will drive breakthroughs through material science. So brand-new materials that nobody has ever thought of.

Pharmaceuticals that we never thought could be made.

And chemical engineering, putting together chemicals that no man has ever thought.

That's going for happen by December.

Imagine a chemical compound that makes carbon capture, economically viable. The climate change stuff, that's over.

It will be over.

Because this will solve that! These are not fantasies.

This is Grok 4.

Musk said something that he never thought. He believes that within the next year, by 2027, Grok 4 will uncover new physical laws.

So that will rewrite the understanding -- our understanding of the entire universe.

That there will come -- like there's gravity. Hey, you know what, there's another law here that you never thought of. Wait. What?

That, he says, will come by 2027. This is going to accelerate human discovery, at an unprecedented scale.

I told you, at some point. I said, by 2030. It might be a little earlier than that.

Things will be happening at such a fast rate, you won't be able to keep up with them.

And it will accelerate to the point to where you won't even understand what all of this means.

Or what the ramifications are!

Are you there yet?

In six months, Grok 4 could evolve into a system, that dwarfs human expertise in economics, defense, all of it.

Now, again, it's a bit terrifying to quote Elon Musk. Why?

Because we don't know, what else comes with this.

This is like an alien life form.

We have no idea, what to predict. What it will be capable of.

How it will view us, when we are ants, to its intellect.

Okay?

It is a tool, but it is also Pandora's box.

If Grok 4 is the biggest step towards AGI.

And maybe one of the last steps to AGI.

My feeling is: What I've been saying forever.

2027 to 2030, I'm leaning more toward the 2027 now.

Because of this announcement last night.

We are on the verge of AGI.

And everything in human existence changing overnight.

And as Musk said himself, two times, it's terrifying!

We should act like it is terrifying.

Or risk losing the control of the future, that we're all trying to build. That's the biggest story of the day.

I think! In my opinion.

Bill O’Reilly’s SOLUTION to the DOJ’s Epstein Files fallout

Bill O'Reilly joins Glenn Beck with his plan for how the Trump administration can fix the Epstein Files fallout "overnight." Plus, he explains why he believes there's only one way that former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan get indicted by a grand jury.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. Bill O'Reilly.

Welcome to the program, sir! How are you?

BILL: Welcome. (inaudible)

And right off the bat, I have to correct you.

GLENN: Yeah. You're not alive. What know.

BILL: I mean, you know -- you don't know that?

GLENN: Yeah, yeah. No. I -- I thought you were dead. Anyway --

BILL: You were dead to me, oh!
(laughter)
I --

GLENN: I get it.

BILL: That's just another brick in your wall, Beck.
(laughter)

GLENN: It's good to talk to you, Bill.

Tell me -- you had a conversation with -- with President Trump, what, a couple of months ago, and I talked about --

BILL: Yeah. St. Patrick's Day, he invited me to sit on a cabinet meeting, which he does sometimes.

And he said, look, we've got files, Kennedy, King, Epstein -- what do you think? And I said, well, first Kennedy you've got to put out pretty much everything, which he did. King, he didn't. I don't know why. Because that's important too.

And then on Epstein I said, you have to be careful here, because this is now being used in political precincts. Both sides want to destroy anybody that was associated with Epstein. And the problem is that a federal investigation. They don't make a determination whether you had a -- what kind of relationship you had with Epstein. They just said, so-and-so had lunch with him.

Or maybe so-and-so had -- saw him at a party. And I said, any name of a human being associated with Epstein, in any way, that person is going to be destroyed. Because you know, the press is not going to put anything into context.

So I said, but it's very important that the Justice Department tell the folks what they know.

And you don't have to get specific with anything.

But you have to say, this is the information that we've compiled. And that's not hard.

And I don't know why the Trump administration is not doing that.

GLENN: Wow!

So, first of all, it's your fault, that we're not getting any names. We learned a lot here.

BILL: Probably my fault, but the president --

GLENN: You know what, I think you're right. I don't want all the names of the people. I want to know --

BILL: And I don't either.

GLENN: Right! I want to know the Justice Department has sorted through the things, and then have gone through. And said, this is criminal. This is not. These people are being indicted, et cetera, et cetera. But to come out and say, there is nothing there, I mean, it's -- it's at least --

BILL: It's ridiculous.

GLENN: It's mass incompetence, at least from Pam Bondi. How could she come out and say, it's all sitting on my desk?

And then when she doesn't release it, she says, well, that's because the FBI in New York is thwarting this process. There are people up there, that are trying to keep this from me.

And then she makes no arrests on that. We never hear about that again.

And then now all of a sudden, there's nothing to see.

BILL: Well, listen, Pam Bondi does not make decisions on her own.

No cabinet member does.

All the decisions come out of the West Wing.

So what I believed happened was, Trump was so obsessed with the big bill, with Iran, with Putin, with China.

That this -- they didn't even think about this. Okay?

GLENN: I believe that.

BILL: And it slowly began to unravel. And then I caught it by surprise.

But this is the easiest fix. Somewhere so easy.

BILL: So if I'm in charge, and that would be a great thing for everyone, except you, Beck -- but every other American, if I were in charge, tremendous. You would be in Botswana. Right.

GLENN: Right. Oh, I know.

Yeah. Yeah. I would be the ambassador of the white farmers in -- in South Africa if it were up to you. I know. I know.

BILL: No. You would be wandering around going, I am Glenn Beck. And they would go, who? That's what you'd be doing.

GLENN: That's every day.

BILL: So this could happen within the hour. Pam Bondi announces a press conference for tomorrow.

At that press conference, sitting next to her, is Merrick Garland, everyone.

You had this stuff for four years! Now, I understand that Mr. Garland has gone native and is living in a -- well, we can find him. We can pull him out of there, and have him and Pam, sit there and answer questions in a general way about what evidence the Justice Department of the United States has compiled.

GLENN: Not going to happen.

BILL: That's it!

Well, if it's not going to happen, then President Trump is going to take a hit.

But he's calculating that this will say that it's that night important.

But I don't know why you would not do it.

I just don't know. And I'm usually pretty good at predicting what the president does or does not do.

GLENN: So here's the thing, Bill.

I think he keeps focusing on Epstein. It's not that big of a deal.

It's not about Epstein. It's about justice.

It's about, can we trust the people -- correct!

It's all about credibility and justice.

And he's not seeing that. And I don't know how he's missing that. Because I agree with you.

He's been so busy on so many other things.

BILL: That's right. That's right.

GLENN: This is not at the top of his priority list.

But he did campaign on it.

BILL: Right.

And I don't know if there's anybody inside the White House.

He looks to be annoyed, when this subject comes up.

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BILL: And here's the -- what works -- you have to understand.

A guy like Donald Trump runs it all.

If he's annoyed, nobody will want to annoy him more. Okay?

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BILL: That's how it works. The older arch is, because Epstein got favorable treatment.

By the feds, in the first go around in Florida, that there's a deep suspicion about this case.

But if you break it down, if the Biden administration had any dirt on any Republican associated with Epstein. It would have been out.

And vice-versa.

If the Republicans had any dirt on any Democrats. Now, we know that former president Clinton, was involved with Epstein to some extent.

I don't know if that was a factor, okay? I don't know.

But your right for once. You're right. It's about credibility. It's about the American people trusting that we do have equal justice for all!

So what do you -- what do you make of now the Russia gate thing, coming out, today. Or yesterday.

The FISA court.

The fact that they're now saying, hey.

You know, we need to hold Brennan accountable.

We're like five or six days away.

Weeks away from him, you know, slipping past the -- the statute of limitations.

I mean, all these things are out today.

There's that. There is also the -- let's see here.

The Secret Service -- I think this happened a year ago.

But it's being reported as if it's news.

Secret Service suspends six agents assigned to protect Trump during a Butler assassination attempt. I mean, all these things are coming out. Like, look, we're busy on all these things. And I do believe they're busy on these things.

But it's like the Keystone Cops are in charge of the PR on this. It's bad.

BILL: Well, there's a lot of politics involved in both of those cases. Number one, in order to get Comey and Brennan to get indicted by a grand jury. Federal grand jury, and that's the only passage, you would have to have a whistle-blower, saying, yeah, these guys abused their power. I worked for them. And they absolutely wanted to get Trump.

And they knew the Russia dossier was phony.

And they did it anyway.

If I have that Justice Department.

Then you can get those guys.

If you don't have it, they will not be even indicted by a grand jury.

GLENN: So how is it that we do not have that Justice Department?

How do we not have that Justice Department?

BILL: Well, look. I don't know whether they have a whistle-blower or not, okay?

And if they have a whistle-blower, I want the case to go forward.

I want those two men indicted.

You can't do that, at that level.

As far as the Secret Service is concerned, monumental screw up. Everybody knows it. They fired the morons in charge of it. That woman -- I was embarrassed listening to her, trying to explain.

They didn't know what the deuce was going on. But this was across-the-board, in the Biden administration.

You know, it was a year ago Sunday, this upcoming Sunday.

GLENN: Right.

BILL: And it's just another example of how the Biden administration was the second worst administration in the history of this country. People have no idea how bad it was.

Every single agency was chaotic. Nothing worked. And this is just part of that. And we'll have a slew of stuff on Sunday. Nothing really meaningful.

I mean, they suspended the Secret Service agents, as they should have. They fired the director as they should have. The guy was a nut.

I don't know if there was anything more to that. I doubt it.

I'm more interested in the guy in the bushes. Because they don't know anything about him. I would like to know a little bit about him.

But again, the federal government, it doesn't really matter. It's the government. They never want to tell us stuff, Beck, never.

We always have to pull it out of them. It's almost like Russia or something. Come on!

GLENN: Right. Yeah. Let me ask you, let me take you back again to the Epstein thing.

I noticed yesterday, there were these people who were on the left. Who were taking tweets of mine. That say, look. These things don't make sense. On the Epstein thing. And they just have to be answered. And not anti-Trump at all.

And yet, the anti-Trump people were retweeting that, and they're trying to -- they're trying to get the right to fight against itself again and split people away from Donald Trump, where I don't think this Epstein thing is -- is splitting people from Donald Trump, at least at this point.

And I -- you know, I -- my wife stopped me from answering some of those tweets, yesterday.

Because it's never good, when you -- when I tweet in anger. Which I did.

But -- or was going to. What did you think about how this is being used against the right to try to separate us even more?

BILL: Everything is political. Everybody knows that for you.

But the MAGA people, from the mail I get. And I get a voluminous amount of mail. They're not happy.

GLENN: Oh, I agree. I'm not happy.

BILL: Now, are they going to throw President Trump under the cliché-ridden bus? No. Because to them, the greater good is being served by a fair tax bill.

Trying to cut waste.

Dealing with Iran effectively. And hopefully dealing with Putin.

That's another thing, that's on Trump's plate.

He has to deal with Putin now.

Has to. And that will be the next big story.

GLENN: How is he going to deal with it?

BILL: Lavrov and Rubio, are in Indonesia, as we speak.

And I assume that Rubio is delivering a message. That you either stop, or we're going to just absolutely crush you economically. Which the United States can do. By saying. No bank does business with Moscow.

And if you do business, no matter what bank you are, we're going to put you out of business.

Okay?

GLENN: Yeah. I've only got a couple of seconds. But didn't we already do that under Biden?

BILL: No! We didn't do the banks. We did the sanctions. And the sanctions they can always get around, because China is going to buy as much oil from Russia as possible.

You stop the banks, from doing all business with Moscow? Who is going --

GLENN: Isn't that what the SWIFT thing was all about?

When we kicked them off of SWIFT, wasn't that what that was all about?

BILL: No! Because they can still do a huge business with countries buying their oil.

And they got to pay Putin and Russia for the oil, and that has to go through the banking system.

If you stop the banking system, he can't get paid.

GLENN: Hmm, it's amazing. I'm glad I'm not the president right now. I think he's made some very brave decisions, and he is walking a tightrope. I mean, the world is on edge. And I pray for --

BILL: He looks very tired to me. Very tired. I haven't talked to him in a while, which is unusual. But you're right. You're absolutely right. That's the second time you've been right in this conversation. My God!

GLENN: I know. It's crazy.

BILL: What in the world.

GLENN: I was wrong about you being dead.

BILL: What is happening?

GLENN: It's good -- it's good to talk to you, my friend. Is everything okay? Is everything going well?

BILL: Everything is all right, Beck. We are not only successful, but that's old news. We've been that way for 50 years, but I appreciate you having me on your fine program.

GLENN: Okay. I love you.

BILL: Stu is still breathing.

GLENN: Hmm.

BILL: So that's good. Right.

But I've got a big book called Confronting Evil. Of course, we sent it, and of course you denied getting it. That comes out September 9th, so put me on a dance card.

GLENN: Well, we'll have you on. And you can also find Bill and his YouTube page. YouTube.com/BillOReilly. Or is it The Walking Dead?
(laughter)
He's not even laughing. Maybe he hung up. Bill O'Reilly, great to have him on.

FLASHBACK: Kash Patel says FBI Director has Epstein's "Black Book!"

During a 2023 interview with Glenn Beck, now-FBI Director Kash Patel adamantly proclaims that the FBI and specifically the FBI Director is in direct control of Jeffrey Epstein's "Black Book" of clients. So now given the most recent claims by Patel and DOJ Attorney General Pam Bondi, what has changed from his perspective since taking this role? What do YOU think is the explanation for this change in tune by Kash Patel?

Watch Glenn Beck's Extended Interview with Kash Patel from 2023 HERE

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Are Epstein's "Blackmail Videos" Being Used for Leverage RIGHT NOW?

What was Jeffrey Epstein's operation all about. If he was at the center of a massive blackmail operation to compromise those in positions of power, who is in possession of that information now? Glenn Beck and ATF Whistleblower John Dodson analyze the details of this situation and give their thoughts on what is the most likely reality surrounding Epstein.

Watch Glenn Beck's FULL Interview with ATF Whistleblower John Dodson HERE