RADIOAugust 02, 2024

Donald Trump Was RIGHT. Kamala & Her Cronies FAKED a Race Fight

Glenn looks into the past to see who’s right: Donald Trump or the media. Trump claimed that Kamala Harris only started to emphasize her black heritage over her Indian heritage when it was convenient for her political career. The media called him racist for pointing that out. Well … Glenn opens the archives to prove that the media once sounded just like Trump – Don Lemon especially! Trump didn’t start a “race fight.” The media did. Glenn also reviews Harris’ first unscripted comment since launching her presidential campaign … and it went about as well as you’d expect.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let's start with Karine Jean-Pierre, about the plea deal on 9/11, that everybody is so happy about. Let's let those people not get the death penalty. What do they do? They only killed 3,000 people. Here's Karine Jean-Pierre.

VOICE: If you have a message to some of the 9/11 families, who wanted to see this kind of come to a fuller process.

VOICE: So, look, I think this is basically what Jake said. This is something that we had no involvement in. He didn't have any involvement in.

And so, the -- the White House played no role, in this process.

And the president directed his -- his team to consult as appropriate with officials and lawyers and Department of Defense obviously.

And, you know, we have said this before, you know, we -- we are -- you know, our hearts go out to the families, who lost the loved ones. On that -- on that day.

And, you know, the president of 9/11, has honored them every year, and the families, who, again, lost their loved one on that terrible day.

GLENN: Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

Okay. All right. Well, I feel like -- I feel like they've got things under control there at the White House.

Now, Joe Biden is -- is there on the tarmac. Waiting for the American citizens imprisoned in Russia.

And Biden is there. And he's -- he spots a cute little girl. Oh, God.

Cut two.

BIDEN: You all know we have a tradition in the Biden family. We say happy birthday. Right?

All of you.

Happy birthday to you. Happy birthday to you.

Happy birthday, Dear Miriam. Happy birthday to you.

Remember, no serious --

GLENN: Dating advice. Yeah. That's right.

BIDEN: God bless you. She's his daughter.

GLENN: Oh, isn't that great? Hugging her. Giving her a little kiss. Keeping her close, you know what I mean?

Hey, no serious in dating until 30.

I'm not interested until after 30. So we have that going on.

Now, in this hostage release, what was really nice was Joe Biden said, you know, Donald Trump couldn't have gotten this deal done. He wouldn't have done this.

You know, I've got Putin on the horn. And we made a deal.

Let's talk about that for a second.

There's a couple of things that are wrong with that. First of all, why do you think Putin got on the phone with you? Right at election time?

Do you think he's for Donald Trump? Or is he for you being president.

So he's making a deal, which makes you look good. What does that tell you?

Does that tell you that Putin is afraid of you?

No. He's doing PR for you. He wants the Biden administration, not the Trump administration.

Hello, ding-dong. Also, you did make a deal. And it was lousy for us. Why is it, they got more than we got?

Well, why?

Because you're desperate. You're desperate, that's why.

And he knows that. And he wants to play in, to the political narrative, here in America.

Oh. Okay. So now, when -- when he's on the tarmac, Kamala has her first unscripted moment in the last couple of weeks.

They -- they -- they are talking -- her and Biden. And he's just standing there like, I have no idea what she's saying. And they say, what -- any comments on what's about to happen?

And here's what Kamala says, twenty-one, please.

KAMALA: This is just an extraordinary testament to the importance of having a president who understands the power of diplomacy, and understands the strength that rests in understanding the significance of diplomacy, and strengthening alliances. This is an incredible day.

GLENN: What did she just say? Whatever circular -- oh, my gosh.

STU: By the way, Glenn. That is, I believe, officially the first question, she's been asked.

I may have missed something. I know RuPaul asked her a couple of questions. So not counting those. I'm saying, from a reporter.

And I believe it was, how do you feel about this amazing thing that happened? But she -- that's, I believe, the first question she's been asked.

And it was the easiest question imaginable. Basically, compliment yourself. And she still -- she still blew it.

That is -- we have to get her -- we just have to get her. You have to get her in front of these cameras.

As soon as people see this. You know, this little boom let goes away.

GLENN: You know, I tell you, I have a real problem with you, Stu.

Because you're so racist. She's still reeling from President Trump. Saying, I thought she was an Indian.

And everybody -- everybody in the press. And they know what they're doing. They are -- they are taking and twisting his words.

He's not saying, she wasn't black. He was making a comment of, wait. But she never called herself black, until this point in the election.

Ask then, when she needed the black vote, had he said, oh, I'm black.

Here she is, Kamala Harris, 2019.

Cut 22.

VOICE: Is -- because you are an idiot.

Okay. And I don't know if anybody knows that. I find that wherever I go, and I see Indian people at the supermarket or the street.

Everyone is like, you know that Kamala Harris is Indian, right?

It's like our thing that we're so excited about, running for president.

We're both Indian. But actually we're both south Indian.

STU: Stop. We need to stop and address one thing here.

What Mindy Kaling has just said has never occurred.

Never, ever, one time, in her life, did this incredibly famous person, who was on one of the most beloved sitcoms of all time have someone walk up to her and say, did you know that Kamala Harris was Indian?

That story never, ever, ever occurred. That is complete nonsense.

I just want to get that on the record.

GLENN: Okay. Next. Here's Kamala Harris in 2020.

She's not black. She's Indian. Listen.

KAMALA: Today on August 15th, 2020, I stand before you as the first candidate for vice president of the United States of South-Asian descent.

GLENN: Okay. Now, nobody is -- nobody is not -- nobody is saying she's not black.

Okay? Yes, she's black. She's Indian.

She's half black. She's half Indian. We know how science works.

You're the ones confused about what's a woman.

So we got it. Her dad was black.

Her mom was Indian.

Even Don Lemon, when she started saying, that she was black. He was started to be offended. Because he was like, she's calling herself African-American.

Listen. This is Don Lemon.

VOICE: Black woman.

VOICE: I agree with that. Is she African-American? No, no, no, no.

But is she African-American?

There is a difference. There's nothing wrong with that. Nobody is trying to take anything away from her. I think you're falling into a trap with that. All she had to do was say, I am black.

GLENN: Okay. Stop. Trouble she got in for that. She's not African-American. No, she's not. She's Jamaican-Indian.

And there's nothing wrong with that. Nothing wrong with that happen. Except, she uses it to play on constituents. That's the only thing Donald Trump was saying. He's not questioning who she is.

We all know who she is now. But she said, she was Indian. When she was needing the Indian vote.

And then she's black, when she needs the black vote. She's both!

STU: Yeah. And the way --

GLENN: Can you please. It's so bad. The way he actually said it. You know, she turned black a couple years ago.

And like they are so dishonest, that they're acting as if they think he thought she just turned black. Literal statement. Now, they know Kelly what they're doing. It's amazing as well. This is coming from the same people who say, you can change races based on just saying it, right?

GLENN: I know. I know.

STU: This is like the Rachel Dolezal thing, if it was literal.

They would be supporting it. If she was just Indian her whole life and said she was black, they would then say, she is now black. But because Donald Trump made the point in a critical way. All of a sudden, that's not possible. It's racist to even suggest.

GLENN: I know. I know.

So I would like to suggest, she's not only Jamaican Indian. Black.

But she's also southern. Because, you know, she was raised in Berkeley.

That's Southern California, isn't it?

Which explains her speech this week, the southern accent.

26.

VOICE: And you all helped us win in 2020. And we will do it again in 2024.

GLENN: That is -- that is Southern California.

I mean, she's -- she's all over it!

All over it. You know, I don't know if you heard Michael Malice, this week.

But I love Michael Malice. And what he said, on Joe Rogan, this week, about Kamala Harris.

VOICE: Officer Harris, you're either racist or sexist or ableist. So they will use --

VOICE: Yeah, because she's a retard. She's literally retarded. I mean, Ukraine is a country, in Europe. And Russia is another country, and a powerful country. And Russia invaded Ukraine, and that's wrong.

VOICE: This is really important, this is what could be unburdened by what has been. I think America is like a wine mom. Because it seems like she's three deep by noon. And she has got the three faces of wine mom. She's got happy drunk. Oh, my God, cackling. Cackling. Then there is trying to make drunk at work, where you're trying to make sense, but you don't. Space is around us all. And unites us all. And inspires us all.

And then there's, I'm being stern, so you don't realize how plastered I am. And I'm making a point. And that little girl was me. Now I'm going to up stairs, and don't knock on the door. Because I'm going to pass out. So those are the three ways she talks.

VOICE: Ukraine is a country in Europe. It exists next to another country called Russia. Russia is a bigger country. Russia is a powerful country. Russia decided to invade a smaller country called Ukraine. So basically, that's wrong.

GLENN: Can I tell you something though, when I listen to that. I just think, this is so vapid. But then I think, how many Americans need it broken down, that way?

STU: Certainly, her voters do.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

It was a -- it's a bigger country. And so then that's wrong.

Oh, okay. Thank you. Mamala. I appreciate that. Now, I understand big things.

Big countries shouldn't go into little countries. Can little countries go into big countries? Would that be wrong?

I mean, it is -- it's just -- it's amazing. Amazing.

STU: Do we know, Glenn, how many various ceilings, she would be busting through with this?

Because we know we would have the first black woman. We would have the first woman.

We would have the first Indian. We would have the first south Asian.

We would also have the first Asian. And this one particularly, is bothersome. Because at some point, I don't know.

Maybe it's 20 -- somewhere in the 20 years from now.

Some great who can't understand son, or who can't understand daughter, of a person, a Japanese-American, who was put into internment camps by the president that every Democrat thinks is the best president of all time, is going to rise to power, and maybe be elected president. And they'll be like, actually, you're the second Asian president.

Sorry, Kamala won back in 2024. God forbid.

And sorry, you don't count. You didn't break any ceilings. You're a giant zilch. You get no recognition. Sorry about that. Good night.

I mean, that's sad.

GLENN: It's -- did you hear the flashback of Ford from 1978, or '79? Where he was asked. He was running against Ronald Reagan at the time. And they were in the primaries. And he's asked by this little girl. You know, I'm eight years old.

And I want to see some day, a female president. What is it going to take? What advice would you give an 8-year-old girl who wants to be president.

Okay. So he says, well, I'll tell you. We'll have a female president. It is inevitable in the future. But let me tell you how it's going to come. Okay?

This is 1978 or 1979. Let me tell you how it's going to come. Either the Democrats or the Republicans are eventually going to nominate a woman to be the vice president.

And the vice president will be serving in that administration, until the president dies or bows out. And that's how she'll become president.

That will be your first president.

STU: Really? I have not heard that. That's an incredible, biz moment. Why was he -- was he just so convince that had Americans hated women? Or was he convince that had they were sexist. Or what was the reasoning for that?

GLENN: I don't know. I would imagine that -- he didn't think that kind of change could be made.

STU: Really?

GLENN: For a president.

STU: So it's a different era. You know, I understand.

GLENN: Run by white men. Keeping women down.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.