RADIOOctober 07, 2022

Is Donald Trump’s midterm advice working for Republicans?

What is former President Donald Trump urging Republicans to focus on as the midterms approach? CRIME. People are afraid to walk outside, he says. So, how is that advice faring so far for GOP candidates? In this clip, Glenn and Stu discuss some of the most contested midterm races: the races to pay attention to, what candidates are choosing to focus on, and how the matchups look so far…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Trump is imploring the G.O.P. to focus on crime, as midterms near. He says, people are afraid to walk outside. And that is true, in many parts of the country.

And it is working, in Wisconsin, isn't it?

STU: Yeah. Yeah. Ron Johnson and Mandela Barnes. And the big thing the Johnson campaign has hit Barnes on, is his -- you know, flirtations many times over with the -- the defund the police crowd. You know, he did an event with Ilhan Omar.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. You want to talk about being clueless. Yeah.

STU: Yeah. So they've been hitting them hard on this.

And especially in Wisconsin, which has gone through a real rough couple of years. People might remember. This is a situation, where it's really damaging. Barns' candidacy. And I think this is a message that is working across the country. That's just the highest profile of it. Johnson has worked out a pretty consistent lead there. And usually, Johnson wins when all of the polls says he's down by a couple of points. And he winds up winning. Now the polls are saying, he's up by a couple of points. Things are looking pretty good there for Johnson.

GLENN: Also, it looks pretty good in Arizona. CBS you.gov survey, show that Kari Lake and Katie Hobbs are tied now, 49-49, which I -- I'm surprised by. Especially -- I think that will change, especially since during the debate, Katy Hobbs was asked, you know, do you have any specific lessons that you might have learned from the Hispanic community? Which I think is a ridiculous question.

STU: It is a ridiculous question, I will say.

GLENN: No. She couldn't. No, she couldn't come up with anything.

She kind of struggled, you know, a bit here and there. And then she said, well, I -- I have a sister-in-law who is a Latina, and then tried to say a few words in Spanish. It didn't go well. It didn't go well.

STU: It's funny. It's such a random question.

GLENN: What would you say?

STU: I would say, I don't categorize the lessons I learn by race. Now, I can say that. She can't say that.

GLENN: A Democrat can't say that.

STU: She can't say that. I think that's a totally legitimate response to that question. Why the hell would I think, you know, what lessons have I learned from Latinos today? Like what weirdo thinks that way?

GLENN: You know, I have actually thought that. I have thought, there's a really good lesson --

STU: So you're the weirdo. I don't think you think that way generally.

GLENN: No. I wouldn't have thought of it, like I've got to learn a lesson. But what have I observed?

I've observed, God and family are center in their families. And their families do pretty well.

You know, they may not be at the top of the economic spectrum in America. But they do pretty well. They're families. They know what their priorities are. And I think that's great.

STU: That answer also not available to Katy Hobbs. She can't say that she cares about the nuclear family.

GLENN: No. She can't. She can't.

All right. So Blake Masters also looks like he's narrowing the lead. Kelly with 51, and Masters, 48.

STU: This has been narrowing for weeks.

GLENN: Yep.

STU: They pulled all the money out of Arizona. At least from the McConnell side of things. Which I think was a big mistake.

You know, I think McConnell does want the majority.

So he what I come back in. Hopefully, there are also talks about Peter Thiel, who has been a big supporter of Masters, coming in with an influx of cash, late in the campaign, which would be really, really helpful right now.

Because, look, Masters has the debate tonight. This is the big one, is tonight.

GLENN: I wish I could get that on TV. I would love to get that. Probably get it online.

STU: Probably can.

It's a big one. Really, there hasn't been a side-by-side, with Masters and Kelly.

GLENN: And I think Masters might cream him.

STU: I think so too. He's pretty smart.

GLENN: Yeah. Pretty smart?

STU: You know, I mean, we talked to him.

He's a smart guy -- he's got a really good history -- worked as an entrepreneur.

Worked inside the tech industry.

Kind of like -- I think he'll be more impressive to Arizona voters, than what the media has presented.

The media has presented him as this crazy person, who is just this lunatic. You know, come out, his eyes bulging out.

He's going to be doing all these crazy things. And Mr. Election denial himself. I mean, we've talked to him a bunch of times. That's not him at all.

I mean, he just seems like a really smart guy, that wants to do the best thing for Arizona. So I think him being side by side with Kelly, will help, if he has good performance today.

GLENN: Ron DeSantis.

STU: Doing really well.

GLENN: He's doing really well.

Eleven-point lead over Charlie Crist, which -- really?

Only 11 over Charlie Crist.

STU: How could you possibly vote for Charlie Crist at this point?

GLENN: I know. I have no idea. No idea.

STU: Now, an unnamed Democrat, there's plenty of people who might support that. But Charlie Crist obviously just goes wherever he can grab for power.

GLENN: Charlie Crist. You can talk Charlie Crist out of supporting himself.

STU: 100 percent. If it would give him the slightest advantage, he would vote against himself.

GLENN: He would. He would.

STU: I also looked at this too, this poll is important. In this, I believe entirely, before the hurricane.

So and he has had rave reviews of the way --

GLENN: Yeah. Even President Biden yesterday. You know, what's really great about the way he's handled things.

He doesn't dismiss global warming. Really? That's not --

STU: That has nothing to do with this.

GLENN: By the way, he has long coattails. The same poll shows three Republicans seeking cabinet posts, dug double-digit leads. Double digit leads.

That is -- I mean, this is Florida, man. This is Florida. That's not a deep red state.

STU: Yeah. People forget, Ron DeSantis won as the governor by 0.4 points. He did not run away with that election, by any means.

In fact, every big statewide election, where you think of Republicans.

Rick Scott, won very, very narrowly.

That's the way this works. You don't win by double digits, as a Republican by Florida. Maybe until now.

GLENN: So we have to talk to the woman who is running for the governor of Oregon.

I think she might win.

Now, she's still, you know, in the back. Let's see. Christian Drazin, who last week, oh, my gosh. Last week in four consecutive polls, took the lead. Did you know that?

STU: Yeah. Now, this is the race that we talked about yesterday. There's an independent that grabbed a large chunk of the vote there. Almost 20 percent.

So it's sort of like, if you go back to the Ross Perot type election. There's a real split here.

That's the type of thing, that hurt George H.W. Bush back in -- back in the day. I think it's helping here, the Republican. And there's a real chance here.

GLENN: Can I tell you something?

Her opponent in a -- in a debate, I think it was yesterday.

Called for the construction of a meth stabilization center.

She wants safe havens.

STU: It's called Portland. I mean, we've seen this in action over the past couple of years.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. Oh, Michigan. I mean, can you imagine, with everything going on in Oregon, crime, drugs, everything else. You're like, I think we should build a safe haven for meth users.

I mean, God help you, Oregon. If that woman wins, you're in deep trouble.

STU: This really is the separation between Republicans and Democrats right now. The Democrats want safe havens for meth users. Republicans want safe havens for people who are around -- who have to deal with the meth users.

GLENN: Safe havens for people.

STU: For people. You know, so they don't have to get attacked in the street. By the meth users you're trying to give is safe spaces to.

GLENN: That's really what it should be. Safe havens for people who want to go to work. Raise their children. Not get stabbed. Or have their kids die on fentanyl. That's a safe haven. That's a Republican safe haven.

STU: Yeah. And, again, that message connects with people right now.

Everybody feels this way. We're spinning out of control, no matter what major city you live near. When you go down into the middle of it.

It seems like no one is really trying anymore, to really keep you safe.

GLENN: Yeah. So there is hope, because of that. Real hope. But I -- I showed a chalkboard last night. I'll talk about it here, in about 15 minutes. And you can find it at Blaze TV.
It's a really important show.

And I think it's not just sobering. It also gives you the answer, okay? Because the guy who made this chalkboard, forty years ago, he was with the KGB. He said, here's how you do it from the inside. Because we were going to do it.

So here's how the Soviet Union. This was before the Soviet Union collapsed. He said, here's the plan.

And I got to tell you, I'm not saying the Soviets are doing it, or the Russians are doing it. Although, they'll pile on. But it is exactly what is happening to us. And he said, it's a 20-year plan.

And the only flaw -- the only way, this can be stopped, and I'll let him tell you next hour, via videotape.

He's long dead.

But it is -- it's an answer you know. It's an answer you know. And it's an answer that everybody -- yeah. It will. Yeah, it will.

This was the thing that the Soviets felt was their biggest danger in this.

Also, it is -- it's remarkable, as a time line. Because they said it was a 15 to 20-year plan.

How long have we been going through this, Stu? Really, it's like September 11th. Right after that?

It's about a 20-year plan. And he said, that has -- it has to be 20 years. Because it has to get the next generation.

It has to be in the schools. And the kids have to be demoralized. And confused. And everything that our kids are right now.

And he said, because that generation is the one who is really going to push it through.

And he -- he laid out four steps.

I showed it last night on TV.

Four steps. And we're at the end of the third step. And the fourth step is, totalitarianism. And there's different ways that can go, but totalitarianism. So there's really only three steps to disaster. And we are at that line of disaster. This is like last call. Last call.

So important that you hear it. And I think it will give you great hope. At least it does me. Debating on whether I should tell you a story. I'm going to think about it.

There's something that -- something that's very personal, to me.

That happened to me about two years ago. And while it was terrifying to think about it, at the beginning, it actually totally changed my perspective.

And by the end of a conversation, I was like, I feel so much better. I -- I like, really have hope. Let me think on that. But I think this will give you hope. I really do. So you can watch us on BlazeTV. Join us, please. I'm almost out of time.

There is, I don't know if you saw this. This came out September 30th. A consortium of four private groups, worked with a Department of Homeland Security. And Department of State, to sensor massive numbers of social media posts, they consider misinformation during the 2020 election.

Then its members got rewarded with millions of federal dollars from the Biden administration. The election integrity partnership is back in action again, for the midterm elections, raising concerns among people who believe in, I don't know, freedom. That a chilling new form of public/private partnership to evade the First Amendment prohibition of government censorship may be expanding.

What they did in 2020, is they set up this service. That allowed federal agencies like home land cyber security, infrastructure, security agency, which I've never even heard of. And the state's global engagement center, to file tickets. They could go to this public/private thing. And the government agencies could say, I want to write a ticket. That's misinformation. You should remove it.

And they would.

They also -- listen to this. They also gave our empowered, with federal agency-like power. To the Democratic National Committee. Common cause, and the NAACP. So they could write tickets as well. And have people censored.

We were on that list. And I was specifically named. I want you to know, it's a matter of time. Please, it is so important. And I know you're -- I know how hard you work for your money. And I know every dollar counts. But if you believe we can help you through things, please, subscribe to Blaze TV and do it now.

We're in a place, where we're going to have to have you, with us. Join us, if you can. BlazeTV.com/Glenn. And the promo code is Glenn. BlazeTV.com/Glenn. Promo code Glenn. And save.

EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains His FIERY Rejection of Spending Bill

According to the media, there’s a big fight going on between Republicans over the House’s new slimmed-down continuing resolution spending bill. Some, including President-elect Donald Trump, wanted the bill to pass. But others, like Texas Representative Chip Roy, argued that it still wasn’t ready. However, is the Republican “unity coalition” really crumbling, like the media claims? Rep. Chip Roy joins Glenn to explain what’s really going on. He argues that he IS trying to give Trump and DOGE a 100-day “runway” to fix the country. But he makes the case that, by increasing the debt ceiling by $5 trillion without agreeing on other cuts, this bill gives bad actors the ability to be an “obstacle” to Trump’s agenda further down the line. Plus, he reveals to Glenn that he believes some of these bad actors LEAKED false information about his stance to Mar-a-Lago.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN:

I think we have a great opportunity today. To show you how to have a -- tough conversation, with friends, friends. Where you deeply disagree on something.

But you know that their intent is good. They know my intent is good. Or our intent is good.

And we actually have the same end goal, but we disagree on the path. And we're going to walk away friends.

Chip Roy is joining us today. And, Chip, I love you. And I always will. And I agree with your, we've got to cut spending. We have to. But Liz Wheeler is with me. And we've been talking about it all morning. It's the -- the -- the -- the system of DOGE and Trump, the call-out to the world, in saying, you've got to surrender the Capitol. You know, the bad guys are in and about to take all the money.

Surround, and tell them, come out with your hands up. And that happened. And we scored a massive win, in an entirely new way.

Ask then you stood on principle, one we both agree with.

And it failed!

And so here's -- here's what Liz and I were talking about. Here's what we want to say to you.

And then get your response.

LIZ: Hi, Congressman Roy, this is the way I see it. I want your take on it. I love you. I think you're one of the best members of Congress. I disagree with you on the process that's happening. And I think that is the difference. The process. We elected Donald Trump to be a disruptor. Because Republican members of Congress for decades have been telling they're fiscal conservatives. They want to decrease the debt SEAL. It hasn't happened.

It hasn't -- it hasn't been done. And so Donald Trump comes in with Elon Musk, and uses this DOGE process to first identify these pieces of garbage in the first 1500-page bill. And take those things to the people. We took them to members of Congress. Congress said, okay. We'll listen to you.

So that new process was very effective.

And my question to you is: Once that process was proved to be effective. Which I think is exciting and wonderful.

How do we bridge this divide, with you, to say, okay.

Let's put some faith in this new process. And trust Elon Musk and Donald Trump and the Dow Jones process, to eventually address the debt ceiling, but get this done right now?

GLENN: And not blind trust. Chip.

CHIP: So appreciate you guys. Appreciate being on the show. Particular order. I have to go through a couple of things.

GLENN: Yep.

CHIP: Number one, it's important to remember that my job and my duty is to the Constitution, to God, and the people I represent. I told them, when I came to Washington, I would not -- I would not let the credit card and the debt ceiling and the borrowing of the United States without the spending restraints necessary to offset it.

GLENN: Okay.

CHIP: Right now, all we have are promises and ideas and notions. What I know, that neither of you respectfully no, and that none of your listeners respectfully no are the people that are in the room, that I was in with yesterday. And the day before, who are recalcitrant.

And do not want to do the spending cuts that we need to do.

That I believe the president and the DOGE guys. And everybody want to do.

My job, is to force that through the meat grinder. To demand that we do our damn job. Okay?

GLENN: Okay. So hang on. Okay. So wait. Wait. You're right. You're right. You're right. Go ahead.

CHIP: Number thee, when we were going through the bill, I'm glad the bill dropped from 1,550 pages to 116 pages. Three-quarters of Twitter or X or whatever you want to call it, have been out there spreading false facts that we supported a bad bill and didn't like the better bill.

That's not true. But let's be Lear. The 1400 pages that were cut out. It's a panacea.

There were some good stuff in there. There were some bad stuff in there. There was a lot of disinformation.

There wasn't a $70,000 pay raise. There was a 3,000-dollar pay raise.

I didn't support any pay raise. I didn't support a lot of the stuff in there.

But there's a lot of misinformation. And here's the thing: The 116 pages that were left, and I opposed violently the first bill. I was leading the charge on fighting and killing the first bill.

GLENN: And I love you.

LIZ: The second bill for 116 pages. Turned off -- turned off the pay go requirement. That we slash 1.7 trillion automatically.

And added a 5 trillion that are increase.

My view was, I could not support that, without a clear understanding of what cuts we would get, in mandatory spending next year. And undo any of the Inflation Reduction Act.

The undoing of the student loans. The undoing of the crap with the food stamps.

And everything else. I yield back.

GLENN: Okay. I yield back.

Chip, you're not in a hostile room. We love you. And we agree with your end goals. It's our end goal too. We didn't make that promise that you made to the people that voted for you. So we have more wiggle room here.

But you say -- I think our big difference is, you say, I know the guys in the room.

You're right. You do. And we -- we ceded that earlier today on the show.

You are -- one of us is wrong on trust.

I don't trust any of the weasels in Washington.

But I think Donald Trump and Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have earned enough trust, to get a grace period, here for the first -- maybe the first year.

Or at least six months.

To turn the economy around, and also reduce the size of the government.

And totally flip this thing.

And I know, as somebody who is -- you know, run a company, mainly into a ground. But run a company, and have to switch it, in the middle, and totally reshuffle. That -- that actually costs money, while you're doing it, to bridge the gap.

Because you have to fill up holes while you're filling in the gap.

You don't trust the people in the room. Neither do we.

But we do trust the system that worked on Wednesday with DOGE and Donald Trump.

Where do we disagree?

Can you give them --

CHIP: We don't disagree. And yesterday morning, I was making that precise argument in a room full of conservatives and then a follow-up room with people who will call it, less conservatives.

GLENN: Republican. Yes.

CHIP: And so we were making this argument. And then someone infamously. Something leaked out of the room, somehow out to Mar-a-Lago. That I was being resistant. Because I was negotiating trying to get the agreement to achieve the objective that you just said. I was trying to get, okay. In fact, yesterday morning, I made the argument to a group of conservatives. We need to give the president runway. We need to give him his first 100 days. We need to appreciate JD, and Vivek, and all the people -- and everybody involved. For the president to achieve the objective.

But to get there. We have to make sure that the guys in the room, that are an obstacle to that, don't have the ability to block it.

Because information flow matters. And when those guys tell the president, they can't achieve X.

Then the president will not achieve X. Our job was to force and demand, guys, we need actual understanding of what the cuts will be.

And because otherwise, we're asking us to accept a 5 trillion-dollar limit in our credit card increase. In exchange for nothing!

Literally, in exchange for nothing, but -- but hope.

So our job was to force that change.

Unfortunately, while I was trying to make the argument that we needed something in order to get the votes, someone leaked that down to Mar-a-Lago, and the president reacted.

But now I have to now manage that.

GLENN: Right. I know. I know.

CHIP: They're trying to enforce change in town.

GLENN: So hang on.

We have to leave this. Because I'm going to run against the clock.

I could talk to you all day about this. You were in a meeting this morning about J.D. Vance. Can you tell us anything about that meeting?

CHIP: That meeting happened, because despite what happened yesterday, I'm trying to get this done. Last night, talking to JD, we worked to get this meeting done. We had some good progress this morning.

But there still remains people concerned about spending. That we can work out, what agreement we can reach. On what spending cuts. We can actually get next year, in exchange for giving the vote on a debt ceiling increase.

So it remains fluid. Progress was made. But we have to keep working on it.

And I left that meeting to talk to you. Soil get an update in a minute.

GLENN: Thank you for that, by the way.

I hear there is a new bill that may be coming today.

Is that the one you're talking about?

Or is this another bill that could be another nightmare?

CHIP: Despite other people leaking crap, I refused. I can't say, because it's not been decided by the speaker.

And it's not right to talk about things they're talking about in private meetings.

GLENN: Yeah, but it's -- it's this speaker. I mean, is he really the speaker anymore, Chip, really?

CHIP: We need to hear what bill we need to get forward. And I can't talk about the private meetings. But, look, I'm going to keep fighting for what I promised people that I represent.

I'm going to fight to cut spending. I am going to represent article one.

I'm going to support the president's agenda, but we've got to do that together.

GLENN: Okay.

Chip, thank you.

I think we can -- I think we agree, but I await to see what that means to you. Because we may just have to agree to disagree on this.

But I love you. And I still want you to replace Cornyn.

CHIP: The short version is, for inflation's sake, we cannot increase the debt ceiling $5 trillion without knowing what we're getting for it.

And I don't think anybody should disagree with that.

GLENN: But you don't disagree that Elon Musk and Trump and Vivek are serious about gutting the system.

CHIP: I believe that is their objective. I believe there are obstacles to that objective. And I need to know the sincerity of how we deal with those obstacles, both structural, and human. And we have to figure that out. And that's my job.

America's Favorite Villain Is Ready for Nuclear Fallout. Are You? | Glenn TV | Ep 401

In this episode of Glenn TV — a theatrical how-to guide to survive the breakdown of society after a nuclear attack, according to the new movie “Homestead” from Angel Studios. Glenn Beck interviews the movie’s star and executive producer, Neal McDonough, who plays the head of a family trying to survive as society is breaking down in a postapocalyptic world. You’ve probably seen Neal in everything from the hit TV shows “Yellowstone,” “Suits,” and “Justified” to movies like “Captain America,” “Minority Report,” and the groundbreaking mini-series “Band of Brothers.” Glenn asks Neal what it’s like to play a villain so often, how TV and movies are changing, and how he survived Hollywood as a devoted Christian and husband who refuses to do onscreen kissing scenes with any of his female co-stars. They also discuss his battle with alcoholism, what it’s like working the legends like Sylvester Stallone and Kevin Costner, and the cultural craving for Western cinema. Note: Angel Studios is a sponsor of “The Glenn Beck Program.” Get your tickets for “Homestead” at https://Angel.com/Beck.

Biden FLOODED the Government With DEI, But Trump Has ONE Way to Win

With just weeks left in office, President Biden (or whoever’s actually calling the shots) has decided to hire 1,200 DEI officials. Is this part of a plot to undermine Donald Trump’s plans and make it harder for him to rid the government of woke Deep State bureaucrats? Glenn and fellow BlazeTV host ‪@lizwheeler‬ discuss how other Democrats have recently proposed things like this, including a UK-style “shadow cabinet” that would oppose Trump. Liz also gives her advice to Trump on how to deal with these new DEI officials, who will be paid hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to focus on things like “health equity” …

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. Where were we, Liz?

LIZ: The Biden administration. Although, not Biden. Because he can't tell the difference between a nickel and a dime, trying to sabotage the Trump administration.

GLENN: Yeah. So the latest on this is now Biden is hiring 1200. Biden is not doing it.

But he's hiring 1200 DEI officials, and putting them just under the appointed official. So there will be 1200.

Some of these people make almost $400,000 a year. $400,000 a year! That's your tax dollar!

Will you -- in your -- in your life, your average person, I don't know if you'll ever even -- if you'll ever even pay $400,000 in taxes?

So you could be working your whole life, for that one hire.

And he's hired 1200 of them.

And all he's trying to do is make sure the DEI positions just can't get cut.

I've got news for you.

Donald Trump is going to cut those positions.

He's going to. And it's going to get ugly.

I mean, the ACLU was all over this, saying, oh, we've got plans. We're going to -- we're going to -- this is obscene.

This is absolutely obscene. What the Democrats are trying to do. By thwarting the president.

And honestly, thwarting the will of the American people. Remember the speech that was given by I don't know, some boob from -- well, one of the Carolinas.

I don't want to besmirch the other one for electing a boob. But he was -- he was giving a speech in the well of the Senate. And he said, we need a shadow government. What?

Hold it. You mean a Deep State. Because we already have one of those. And he said. This is a quote.

One of the most obscene things I've ever heard from an elected representative. We failed to make our case. That our policies are better.

Now, in my world, growing up in America, the next sentence is: We need to sit down and talk and find out why we're out of step, with the American people.

His was, but we know we're right. So we need a shadow government, to make sure we put our policies in, anyway.

There's nothing more un-American than that.

By the way, Ted Cruz also said, he thinks there's criminal charges that could be lodged against Biden and his administration for the selling of the steel and the walls for the border.

I think so too. I think so too. He'll probably end up blanketing or pardoning everybody that has either lived by a Biden. Or a Democrat.

Worked for the administration. Everybody will get a pardon at the end.

Honestly, it's like, hey. Everybody, Oprah is here.

Look under your seats.

Because you've got a pardon. You've got a pardon. And you've got a pardon.

Ugh!

Now...

PAT: The Department of Health and Human Services on November 15th. This is posted immediately after President Trump has been reelected.

They advertised for the following position. A deputy assistant secretary for Minority Health. With a salary of up to 221 thousand dollars. This is the goal of this position.

Or this is the purpose of this position.

To, quote, promote health equity.

To promote health equity.

What does that mean?

It means racial criminalization in health care.

It means, if you are seeking, I don't know.

Think about during the pandemic. When there was limited resources. Limited beds in the emergency room.

Limited amounts of drugs and therapeutics, that people could access, in order to treat COVID when it's at its worse.

Well, now you will be screened based on the color of your skin.

That's what health equity is. Health equity is a word used to disguise the reality, that it's just -- it's socialism.

It's discrimination.

It requires, a government official to look at you, and make a decision about whether or not you are going to have access to health care that you might need, based on what you look like.

Not based on the severity of your illness. Not based on your ability to pay. Not based on your request for care. But based on the color of your skin. That's not only wrong and immoral and completely absurd, that a bureaucratic in that position would make over $221,000. That's evil. The left likes to pretend, that you're a racist. Or I'm a racist. Just for voting for Donald Trump. This is evil racism. This is the kind of stuff that we eradicated from our country.

And Biden is trying to plant the Trump administration. With these evil little minions before he leaves.

GLENN: I mean, why are we -- why are we surprised?

How many anti-slavery amendments do we have, to the Constitution.

I mean, it's amazing to me. With very few exception, after ten, most of these seem to be like, oh.

Yeah. Okay.

You're so stupid, you don't understand.

Slaves need to be free. Okay.

Then the next amendment is like, okay. All right.

Let me limp up to explain this once more.

That means, they're Americans, and can vote!

How many amendments are -- are just one after another, especially on slavery.

And, by the way, who was it that didn't understand that slaves should be freed? The Democratic Party.

It -- I swear to you, these amendments are just, God, we didn't think you would be this stupid.

It's already covered!

But let's lay it out clearly, for you.

You cannot discriminate by color! By race! By religion.

We thought that had already been covered, but apparently, not.

LIZ: What I would do if I were the Trump transition team. This is obviously a deliberate effort by the Biden administration. Because within the first ten days after the election, 33 of these jobs were posted on government websites.

So this was -- they were like, okay. Trump is coming in. Let's start ceding the deep state with these races. What I would do if I were Trump transition is I would say, we take racial equality, very seriously. We take civil rights very seriously.

In the administration, of the 47th president of the United States, and anybody who engages, especially a government official who engages in racial discrimination will be prosecuted. And prevent these people from even accepting these jobs. Because they will be threatened with legal action if they do.

GLENN: You can make a legal case. A solid, legal case, that that is exactly right. And that's what should be done.

They would be doing that to us, if we were -- if we were discriminating on race. If we were like, you know what, we're only going to hire white people.

We would go to jail.

Oh, you know what. We're just going to shuffle the deck here.

We're going to look at everybody.

But we lean towards white people.

Did you have Wheaties for breakfast?

If you had Wheaties as a childhood, you're in a different category. Okay?

I mean, we would go to jail. We would be shut down.

It's the same thing.

But don't expect the Democrats to get it.

Did you see the new -- or the DNC chair front runner?

The one they're thinking should be the head of the DNC?

He said, the problem with the election is, the convention should have featured pro-Hamas activists.

LIZ: I totally agree. That absolutely should have --
GLENN: At least they would have been honest.
LIZ: Think about how many Democrat voters, and really prominent people too.

I'm talking about Joe Rogan. I'm talking about Elon Musk. I'm talking about RFK Jr. These were fairly hard-core Democrats, who not only converted to being like, okay. We'll tolerate a Republican. Because it's not Joe Biden.

It's not Kamala Harris.

These people are the biggest supporters of President Trump right now, because of that kind of garbage. So DNC, if you are going to be radical, please be honest and tell us.

Thank you. It's just ushering new Republican voters right into our arms.

GLENN: I respect you, more than I respect people like Mike Johnson.

Mike Johnson doesn't tell me what -- he doesn't tell me what he really is.

What he really believes.

He tells me what I want to hear. I don't believe it. Then he's elected. Then he gets in.

And then he rapes you.

You know, I have much more respect for -- for people who are like, yeah. I'm pro-Hamas.

And you should elect me.

Well, I don't think I'm going to do it.

But thank you for telling me who you really are.

LIZ: Yeah. Great. Let's take all of the Democrat members of Congress. And let's Jamaal Bowman them, let's Cori Bush them.

Because as soon as they were honest about being pro-Hamas, voters were like, actually, we're good.

GLENN: Yep. Yep.

By the way, Hochul has come out. And she has now tried to stir up support to end the electoral college.

Because no offense, Wyoming, according to her words, New York voted for Kamala Harris.

You know, it is so dishonest. And this would -- this would have no space, if -- if we were actually teaching you students, what the electoral college is for.

You want to talk about fairness. Here's fairness: Should New York City dictate what all of New York does?

No!

They have representation. Of all the small towns.

All the farming towns.

Everything else.

New York City, should not be the one that tells everyone else, exactly how to live!

I think there should be electoral colleges in states now.

Because the cities are just devouring, all of the communities outside of those mega cities.

The electoral college is to make sure, that New York, California, and let me say, Texas, doesn't run over all of the other states!

And force how they're living in those cities, and those big states. In Wyoming!

Or Idaho!

Or Alabama!

Yeah. I don't have to live like you do in New York City.

I don't want to live like you do in New York City.

And we have completely different values than you do.

We should have a say, and an even, equal seat at the table.

That's why we have the electoral college. And we have the popular vote.

So you can see. And it's usually pretty close.

This time, however, Hochul, you lost the popular vote!

So you don't really have a case here, on the electoral college.

But you don't have a case.

If you're an American, you don't have a case on the electoral college anyway.

LIZ: Wait a second. Have we war gamed the scenario that you just proposed.

If there was an electoral college on the state level in California or on the state level in New York, what would the -- have we actually looked at a map here. If anybody has done this. Tag me on social media.

Because I am fascinated by this idea. I've not thought of this before. But I -- would we actually swing those states Republicans, if there was a state level?

STU: I bet we would. I bet we would.

You know, every time. Look at Wyoming.

Jackson Hole now controls Wyoming. Just controls it.

Who is -- who is so close to controlling Texas?

All the big cities.

You know, you don't have a chance. When these cities grow so large, they tip everything.

That's why we have an electoral college.

And it didn't used to be this way.

But our cities are becoming mega cities.

Almost states in and among themselves.

You -- you have to balance. Otherwise, the farmer and everybody else, that makes your life possible, in a city, gets screwed.

GLENN: And also think about cheating for a second. If you have a popular vote across the whole country, versus an electoral college system, it's a lot easier to impact the outcome of the entire presidential election because you can have one county somewhere with corrupt election officials.

And if they cheat by 10,000 votes, that could change the outcome of the election.

But if you're an electoral college, it doesn't necessarily.