RADIOJune 23, 2023

THIS Hunter Biden text may be the SMOKING GUN against Joe

Testimony heard yesterday by the House Committee on Ways and Means led to some BOMBSHELL revelations about the Biden Crime Family. In this clip, Glenn reads a WhatsApp message from Hunter Biden to a former Chinese business partner, Henry Zhao. And the SHOCKING content of that text may the smoking gun to incriminate Joe…even though the president has repeatedly said he knew nothing of his son’s business dealings. Glenn is joined by his chief researcher, Jason Buttrill, who helps break it all down…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, I want to talk you to about something that happened with the IRS whistle-blowers yesterday.

Testimony heard at the House committee on ways and means, attesting to the Department of Justice hamstringing the US attorney David Weiss, and his ability to be pursue, the Hunter Biden case.

The whistle-blowers, Gary Shapely, he led the IRS investigation on the Hunter Biden case. The case was code named Sportsmen. I don't know how you put him as a sports -- anyway, as well as one of his subordinate agents named undisclosed.

I'll just give you a couple of things. I'll give you the top ten things we learned yesterday.

From just the news. But I want to go to -- there it is. Here it is. A WhatsApp message, connected to Joe Biden. And Hunter Biden's business deal.

Now, I don't know why we haven't seen this, before.

The second unnamed whistle-blower said that there was a WhatsApp message, found where Hunter Biden mentioned his father, President Joe Biden in the context of business deals.

Now, remember, I have nothing to do. I didn't know about my son's business. And we've told you, that's impossible. It is impossible.

And we've shown you circumstantial evidence. Okay?

But in the WhatsApp message, here's what he says. And this, the FBI and IRS had July 30th, 2017.

Biden says to Henry Zhao, one of his Chinese affiliates, a guy he is doing business with. Jason, I want to bring you in. Because you're chief researcher. I've been busy on the book. I want to clarify, and make sure I'm right on everything.

Henry Zhao is the guy who is Communist Party affiliated. Right?

Okay. And this is the -- I can't remember the name of the company.

JASON: CEFC.

GLENN: Yes. Which was?

JASON: That was -- I guess they're an energy company.

GLENN: But it's a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chinese government. Okay?

And the contact was a guy in the Communist Party Henry Zhao.

And this is what Hunter Biden wrote: Quote, I am sitting here with my father. And we would like to understand, why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.

Now, it goes on. But I think that's enough.

Don't you? I'm sitting here, with my father. Not the big guy.

You know, he's become very spiritual. Maybe he was talking about his father in heaven. I'm sitting here in prayer, with my father in heaven.

And he's wondering why the commitment, you know, to some of those commandments, has not yet been fulfilled.

Maybe that's the explanation.

He says, tell the director, that I would like to resolve this now. Before it gets out of hand.

And now means tonight. And Xi, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this, other than you, Zhang or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me, and every person he knows, and my ability to forever hold a grudge, that you will regret not following my direction.

I am sitting here, waiting for the call, with my father. In heaven.

Or as he wrote, he left the in heaven part out.

I'm sitting here waiting for the call with my father.

STU: I mean, I -- I am -- I was very, very suspicious of -- and I would say knew that Joe Biden committed crimes like this.

And this is not a surprise. I am surprised they were this blatant with it.

I am shocked that this message actually exists. This is Hunter Biden blatantly blurting out everything we've been accusing him of. It's happening. Is it -- this is real, right?

Like, honestly, I went back 20 times yesterday, going did someone say they saw this message? Is it one of those things, it turned up on the internet. We can't explain why. This is real, Jason, right? There's no question about it.

JASON: This is not only real. But the FBI. And this is in the first couple pages of this report.

GLENN: Because the report is like 250 pages. And thank God for you, Jason, reading all of it.

JASON: Always a schmuck. The FBI authenticated all of this in November 2019. Now, just think about what happened after that.

GLENN: Okay. That's a year before the election.

That's a year before the laptop goes out.

They verified the FBI we now know verified that that laptop was real, a year before anyone even heard the word Hunter laptop.

VOICE: But what did they do to social media companies like Facebook after this?

They went to companies like Facebook and say, hey, there might be some Russian disinformation, that might be coming on your way soon. Just want to put it on your radar.

That eventually led to the blacklisting, and banning of that information. Like the New York Post article.

This is unbelievable. Absolutely unbelievable.

GLENN: What is truly, truly an act of treason toward freedom, is the press not raising hell over this. Okay?

This is -- this is the smoking gun. The smoke. The little smudged bullet. In the wall. This is all of it.

This is all of it. And for them not to take this now, and say -- because here's the problem.

Only half the country cares. And until you get the other half to care, nothing is going to happen.

But if ABC, NBC, boy. I would be horrible if people started protesting the mouse house. Because ABC only moves when anybody threatens the mouse house.

The actual park. You're saying, I'm going to picket your park. They go crazy. They don't care about the moving or anything like that.

They care about the parks. So I would hate to see somebody organize a really lasting, long-term, and smart picturing of those parks. To get ABC to actually start to tell the truth.

The fact that they just -- that this isn't the lead and non-stop story of the year.

STU: Yeah. Because it's not only this message. You know, we've seen the laptop, we've seen tons of stuff on there, that's a real problem. The reason we're seeing this message today.

Is because the whistle-blower said, they have these messages. And they were blocked from having to investigate them.

GLENN: Yeah. So listen to the whole thing. Listen to these other things.

Biden met CEFC Chinese business client of Hunter.

Did you know that? He didn't know anything about it.

He meets this guy. Shapely recalled Rob Walker, a business associate of Hunter, describing a meeting that Joe Biden attended with the Chinese company.

Walker went on to describe an instance in which the former vice president showed I happen at a CFC meeting. Walker said, we were at the Four Seasons. We were having lunch.

And he stopped in.

He said, hello to everybody. I don't think he drank water. I think Hunter Biden said, I may be trying to start a company, or try to do something with these guys. And could you?

And I think he was like, I'm around. And he would show up. He recounted.

So I don't know exactly what that means, other than, I want to do business. And could you be involved in

But he didn't want to say that. You know, if you're around. Would you show up from time to time?

Is that what you get from that?

JASON: Yes. Does that go on to say what the conclusions that they drew from that meeting?

Okay. So that goes on even further in the testimony. And the person -- whoever is asking the whistle-blower questions. Says, was it your impression, that all of this was orchestrated, between Joe and Hunter for this entire -- for him to show up at that time, to make that presence, to influence this meeting.

Was it your impression that this was orchestrated. He answers. Yes. That was my impression.

GLENN: Okay. So this is not some nameless whistle-blower.

There are those that are afraid. This is a high-ranking IRS official. That was in charge of this investigation.

And as you will find out in a few minutes. He is blowing the whistle. Not only on what they found.

But what they were not allowed to do.

All the stuff that this was, oh, no. We stayed out of it.

Is an absolute lie.

And we now have the FBI stating it. And we have the -- and we have the IRS stating it.

All of the agents, that were involved in the actual work, and at the IRS, the guy who was in charge of the agents, who were doing the work.

JASON: Can I point also, we've been critical on the FBI, as we should on a lot of things. This was very remarkable on this testimony.

The rank-and-file FBI agents were just as pissed off as this whistle-blower was. Because it was clear that something was happening at the higher level. But the rank-and-file FBI agents were like, let us investigate. Let us ask these questions.

GLENN: I would love to see, if they really cared. If they really cared. I have to tell you, any of these guys lose their job, and you are really coming out and blowing the whistle.

And you have the hard facts. I think this audience would raise millions of dollars to make sure your family was taken care of.

You know what I mean?

You've got to do your patriotic duty.

You have to speak out.

Let me come back. There's more shocking stuff.

How do we not know about this?

Okay. So now the FBI whistle-blower. And, again, not rank and file guy. This was the guy in charge of the investigation.

The IRS whistle-blower describes in detail, yesterday, how Hunter Biden evaded paying taxes on his Burisma income.

Biden's appointed attorneys, allowed the statute of limitation to run out.

Okay?

Listen to this. Here's the quote. And so the way the money worked, is, there's a document in which the contract between Burisma and Hunter Biden. Those are the two parties.

It was for $1 million per year.

Of course, this was 2014.

And it was negotiated in April. So the payments in that year, were reduced by the months.

So it was not shockingly 666. 666,000.

83 thousands of individuals dollars a month. He was receiving. What Hunter Biden did. I'm quoting. The testimony.

Is that he told Burisma to send that income, to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, which was his company. And then when the money came back to him, he booked it as a loan. So there's all this mechanization of nonsense happening over here, in the nominee structure. Oh, this is complex. This is complex. And, well, it's not complex.

Because this is taxable events.

As soon as the income came from Burisma to Hunter Biden, whatever he did with it, after that, was just a scheme to evade taxes for that year.

To add to that, is Rosemont Seneca's Bohai and Archer. When the money came back to Biden, they booked it as an expense on their books.

So even the two parties didn't treat it the same way. Then Eric Schrenrin (phonetic) realized this, looked into this, and he even told Hunter on multiple occasions, multiple communications.

You need to amend your 2014 return to include the Burisma income. He never did.

But they never let -- the FBI never let them investigate that, in time.

They kept asking, we have this. We have this. We have this.

Well, I'm not sure. Let's not go there yet.

Until it expired.

And now, statute of limitations.

But they intentionally blocked it, until they expired. What?

Listen to this.

I had alluded to Ferra and some other things here. But some of these people here, Chairman Ye, Gang Dong-won, Zhao are believed to be connected to the Chinese Communist Party. Okay?

So could there be national security implications with communications with those officials? The testimony is, that is correct.

And was that sentiment also shared by the FBI? Answer, yes.

And despite those concerns, that the FBI had, and the rest of the team had, he was not looked into. Is that correct?

The prosecutors said, don't do it.

When we asked for location. GPS location, on some of these documents. They said, no. We're not going to do that.

And if FBI did something, at some level, I'm not privy to it.

They blocked them, even the WhatsApp, if I'm not mistaken, Jason. Even the WhatsApp message. They wanted to geo locate where that message came from, to make sure he was in the house, and dad was in the house.

They wouldn't do it. Now, why in an honest investigation would you not do that?

Why wouldn't you exonerate the president? Would be very easy to do.

SHOCK POLL: The % of Young People Who Support SOCIALISM is Insane

New polling reveals a shocking truth: young Americans aren’t just open to socialism... they overwhelmingly want a socialist president in 2028. Glenn Beck and Justin Haskins break down five alarming surveys showing massive ideological shifts among voters ages 18-39, including young Republicans. Why is socialism exploding in popularity, and what does this mean for the future of America? Are we on the brink of a political transformation or potentially even a national crisis?

Watch This FULL Episode of 'Glenn TV' HERE

Property Taxes are OUT OF CONTROL - And Here's Why! | Guest: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

Texas Governor Greg Abbott joins Glenn Beck to expose why Texans are being crushed by skyrocketing property taxes — and how local governments, not the state, keep driving homeowners deeper into financial distress. Gov. Abbott breaks down his five-point plan to impose strict spending limits, force voter approval for tax hikes, reform out-of-control appraisals, empower citizens to slash taxes themselves, and eliminate school district property taxes for homeowners altogether. Glenn argues that property tax is morally wrong because it prevents Texans from ever truly owning their land, and Abbott lays out his strategy to fight both parties in the legislature to finally deliver lasting relief.

Joe Rogan & Glenn AGREE: We just got CLOSER to civil war

Joe Rogan recently warned that we may have gotten to Step 7 of 9 in the lead-up to civil war. Glenn reviews the 9 Steps and explains why he believes Rogan nailed this one. But Glenn also lays out what Americans MUST do to reverse this trend...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So if you take what Fetterman said yesterday about how people are cheering for him to die on the left, and then you couple it with something that was on the Joe Rogan show on Tuesday. He was saying that the reaction to the death of Charlie Kirk makes him think that the US is closer to Civil War than -- than he thought.

Now, let me quote him. He said, after the Charlie Kirk thing. I'm like, oh, my.

We might be at seven. This might be he step seven on the way to a bona fide Civil War. Charlie Kirk gets shot, and people are celebrating.

Like, whoa. Whoa. Whoa.

You want people to die that you disagree with?

Where are we now on the scale of Civil War?

Well, let me go over the scale of Civil War, because it's sobering.

Now, none of this has to be true. If we wake up and decide, I don't want to do this anymore!

Okay?

Here's step one.

Step one. Loss of civic trust.

Every civil conflict begins when people stop believing that the system is fair. Are we there?

We're so far -- we're so far past the doorway, we are comfortably asleep on the couch on this one. Gallup and Pew both show trust in Congress, the media courts, and the FBI government are now at record lows.

The Edelman Trust Barometer classifies the US now as severely polarized. Majority of Republicans distrust federal elections. Majority of Democrats don't trust the Supreme Court.

Americans are really united on one thing, and that is the other side is corrupt!

When faith in the rules collapses, the republic begins to wobble. But that's step one. Step two, polarization hardens into identity!

Political disagreement is normal!

Identity conflict is fatal!

But that's what Marxists push. Identity politics. This is when politics stopped being about policy, and started being about who you are as a person.

Have we crossed this one into step two?

I mean, we're neck deep into this. A study on this, from PRRI.

It's a survey, found 23 percent of Americans believe political violence may be necessary to save the that I guess.

I think that's an old study. Americans now sort themselves by ZIP code into ideological enclaves. The big sort: Universities, activists, corporations. Everybody is promoting oppressor versus oppressed.

And that -- does what?

It puts us into incompatible tribes. Opponents aren't wrong anymore. The opponent is dangerous!

If I go back and you look at civil wars, Lebanon, before 1975. Yugoslavia, before 1991. That's -- we're doing that. Okay?

Step three. Breakdown of the gatekeepers. The gatekeepers are kind of like the referees of society. It's the media, political parties, churches, civic leaders.

When they fail, extremism fills the vacuum. Okay. Where are we on this? Have our gatekeepers failed us?

Yeah. I think both parties, especially the left, you know, everything I predicted that the left was going to be eaten by the extreme left, and then the communists and the socialists is now happening.

They've lost control of the fringe of each party. Media transformed, you know, from referees into team coaches. Tech platforms. It's outrage for profit. Universities are not there to cool things down. They heat them up.

Churches. Churches are useless. Useless.

When the referees leave the field, the game devolves into a brawl. And the refs are gone off the field. So there are only nine steps. We're at step four. Here's step four.

Are you ready for this one?

Parallel information realities.

Civil wars don't require different opinions. They require different realities.

I remember reading about Germany, at the beginning of, you know, the Nazi era. How the two new newspapers. One was propaganda for the government.

And the other one, it was the last one that was kind of the holdout.

And they said, you could read them, and they would cover the same thing.

But they had almost no information was the same. Except, that happened yesterday.

Here's what they said. And then everything else was different. That's exactly -- I mean, step four is complete!

We can't agree on facts, right?

Crime rates. Border numbers. Inflation. Election security.

Two Americans can watch the same video. And see opposite truths.

Social media algorithms are creating customized political universes.

Digital echo chambers. Deepfakes. We're just at the beginning of that. And both sides accuse the other of running disinformation machines.

Why? Because we don't have a shared reality. So if you don't have a shared reality. How do you settle any dispute?

On the nine steps, we're up to number five. Coming in at number five.

Loss of neutral rule of law.

This out of the nine steps with, five is the pivot point.

It's not corruption, it's the belief that the law is no longer neutral.

Are we there yet?

Let me tell you the CBS you.gov poll. 67 percent say the justice system is used for political purposes.

I think that's low. January 6 defendants given years in prison, 2020 rioters were released. High profile political figures, prosecuted or shielded based on party.

FBI whistle-blowers alleging pressure to inflate domestic extremism numbers. States like Texas, directly defying federal directives, on border enforcement.

And now, leading the way, with the federal government.

History is really cold and unforgiving on this point.

Once the people believe justice is political! Remember, this is the turning point.

The republic stands on borrowed time. Once you no longer believe that justice is achievable. Step six.

Are we there?

I think we are.

Step six. Normalization of political violence!

This is where violence stops shocking the system. Are we there?

Remember, where violence stops shocking the system. Look at evidence just from Virginia. What they just voted for.

He was calling for the death of a -- a political opposition.

Calling for his children to be killed.

Was called on it, never apologized.

Never said anything other than, yeah. I know. He dug it deeper.

Was anyone shocked by it? Apparently not. They elected him. Here's the evidence. 2020 riots.
574 events. $2 billion in damage. Was anybody outraged by that? Or was it downplayed and excused?
Assassination attempts. Assassination attempts against the president. Supreme Court justice.

Fistfights. And mob actions on college campuses. To silence speakers. Rising to do for punching a fascist or stopping genocide. Depending on the ideology. Online chatter discussing Civil War, national divorce, and revolution.

When violence becomes part of the political language, a nation crosses an invisible line. We're now up to step seven out of nine.

This is where Joe Rogan said, are we at step seven?

The rise of militias and parallel forces.

When a state loses he is monopoly on force.

Countdown accelerates. So where are we on this one?

I think we're seeing, maybe early signs of this.

You're starting to see the -- the states kind of organize these mobs, you know, to go after ICE.

Right?

Armed groups, right-wing, left-wing radical secessionists. Anyone.

Once they start forming their own police forces. Or their own option forces, then you have -- then you have everything really falling apart.

Entirely!

I don't think we're there, yet!

But we're starting to see the beginnings of this.

Step eight. The trigger event.

Civil Wars don't begin with a plan. They begin with a spark.

So where are we?

We're not here yet. The conditions are right. Potential triggers, disputed election in '26 or '28.

Political assassination or major attack.

Supreme Court decision that ignites mass unrest.

Financial crisis or dollar crisis.

A state federal standoff turning violent!

Nothing is ignited yet, but the room is soaked in gasoline. So we don't have seven. We're on the verge of eight, at any time. And here's nine.

This is the point of no return.

When police, military, or federal agencies split, even if no one calls it that, well, where are we?

Well, I just read a story about how with the Mamdani election in New York, a good number of the police force is going to leave. And they're going to go join police forces elsewhere. You also have the tension between the state National Guard, and the federal directives, the state guard and the state directives. Law enforcement recruitment is at crisis lows. The distrust of the FBI, DOJ, CIA. Tens of millions of Americans. I always really respected those institutions. I have no respect for them now. If you have states openly defying federal rules on immigration, drug laws, sanctuary policies.
Whistle-blower claims of internal politicization.

All of these things are in play for the first time in 150 years, people can imagine!

So I give this to you, not to be fearful of, but to know where you are. As a map!

Know where you are.

And hopefully, it might wake some people up, if you chart America on, on the nine step model of Civil War. Steps one through four, completed!

Step five, happening!

Step six, happening! Step seven, beginning! Step eight, just waiting for it. And step nine, avoidable, only if step eight, never happens. Again, I'm not telling you for doom purposes, this is diagnosis. This is a doctor going, I want you to look at the chart.

And this is a doctor saying, I want you to look at -- do you see what's happening to your body?

If you don't stop this habit, you are going to die. You don't have to die. You can stop smoking and drinking right now. You can start exercising. But if you don't, you are going to die.

The question is, are we the nation that says, nah, that's not going to happen to me. Or are we the nation that wakes up and sees our chart and says, good heavens, it's way far more gone than I thought it was. But I feel something in the air.

I'm going to change my behavior. The nation that refuses to look and wake up and stop calling their neighbors enemies, is the nation that fails!

We have to strengthen these things that have already fallen. And, you know what, the easiest one to do is?

Church. Where are you ministers and pastors priests and rabbis?

Where the hell are you?

I think there's going to be a special section for you, when you cross over to the -- because you're doing things in the name of God!

So when you get to the other side, I think there's going to be a special section for those who remained silent. While his rights were being taken away.

You don't own that right.

I don't own that right.

The Lord gave us those rights, and said, protect them!

By you, being the representative, the voice box, if you will, of the Lord, to shepherd his people. By you not standing up and saying, hey, by the way, we have -- we have a moral responsibility to protect these rights for the next generation! By you refusing because you're afraid. Because I think, there's no politics in the Bible! There's no politics in the Bible. Really?

The whole thing is about politics. Is about the moral way you have to live your life.

Calling things as you see them. Calling them back to eternal principles.

He didn't tell anybody how to vote. Render to Caesar what is Caesar's.

But there are certain principles that you have to have, or you lose not only this citizenship, but the next citizenship. The one that really matters. And, boy, if you are doing it because you're a coward, you are in the wrong business!

Get out of the pulpit, and go to work at Jack in the Box.

Democrat “SMOKING GUN” on Trump & Epstein gets DESTROYED by facts

The House Oversight Democrats recently released "new" emails allegedly proving President Trump lied about his knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. However, Glenn points out a glaring issue with these emails that destroys their entire narrative...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, let's dive right into the Epstein Maxwell emails. My gosh, Stu!

Why are they trying to cover up that Donald Trump had sex with children!

STU: I mean, it's just clear, as -- as day, in the emails!

GLENN: Yeah. No.

STU: He spent hours with one of the victims. What else could have possibly have occurred in that arrangement? We don't know!

GLENN: And it's -- it's one of the victims, Stu. One of the victims!

STU: One of the victims, that's all we know. One of the victims.

GLENN: Let me read what Jeffrey Epstein wrote. I want you to realize that the dog who hasn't barked is Trump. Victim redacted. Victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned. Police chief, et cetera.

Okay. New information, just released. Or is it?

Because in 2011, 2011, that was released and everybody knew it. It's been out floating around. Here's the change: In 2011, this is what it read.

I want you to realize that the dog hasn't barked is Trump. Virginia spent hours at my house with him.

Why would you redact a name that is already out in the public square!

It's already out!

The memo is already out. The email is already out. It's been out for years. Why would you redact that name now?

Well, because it makes it all of a sudden, new and shiny. Shiny and new. If you don't know who said it, you see victim, and you're like, oh, you see victim. Who is the victim?

I don't know. But when you know it's Virginia, you know this has already gone to court. This is -- she already testified about this!

He didn't partake in any of this, any sex with any of it. It's true. He didn't partake in any sex with us, and I'm quoting, this is from the testimony. But it's not true, that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me. Have you ever met him?

Yes, at Mar-a-Lago, my dad and him. I wouldn't say they were friends, but my dad knew him, and they would talk. Have you ever been in Donald Trump or Jeffrey Epstein's presence with one another? No!

What's the basis of your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey? Jeffrey has told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.

He didn't partake in any of -- any of the sex with any of it. He flirted with me.

It's true, that he didn't partake in any sex with us. But it's not true that he flirted with me.

So I don't understand that. But she goes on. Donald Trump never flirted with me!

Okay. So what -- what's new about this?

This is the same girl, this is the same person that -- didn't she work at Mar-a-Lago?

Or she was going to get a job at Mar-a-Lago.

STU: Yeah. I believe she did at one point.

GLENN: Yeah. So we know they know each other. We know they know each other.

We know that at Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey Epstein would come, and he was poaching the employees. The girls there. To go work for him.

And Donald Trump went to him. And said, "Hey, man. Stop it. Stop poaching people from me. That's not cool. Don't do it." And then he said, "Oh, yeah. All right." And then he did it a second time. And he's like, "You know what, you're out. I don't want you here anymore. I asked you not to do it, and you did it." Now, that doesn't mean that he knew what was happening to the girls or what was happening or anything else.

And even if it did mean something was happening with the girls, he was saying, "Hey. Stop it! Don't take any of the girls or the women here.
Don't do it." I don't believe he knew anything about any of this. But God only knows! And really, God only knows!

This is not new news. Donald Trump, he might end up beating Bezos as the richest man on the planet! When all is said and done!

Because, again, the -- they're presenting this as new fact, a giant scandal. Stu, I don't know if you know this. This is -- this breaking news is a giant scandal.

STU: Yeah. I've heard democratic representatives saying that over the past 24 hours. Yeah. We need to investigate this.

This is shocking stuff. It's a massive scandal. Even ABC News, I heard, pushed back against this. And said, well, what scandal? What are you implying occurred here?

We know who the victim was. We know the victim. Like why. Why did you even redact that name?

And they're like we always redact name of victims.

Do you really? When they're already out publicly?

Not to mention, this particular victim is not even alive.

You know, she sadly died. I mean, it's a terrible, terrible story.

GLENN: Terrible story.

STU: Yeah. She passed away.

A suicide. It was at least the report I believe. But she has a posthumous book coming out. But like a terrible, terrible story.

But, you know, to act as if you have to protect her identity when, number one, she's dead.

GLENN: Is ridiculous.

STU: Number two, everybody already knows who she was, including the news sources, who also have a policy, you would think.

And ABC has a policy. They redact, that was in this type of situation. But it's already been out. We already knew who it was.

So they redacted to make it look like he's with other people who have not already told us nothing bad occurred! You know, and it is an absolutely awful tactic. And at least --

GLENN: I think litigation should follow again. I think he should sue them again. Anyone who is presenting this as new information.

ABC did their job. Congratulations for ABC. They did their job.

They pointed out, this is not new information.

Why would you redact. Why are you releasing this now? And you're redacting a name this -- this email is already out!

You're presenting this as a new scandal.

And you redacted that name. This is completely dishonest. The news media shouldn't even run with it. They shouldn't even run with it. They should have said, old news. Old news. And if you did run with it, you should have handle it had like ABC handle it had. Wait a minute. Why did you redact name.

What do you mean that there's a new scandal. She already testified exactly opposite of what you're believing Jeffrey Epstein over the victim right now. I just want to make sure you understand the Democrats right here. You're taking the name of Epstein, over the victim.

Oh, okay. All right.

STU: And Epstein doesn't even say that anything occurred.

GLENN: No.

STU: There's not -- it's just -- it would be something you would have to jump to a conclusion, to accuse Donald Trump of something like this.

And we know what happened, because the victim said nothing!

Said, it was nothing!

GLENN: Right.

STU: In fact, it wasn't even a flirtation. Which, by the way, even that, you might have thought was creepy. It wasn't even a crime.

It wasn't even flirtation. So it's a disgrace in every single way.

GLENN: All right. So let me take you here. Let me take you here.

If you remember when the shutdown first started, what did the Democrats say, the reason why they did the shutdown?

Not them! Why Mike Johnson and everybody else wouldn't negotiate!

Why wouldn't -- why wouldn't the Republicans negotiate?

Because the heat was on, to release the Epstein files.

And they didn't want to have to do that. So they shut the government down!

Okay?

They wouldn't negotiate. You didn't hear any of this? Oh, it's so arrogant.

STU: It doesn't make any sense at all. That's probably what they said.

GLENN: I know. I know. So the government is open, and what does Mike Johnson do yesterday?

He said the House is going to vote on a bill to release all of the files related to the late financier, convicted child sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein next week. He said on Wednesday that a discharge position to bypass leadership and force a vote on the bill, hit the benchmark for needed signatures. It's been decided by him to expedite the vote for the bill, which under the current rules could have been delayed until at least early September.

So he says, as soon as that petition hit, the needed 218 signatures, I brought it up. Unanimous consent. Let's go! Release it.

So he's pushing this forward. Good, Mike!
Release all of it. Thank you!

Get it out. Lance this boil.

I mean, if anybody thinks that you're ever going to get the truth on this in the first place, it's madness. It's madness. Everybody -- I mean, so many important people were involved in this, and it was in the hands of the Democrats for the longest time. Okay?

So they had all of this information. You don't think it was all picked through? And if there was anything about Donald Trump, you don't think that would have come up between 2020 and 2024?

There's nothing in there about Donald Trump. These people are so stupid. This time, we've got him, boys. This time, we've got him.

No, you don't. This time, it's like Wile E. Coyote. This time, we've got the Roadrunner!

No. You're never going to catch him on this. It doesn't work. The guy was the most investigated person in the history of the world, and you've got nothing! Now, it's good to come out.

But if you think you're going to catch a bunch of people on the left, you're not going to. Because they had it, you know, in their possession.

You don't think all of the names were taken out? You don't think things were destroyed, if there was anything? I believe there was something. But I don't believe there's any names in it anymore. You're not going to get the truth on this one. You're just not going to get the truth, but release everything that we have. Everything!

Oh. Oh, by the way, also in the Epstein emails. How come nobody is talking about this one, Stu?

This one is from Michael Wolff, to Jeffrey Epstein. And then Jeffrey Epstein responds.

So Michael Wolff writes, "What's the thumbnail on Nes Baum (phonetic) Foster?"

And Jeffrey Epstein writes back, "Nes Baum White House Counsel, dot, dot, dot, Hillary doing naughties with Vince."

Now, Vince Foster killed himself, you know, and then killed himself at the White House. And then drug himself across the street to the park.

I mean, I don't know -- the Vince Foster thing is so old. And it doesn't -- but why is nobody talking about that one?

Why is no one talking about that?

Also, this the Jeffrey Epstein email bundle, ABC, you don't feel that's necessary to bring that one up?

Huh. Interesting.