RADIOJune 23, 2023

THIS Hunter Biden text may be the SMOKING GUN against Joe

Testimony heard yesterday by the House Committee on Ways and Means led to some BOMBSHELL revelations about the Biden Crime Family. In this clip, Glenn reads a WhatsApp message from Hunter Biden to a former Chinese business partner, Henry Zhao. And the SHOCKING content of that text may the smoking gun to incriminate Joe…even though the president has repeatedly said he knew nothing of his son’s business dealings. Glenn is joined by his chief researcher, Jason Buttrill, who helps break it all down…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, I want to talk you to about something that happened with the IRS whistle-blowers yesterday.

Testimony heard at the House committee on ways and means, attesting to the Department of Justice hamstringing the US attorney David Weiss, and his ability to be pursue, the Hunter Biden case.

The whistle-blowers, Gary Shapely, he led the IRS investigation on the Hunter Biden case. The case was code named Sportsmen. I don't know how you put him as a sports -- anyway, as well as one of his subordinate agents named undisclosed.

I'll just give you a couple of things. I'll give you the top ten things we learned yesterday.

From just the news. But I want to go to -- there it is. Here it is. A WhatsApp message, connected to Joe Biden. And Hunter Biden's business deal.

Now, I don't know why we haven't seen this, before.

The second unnamed whistle-blower said that there was a WhatsApp message, found where Hunter Biden mentioned his father, President Joe Biden in the context of business deals.

Now, remember, I have nothing to do. I didn't know about my son's business. And we've told you, that's impossible. It is impossible.

And we've shown you circumstantial evidence. Okay?

But in the WhatsApp message, here's what he says. And this, the FBI and IRS had July 30th, 2017.

Biden says to Henry Zhao, one of his Chinese affiliates, a guy he is doing business with. Jason, I want to bring you in. Because you're chief researcher. I've been busy on the book. I want to clarify, and make sure I'm right on everything.

Henry Zhao is the guy who is Communist Party affiliated. Right?

Okay. And this is the -- I can't remember the name of the company.

JASON: CEFC.

GLENN: Yes. Which was?

JASON: That was -- I guess they're an energy company.

GLENN: But it's a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chinese government. Okay?

And the contact was a guy in the Communist Party Henry Zhao.

And this is what Hunter Biden wrote: Quote, I am sitting here with my father. And we would like to understand, why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.

Now, it goes on. But I think that's enough.

Don't you? I'm sitting here, with my father. Not the big guy.

You know, he's become very spiritual. Maybe he was talking about his father in heaven. I'm sitting here in prayer, with my father in heaven.

And he's wondering why the commitment, you know, to some of those commandments, has not yet been fulfilled.

Maybe that's the explanation.

He says, tell the director, that I would like to resolve this now. Before it gets out of hand.

And now means tonight. And Xi, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this, other than you, Zhang or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me, and every person he knows, and my ability to forever hold a grudge, that you will regret not following my direction.

I am sitting here, waiting for the call, with my father. In heaven.

Or as he wrote, he left the in heaven part out.

I'm sitting here waiting for the call with my father.

STU: I mean, I -- I am -- I was very, very suspicious of -- and I would say knew that Joe Biden committed crimes like this.

And this is not a surprise. I am surprised they were this blatant with it.

I am shocked that this message actually exists. This is Hunter Biden blatantly blurting out everything we've been accusing him of. It's happening. Is it -- this is real, right?

Like, honestly, I went back 20 times yesterday, going did someone say they saw this message? Is it one of those things, it turned up on the internet. We can't explain why. This is real, Jason, right? There's no question about it.

JASON: This is not only real. But the FBI. And this is in the first couple pages of this report.

GLENN: Because the report is like 250 pages. And thank God for you, Jason, reading all of it.

JASON: Always a schmuck. The FBI authenticated all of this in November 2019. Now, just think about what happened after that.

GLENN: Okay. That's a year before the election.

That's a year before the laptop goes out.

They verified the FBI we now know verified that that laptop was real, a year before anyone even heard the word Hunter laptop.

VOICE: But what did they do to social media companies like Facebook after this?

They went to companies like Facebook and say, hey, there might be some Russian disinformation, that might be coming on your way soon. Just want to put it on your radar.

That eventually led to the blacklisting, and banning of that information. Like the New York Post article.

This is unbelievable. Absolutely unbelievable.

GLENN: What is truly, truly an act of treason toward freedom, is the press not raising hell over this. Okay?

This is -- this is the smoking gun. The smoke. The little smudged bullet. In the wall. This is all of it.

This is all of it. And for them not to take this now, and say -- because here's the problem.

Only half the country cares. And until you get the other half to care, nothing is going to happen.

But if ABC, NBC, boy. I would be horrible if people started protesting the mouse house. Because ABC only moves when anybody threatens the mouse house.

The actual park. You're saying, I'm going to picket your park. They go crazy. They don't care about the moving or anything like that.

They care about the parks. So I would hate to see somebody organize a really lasting, long-term, and smart picturing of those parks. To get ABC to actually start to tell the truth.

The fact that they just -- that this isn't the lead and non-stop story of the year.

STU: Yeah. Because it's not only this message. You know, we've seen the laptop, we've seen tons of stuff on there, that's a real problem. The reason we're seeing this message today.

Is because the whistle-blower said, they have these messages. And they were blocked from having to investigate them.

GLENN: Yeah. So listen to the whole thing. Listen to these other things.

Biden met CEFC Chinese business client of Hunter.

Did you know that? He didn't know anything about it.

He meets this guy. Shapely recalled Rob Walker, a business associate of Hunter, describing a meeting that Joe Biden attended with the Chinese company.

Walker went on to describe an instance in which the former vice president showed I happen at a CFC meeting. Walker said, we were at the Four Seasons. We were having lunch.

And he stopped in.

He said, hello to everybody. I don't think he drank water. I think Hunter Biden said, I may be trying to start a company, or try to do something with these guys. And could you?

And I think he was like, I'm around. And he would show up. He recounted.

So I don't know exactly what that means, other than, I want to do business. And could you be involved in

But he didn't want to say that. You know, if you're around. Would you show up from time to time?

Is that what you get from that?

JASON: Yes. Does that go on to say what the conclusions that they drew from that meeting?

Okay. So that goes on even further in the testimony. And the person -- whoever is asking the whistle-blower questions. Says, was it your impression, that all of this was orchestrated, between Joe and Hunter for this entire -- for him to show up at that time, to make that presence, to influence this meeting.

Was it your impression that this was orchestrated. He answers. Yes. That was my impression.

GLENN: Okay. So this is not some nameless whistle-blower.

There are those that are afraid. This is a high-ranking IRS official. That was in charge of this investigation.

And as you will find out in a few minutes. He is blowing the whistle. Not only on what they found.

But what they were not allowed to do.

All the stuff that this was, oh, no. We stayed out of it.

Is an absolute lie.

And we now have the FBI stating it. And we have the -- and we have the IRS stating it.

All of the agents, that were involved in the actual work, and at the IRS, the guy who was in charge of the agents, who were doing the work.

JASON: Can I point also, we've been critical on the FBI, as we should on a lot of things. This was very remarkable on this testimony.

The rank-and-file FBI agents were just as pissed off as this whistle-blower was. Because it was clear that something was happening at the higher level. But the rank-and-file FBI agents were like, let us investigate. Let us ask these questions.

GLENN: I would love to see, if they really cared. If they really cared. I have to tell you, any of these guys lose their job, and you are really coming out and blowing the whistle.

And you have the hard facts. I think this audience would raise millions of dollars to make sure your family was taken care of.

You know what I mean?

You've got to do your patriotic duty.

You have to speak out.

Let me come back. There's more shocking stuff.

How do we not know about this?

Okay. So now the FBI whistle-blower. And, again, not rank and file guy. This was the guy in charge of the investigation.

The IRS whistle-blower describes in detail, yesterday, how Hunter Biden evaded paying taxes on his Burisma income.

Biden's appointed attorneys, allowed the statute of limitation to run out.

Okay?

Listen to this. Here's the quote. And so the way the money worked, is, there's a document in which the contract between Burisma and Hunter Biden. Those are the two parties.

It was for $1 million per year.

Of course, this was 2014.

And it was negotiated in April. So the payments in that year, were reduced by the months.

So it was not shockingly 666. 666,000.

83 thousands of individuals dollars a month. He was receiving. What Hunter Biden did. I'm quoting. The testimony.

Is that he told Burisma to send that income, to Rosemont Seneca Bohai, which was his company. And then when the money came back to him, he booked it as a loan. So there's all this mechanization of nonsense happening over here, in the nominee structure. Oh, this is complex. This is complex. And, well, it's not complex.

Because this is taxable events.

As soon as the income came from Burisma to Hunter Biden, whatever he did with it, after that, was just a scheme to evade taxes for that year.

To add to that, is Rosemont Seneca's Bohai and Archer. When the money came back to Biden, they booked it as an expense on their books.

So even the two parties didn't treat it the same way. Then Eric Schrenrin (phonetic) realized this, looked into this, and he even told Hunter on multiple occasions, multiple communications.

You need to amend your 2014 return to include the Burisma income. He never did.

But they never let -- the FBI never let them investigate that, in time.

They kept asking, we have this. We have this. We have this.

Well, I'm not sure. Let's not go there yet.

Until it expired.

And now, statute of limitations.

But they intentionally blocked it, until they expired. What?

Listen to this.

I had alluded to Ferra and some other things here. But some of these people here, Chairman Ye, Gang Dong-won, Zhao are believed to be connected to the Chinese Communist Party. Okay?

So could there be national security implications with communications with those officials? The testimony is, that is correct.

And was that sentiment also shared by the FBI? Answer, yes.

And despite those concerns, that the FBI had, and the rest of the team had, he was not looked into. Is that correct?

The prosecutors said, don't do it.

When we asked for location. GPS location, on some of these documents. They said, no. We're not going to do that.

And if FBI did something, at some level, I'm not privy to it.

They blocked them, even the WhatsApp, if I'm not mistaken, Jason. Even the WhatsApp message. They wanted to geo locate where that message came from, to make sure he was in the house, and dad was in the house.

They wouldn't do it. Now, why in an honest investigation would you not do that?

Why wouldn't you exonerate the president? Would be very easy to do.

EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains His FIERY Rejection of Spending Bill

According to the media, there’s a big fight going on between Republicans over the House’s new slimmed-down continuing resolution spending bill. Some, including President-elect Donald Trump, wanted the bill to pass. But others, like Texas Representative Chip Roy, argued that it still wasn’t ready. However, is the Republican “unity coalition” really crumbling, like the media claims? Rep. Chip Roy joins Glenn to explain what’s really going on. He argues that he IS trying to give Trump and DOGE a 100-day “runway” to fix the country. But he makes the case that, by increasing the debt ceiling by $5 trillion without agreeing on other cuts, this bill gives bad actors the ability to be an “obstacle” to Trump’s agenda further down the line. Plus, he reveals to Glenn that he believes some of these bad actors LEAKED false information about his stance to Mar-a-Lago.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN:

I think we have a great opportunity today. To show you how to have a -- tough conversation, with friends, friends. Where you deeply disagree on something.

But you know that their intent is good. They know my intent is good. Or our intent is good.

And we actually have the same end goal, but we disagree on the path. And we're going to walk away friends.

Chip Roy is joining us today. And, Chip, I love you. And I always will. And I agree with your, we've got to cut spending. We have to. But Liz Wheeler is with me. And we've been talking about it all morning. It's the -- the -- the -- the system of DOGE and Trump, the call-out to the world, in saying, you've got to surrender the Capitol. You know, the bad guys are in and about to take all the money.

Surround, and tell them, come out with your hands up. And that happened. And we scored a massive win, in an entirely new way.

Ask then you stood on principle, one we both agree with.

And it failed!

And so here's -- here's what Liz and I were talking about. Here's what we want to say to you.

And then get your response.

LIZ: Hi, Congressman Roy, this is the way I see it. I want your take on it. I love you. I think you're one of the best members of Congress. I disagree with you on the process that's happening. And I think that is the difference. The process. We elected Donald Trump to be a disruptor. Because Republican members of Congress for decades have been telling they're fiscal conservatives. They want to decrease the debt SEAL. It hasn't happened.

It hasn't -- it hasn't been done. And so Donald Trump comes in with Elon Musk, and uses this DOGE process to first identify these pieces of garbage in the first 1500-page bill. And take those things to the people. We took them to members of Congress. Congress said, okay. We'll listen to you.

So that new process was very effective.

And my question to you is: Once that process was proved to be effective. Which I think is exciting and wonderful.

How do we bridge this divide, with you, to say, okay.

Let's put some faith in this new process. And trust Elon Musk and Donald Trump and the Dow Jones process, to eventually address the debt ceiling, but get this done right now?

GLENN: And not blind trust. Chip.

CHIP: So appreciate you guys. Appreciate being on the show. Particular order. I have to go through a couple of things.

GLENN: Yep.

CHIP: Number one, it's important to remember that my job and my duty is to the Constitution, to God, and the people I represent. I told them, when I came to Washington, I would not -- I would not let the credit card and the debt ceiling and the borrowing of the United States without the spending restraints necessary to offset it.

GLENN: Okay.

CHIP: Right now, all we have are promises and ideas and notions. What I know, that neither of you respectfully no, and that none of your listeners respectfully no are the people that are in the room, that I was in with yesterday. And the day before, who are recalcitrant.

And do not want to do the spending cuts that we need to do.

That I believe the president and the DOGE guys. And everybody want to do.

My job, is to force that through the meat grinder. To demand that we do our damn job. Okay?

GLENN: Okay. So hang on. Okay. So wait. Wait. You're right. You're right. You're right. Go ahead.

CHIP: Number thee, when we were going through the bill, I'm glad the bill dropped from 1,550 pages to 116 pages. Three-quarters of Twitter or X or whatever you want to call it, have been out there spreading false facts that we supported a bad bill and didn't like the better bill.

That's not true. But let's be Lear. The 1400 pages that were cut out. It's a panacea.

There were some good stuff in there. There were some bad stuff in there. There was a lot of disinformation.

There wasn't a $70,000 pay raise. There was a 3,000-dollar pay raise.

I didn't support any pay raise. I didn't support a lot of the stuff in there.

But there's a lot of misinformation. And here's the thing: The 116 pages that were left, and I opposed violently the first bill. I was leading the charge on fighting and killing the first bill.

GLENN: And I love you.

LIZ: The second bill for 116 pages. Turned off -- turned off the pay go requirement. That we slash 1.7 trillion automatically.

And added a 5 trillion that are increase.

My view was, I could not support that, without a clear understanding of what cuts we would get, in mandatory spending next year. And undo any of the Inflation Reduction Act.

The undoing of the student loans. The undoing of the crap with the food stamps.

And everything else. I yield back.

GLENN: Okay. I yield back.

Chip, you're not in a hostile room. We love you. And we agree with your end goals. It's our end goal too. We didn't make that promise that you made to the people that voted for you. So we have more wiggle room here.

But you say -- I think our big difference is, you say, I know the guys in the room.

You're right. You do. And we -- we ceded that earlier today on the show.

You are -- one of us is wrong on trust.

I don't trust any of the weasels in Washington.

But I think Donald Trump and Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have earned enough trust, to get a grace period, here for the first -- maybe the first year.

Or at least six months.

To turn the economy around, and also reduce the size of the government.

And totally flip this thing.

And I know, as somebody who is -- you know, run a company, mainly into a ground. But run a company, and have to switch it, in the middle, and totally reshuffle. That -- that actually costs money, while you're doing it, to bridge the gap.

Because you have to fill up holes while you're filling in the gap.

You don't trust the people in the room. Neither do we.

But we do trust the system that worked on Wednesday with DOGE and Donald Trump.

Where do we disagree?

Can you give them --

CHIP: We don't disagree. And yesterday morning, I was making that precise argument in a room full of conservatives and then a follow-up room with people who will call it, less conservatives.

GLENN: Republican. Yes.

CHIP: And so we were making this argument. And then someone infamously. Something leaked out of the room, somehow out to Mar-a-Lago. That I was being resistant. Because I was negotiating trying to get the agreement to achieve the objective that you just said. I was trying to get, okay. In fact, yesterday morning, I made the argument to a group of conservatives. We need to give the president runway. We need to give him his first 100 days. We need to appreciate JD, and Vivek, and all the people -- and everybody involved. For the president to achieve the objective.

But to get there. We have to make sure that the guys in the room, that are an obstacle to that, don't have the ability to block it.

Because information flow matters. And when those guys tell the president, they can't achieve X.

Then the president will not achieve X. Our job was to force and demand, guys, we need actual understanding of what the cuts will be.

And because otherwise, we're asking us to accept a 5 trillion-dollar limit in our credit card increase. In exchange for nothing!

Literally, in exchange for nothing, but -- but hope.

So our job was to force that change.

Unfortunately, while I was trying to make the argument that we needed something in order to get the votes, someone leaked that down to Mar-a-Lago, and the president reacted.

But now I have to now manage that.

GLENN: Right. I know. I know.

CHIP: They're trying to enforce change in town.

GLENN: So hang on.

We have to leave this. Because I'm going to run against the clock.

I could talk to you all day about this. You were in a meeting this morning about J.D. Vance. Can you tell us anything about that meeting?

CHIP: That meeting happened, because despite what happened yesterday, I'm trying to get this done. Last night, talking to JD, we worked to get this meeting done. We had some good progress this morning.

But there still remains people concerned about spending. That we can work out, what agreement we can reach. On what spending cuts. We can actually get next year, in exchange for giving the vote on a debt ceiling increase.

So it remains fluid. Progress was made. But we have to keep working on it.

And I left that meeting to talk to you. Soil get an update in a minute.

GLENN: Thank you for that, by the way.

I hear there is a new bill that may be coming today.

Is that the one you're talking about?

Or is this another bill that could be another nightmare?

CHIP: Despite other people leaking crap, I refused. I can't say, because it's not been decided by the speaker.

And it's not right to talk about things they're talking about in private meetings.

GLENN: Yeah, but it's -- it's this speaker. I mean, is he really the speaker anymore, Chip, really?

CHIP: We need to hear what bill we need to get forward. And I can't talk about the private meetings. But, look, I'm going to keep fighting for what I promised people that I represent.

I'm going to fight to cut spending. I am going to represent article one.

I'm going to support the president's agenda, but we've got to do that together.

GLENN: Okay.

Chip, thank you.

I think we can -- I think we agree, but I await to see what that means to you. Because we may just have to agree to disagree on this.

But I love you. And I still want you to replace Cornyn.

CHIP: The short version is, for inflation's sake, we cannot increase the debt ceiling $5 trillion without knowing what we're getting for it.

And I don't think anybody should disagree with that.

GLENN: But you don't disagree that Elon Musk and Trump and Vivek are serious about gutting the system.

CHIP: I believe that is their objective. I believe there are obstacles to that objective. And I need to know the sincerity of how we deal with those obstacles, both structural, and human. And we have to figure that out. And that's my job.

America's Favorite Villain Is Ready for Nuclear Fallout. Are You? | Glenn TV | Ep 401

In this episode of Glenn TV — a theatrical how-to guide to survive the breakdown of society after a nuclear attack, according to the new movie “Homestead” from Angel Studios. Glenn Beck interviews the movie’s star and executive producer, Neal McDonough, who plays the head of a family trying to survive as society is breaking down in a postapocalyptic world. You’ve probably seen Neal in everything from the hit TV shows “Yellowstone,” “Suits,” and “Justified” to movies like “Captain America,” “Minority Report,” and the groundbreaking mini-series “Band of Brothers.” Glenn asks Neal what it’s like to play a villain so often, how TV and movies are changing, and how he survived Hollywood as a devoted Christian and husband who refuses to do onscreen kissing scenes with any of his female co-stars. They also discuss his battle with alcoholism, what it’s like working the legends like Sylvester Stallone and Kevin Costner, and the cultural craving for Western cinema. Note: Angel Studios is a sponsor of “The Glenn Beck Program.” Get your tickets for “Homestead” at https://Angel.com/Beck.

Biden FLOODED the Government With DEI, But Trump Has ONE Way to Win

With just weeks left in office, President Biden (or whoever’s actually calling the shots) has decided to hire 1,200 DEI officials. Is this part of a plot to undermine Donald Trump’s plans and make it harder for him to rid the government of woke Deep State bureaucrats? Glenn and fellow BlazeTV host ‪@lizwheeler‬ discuss how other Democrats have recently proposed things like this, including a UK-style “shadow cabinet” that would oppose Trump. Liz also gives her advice to Trump on how to deal with these new DEI officials, who will be paid hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to focus on things like “health equity” …

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. Where were we, Liz?

LIZ: The Biden administration. Although, not Biden. Because he can't tell the difference between a nickel and a dime, trying to sabotage the Trump administration.

GLENN: Yeah. So the latest on this is now Biden is hiring 1200. Biden is not doing it.

But he's hiring 1200 DEI officials, and putting them just under the appointed official. So there will be 1200.

Some of these people make almost $400,000 a year. $400,000 a year! That's your tax dollar!

Will you -- in your -- in your life, your average person, I don't know if you'll ever even -- if you'll ever even pay $400,000 in taxes?

So you could be working your whole life, for that one hire.

And he's hired 1200 of them.

And all he's trying to do is make sure the DEI positions just can't get cut.

I've got news for you.

Donald Trump is going to cut those positions.

He's going to. And it's going to get ugly.

I mean, the ACLU was all over this, saying, oh, we've got plans. We're going to -- we're going to -- this is obscene.

This is absolutely obscene. What the Democrats are trying to do. By thwarting the president.

And honestly, thwarting the will of the American people. Remember the speech that was given by I don't know, some boob from -- well, one of the Carolinas.

I don't want to besmirch the other one for electing a boob. But he was -- he was giving a speech in the well of the Senate. And he said, we need a shadow government. What?

Hold it. You mean a Deep State. Because we already have one of those. And he said. This is a quote.

One of the most obscene things I've ever heard from an elected representative. We failed to make our case. That our policies are better.

Now, in my world, growing up in America, the next sentence is: We need to sit down and talk and find out why we're out of step, with the American people.

His was, but we know we're right. So we need a shadow government, to make sure we put our policies in, anyway.

There's nothing more un-American than that.

By the way, Ted Cruz also said, he thinks there's criminal charges that could be lodged against Biden and his administration for the selling of the steel and the walls for the border.

I think so too. I think so too. He'll probably end up blanketing or pardoning everybody that has either lived by a Biden. Or a Democrat.

Worked for the administration. Everybody will get a pardon at the end.

Honestly, it's like, hey. Everybody, Oprah is here.

Look under your seats.

Because you've got a pardon. You've got a pardon. And you've got a pardon.

Ugh!

Now...

PAT: The Department of Health and Human Services on November 15th. This is posted immediately after President Trump has been reelected.

They advertised for the following position. A deputy assistant secretary for Minority Health. With a salary of up to 221 thousand dollars. This is the goal of this position.

Or this is the purpose of this position.

To, quote, promote health equity.

To promote health equity.

What does that mean?

It means racial criminalization in health care.

It means, if you are seeking, I don't know.

Think about during the pandemic. When there was limited resources. Limited beds in the emergency room.

Limited amounts of drugs and therapeutics, that people could access, in order to treat COVID when it's at its worse.

Well, now you will be screened based on the color of your skin.

That's what health equity is. Health equity is a word used to disguise the reality, that it's just -- it's socialism.

It's discrimination.

It requires, a government official to look at you, and make a decision about whether or not you are going to have access to health care that you might need, based on what you look like.

Not based on the severity of your illness. Not based on your ability to pay. Not based on your request for care. But based on the color of your skin. That's not only wrong and immoral and completely absurd, that a bureaucratic in that position would make over $221,000. That's evil. The left likes to pretend, that you're a racist. Or I'm a racist. Just for voting for Donald Trump. This is evil racism. This is the kind of stuff that we eradicated from our country.

And Biden is trying to plant the Trump administration. With these evil little minions before he leaves.

GLENN: I mean, why are we -- why are we surprised?

How many anti-slavery amendments do we have, to the Constitution.

I mean, it's amazing to me. With very few exception, after ten, most of these seem to be like, oh.

Yeah. Okay.

You're so stupid, you don't understand.

Slaves need to be free. Okay.

Then the next amendment is like, okay. All right.

Let me limp up to explain this once more.

That means, they're Americans, and can vote!

How many amendments are -- are just one after another, especially on slavery.

And, by the way, who was it that didn't understand that slaves should be freed? The Democratic Party.

It -- I swear to you, these amendments are just, God, we didn't think you would be this stupid.

It's already covered!

But let's lay it out clearly, for you.

You cannot discriminate by color! By race! By religion.

We thought that had already been covered, but apparently, not.

LIZ: What I would do if I were the Trump transition team. This is obviously a deliberate effort by the Biden administration. Because within the first ten days after the election, 33 of these jobs were posted on government websites.

So this was -- they were like, okay. Trump is coming in. Let's start ceding the deep state with these races. What I would do if I were Trump transition is I would say, we take racial equality, very seriously. We take civil rights very seriously.

In the administration, of the 47th president of the United States, and anybody who engages, especially a government official who engages in racial discrimination will be prosecuted. And prevent these people from even accepting these jobs. Because they will be threatened with legal action if they do.

GLENN: You can make a legal case. A solid, legal case, that that is exactly right. And that's what should be done.

They would be doing that to us, if we were -- if we were discriminating on race. If we were like, you know what, we're only going to hire white people.

We would go to jail.

Oh, you know what. We're just going to shuffle the deck here.

We're going to look at everybody.

But we lean towards white people.

Did you have Wheaties for breakfast?

If you had Wheaties as a childhood, you're in a different category. Okay?

I mean, we would go to jail. We would be shut down.

It's the same thing.

But don't expect the Democrats to get it.

Did you see the new -- or the DNC chair front runner?

The one they're thinking should be the head of the DNC?

He said, the problem with the election is, the convention should have featured pro-Hamas activists.

LIZ: I totally agree. That absolutely should have --
GLENN: At least they would have been honest.
LIZ: Think about how many Democrat voters, and really prominent people too.

I'm talking about Joe Rogan. I'm talking about Elon Musk. I'm talking about RFK Jr. These were fairly hard-core Democrats, who not only converted to being like, okay. We'll tolerate a Republican. Because it's not Joe Biden.

It's not Kamala Harris.

These people are the biggest supporters of President Trump right now, because of that kind of garbage. So DNC, if you are going to be radical, please be honest and tell us.

Thank you. It's just ushering new Republican voters right into our arms.

GLENN: I respect you, more than I respect people like Mike Johnson.

Mike Johnson doesn't tell me what -- he doesn't tell me what he really is.

What he really believes.

He tells me what I want to hear. I don't believe it. Then he's elected. Then he gets in.

And then he rapes you.

You know, I have much more respect for -- for people who are like, yeah. I'm pro-Hamas.

And you should elect me.

Well, I don't think I'm going to do it.

But thank you for telling me who you really are.

LIZ: Yeah. Great. Let's take all of the Democrat members of Congress. And let's Jamaal Bowman them, let's Cori Bush them.

Because as soon as they were honest about being pro-Hamas, voters were like, actually, we're good.

GLENN: Yep. Yep.

By the way, Hochul has come out. And she has now tried to stir up support to end the electoral college.

Because no offense, Wyoming, according to her words, New York voted for Kamala Harris.

You know, it is so dishonest. And this would -- this would have no space, if -- if we were actually teaching you students, what the electoral college is for.

You want to talk about fairness. Here's fairness: Should New York City dictate what all of New York does?

No!

They have representation. Of all the small towns.

All the farming towns.

Everything else.

New York City, should not be the one that tells everyone else, exactly how to live!

I think there should be electoral colleges in states now.

Because the cities are just devouring, all of the communities outside of those mega cities.

The electoral college is to make sure, that New York, California, and let me say, Texas, doesn't run over all of the other states!

And force how they're living in those cities, and those big states. In Wyoming!

Or Idaho!

Or Alabama!

Yeah. I don't have to live like you do in New York City.

I don't want to live like you do in New York City.

And we have completely different values than you do.

We should have a say, and an even, equal seat at the table.

That's why we have the electoral college. And we have the popular vote.

So you can see. And it's usually pretty close.

This time, however, Hochul, you lost the popular vote!

So you don't really have a case here, on the electoral college.

But you don't have a case.

If you're an American, you don't have a case on the electoral college anyway.

LIZ: Wait a second. Have we war gamed the scenario that you just proposed.

If there was an electoral college on the state level in California or on the state level in New York, what would the -- have we actually looked at a map here. If anybody has done this. Tag me on social media.

Because I am fascinated by this idea. I've not thought of this before. But I -- would we actually swing those states Republicans, if there was a state level?

STU: I bet we would. I bet we would.

You know, every time. Look at Wyoming.

Jackson Hole now controls Wyoming. Just controls it.

Who is -- who is so close to controlling Texas?

All the big cities.

You know, you don't have a chance. When these cities grow so large, they tip everything.

That's why we have an electoral college.

And it didn't used to be this way.

But our cities are becoming mega cities.

Almost states in and among themselves.

You -- you have to balance. Otherwise, the farmer and everybody else, that makes your life possible, in a city, gets screwed.

GLENN: And also think about cheating for a second. If you have a popular vote across the whole country, versus an electoral college system, it's a lot easier to impact the outcome of the entire presidential election because you can have one county somewhere with corrupt election officials.

And if they cheat by 10,000 votes, that could change the outcome of the election.

But if you're an electoral college, it doesn't necessarily.