President Biden spoke after the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity ... and Glenn couldn't believe what he heard. Biden slammed the Court's ruling, which granted former president Donald Trump absolute immunity for presidential actions and presumptive immunity for "official" actions. Biden followed the lead of dissenting Justice Sonya Sotomayor, claiming that the Court basically allowed the president to do anything, including go after his opponents ... Wait? Like Biden is doing right now?! Glenn reviews Biden's speech line by line and highlights all the hypocrisy within it.
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Well, I just don't know what to say. I watched the president's speech last night. And everybody coming out and saying, he could go after us. He could shut us down. Now that the Supreme Court has ruled. Donald Trump, if he's elected, he will come in and he will start putting people in jail.
Huh. I want you to remember that here in just a second. We will get back to it.
Here's what the president had to say last night, at a press conference.
It's cut nine.
(music)
BIDEN: The presidency is the most powerful office in the world. It's an office that not only tests your judgment. Perhaps even more importantly, it's an office that could test your character.
GLENN: Yes. Yes.
BIDEN: Because you not only need moments where you need courage for the full power of the presidency. You also face moments where you need the wisdom to respect the limits of the power of the presidency.
GLENN: Yes. Stop there for a second. So, Stu, what would some of those limits be?
Because it's an awesome responsibility, to be president of the United States. But you can't just do anything. Right?
Like, what would some of the limits be. You couldn't just go out and kill people, right?
STU: I don't know. That's not what I have been hearing, Glenn. Over the past 24 hours.
GLENN: Really. Wow?
STU: My understanding is the Supreme Court gave James Bond license to kill, to the president of the United States.
GLENN: No. No. No, I don't think that's true. But we'll continue to listen.
STU: Yeah. Immune. Immune. Immune.
GLENN: I didn't hear the whole speech. So we'll go on.
I was thinking something smaller, like -- like maybe you say, hey, you have student loans.
I can't help you with those. That would be the -- the constitutional thing. But the president couldn't just say, I'm going to just forgive all student loans.
STU: Yeah. Yeah. That -- you're thinking of the old-timey America.
There was a version of America, where the -- you know, the head of the executive branch couldn't just spend $500 billion on a whim, without Congress.
But those days are long gone, Glenn.
GLENN: Okay. But it would go to the Supreme Court. If it was wrong, it would go to the Supreme Court. And they would tell a president to stop it. And he would.
STU: No. He would just do it again.
GLENN: Oh, it went to the Supreme Court.
STU: Yeah. They shot it down.
GLENN: Awesome.
STU: So he just did it again.
GLENN: Yeah.
STU: And then in a slightly different way. Like 1 percent different.
And then sends it through the courts again.
And, again, it will get rejected again.
Then he'll just do it again.
GLENN: Right. So that's weird. It's an awesome power. And, you know, it shows character. You know, when you restrain yourself from doing those things that you can't do. Anyway, I digress.
BIDEN: Respect the limits of the power of the office of the presidency.
Legislation was founded on the principles. There are no kings in America. Each. Each of us is equal before the law.
No one, no one is above the law.
GLENN: Okay. Stop for a second. Stop for just a second here.
Stu, are we all equal under the law here?
I mean, is that true?
STU: It doesn't seem true. Uh-huh.
GLENN: Like, for instance, if you were held in contempt of Congress.
Right? You would go to jail. Right?
Like Steve Bannon just went to jail yesterday.
STU: Sure. Another Trump adviser who said, no. I can't share that. That's executive privilege.
They sent him to jail.
STU: Navarro. But it's all equal, right?
I mean, let's say, somebody was -- yeah. Not releasing tapes of testimony.
And they say, well, that was executive privilege.
And they were in contempt of Congress. They go to jail as well, right?
STU: No.
I mean, I don't know what you're talking about specifically. But what you just described does not sound at all like something you would go to jail for.
GLENN: Okay. Well, let's say you were the head of the DOJ. And Congress said, you have to produce this information, and then you didn't.
STU: Right. Totally fine.
GLENN: You would be in contempt of Congress.
No, no, no. You don't go to jail?
STU: That doesn't seem like a jailable offense at all.
It's like, I can see where you're getting confused here.
Like, for example, if you were to -- like, riot at a federal building.
Right? That's something you would go to jail for. It's wrong!
You don't do those things.
GLENN: Right. Right. The darkest day.
STU: Yeah, and then there's another separate scenario, where let's say you were to riot, at a federal building. You don't go to jail for that.
GLENN: Oh, wait. Was it just a federal building?
STU: If you're rioting at a federal building, you're going to jail.
If you're simply rioting at a federal building, you don't go to jail.
GLENN: So is it kind of like -- it's a very subtle difference, it's kind of like, when you're praying in front of an abortion clinic. You would go to jail.
STU: Jail.
GLENN: And but if you burn down an abortion clinic. You don't go to jail.
STU: Depends on -- are you burning it down, because they're not doing enough abortions? If you're burning it down because they're frequently aborting enough kids, then yes. You cannot go to jail. But if you burn it down because you think they're doing too many abortions. Then obviously, you go to jail.
GLENN: Okay. So if you burn down an abortion clinic, you would go to jail, if you disagreed with them. But if you burned down the people's business, where they were pro-life, I also go to jail.
STU: Well, they're pro-life? The owners of the business. Yeah. No. You would not go to jail for that.
Why would you go to jail for that? That's stupid.
GLENN: Okay. I want to understand, that I understand equal justice under the law.
I think we have it. Go ahead with President Biden.
BIDEN: Not even the president of the United States. Today, the Supreme Court decision. On presidential immunity.
That fundamentally changed. For all. For all practical purchases.
Today's decision almost certainly means that that there are no limits to what a president can do. It's a fundamentally new principle. It's a dangerous precedent.
GLENN: Yeah, dangerous.
BIDEN: Because the power of the office, will no longer be constrained by the law. Even the Supreme Court of the United States.
GLENN: Wow. Stop for a second.
That is news, isn't it?
Especially to the Supreme Court.
That is news. That no matter what the president does. Even if it breaks the law, you're not going to have pay a price for it.
I didn't know that. I didn't know that.
See, what the left is afraid of right now is what they're saying is, he is going to silence speech. Donald Trump will silence any dissent.
And that's not happening now. Uh-uh.
Or he would put his -- he would put his -- you know, former allies -- I mean, his former foes in jail.
For instance, let's say, you're running against a guy who Donald Trump didn't think he could beat. Then he would just make up some charges.
And then get the guy arrested.
And then keep him, you know, in the court system, until you finally got him into jail.
That's what Trump could do. Trump could do that.
Because of yesterday's rulings.
So that's pretty -- pretty frightening.
You know, I think if we're really going to go all the way. What should be terrifying, is that Donald Trump could just round up a whole group of people, because he didn't like them.
You know what I mean?
Just round them up.
And then put them like in a concentration camp. Kind of like FDR did with the Japanese. And that wouldn't be legal. You know, he would get out of office. And he would never pay the price. that FDR had to pay.
STU: Which is that he named our best president.
GLENN: Well, yeah. That's weird.
STU: Over and over again.
GLENN: Yeah. The guys who would violate these are always the progressives. Always.
The deep, deep progressives are the ones, who violate all these things.
Now, when it comes to just killing people, or doing something illegal, the Supreme Court case laid out it must be constitutional. So if the -- if the president acts in an unconstitutional way, then you can get him!
But unless it's -- unless it's unconstitutional, he can't do it. So it would be unconstitutional to round up the people that disagreed with you.
It would be unconstitutional to silence those who oppose you!
It would be unconstitutional to go after your opposing political foe, and try to put them in jail. All things that Joe Biden is currently doing.
STU: Yeah. I mean, it's funny, this ruling is coming from Roberts. Who is an institutionalist. Right?
If anything, we've complained about him a million times, because he's so unwilling to shake up things. Just because, you know, it happens to be the constitutional way.
I mean, Obamacare is a great example of that.
It will shake things up. I don't want to give the impression, that we're too impactful on society.
He's always doing these things. That's in a way, what this ruling is.
What he's saying is, hey. We shouldn't have -- I mean, in a way, it's designed specifically to protect Joe Biden.
Because everybody knows, if there's no immunity. What do you think Donald Trump will do when he's president of the United States, after what he's just been through. He will go in there, and find everything that he can. And go after Joe Biden on that.
He promised to do with Hillary. He didn't do it. He now says he regrets not doing it.
And now they've done it to him! So you think he will just sit back and say, you know, let me show you what I will do as president.
It's a shoulder shrug. I don't think that's the way it will go down. In a way, Roberts is protecting both sides from this back and forth that can easily come.
GLENN: However, what the president has done, is not constitutional.
And he should go to jail. Not for the things that he's done in office.
I disagree with all his policies. The whole thing, of, you know -- of, you know, taking away your student loans. And things like that.
You know, that's unconstitutional. But I don't think that's something that you go after.
However, the business dealings with China?
Yeah. I think that should be prosecuted.
STU: At least as far as we know.
GLENN: That didn't happen as president.
STU: As far as we know, none of that happened while we were president. That wouldn't help at all. I think what Roberts is doing here, is just setting a high bar.
GLENN: That's what he's saying.
STU: Of course you can go after a president for the worst things in the world. However, there's a high bar for you to clear. So don't bother bringing up your BS nonsense every ten seconds because it's not going to work. That's beyond the fact that we all knew what he said was true.
Official acts would be -- you would be having immunity for. Like you're not able under the law, Glenn, to kill people. Right?
Like you can't just -- like, you couldn't send a drone to start murdering people, in other countries.
The president, with his powers, as commander-in-chief, has -- powers that we don't have.
Like, we all know that. There was some sort of implied immunity for official acts. We all knew that. We all knew unofficial acts would not be covered here.
There was nothing new in this ruling. It was blatantly obvious. Yet they have to do this charade every single time. And act, oh, SEAL Team Six might come and just start being utilized to kill people. You know how many -- how many different layers of checks and balances would have to -- including SEAL Team Six, just going along with this.
Which they would not be covered to do. They would all get prosecuted. They would all be put in prison. But we're supposed to believe, that Donald Trump would be fine for doing this.
It's insanity.
GLENN: All right. Well, let me just end with this.
As the president was saying this, two things happened yesterday. Christian pro-life father of 11 is now facing over a decade in prison.
He will be sentenced today, okay? For a peaceful protest in Tennessee. It was a violation of the Face Act, you know. They were praying in the hallway.
What he said, yesterday, is this: Quote, it's real easy for me. I can go and go to battle and go to jail as an individual. And it's not a big loss.
The challenge comes, when you're leading your family through it. When you're talking to your 3-year-old and your 23-year-old and your other family. Von said that he wanted to pray to God, quote, every day. And get up ready to take on the day, with whatever circumstances believe my way, with a humility and a grace and a spirit-led life. That represents all of us in our society. Represents him and our community around us.
How many politicians order their life after truth and justice, versus power, greed, negotiation, and negotiating principles?
So here's a guy who said, I believe what I believe. God will be with me.
I'm going to go to jail. At the same time, Bannon also went to jail.
For contempt of Congress. There are now 15 -- I believe 15 people in the Biden administration that have been deemed in contempt of Congress.
None of them are being prosecuted.
But Donald Trump's people are. Bannon said this, and I don't like Bannon. Okay?
I don't agree with Bannon on everything. I think he's -- a thought leader, that I really strongly disagree with many times. But he should not be going to jail.
He said, I am proud to go to prison. If this is what it takes to stand up to tyranny, if this is -- if this is what it takes to stand up to the corrupt criminal DOJ. If this is what it takes to stand up to Nancy Pelosi, if this is what it takes to stand up to Joe Biden, then I am proud to do it.
You have people crying that they might go to prop. While they're putting people in prison, for the things that they have done themselves.
Please, Mr. President, don't talk to me about out of control tyranny from the Supreme Court. They have done exactly the opposite.
They have protected the presidency, while they are dismantling the administrative state.