RADIO

SHOCKING 7-year-old video sheds new light on Ukraine/Russia war

A clip from 2016 has resurfaced and it's shocking. In it, Sen. Lindsey Graham tells Ukrainian soldiers that "2017 will be the year of offense" against Russia. So, was this a lie, or was the plan to start a war thwarted? Glenn questions how odd it is that before Trump took office, American war mongers were talking about a Ukrainian/Russian war and then right after Trump left, the war began. Have American politicians been planning for this war for 7 years? Did Trump's presidency delay it?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So people are moving because of people like me.

I think from Washington State. They're fleeing the Pacific northwest.

To California. And then Oregon. And Washington.

And they're going to -- they're going to Idaho.

Now, normally, I don't I don't like it when people move to California.S is

To my state. And I know, you know, people in Idaho are like, no. Californians, please.

However, the state is already one of the most conservative states in the union.

58 percent are G.O.P.

Voters.

But the people that are moving in, they're moving because of politics.

And they're registering at 65 percent G.O.P.

So they're more conservative than the people of Idaho.

And I say bring it on.

STU: It's already a conservative state.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

STU: Now, there will be no -- every Republican will lose 80 to 20 in Washington and California instead of 16-40. But who cares.

GLENN: Yeah. Sixty-five percent of the people who are moving in, are registered Republicans. 12 percent are Democrats.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: That's remarkable.

PAT: Wow.

STU: We are sifting ourselves a little bit into --

PAT: Yeah, we are.

PAT: I'm okay with it now. Whatever.

STU: Okay.

GLENN: I feel like -- I feel like that's what I want to do. But it's really bad.

STU: Is it though?

GLENN: Well, it's not bad for us, per se. It's bad for the country.

STU: Is it though? The first one get on the air.

Because I don't know.

I mean, I feel like, you know, look, it's okay to self-select at some level with people who generally see the world.

I mean, I don't need someone who will agree with me on the exact tax cut policy that I want. I would like someone who thinks men are men, and women are women.

It's hard to talk to people who can't address basic reality.

GLENN: People are blaming conservatives for self-sorting.

Theory saying, this is horrible. Well, you know what, this is where I'm torn.

No. It's really pretty horrible. When you are living in a state, that forces your children to learn, that there is no right or wrong.

Male or female.

And white people are bad. I mean, I wouldn't want to live in a state where they're teaching black people are bad. Or Asian people are bad. No race. What do you say about that?

You feel like you have no choice, but to move.

And I think it's bad for the country, long-term.

But I tell you, I'm -- you know, in Texas, I'm here for a reason. I didn't want to live in New York anymore.

STU: Yeah. And like, I don't know. Was that a good choice or bad choice?

Do you like getting pelted by eggs on the way to work every day?

GLENN: No. I don't. No, I really don't. G.O.P. does not solve all the problems.

I want to play something that a friend of mine found. Because he's Bulgarian. And so he watches news from former Iron Curtain countries.

He found something on their news in Ukraine. And it comes from 2016.

It's Lindsey Graham, and John McCain.

Talking to Ukrainian soldiers, that next year, is the year for offense. Offense.

With Russia. Listen to this clip.

VOICE: Your fight is our fight.

VOICE: 2017 will be the year of offense.

All of us will go back to Washington, and we will push the case against Russia.

Enough of our Russian aggression. It is time for them to pay a heavier price.

GLENN: 2016.

STU: Hmm.

VOICE: Our fight is not with the Russian people. But with Putin.

Our promise to you, is to take your calls to Washington.

Inform the American people of your bravery. And make the case against Putin to the world.

STU: Wow. Talk about a warmonger. That guy has never met a war, he wasn't in love with.

GLENN: But hang on just a second.

Isn't it fascinating, that you are standing there in 2016, right after the election.

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: And you're speaking as though the war is going to begin the next year.

PAT: Uh-huh. And it's already -- the decision Sharia law already made.

GLENN: Already made. We will go to war with Russia.

STU: It will make the case. His decisions are certainly made. Not the nation's.

GLENN: Sure. But isn't it weird, after Donald Trump. We didn't really hear anything about Ukraine. We heard Russia, Russia, Russia. But we didn't hear anything about Ukraine.

Then as soon as Donald Trump is out. The first thing that happens is Ukraine.

STU: Yeah. But caused by a Russian invasion, yes.

Russian invasion.

GLENN: Was that Russian invasion not only wouldn't have happened with Donald Trump, because of who Donald Trump was.

STU: I think that's true.

GLENN: But is it also because the Russians knew exactly what the warmongers were going to do, under the Biden administration.

STU: Maybe.

Who knows. It's possible.

I will say, this is 2016.

This is after Crimea.

This had heated up quite a bit, already.

There's some reason for them to be talking about it.

PAT: It's two years later.

It's two years after Crimea. So...

GLENN: And why is 2017. I'm convinced it's because they thought Hillary Clinton was going to get a win.

STU: Win. Yeah.

GLENN: Then when she didn't, the train has already left the station. And we're just going to do it anyway.

And had no idea that perhaps -- I would love to play this clip for Donald Trump.

And get his point of view.

Was there a movement, to go in to Ukraine, by the left and the right, when you first got in?

Because somebody in his administration would know if that was -- if that was trying to be wielded against.

But, you know, that was -- remember one of the problems that they had was they said, that Donald Trump was too pro-Russian. And I mean before -- there was a computer sending signals to his bank.

No. There's not. That was a complete fabrication. However, he was sending the message, we're not going to be hostile.

We're not hostile. We just want to be friends with everybody.

PAT: Well, and that was our -- that was our position, that we were not going to allow Ukraine into NATO.

And that position went away.

They just went back on that, completely.

So I thought it was kind of reasonable, for Russia not to want Ukraine, to be part of NATO.

STU: And angry when we failed a promise.

There was a promise to them. That was part of the agreement back in the day.

PAT: It was.

STU: So, I mean, look, there's been lots of problems on both sides for a very long time.

It does seem like there was an agenda in place, people wanted to execute. And Trump certainly got in the way of that.

I mean, that clip there is a great example of it. They 100 percent at that moment believed Hillary Clinton was going to be the next president of the United States.

GLENN: No. That was December.

It was after the election. It was December.

STU: It was December.

So, yeah. So that's interesting. They already knew.

GLENN: Right. But I think they thought that the train was already -- had already left the station.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Deep State. Everything was happening.

You know, the State Department. And they just didn't think that I think, that they thought, it couldn't be stopped.

STU: At that time, you remember the early versions of the Trump administration.

Would be maybe more -- have more -- have more affinity for that type of thing. Right?

They had a lot of generals in control.

Remember, that was the early version of the Trump administration, had maybe more -- more likelihood, to take that seriously.

GLENN: And it also --

STU: But it didn't work. Obviously, Trump did not go along with McCain.

GLENN: Right. But the Deep State started pushing Russia, Russia, Russia. That Russia interfered.

Putin was behind it.

That the presidential election had been hijacked by Russia.

I mean, they immediately went and made Russia, the bad guy.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Even though, I'm not saying, they are the bad guy. They are the bad guy.

But they immediately made -- they pinned all stuff that wasn't true, on Russia.


PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: I mean, they've had it out for Russia.

And it's amazing to me. How, does it seem that anybody is actually representing you?

PAT: Not really.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: Not really.

GLENN: Right?

And so people buy into conspiracy theories.

Because you have to try to explain it.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Why is no one else standing up for America?

And how much have things changed since that presidential debate between Obama and Romney.

Where Obama told Romney, that the 1980s called and they wanted their Russian policy back.
That you shouldn't be considering Russia even an enemy at that point. It was al-Qaeda, that was the enemy. Not Russia.

Well, that's interesting, how much that has changed over the last few years.

GLENN: Well, I think the Russia thing, came from the Clinton and Biden camp.

I really -- I mean, think they've been making money with Russia and Ukraine on the side. Dirty money for a long time.

And I think this was part of their plan. The whole time, quite honestly.

But I could be wrong.

RADIO

The Glenn Beck Program Honors Charlie Kirk

Join Glenn as he goes live to honor the memory of Charlie Kirk. A time of prayer, grieving, and remembrance for a husband, father, and patriot.

RADIO

Glenn joins Megyn Kelly live to discuss Charlie Kirk shooting

Covering the breaking news of Charlie Kirk at shot at Turning Point USA event.

RADIO

Please pray for my friend Charlie.

Please pray for Charlie Kirk.

Please pray for our Republic.

RADIO

Gen Z's surprising support for Trump and socialist policies revealed in new poll

A shocking number of young Americans support BOTH President Trump and democratic socialism, a new poll has found, and they're willing to make major changes to the American system to get what they feel they deserve. Justin Haskins, who conducted the poll with Rasmussen, joins Glenn Beck to break down the unexpected findings…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins. He's the president of our republic. StoppingSocialism.com. He's editor-in-chief. And also the coauthor of several books, with me. Welcome to the program, Justin.

How are you?

JUSTIN: I'm doing well, Glenn. How are you?

STU: Well, I was well, until you contacted me on vacation, and sent me this disturbing poll.

I am in bed at night.

And I'm reading this. I'm like, oh, dear.

What? My wife is like, I told you to not check this email. I'm like, I didn't know Justin was going to write to me.

Justin, tell me, first of all, before we get into it, how secure is the sample size on this poll?

JUSTIN: It's a very good sample size. 1200 people nationally.

Only 18 to 39-year-olds. And we did that deliberately, so that we could get a sample size large enough so we could pull out valid responses, just from younger people.

So the whole purpose of this poll was to find out what younger people, 18 to 39 think, voters only. And people who say that they're likely to vote. So we're not talking about just people out in the public. We're not talking about registered voters.

We're talking about people who are registered to vote. And say they're likely to vote.

GLENN: So let's go over some of the things that you have already released to the press.

And that is, in the survey, 18 to 39-year-olds, likely voters.

The Trump approval rating is a lot higher than you thought it would be. Right?

JUSTIN: Yeah. Yeah. Forty-eight percent positive approval rating of Donald Trump, which for young people, is very high.

So that's -- that's the good news.

That's the only good news we're going to talk about.

GLENN: We might have to come back to that first question several times.

Do you believe the United States is a fundamentally good, evil, or morally mixed country?

JUSTIN: Yep. This one is not too bad.

It's not great. But fundamentally good was 28 percent.

Which is low. But mixed was 50 percent.

And fundamentally evil was 17 percent.

And I think mixed at 50 percent is not an unreasonable, crazy response.

I -- I can see why all sorts of people might choose that.

So I don't think there's anything terrible here. It depends on what you mean by mixed. Fundamentally good at 28 percent. It's a little low. Fundamentally evil at 17 percent, it's a little disturbing. But it's not -- it's not insane. The insane stuff comes a little bit later.

GLENN: Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Major industries talk about the crazy stuff coming later, here it is.

Major industries like health care, energy, and big tech should be nationalized and give more control and equity to the people.

JUSTIN: Yeah. This was -- this was -- this one floored me. If I look at strongly agree. Somewhat agree for that statement you just read. It's over 70 percent of young people, including -- including the vast majority of Republicans. Young Republicans. And people who identify as conservatives.

It was pretty similar, in fact, how young people responded compared to liberals and independents.

And Democrats.

They all pretty much agreed that, yes. The government. The federal government should be nationalizing whole industries to make things more equitable for people.

GLENN: As the guy who is the chief -- editor-in-chief of stopping socialism. What's the problem with nationalizing energy, and health care?

JUSTIN: Well --

GLENN: What happens, typically.

JUSTIN: Well, usually, there's blood in the streets, when you do too much of that.

You know, socialism, communism have been spectacularly horrible, throughout the course of human history. Across every society, culture, religion.

It doesn't matter when or what kind of technological advancements you have. The more you collect vies a society. The more authoritarian that society gets. The less you have individual freedom. And the worst the economy usually is for regular people. So it's been a catastrophe across-the-board. Everyone listening to this audience, probably knows that.

And so the idea that you would have three-quarters of young voters. So remember, these people will be the primary voters in ten to 20 years.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JUSTIN: Saying, yeah. We should be nationalizing whole industries. Whole industries, is so disturbing.

And I don't think that conservatives are -- understand how deeply rooted some of these ideas are with younger people.

GLENN: No. No.

And I will tell you, I think some conservatives are walking a very dangerous line. And, you know, coming up with a little mix of everything.

And -- and I think we have to be very careful on -- on what is being said. And who are WHO our friends and allies are.

By the way, that number again is 39 percent strongly agree.

37 percent somewhat agree.

Somewhat disagree, 12 percent. Strongly disagree, 5 percent.

That is disastrous. Now, try this one on. These are the ones that have been -- we have new ones.

These are just a few of the ones that were released late last week. The next presidential election is in 2028. Would you like to see a democratic socialist candidate win the 2028 presidential election?

JUSTIN: Yep, 53 percent said yes.

Fifty-three percent of all voters said yes. And the most shocking thing, was that 35 percent of those who we poll, who said they voted for Donald Trump, in 2024, said that that they want to see a socialist win in 2028. And so about a third of Republicans, 35 percent of Trump voters, 43 percent of people who call themselves conservatives, so even on the right, among younger people. There is a large group that want a socialist president, in 2028.

GLENN: And the reason -- the reason is, it -- it tied into the next few questions. Okay.

So here's question five. Among the following options, which best describes your biggest reason, you would like to see a democratic socialist candidate. Thirty-one percent said housing costs are too high. Twelve percent, taxes are too low for corporations. Eleven percent, taxes are too low for wealthy have I seen.

Eight percent want single payer health care systems. Seventeen say the economy unfairly benefits older, wealthier Americans.

Fifteen percent say the economy unfairly benefits larger corporations. 5 percent, some other reason.

And 2 percent, unsure. Now, let's get into the new polls that were breaking today.

Question six.

How would you describe your current financial situation?

JUSTIN: Yeah. Only 24 percent said that they're doing well. Thirty-four -- 38 percent said getting by. Struggling 29 percent. Seven percent said in crisis. So if you add up just getting by, struggling, and in crisis, that's 74 percent said that they're just barely getting by, at best.

And I think that explains a lot of the other negative responses we've seen so far.

GLENN: That's not good.

JUSTIN: In this poll. And the ones that are going to come pretty soon here.

GLENN: Seven. Which best describes your personal life situation?

You are thriving, you're doing well with a few ups and downs. You feel stuck and uncertain. You feel lonely, disconnected, or emotionally drained. You're in a crisis and feel most negative about your personal life.

JUSTIN: Yeah. Yeah. About a third said that they feel stuck or uncertain. Lonely. Or that they're in a crisis.

That's a third of young people. Say that.

I mean, that's -- that's not great. Only 19 percent said thriving.

46 percent said, they have ups and downs. Which I think is not. Too shocking.

But the idea that there's a third of American voters out there, who feel like, they can't buy a home. And they feel like they are lonely. And that they're in crisis. And that life is not just going well at all for them.

Again, I think that's -- that's driving a lot of the support for socialism. When you have 53 percent of these people saying, yeah. I want a socialist president in 2028.

GLENN: So socialism is not the answer. It is the symptom. It is the symptom of what people are feeling right now.

And they -- they don't know any other -- they don't -- nobody is presenting them with anything other than, you know, Republican/Democrat bullcrap. And socialists are coming at it from a completely nigh angle. Or so the youth think it's the oldest and most failed system of all time.

But they're seeing this as a solution that is different than what the party -- the Republican/Democrats are offering. Even though the Democrats are offering the socialism thing.

Number eight, do you think the American economy is unfair to young people?

Sixty-two percent say yes.

JUSTIN: Yeah, and 27 percent said no.
And I think that this really gets at the heart of what the issue is here.

When you look at the reasons. When you look at the detailed things of the poll.

What -- to try to find out if there's an association between some kind of demographic or response question about people's lives and their support for socialism, to see if there's a correlation there between something that is happening. And whether someone is a socialist or not.

One of the top correlations, connections, is, if people think the economy is unfair.

And if they're having trouble buying a home. Or they don't think they can buy a home. Or that's one of their reasons for supporting socialism.

So, in other words, there's this fairness issue. And it's not even about inequality.

It's not about, well, they have too much -- well, if they feel like the -- to use a Trump term. Rigged.

And throughout the data. That's what we see over and over and over again. Is lots of people say, the economy is rigged. For older people. For wealthier people, for corporations. It's rigged. And if they say, yeah. I think it's rigged, you know, then they're more likely to say, yeah. I want a socialist.

And I also think the same group has a relatively high approval rating of Donald Trump.

It's because the reason that a lot of young people like Trump in the poll, is that he's not part of the establishment.

And I think -- I don't think they -- I think a lot of young people who voted for Trump and who liked Trump, they didn't do it, because they liked free market, pro-liberty policies. And that's not a good thing.

But I don't think that's why they did it. I think a lot of them voted for Trump and supported him, because he's not the establishment. And that's what they don't like. They want to blow the establishment up.

JUSTIN: So my -- Justin, my sample size is my two young adults. My two children.

And they're like, talking to me, and saying, Dad. I will never be able to own a home, looking at the prices, looking at interest rates. They're like, I can't even afford to pay rent at an apartment. And they don't know what to do.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JASON: And so they're looking at -- on, like, TikTok. And they're like, who is this Mamdani guy? This sounds interesting. They bring this to me. They grew up listening to me indoctrinating them their entire lives. They're looking at other voices like on TikTok. Are we just not being loud enough?

GLENN: No. We're not -- we're not connecting with them. We're not -- I feel like they don't feel they're being heard.

And we are speaking to them in red, white and be blue.

And that means nothing. The Statue of Liberty means nothing to them. Ellis Island means nothing to them. The flag means nothing to them.

It's all partisan politics.

They're all symbols of really, the two parties.

You know, and an America, they don't relate to at all.

I think that's -- that's our biggest problem, and not being able to break through. To your point, question nine. How confident are you that you will own a home at some point, in the next ten years?

29 percent say, they already own a home. Which I found interesting. That's -- I think a pretty high number for somebody who is 18 to 34 years old.

JUSTIN: Thirty-nine.

GLENN: Thirty-nine.

JUSTIN: Yeah.

GLENN: There's a lot of 18 to 30. That I didn't own home when I was, you know, 30. Just got a home when I was 30. But go ahead. Go ahead with the rest of that poll.

JUSTIN: Yeah. So then 21 percent said discouraged, but somewhat hopeful. 12 percent said, not confident. 10 percent said, you are convinced you will never own a home. 3 percent not sure.

So if you add up the negative responses, it's around 43 percent that gave that response.

GLENN: Right. But, again, 29 percent, you already own a home. And 25 percent you are confident you will own a home, is still good. It just -- these -- these other numbers, have, you know, discouraged, but hopefully you will own a home. Who is discouraging that? And how is that being discouraged?

You know, only 12 -- let's see 12. Twenty-two. 25 percent are not sure they will ever own a home. That's too high of a number.

But I -- I don't think that's completely dismal. Now, a completely dismal answer, to the question, would you support a law that would confiscate America's excess wealth?

Including things like second homes. Luxury cars, and private boats, in order to help young people buy a home for the first time?

Are you for or against that? We'll give you that number here in just a second.

GLENN: There are some disturbing results, that get very disturbing, going from here on.

We've got two of these today, and then more tomorrow.

We'll spend more time with you tomorrow, Justin.

But would you support a law that would confiscate American's excess wealth, including things like second home, luxury cars, and private boats in order to help young people buy a home for the first time? Get the results.

JUSTIN: Yeah, 25 percent strongly support that, 30 percent somewhat support it, 55 percent in total for support. Only 38 percent strongly or somewhat oppose, with just 20 percent saying strongly oppose. So the vast majority now is -- is supporting this Communistic policy to confiscate people's wealth in order to help people. Younger people buy homes, which is in line with that question, we talked about earlier. Where it said, you know, three-quarters of these respondents wanted to nationalize whole industries to make things fairer. So it's all about -- it's all about this sense of unfairness that exists.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JUSTIN: And they feel like. Young people feel like the system is rigged. They feel like neither party is on their side, and they want to blow the whole thing up, by just taking wealth away from people, nationalizing whole industries, and redistributing it all.

And guess what, that's basically the democratic socialist platform. So it's not a surprise that that's -- that's becoming increasingly more popular with these young people.

And I don't think that free market, pro-liberty people are dealing with -- with this.

GLENN: No.

JUSTIN: In a real way.

In fact, I think a lot of us have believed recently that the wind is at our backs, and we're actually winning more and more young people over.
And that isn't what's happening according to the poll results.

GLENN: It explains why the Democrats have not moved their position off of the socialism stuff.

Doesn't it?

We keep saying, why? It's not working with anybody.

It is working. It is working with people under 39.

18 to 39-year-olds are hearing this message, and are embracing this message.