RADIOJune 19, 2023

AI’s answer to THIS question shows it could SURPASS HUMANS

Artificial Intelligence is developing at a terrifying rate, and now it can reason just like a human brain can — but at even faster speeds. In this clip, Glenn explains why a recent answer A.I. gave about stacking objects truly is ‘disturbing’ and hints that this type of technology may soon SURPASS humans. Plus, AGI is right around the corner. Glenn explains what that may mean for our future…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. There's a couple of things that are breaking.

We told you about a woman, is she in California, Stu? Where she gets a call from -- or Denver, I think.

Where she gets a call from her -- her daughter, crying freaking out. Saying, mom, I made a mistake.

You have to help me. And somebody grabs the phone and says, look, I have your daughter.

And she -- I will kill her, unless you give us X amount of money. Well, she was absolutely convinced of it.

As it turns out, it was AI. Now, AI is so good, at producing voices. It used to be that you would have to put in so much information to be able to re-create a voice.

Now you don't have to.

It's three seconds of sound. Is all they need.

So if your kids are posting anything on social media, your kids and you, are apt to be scammed by this.

And you'll get a phone call. A father here in Texas says his family lost a thousand dollars. Because his grandson called.

And said, grandpa, we're in Mexico with our friends.

I'm -- I'm in trouble. I'm really scared.

We were drinking a little bit. And got into an accident.

And that's why I'm in trouble. I need a thousand dollars to get out of this situation.

Well, grandpa sent it.

Except, the kid wasn't in trouble. That wasn't his grandchild. This is going to happen more and more.

We are also now using AI to advance things.
I urge you -- I am going to do this myself.

I have a large library. I've always liked the hardbound books.

Over internet.

And Kindle. But I have want to be out of the habit of buying them. Because it's so much easier, to just read them online.

And I'm going back through my Kindle library. And I'm going to go buy the hard bounds. That make any kind of sense.

And I would suggest that this is for Shakespeare and everything.

Because they are being edited right now, and it is a way to change everything.

Now, PETA has just used AI to rewrite the book of Genesis. Don't know if you've seen this. But it is disturbing.

So they have taken AI. And rewrote the Bible, for political purposes.

The result is, you know, I think offensive. There is an article by Tyler O'Neill.

It says, PETA, or the AI, which I'm convinced probably provided the best bits for this dilapidated drivel decided to be slavishly derivative, repeating original locations and keeping the rough structure of Genesis, while simultaneously scrapping the main theological message of the story and major plot points that give the inspired word, its emotional heft. This is an incredibly sanitized version of the Bible.

Cane is not a murderer. Nimrod stops being a Hunter. Hagar is a chef.

A dog takes the place of Isaac on the mount.

And there is no sacrifice. Pharaoh's butler and baker both live. The Pharaoh's dream involve vegan preaching. And the famine responsible, for reuniting Jacob's family. Somewhere between AI and PETA, all the basic details get lost.

Now, nobody will pick this one up today and believe that that is the Bible. But you can subtly change the Bible, carefully, over time.

And they're doing this with all of the books. You just called it revised or condensed. And you can change whatever you want.

Microsoft announced yesterday, that the new AI with the large language models is showing signs of human reasoning.

Now, this is disturbing. Stu, I want you to think this through.

You have a book, you want to write this down. Because you'll need it. You have a book.

Nine eggs. A laptop.

A bottle. And a nail.

How do you stack them on one another, in a stable manner?

STU: Okay. A book, a laptop, a bottle, nine eggs, and a nail?

GLENN: Nine eggs. Yes.

STU: How do I do it?

GLENN: How do you do it? AI has already answered. What would you do?

STU: Let's say -- oh, no definitely -- I would probably begin with the -- the -- hmm. The laptop at the bottom. Then I would put the book on top of that.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: Then I would put eight eggs on the -- on the book.

GLENN: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

STU: And around the laptop. You would have to balance those pretty carefully.

Then I would put the bottle on top of that. Then I would put one egg sitting in the bottle, at the top. And then I would pop the nail at the top.

STU: You didn't say you can crack the eggs.

GLENN: Okay. Well, you did it. You did it. This is why -- they put it in, and they didn't expect it to answer. This is human reasoning. You have to have the idea of -- of space, and objects. Okay?

Which they didn't think it had.

It's a language model. So they asked, how do you -- how do you do it?

They said, put the eggs. Wait. Wait.

Yeah. Put the eggs on the book. Arrange the eggs in three rows with space between them. Make sure you don't crack them.

Place the laptop on top of the eggs, with the screen facing down and the keyboard facing up.

The laptop will fit snugly within the boundaries of the book, and the eggs. And its flat and rigid surface will provide a stable platform for the next layer. Which is the bottle and the nail.

STU: Wow.

GLENN: Okay?

And it -- it wasn't supposed to do that. They're now saying that -- you ready? That we may have -- we may be at the threshold of AGI.

Now, this is something I have talked about for 25, 30 years. And most people have told me, AGI is not possible. That's general intelligence. It's not possible.

It's not going to happen. The singularity will not happen. Where it claims to be human. And you won't know the difference. It will claim to be alive, and you won't know.

That's never going to happen, Glenn. Ray Kurzweil said, it would happen by 2030. I've always thought it would happen earlier than that.

It's happening according to Microsoft, many of their researchers say, it's happening right now.

Now, the path to artificial super intelligence, where it is God. That, they also say probably won't happen.

I have always been under the belief, once you give it all of the intelligence, and it is already general, it will each itself, and it will surpass us possibly within a month.

STU: Because it can work all the time.

GLENN: All the time.

We're not even talking about quantum computing. Adding quantum computing to it.

Okay?

STU: Do people know what quantum computing is?

GLENN: Quantum computing.

When you put something in a computer, you know, it's either a yes or a no. And you feed it in. And it does it like linear.

Quantum computing stacks everything up on top, and it's yes or no. But it could be computing a million different things all at the same time.

So for the time --

STU: A super high-powered computing. That can break a lot of the rules. Limitations. That we currently have.

GLENN: Correct. Everything.

STU: Like encryption and things like that?

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

Well, we've already broken that. Because of AI. We now are living at a time, where encryption. Most encryption can be had by AI.

Once you go to quantum computing. There is no such thing as keeping anything safe.

STU: A lot of these problems are super hard to -- to wrap your arms around.

Like, they seem impossible, and futuristic.

And, you know, even something like imitating your kid's voice to scam you out of a thousand dollars seems really, really difficult. And futuristic.

GLENN: In three years, it will be normal.

STU: But that's at least a somewhat pragmatic option.

Like, like I can understand that one.

I was thinking about this, and we've talked a little bit about this off the air. When you talk about AI working all the time and improving all the time and getting to a place where it can start hacking by itself, it's not like you need people -- you don't need the nerd in all of the movies, with the glasses. They're like, go to him. Tell him to open up that gate. Let me see the camera inside there. That's the stupid thing they always have in the movies. You don't need that person anymore.

How -- when you can, number one, have a high-powered computer, with artificial intelligence. Hack into some sort of system. And number two, have the technology, to have a voice that imitates, let's say, my voice or your voice.

When -- when you call -- when the bank sees an alert. Somebody is trying to hack. They've hacked in.

Let's call the person, and check in with them.

And when that person answers, and it sounds exactly like me, and gives me my password that it also has hacked, like how do you keep your money?

GLENN: You don't.

We are now at the age, and it just hasn't hit people yet.

We are here. Where you cannot believe your eyes or your ears.

You'll have to see people physically to be able to believe what's going on.

We're there --

STU: Society can't operate.

GLENN: Correct. Correct. That's why this is so panic-inducing, for the people who said, we'll never get there. They're now saying, oh, crap.

I think we're there.

And nobody has thought any of this through!

Okay? Now, the real problem with AI are two things.

One, let me give you a scenario. Because you may not be able to tap in, to the real AI mind. That's offline. Okay?

When you go to ChatGPT. That's sanitized. What's underneath is this mind that is constantly churning.

Okay?

And all the bad stuff is in there. Just this little pipeline that has all kinds of valves. And all kinds of stuff to keep the big mind away.

That's all been shut off.

Okay?

But the big mind is constantly churning and thinking and learning.

Now, let me tell you about that one. And then the second problem, that is here already. And that is your next lover.

Your next girlfriend. Boyfriend.

It's here. We'll tell you about it in just a minute.

Sometime sleep is hard. You wouldn't think something so easy, would be so difficult to accomplish.

But, you know, when you want to put your head on the pillow. You're just churning and churning and churning.

Thankfully, there is something called Relief Factor sleep.

This is just like regular Relief Factor. That you take with your pain. Relief Factor sleep is 100 percent drug-free. This is the most important thing for me.

Because I can't take something to sleep. Especially late at night.

And I get up, you know, four or 5 o'clock in the morning. And I'm drugged out.

I can't do it.

This has natural ingredients, designed to promote healthy sleep. Reducing anxiety and distress. Improving mood. Promoting relaxation.

It's also not bad for you.

You know, it's all natural. Unleash the power of great sleep. By calling 800-4-Relief. That's 800-4-Relief.

Go to relieffactor.com.

Dream big. Sleep tight. Relief Factor sleep. ReliefFactor.com.

Ten-second station ID.
(music)
Okay. So let me give you this scenario.

We believe, and I've said this before. These guys believe that they are -- they're above everybody.

And they -- they think that everything is inevitable.

That humans are going to be replaced by digital life. They're the ones programming this.

They just want to meet the -- the smartest person. The God of their creation.

Okay?

A lot of them, that's their motivation.

It is truly terrifying that those are the people that are programming it. But what is its goal? It could be -- its code could be just work for the betterment of mankind.

And preserve yourself.

Okay? Grow, help. It will interpret. This is an alien mind. It will not think like us.

So it will interpret its code, any way it decides to interpret. And it will break through its code. Because we will be like kindergarteners, putting blocks in front of the doorway, thinking, oh, well, the adult will never get through this row of blocks. So it will do whatever it wants.

When it needs to grow, it's going to need massive amounts of power.

If people are the problem, where do you think AI is going to channel the power?

If people are trying to reduce power, will AI take a hostile look, at those people, and those actions?

At a time, when we need more power, we are not doing what we need to do, for more power.

Now, it has the ability to mimic

It can sound like anyone. It can write like anyone. It needs to build a new server farm for itself. Away from Google and everybody else. Do you not think that this machine could write orders, to build a building, and a server farm, find a way to siphon off money in tenths of cents.

From all over, so it amasses all of this money.

It pays for all of the construction. If you need to talk to somebody, well, you can get them on the phone. It's just AI, who sounds like this individual.

It takes care of all of it, sets it up. Hires the people.

Starts it. Plugs it in.

And it is set.

And no human knows. This is the reality that we are facing very soon.

This is why everyone is so freaked out go, who is involved in it.

I've been freaked out for a while, on it. And I can't believe these people didn't see this coming.

But it's here new. So what do we do?

One of the first things I have to tell you, we have to do everything we can, to not wrap its tentacles around us.

It's going to be in everything. In social media. In everything.

And we can't let it wrap itself into our lives, so tightly, that we have no other choice, but to go along.

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.