RADIOJune 01, 2022

Guess which CRAZY leftist news story is ACTUALLY true

The far-left seems to become more crazy each day, and therefore, current news stories often reflect that outrageousness that's spreading throughout the U.S. So, Glenn reads recent, leftist news story headlines that seem too insane to be real. Can you guess which is true and which is actually from the Babylon Bee?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Hello, America. Hey, I've got good news. It's Tuesday. Right? Right? Who is not for that four-day workweek? Yeah, we'll become Italy where you mail something off, and long after your death, some guy comes and says, this was just delivered to you, and written back in 2022. You're like, wow. On paper. They haven't had paper for 40 years. It will be like that. But for four-day workweek, I'm into.

Anyway, I would like to play Bee or not the Bee. And you tell me. Because I can't tell me anymore, what a real story is, and what a Bee story from the Babylon Bee is. Okay?

So, Stu, I'll give you the headlines. FDA official in charge of evaluating new drugs, hospitalized for mental disorder. The Bee or not the Bee.

Headline number two. San Francisco schools to drop the word "chief" from job titles, to avoid offending Native Americans. That seems so obvious.

STU: It has to be a real one. That one has to be not the Bee.

GLENN: Southwest passenger who asked for permission and got it, to masturbate on a flight, gets 48 days in prison.

STU: That seems too high a punishment for --

GLENN: I was just going to say, 48 days, no way.

STU: In this society?

GLENN: Yeah. Democrats propose replacing Memorial Day with day honoring those who have been mis-gendered.

STU: How can that possibly be a real story?

GLENN: IRS.

STU: Wait.

GLENN: IRS squanders nearly one billion dollars in erroneous pandemic credits, even though they have a 100 million-dollar bonus to hire more people, say they are too short-staffed to track down that billion dollars stolen from us.

STU: Incredible.

GLENN: Be or not to be?

STU: To be honest with you, I'm not sure any of them are Babylon Bee stories. You can make the argument to me, that all of them are real. Which I guess is why the Babylon Bee is good.

GLENN: Or all of them are Babylon Bee.

STU: Yeah, they should all be Babylon Bee stories.

GLENN: Right. Okay. So let me give you -- top federal official in charge of evaluating the safety of drugs. Think covid. Has been hospitalized, against his will. This month.

For an unspecified mental disorder. Prompting concern over his fitness. Prompting concern over fitness for his roles. Which includes, making major decisions that impact public health.

That's a real story. Just happened this weekend. While there are many options on the story, next story. Our leaders. And leadership team, have agreed that given the number of Native Americans in our community, we have -- that have expressed concerns over the use of the title, chief. We're no longer going to use it.

Real story. Southwest Airlines, passenger 34 years old Antonio Mageraghty (phonetic) was sentenced to one year of probation, after pleading guilty last week, to self-gratifying himself during a Southwest flight from Seattle, making more sense, to Phoenix.

STU: Okay.

GLENN: Apparently, he was sitting next to a woman on the flight, when he exposed himself shortly after takeoff. He then said, you know, to the woman, do you mind?

And according to another witness, she put her hands in the air and says, it doesn't matter, does it?

I think that's just surrender. That's just --

STU: Yeah. That's not permission. If you've pulled it out already, you don't get to ask for permission, at that point.

GLENN: Well, he thought her answer was kind of, kinky, end quote.

STU: I think this is just her not wanting to get murdered.

GLENN: Yeah. And her saying, really? Just common sense. If you're asking that with your wiener in your hand, does it really matter? Does it matter in?

STU: Like we say, learn, then vote. The order is important. The same thing hear. You know, you have to get the permission in advance, before the beginning the procedure.

GLENN: Okay. That was a real story.

STU: Of course it was.

GLENN: The IRS, despite getting a 6 percent budget increase, and an addition of 10,000 new IRS agents, the IRS claims, it just can't spare the resources to recover almost a billion dollars in forgery and forged payments. Just can't -- where did I put that billion dollars?

STU: They'll be harassing tons of people in this audience for audits this year.

GLENN: Yeah. By the way, real story.

And then there's this: Democrats have unveiled an official proposal to replace mother-in-law day, which they are calling a problematic holiday, honoring white supremacist soldiers who died for a racist country.

With a more inclusive day, mis-gendered -- misgender -- Misgenderial Day.

STU: Wait. What was that?

GLENN: Misgenderial Day.

STU: Wait. Who is proposing this?

GLENN: Democrats.

STU: No way. Really?

GLENN: This important day will allow us to honor the true heroes. Those brave, nonbinary individuals, who have been called he instead of xi.

STU: All right. You've got me, this is a Babylon Bee story.

GLENN: This is it. Final the true heroes are getting their day of recognition, said Nancy Pelosi. Presidential medal of heroism will be awarded to one brave mis-gendered person, each year. The first one is to be given to Justin Trudeau who is often mistakenly been referred to as a he.

STU: That one is actually Babylon Bee though. Thank God. At least one of them. Because the rest of them --

GLENN: Absolutely could be.

STU: What is going on?

I -- I honestly -- if you want to convince me it was a Democrat, not Nancy Pelosi, who was super aware of --

GLENN: Like AOC.

STU: If you said AOC. Or Ilhan Omar. Or Iliana Presley.

I would have believed it. You know, the only thing is Pelosi just is too -- too public-facing, to be the face of that particular movement. Now, of course, she'll advocate for kids being aborted seconds before birth.

And have no qualms about that whatsoever, but I don't think she'll go that far today. Absolutely. But today.

GLENN: One other thing, just to bring you back to reality. Let me give you a couple of good stories.

Florida's sheriff, the law and order sheriff, Carmine Marcino (phonetic), which I love a sheriff -- Carmine.

You know, I've got some friends. I'm just saying, we'll take care of business, you know what I mean?

Sheriff Carmine March seen zero, responded to the Texas school shooting.

Saying, you don't get to shoot our children. You bring deadly force into this county, and we are going to kill you.

End quote.

I'll take that from you, Carmine, you know what I'm saying? Hey, I love it. I love it. Then Tommy -- Thomas Massie. Had --

STU: I think we should start calling him Thomas Massie. I like that.

GLENN: Little Tommy Massie. He's so cute.

By the way, he's a little mini Tesla. He's got so many patents to his name. Do you know this?

STU: Yeah. He went to MIT. He's like, we did one right. Somehow or another, a smart guy got in there.

Don't worry. He'll be in a straitjacket in a week. He said, what's the number of murderers, who have been deterred by the federal gun-free school zone act?

Number of people that have been --

STU: I can guarantee this number. Zero.

GLENN: Yeah. Zero. Zero.

The federal Gun-free Zone Act, he says, was a knee-jerk reaction in 1990, that has cost more lives than it's saved. Repeal it now. Let the bad guys know, that unceremonious death awaits them if they target your kids.

I am all for that. You know, I've seen these stories this weekends, about, you know, dads who were soldiers. Who are now there -- you know, with the AR. Standing in front of the school. I'm all for that. I'm all for that, even in my house, with my kids. Like, no. Your dad is serious. You are going to clean your room. I'm for that. I'm for a show of force. I think it's good.

STU: Look, it sense to harden these schools. You go through the evidence. And you see that over the years, violence has generally gone down. Even violence in schools have gone down. We went over those numbers last week. But there is a thing that is going on, with these sort of spectacle shootings. This, you know, I want attention for myself. I want to be famous or infamous. And I want to do these things. And it happens in school. You should remember, most things in mass shootings, don't occur in schools. It occurs in other areas. But hardening schools, seems to be a basic step to deter that particular crime. That doesn't mean that it doesn't happen two hours later at baseball practice, sadly. We don't know. But hardening schools seems to be a pretty basic step you can take to push back, on this a little bit. The left jumped to, well, security doesn't do anything. When we got these initial reports, that security officers were on site, right when it happened. Then we found out they weren't. That wasn't true.

And at the very least. We all know that every mass shooting ends. Every one of them. All of them end with armed security. It's just a matter of whether they're on site or not. Whether they show up 20 minutes after they started or not. You can do get them there, at the beginning. And that seems to be the best approach.

GLENN: Shouldn't we all remember that it was Jimmy Carter that gave us the phrase first responders?

It was Jimmy freaking Carter. Now, maybe the peanut thing worked out well.

But other than that, I can't think of one thing that Jimmy Carter did that we should hold on to.

Not one. Not one.

STU: Habitat for Humanity.

GLENN: Yeah. That wasn't.

STU: He was involved in that, right?

GLENN: Yeah. Went and built houses.

STU: Okay. That was it?

GLENN: No.

STU: I thought he had some sort of foundational role. Well, maybe he made a foundation of a house. He helped pour a foundation.

GLENN: I think he was just swinging a hammer, which I don't want to tear those houses down.

STU: You got that.

GLENN: But, yeah.

Other than that, no, he was the guy who said, hey. America, wear a sweater. Which is what they're telling us now. They're blaming the gas prices. We'll play the audio for you. Blaming the gas prices now, on you.

Because Americans just won't stop driving.

(laughter)

STU: No, We won't. You're right. We won't.

GLENN: That's weird.

We were the ones that kind of put the assembly line together, so we can all have cars. And I don't know if you've noticed this. This isn't like, you know, France. Where you can walk across the whole country in a day, you know.

It's not Germany. It's not Switzerland. And even Switzerland has mountains. Well, so do we. I don't know if you know this. I mean, the people who are really hurting. Are the people who live in the rural parts of the country. Which is the majorities of our country, by the way, that have to drive.

Their farmers, or whatever. They have a truck. They drive 30 miles in to go to the factory or wherever they go to work. That's not unusual in America, to drive 30 miles. How are you -- at some point, you can't afford to drive in. And that's what they would say at the White House, is the point.

This AI could change EVERYTHING by next year

With Elon Musk’s announcement of Grok 4, humanity is closer than ever before to creating AGI – artificial general intelligence – which would change everything. Glenn Beck breaks down what’s coming in the next year with AI, which even Elon Musk called “terrifying.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me tell you the biggest story of the day.

And I think it is the biggest story possibly of all mankind, as of today.

It's going to change rapidly.

I don't know if anybody -- did either of you guys watch the Elon Musk thing last night?

STU: No, I did watch a few minutes of it.

GLENN: Okay. Did you, Jason?

JASON: No. I sure didn't.

GLENN: Okay. So the xAI team was there to unveil Grok 4. This is the latest intelligence, and let me be very, very clear.

Last night was not your typical tech launch. This is a moment that demands everyone's full attention.

We are now at the crossroads, where promise and peril are going to collide. Okay?

I have explained to you, for years, AGI.
AI. AGI. And ASI. Narrow intelligence is what we've always had.

General intelligence is the next step. And that is, it's better that man, one -- one, you know, like Grok. Can do everything. That you can do.

Better that you can do.

Okay?

And then there's super intelligence. ASI.

Artificial super intelligence.

That's when things get really, really creepy.

When you hit AGI, the road to ASI could be overnight.

Okay?

We need to understand what's at stake here. Because Grok four brought us closer to that second stage, than ever before.

Grok four is a powerhouse. They demonstrated it last night.

It surpasses the expertise of Ph.D.-level sailors in all fields.

It can get 100 percent on any -- any test for any field, mathematics, physics. Engineering.

You name it.

This is not a search engine.

This is a system that tackles problems, so intricate, they -- they go beyond our existing knowledge base.

Okay?

Let's say there is -- let's say, we have a fusion reactor. And the magnetic containment system goes down. I don't even know what I'm talking about at this point.

But it goes down.

And the top minds all on earth are like, I don't know what to do. Grok 4 can step in, model the physics, design new material, stabilize the system, and avert catastrophe. And it can do it about that fast. Now, this is the capability, that Musk says is just around the corner.

Mark my words. You know, how many -- how many years did I say, between 2027 and 2030, we would start to see this?

STU: Oh, a million times.

That was always --

GLENN: For years. Right? Yeah, always the window.

And everybody, even Ray Kurzweil said, oh, that's way too optimistic. We may be 2050.

And then people started going, 2040, 2030.

Grok shows us 2026 or 2027 is when we're going to hit it. This is the last year, that we have, before things get really weird.

Okay?

Last night, Elon Musk is touting this -- this AI.

And all of the solutions.

And then he says.

Hmm. Probably three times.

Something like this.

And I'm quoting. This is one of them.

It's somewhat unnerving to have created intelligence that's greater than our own.

He then goes on to call it terrifying, twice.

Now, this is a man who has launched rockets, you know, into orbit.

Going to Mars.

And he says, twice!

You know, after he sees the results of it. He says, you know, it's really -- in a way, quite terrifying to see what it's doing.

But we just have to make sure that it remains good!

Oh, okay.

All right. Sure.

Now, the key point in the announcement was the mention of ARC-AGI.

I had never heard of ARC-AGI. I had no idea what it was. But I noticed AGI. And I went, uh-oh. That sounds important. So this is the gold standard. The bench mark testing for artificial general intelligence.

Okay.

As I've said before, AGI. Artificial General Intelligence is a machine that matches all human cognition, across all domains.

Reasoning, creativity.

Problem solving. Not just specialized tasks like playing Go or analyzing x-rays. Everything. For instance, Musk said by mid-next year to the latest end of next year, it will be able to create a full length movie, just from a text prompt.
And do it all at once!

So, in other words, it will say, create a movie, and you just explain the Godfather.

It will do the casting. It will do the writing. It will do the filming, if you will. It will -- score the music, and it will happen that fast.

Almost in realtime. We are nowhere near the computational power now, to do that separately.

But this will do it all at once. It will make a movie with all of it, simultaneously.

So the arc AGI system is the benchmark on how close we are to AGI. Remember, scary things happen at AGI.

Terrifying things happen at ASI. ASI could be a matter of hours, or days after we hit AGI.

Grok 4 scored 16.2 percent on the ARC-AGI scale.

Why is that important? You're like, well, only 16 percent away.

Because last time, it barely broke 8 percent.

And that -- they took that test, last time with Grok three.

And it took us forever to get to 8 percent.

Now, what is it? A year later.

We're at 16 percent. Remember, these things are not linear. The next time, we could be at 32, we might be at 64.

We are on the verge. This is the last year of -- I can't believe I'm saying this. Of normalcy. Okay?

This year is -- we're going to look back at this year, probably two years ago, gosh, remember the good old days, when everything was normal.

And you could understand everything.

This is how close we are!

Everything you and I talked about last night, Stu, about what we're doing in January, make -- put -- does it make it even more critical that that happens like, oh, I don't know.

Right now.

STU: Yeah. For sure.

GLENN: You are going to need to know your values, your ethics, your rights.

You are going to need to know absolutely everything.

Now, Grok 4 is not true AGI yet.

It lacks the full autonomy and the generalized reasoning of a human mind. But it is the closest that we've come.

It's a system that can adapt, innovate, at a level that outpaces specialized AIs by a wide margin.

This is a milestone. This is not a destination, but it's something that should jolt everybody awake. So here's what's coming over the next six months. By December 2025, that's this Christmas!

December 2025, he believes, Musk, that Grok 4, will drive breakthroughs in material sciences.

So, in other words, imagine a new -- brand-new alloy, that is lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel.

And it revolutionizes aerospace and everything else, or a drug that halts Alzheimer's progression, tailored to a person's DNA.

Grok will drive breakthroughs through material science. So brand-new materials that nobody has ever thought of.

Pharmaceuticals that we never thought could be made.

And chemical engineering, putting together chemicals that no man has ever thought.

That's going for happen by December.

Imagine a chemical compound that makes carbon capture, economically viable. The climate change stuff, that's over.

It will be over.

Because this will solve that! These are not fantasies.

This is Grok 4.

Musk said something that he never thought. He believes that within the next year, by 2027, Grok 4 will uncover new physical laws.

So that will rewrite the understanding -- our understanding of the entire universe.

That there will come -- like there's gravity. Hey, you know what, there's another law here that you never thought of. Wait. What?

That, he says, will come by 2027. This is going to accelerate human discovery, at an unprecedented scale.

I told you, at some point. I said, by 2030. It might be a little earlier than that.

Things will be happening at such a fast rate, you won't be able to keep up with them.

And it will accelerate to the point to where you won't even understand what all of this means.

Or what the ramifications are!

Are you there yet?

In six months, Grok 4 could evolve into a system, that dwarfs human expertise in economics, defense, all of it.

Now, again, it's a bit terrifying to quote Elon Musk. Why?

Because we don't know, what else comes with this.

This is like an alien life form.

We have no idea, what to predict. What it will be capable of.

How it will view us, when we are ants, to its intellect.

Okay?

It is a tool, but it is also Pandora's box.

If Grok 4 is the biggest step towards AGI.

And maybe one of the last steps to AGI.

My feeling is: What I've been saying forever.

2027 to 2030, I'm leaning more toward the 2027 now.

Because of this announcement last night.

We are on the verge of AGI.

And everything in human existence changing overnight.

And as Musk said himself, two times, it's terrifying!

We should act like it is terrifying.

Or risk losing the control of the future, that we're all trying to build. That's the biggest story of the day.

I think! In my opinion.

Bill O'Reilly reveals how Trump can END Epstein files nightmare overnight!

Bill O'Reilly joins Glenn Beck with his plan for how the Trump administration can fix the Epstein Files fallout "overnight." Plus, he explains why he believes there's only one way that former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan get indicted by a grand jury.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. Bill O'Reilly.

Welcome to the program, sir! How are you?

BILL: Welcome. (inaudible)

And right off the bat, I have to correct you.

GLENN: Yeah. You're not alive. What know.

BILL: I mean, you know -- you don't know that?

GLENN: Yeah, yeah. No. I -- I thought you were dead. Anyway --

BILL: You were dead to me, oh!
(laughter)
I --

GLENN: I get it.

BILL: That's just another brick in your wall, Beck.
(laughter)

GLENN: It's good to talk to you, Bill.

Tell me -- you had a conversation with -- with President Trump, what, a couple of months ago, and I talked about --

BILL: Yeah. St. Patrick's Day, he invited me to sit on a cabinet meeting, which he does sometimes.

And he said, look, we've got files, Kennedy, King, Epstein -- what do you think? And I said, well, first Kennedy you've got to put out pretty much everything, which he did. King, he didn't. I don't know why. Because that's important too.

And then on Epstein I said, you have to be careful here, because this is now being used in political precincts. Both sides want to destroy anybody that was associated with Epstein. And the problem is that a federal investigation. They don't make a determination whether you had a -- what kind of relationship you had with Epstein. They just said, so-and-so had lunch with him.

Or maybe so-and-so had -- saw him at a party. And I said, any name of a human being associated with Epstein, in any way, that person is going to be destroyed. Because you know, the press is not going to put anything into context.

So I said, but it's very important that the Justice Department tell the folks what they know.

And you don't have to get specific with anything.

But you have to say, this is the information that we've compiled. And that's not hard.

And I don't know why the Trump administration is not doing that.

GLENN: Wow!

So, first of all, it's your fault, that we're not getting any names. We learned a lot here.

BILL: Probably my fault, but the president --

GLENN: You know what, I think you're right. I don't want all the names of the people. I want to know --

BILL: And I don't either.

GLENN: Right! I want to know the Justice Department has sorted through the things, and then have gone through. And said, this is criminal. This is not. These people are being indicted, et cetera, et cetera. But to come out and say, there is nothing there, I mean, it's -- it's at least --

BILL: It's ridiculous.

GLENN: It's mass incompetence, at least from Pam Bondi. How could she come out and say, it's all sitting on my desk?

And then when she doesn't release it, she says, well, that's because the FBI in New York is thwarting this process. There are people up there, that are trying to keep this from me.

And then she makes no arrests on that. We never hear about that again.

And then now all of a sudden, there's nothing to see.

BILL: Well, listen, Pam Bondi does not make decisions on her own.

No cabinet member does.

All the decisions come out of the West Wing.

So what I believed happened was, Trump was so obsessed with the big bill, with Iran, with Putin, with China.

That this -- they didn't even think about this. Okay?

GLENN: I believe that.

BILL: And it slowly began to unravel. And then I caught it by surprise.

But this is the easiest fix. Somewhere so easy.

BILL: So if I'm in charge, and that would be a great thing for everyone, except you, Beck -- but every other American, if I were in charge, tremendous. You would be in Botswana. Right.

GLENN: Right. Oh, I know.

Yeah. Yeah. I would be the ambassador of the white farmers in -- in South Africa if it were up to you. I know. I know.

BILL: No. You would be wandering around going, I am Glenn Beck. And they would go, who? That's what you'd be doing.

GLENN: That's every day.

BILL: So this could happen within the hour. Pam Bondi announces a press conference for tomorrow.

At that press conference, sitting next to her, is Merrick Garland, everyone.

You had this stuff for four years! Now, I understand that Mr. Garland has gone native and is living in a -- well, we can find him. We can pull him out of there, and have him and Pam, sit there and answer questions in a general way about what evidence the Justice Department of the United States has compiled.

GLENN: Not going to happen.

BILL: That's it!

Well, if it's not going to happen, then President Trump is going to take a hit.

But he's calculating that this will say that it's that night important.

But I don't know why you would not do it.

I just don't know. And I'm usually pretty good at predicting what the president does or does not do.

GLENN: So here's the thing, Bill.

I think he keeps focusing on Epstein. It's not that big of a deal.

It's not about Epstein. It's about justice.

It's about, can we trust the people -- correct!

It's all about credibility and justice.

And he's not seeing that. And I don't know how he's missing that. Because I agree with you.

He's been so busy on so many other things.

BILL: That's right. That's right.

GLENN: This is not at the top of his priority list.

But he did campaign on it.

BILL: Right.

And I don't know if there's anybody inside the White House.

He looks to be annoyed, when this subject comes up.

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BILL: And here's the -- what works -- you have to understand.

A guy like Donald Trump runs it all.

If he's annoyed, nobody will want to annoy him more. Okay?

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BILL: That's how it works. The older arch is, because Epstein got favorable treatment.

By the feds, in the first go around in Florida, that there's a deep suspicion about this case.

But if you break it down, if the Biden administration had any dirt on any Republican associated with Epstein. It would have been out.

And vice-versa.

If the Republicans had any dirt on any Democrats. Now, we know that former president Clinton, was involved with Epstein to some extent.

I don't know if that was a factor, okay? I don't know.

But your right for once. You're right. It's about credibility. It's about the American people trusting that we do have equal justice for all!

So what do you -- what do you make of now the Russia gate thing, coming out, today. Or yesterday.

The FISA court.

The fact that they're now saying, hey.

You know, we need to hold Brennan accountable.

We're like five or six days away.

Weeks away from him, you know, slipping past the -- the statute of limitations.

I mean, all these things are out today.

There's that. There is also the -- let's see here.

The Secret Service -- I think this happened a year ago.

But it's being reported as if it's news.

Secret Service suspends six agents assigned to protect Trump during a Butler assassination attempt. I mean, all these things are coming out. Like, look, we're busy on all these things. And I do believe they're busy on these things.

But it's like the Keystone Cops are in charge of the PR on this. It's bad.

BILL: Well, there's a lot of politics involved in both of those cases. Number one, in order to get Comey and Brennan to get indicted by a grand jury. Federal grand jury, and that's the only passage, you would have to have a whistle-blower, saying, yeah, these guys abused their power. I worked for them. And they absolutely wanted to get Trump.

And they knew the Russia dossier was phony.

And they did it anyway.

If I have that Justice Department.

Then you can get those guys.

If you don't have it, they will not be even indicted by a grand jury.

GLENN: So how is it that we do not have that Justice Department?

How do we not have that Justice Department?

BILL: Well, look. I don't know whether they have a whistle-blower or not, okay?

And if they have a whistle-blower, I want the case to go forward.

I want those two men indicted.

You can't do that, at that level.

As far as the Secret Service is concerned, monumental screw up. Everybody knows it. They fired the morons in charge of it. That woman -- I was embarrassed listening to her, trying to explain.

They didn't know what the deuce was going on. But this was across-the-board, in the Biden administration.

You know, it was a year ago Sunday, this upcoming Sunday.

GLENN: Right.

BILL: And it's just another example of how the Biden administration was the second worst administration in the history of this country. People have no idea how bad it was.

Every single agency was chaotic. Nothing worked. And this is just part of that. And we'll have a slew of stuff on Sunday. Nothing really meaningful.

I mean, they suspended the Secret Service agents, as they should have. They fired the director as they should have. The guy was a nut.

I don't know if there was anything more to that. I doubt it.

I'm more interested in the guy in the bushes. Because they don't know anything about him. I would like to know a little bit about him.

But again, the federal government, it doesn't really matter. It's the government. They never want to tell us stuff, Beck, never.

We always have to pull it out of them. It's almost like Russia or something. Come on!

GLENN: Right. Yeah. Let me ask you, let me take you back again to the Epstein thing.

I noticed yesterday, there were these people who were on the left. Who were taking tweets of mine. That say, look. These things don't make sense. On the Epstein thing. And they just have to be answered. And not anti-Trump at all.

And yet, the anti-Trump people were retweeting that, and they're trying to -- they're trying to get the right to fight against itself again and split people away from Donald Trump, where I don't think this Epstein thing is -- is splitting people from Donald Trump, at least at this point.

And I -- you know, I -- my wife stopped me from answering some of those tweets, yesterday.

Because it's never good, when you -- when I tweet in anger. Which I did.

But -- or was going to. What did you think about how this is being used against the right to try to separate us even more?

BILL: Everything is political. Everybody knows that for you.

But the MAGA people, from the mail I get. And I get a voluminous amount of mail. They're not happy.

GLENN: Oh, I agree. I'm not happy.

BILL: Now, are they going to throw President Trump under the cliché-ridden bus? No. Because to them, the greater good is being served by a fair tax bill.

Trying to cut waste.

Dealing with Iran effectively. And hopefully dealing with Putin.

That's another thing, that's on Trump's plate.

He has to deal with Putin now.

Has to. And that will be the next big story.

GLENN: How is he going to deal with it?

BILL: Lavrov and Rubio, are in Indonesia, as we speak.

And I assume that Rubio is delivering a message. That you either stop, or we're going to just absolutely crush you economically. Which the United States can do. By saying. No bank does business with Moscow.

And if you do business, no matter what bank you are, we're going to put you out of business.

Okay?

GLENN: Yeah. I've only got a couple of seconds. But didn't we already do that under Biden?

BILL: No! We didn't do the banks. We did the sanctions. And the sanctions they can always get around, because China is going to buy as much oil from Russia as possible.

You stop the banks, from doing all business with Moscow? Who is going --

GLENN: Isn't that what the SWIFT thing was all about?

When we kicked them off of SWIFT, wasn't that what that was all about?

BILL: No! Because they can still do a huge business with countries buying their oil.

And they got to pay Putin and Russia for the oil, and that has to go through the banking system.

If you stop the banking system, he can't get paid.

GLENN: Hmm, it's amazing. I'm glad I'm not the president right now. I think he's made some very brave decisions, and he is walking a tightrope. I mean, the world is on edge. And I pray for --

BILL: He looks very tired to me. Very tired. I haven't talked to him in a while, which is unusual. But you're right. You're absolutely right. That's the second time you've been right in this conversation. My God!

GLENN: I know. It's crazy.

BILL: What in the world.

GLENN: I was wrong about you being dead.

BILL: What is happening?

GLENN: It's good -- it's good to talk to you, my friend. Is everything okay? Is everything going well?

BILL: Everything is all right, Beck. We are not only successful, but that's old news. We've been that way for 50 years, but I appreciate you having me on your fine program.

GLENN: Okay. I love you.

BILL: Stu is still breathing.

GLENN: Hmm.

BILL: So that's good. Right.

But I've got a big book called Confronting Evil. Of course, we sent it, and of course you denied getting it. That comes out September 9th, so put me on a dance card.

GLENN: Well, we'll have you on. And you can also find Bill and his YouTube page. YouTube.com/BillOReilly. Or is it The Walking Dead?
(laughter)
He's not even laughing. Maybe he hung up. Bill O'Reilly, great to have him on.

FLASHBACK: Kash Patel says FBI Director has Epstein's "Black Book!"

During a 2023 interview with Glenn Beck, now-FBI Director Kash Patel adamantly proclaims that the FBI and specifically the FBI Director is in direct control of Jeffrey Epstein's "Black Book" of clients. So now given the most recent claims by Patel and DOJ Attorney General Pam Bondi, what has changed from his perspective since taking this role? What do YOU think is the explanation for this change in tune by Kash Patel?

Watch Glenn Beck's Extended Interview with Kash Patel from 2023 HERE

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Are Epstein's "Blackmail Videos" Being Used for Leverage RIGHT NOW?

What was Jeffrey Epstein's operation all about. If he was at the center of a massive blackmail operation to compromise those in positions of power, who is in possession of that information now? Glenn Beck and ATF Whistleblower John Dodson analyze the details of this situation and give their thoughts on what is the most likely reality surrounding Epstein.

Watch Glenn Beck's FULL Interview with ATF Whistleblower John Dodson HERE