RADIO

3 stories show the far-left is RETREATING because of YOU

The far-left is COMING UNDONE, Glenn says, and they’re beginning to retreat all because of YOU. In this clip, Glenn shares 3 recent stories — like PayPal’s controversial announcement regarding platform users and misinformation — that prove taking a peaceful stand against the far-left can WORK. ‘They’re scared out of their MINDS,’ Glenn explains. ‘Truth always wins. We just have to stand up and speak it.’

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Anyway, so let me give you three good stories. These are big stories. And you'll hear talk about them, but nobody will put them in perspective. This is you standing up.

Okay? These three things are happening because you are standing up. Story number one. As of October 8th, PayPal's new acceptable use policy, states that, effective November 3rd, activities like sending, posting, or publication of any message, content, or materials, may qualify as violations, if the company decides they are harmful, obscene, harassing or objectionable. Basically, yeah.

Whatever we want. If they depict, promote, or incite hatred, discrimination, of protected groups. You can go after white guys though. No problem.

Or of individuals -- of groups, based on protected characteristics, race, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or are fraudulent, promote misinformation, or unlawful. For each violation, a user may be subject to damages, including liquidated damages of 2500 U.S. dollars, which may be debited directly from your PayPal accounts. You've got to be kidding me.

Okay. Now, this happened, what?

Last week. And last week, we talked about it.

But apparently, a lot of other people talked about it too. Now, they are not a neutral organization. They haven't even said, that they are a neutral organization. Although, they say, they value uniqueness, and diversity of thought.

Oh, do you?

Is that why you shut down the account of the free speech union?

Because they were a little upset about the radical gender theory, and British schools.

Yeah. Yeah. Or how about gays against groomers?

Why did you shut them down?

You didn't even have an explanation for that one. Gays for Groomers say, more and more companies are coming out in full support of the sexualization, indoctrination, and medicalization of minors.

By the way, PayPal also shut down us for them. A campaign group that advocated for reopening schools during the COVID-19 lockdowns. You have to shut them up, you know what I'm saying?

So anyway, they're not neutral. However, here's the good news. In a tweet on Saturday, just a few days after they released this seven-page document. David Marcus spoke out against the new policy, first reported by The Daily Wire. That would apparently allow the digital payment processor to charge $2,500. Elon Musk, another cofounder of PayPal, said he agreed with the criticism, joining a number of others who have spoken out against the new policy. He said, it's really hard for me to openly criticize a company that I used to love, and I gave so much to. But PayPal's new user's rules or whatever goes against everything I believe in.

A private company now gets to decide to take your money, if you say something that they disagree with. That's insanity.

And some other people started saying, David Sacks said, get your money out of PayPal right now.

Scott Adams from Dilbert said, seriously, close your PayPal account immediately, if they don't reverse this today. Vivek Ramaswamy said, misinformation police are now extending their overreach among social media accounts.

Blah, blah, blah. A whole bunch of people. You spoke out about it, Blake Masters, the Arizona Senate campaign, he said, yeah. Get to Washington soon. And I'm going to be working on this.

Then PayPal just released this. That notice went out in error. And we included some incorrect information.

We're not finding people for misinformation. And this language was never intended to be inserted into our policy.

Our teams are working now, to correct our policy pages. Oh.

You know, these -- these companies have such a weird habit of -- like, really bizarre things happening.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: You know, like, I've never said, you know, hey, by the way, just some company policy. You know, if you have brown hair, it's okay. It's absolutely okay to harass you, because we're going to fire you, anyway, because you have black hair. Brown hair. Never said that. Oops. How did that get into the policy?

How did that happen?

PAT: Somebody broke into the policy. And just started writing stuff in it. I hate that.

GLENN: Yeah. You know, that would -- I would accept that. I would like to see the termination of that person. But it's just like they have a bunch of rogue people in there, that are just like, watch this. We're going to -- we're going to -- we're going to take people's money. You should fire those people.

Then next story: Because of you, Vanderbilt to pause gender transition surgeries on minors. The Vanderbilt University Medical Center has paused all gender transition surgeries for minors, following an explosive report about their pediatric gender services, and a letter from the state legislators demanding that the practice is stopped. By the way, this is really Daily Wire. And what's his name on the Daily Wire that did this.

We are pausing gender affirmation surgeries on patients under 18, while we complete this review, which may take several months. In addition, we understand the issue is likely to be taken up by the general assembly in its next legislative station -- session. And as always, we assure that our programs will comply with any new requirements, which may be established as part of Tennessee law. Huh.

PAT: Huh.

GLENN: So -- so no more hormones or double mastectomies for kids. You know, that's probably a good thing.

PAT: Well, since when you changed gender, the suicide rate for those kids, goes up 20 times the national average.

GLENN: That's not 30 times, is it?

PAT: Not 100 times. It's only 20 times the rate. So...

GLENN: Right. Right. So thank you for standing up. See what happens when we stand up?

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Here's number three. Several states have launched efforts to rule out ESG, with 19 G.O.P. attorneys general sending a letter to BlackRock.

BlackRock, increasingly becoming a Republican target, challenging the money manager's commitment to ESG principles.

They claim that BlackRock's policies are undercutting shareholder profits and managing state pension funds.

So Louisiana decided to go a step further. God bless the State Treasury there, John Schroder. He announced last week, the state has divested $560 million, a number that will increase to 794 million over the coming months, as Louisiana exits BlackRock money market funds. Mutual funds, and exchange traded fund holdings.

He writes, your blatantly anti-fossil fuel policies will destroy Louisiana's economy. This divestment is necessary to protect Louisiana from actions and policies that you would actively seek to hamstring our fossil fuel sector.

In my opinion, your support of ESG investing is inconsistent with the best economic interest and values of Louisiana.

All of these things are happening because, one, somebody was brave enough to expose them. Okay?

Matt Walsh. He's the guy who has been exposing and really bringing it to people's attention. Especially at Vanderbilt. That's him. So he was brave enough to stand there, and then tell you. And then you stood up.

This is fantastic news. They are scared out of their mind.

They -- this is all coming undone. I'll tell you -- I'll tell you how this ends for them. I'll show you why this is coming undone. In 60 seconds. Ever flown with American Airlines before?

Yeah. If you have, you might be in for a little surprise. They recently discovered a data breach in their system. And they don't have any idea how many customer's personal information was accessed. But, you know, pretty sure it wasn't just a couple. You know, names, passport numbers, driver's license numbers, medical information. Yeah, floating around there. Somebody took it.

If you've ever flown American. And probably -- I mean, who flies American, you know?

Yeah. My information was in that database. My information was in that database. I'm not worried about it because I have LifeLock. Nobody can prevent all identity theft or monitor all transactions. But LifeLock is the best out there.

And if you join now, you'll save 25 percent off your first year with the promo code Beck. Now, listen, they have both the preventive measure to keep you safe, and access to a restoration team, if you do end up having your information hacked into. I have seen them at work, several times in my own life. And they're really good. Really good. We have not had a problem.

We've had phone calls from them. Hey, there's a problem. And then they cleared it up. It's fantastic. 1-800-LifeLock. 1-800-LifeLock. LifeLock.com. Use the promo code Beck. And save 25 percent.

Ten-second station ID.
(music)

GLENN: All right. Let me show you why this is all coming undone. First of all, everything they talk about is nuts. It's nuts. There's no common sense to any of this stuff. Right? You know it. I know it. Oh, gee. It looks like a lot of people are going to be freezing to death in Europe. They're using -- they're literally -- people in Europe, are literally buying horse and cow dung, to burn in their fireplaces, to keep warm. That's going to work out well. It's going to work out well. So what does our president and the progressive left do?

Well, they cancel the pipelines. But they want to make sure that we have oil. So first, they are willing to sacrifice everything they say they believe in. You know, with the death of Khashoggi and go over and kneel at the feet of the -- the Saudi prince after insulting him. And he not only doesn't raise it by 20 percent, I think he was asking -- he reduces the amount they're producing. That's ineffective these guys are. So we're willing to go over to Saudi Arabia, but not here. Now we're going to Venezuela. And we are now trying to buy oil from Venezuela.

But not from here. Not in America. No, no, no. Venezuela, we would rather help them. That makes no sense. You know it. I know it.

This is the other reason why it's all falling apart. These people are not who they say they are. Not who they are, forcing us to say we are.

Okay? You know, I -- they're saying to us, that we're the racists. And they're like, I'm not a racist. I'm not a racist.

Who are they? A recording which was reported in the Los Angeles times, and has not yet been reviewed by the New York Post.

Captured the counsel president, the LA counsel, as referring to her colleague, Mike Bonin's black son as (another language). Is that right? Which apparently means "that little monkey" in Spanish. Oh, okay. All right.

Martinez, who is a Latina. I'm sorry. Latinx. Also said about him, who was white, was raising a toddler like a little white kid. I was like, this kid needs a beatdown. Let me take him around the corner, and I'll brill him back. City council president said. She also referred to the child as something else, which is the N-word in Spanish, I'm guessing.

At another point, in the roughly hour-long conversation, she called Bonin, also a Democrat, that little bitch. Kevin de Leon. A member of the city council, who unsuccessfully ran for mayor in California Senate, said in the recording, that Bonin treated his child like a little yard bag or a Louis Vuitton bag. So the audio, which was recorded, we don't know by who, was posted by Reddit. That user who posted it, was now suspended.

Huh. Before the suspension, it was posted, it said, wow. You know it happens. But when you actually hear it, it's unbelievable. This looks like the labor movement is in bed with city hall. Of course it is. Of course it is. Now, the guy whose son -- by the way, three years old that was attacked.
Says, he's -- he's heart sick, and angry. And the leaked audio also captures Martinez, attacking the progressive LA district attorney, saying, F that guy.

He's with the blacks.

So we know who these people are, it's only a matter of time, before they expose themselves.

On the other side, you have what's happening in Florida. Almost 100 percent of the power has now been restored. This came over the weekend. Almost 100 percent of the power, has been restored.

DeSantis has done an incredible job. Now, let me give you another reason. There is a huge, huge outpouring of women and girls on the streets, in Iran. And they are being shot, imprisoned, tortured. But it's not stopping them. This is youth in the streets. And they said, they're not going to stop. The regime has had internet blackouts, so it's hard for them to communicate. They don't know what's going to be happening to them, at all. But there are still massive gatherings that are going on. Patrols in almost every street. One of the girls said, I assure you, the press -- the protests are not over. The people are angry. They're talking back to the police, in ways I've never seen.

Yet, our left is not standing with these girls. The people who protest to love women so he knew, are not standing. Ahmed Abu Murkia (phonetic), my guess. Twenty-five years old. I'm just going to call him Ahmed. He reportedly was living in Israel for two years. And seeking resettlement in Canada, because of threats to his life, because he was gay. Israel was protecting him, from the Palestinians.

Last Wednesday, he was beheaded in the West Bank. The victim's friends and media outlets said he was kidnapped from Israel, and taken to the Palestinian city, authorities arrested a suspect in the killing. Who filmed the murder. And then posted it on social media. Have you heard any gay organization, talk about this?

Have you heard any gay organization, that says, that the Palestinians are open-minded? It's Israel, that is the problem.

Really? Because Israel was protecting and accepting of the man's lifestyle. The Palestinians took him. Kidnapped him. His family was behind it.

PAT: Hmm.

GLENN: And beheaded him. Truth always wins. We just have to stand up, and speak it.

EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains His FIERY Rejection of Spending Bill
RADIO

EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains His FIERY Rejection of Spending Bill

According to the media, there’s a big fight going on between Republicans over the House’s new slimmed-down continuing resolution spending bill. Some, including President-elect Donald Trump, wanted the bill to pass. But others, like Texas Representative Chip Roy, argued that it still wasn’t ready. However, is the Republican “unity coalition” really crumbling, like the media claims? Rep. Chip Roy joins Glenn to explain what’s really going on. He argues that he IS trying to give Trump and DOGE a 100-day “runway” to fix the country. But he makes the case that, by increasing the debt ceiling by $5 trillion without agreeing on other cuts, this bill gives bad actors the ability to be an “obstacle” to Trump’s agenda further down the line. Plus, he reveals to Glenn that he believes some of these bad actors LEAKED false information about his stance to Mar-a-Lago.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN:

I think we have a great opportunity today. To show you how to have a -- tough conversation, with friends, friends. Where you deeply disagree on something.

But you know that their intent is good. They know my intent is good. Or our intent is good.

And we actually have the same end goal, but we disagree on the path. And we're going to walk away friends.

Chip Roy is joining us today. And, Chip, I love you. And I always will. And I agree with your, we've got to cut spending. We have to. But Liz Wheeler is with me. And we've been talking about it all morning. It's the -- the -- the -- the system of DOGE and Trump, the call-out to the world, in saying, you've got to surrender the Capitol. You know, the bad guys are in and about to take all the money.

Surround, and tell them, come out with your hands up. And that happened. And we scored a massive win, in an entirely new way.

Ask then you stood on principle, one we both agree with.

And it failed!

And so here's -- here's what Liz and I were talking about. Here's what we want to say to you.

And then get your response.

LIZ: Hi, Congressman Roy, this is the way I see it. I want your take on it. I love you. I think you're one of the best members of Congress. I disagree with you on the process that's happening. And I think that is the difference. The process. We elected Donald Trump to be a disruptor. Because Republican members of Congress for decades have been telling they're fiscal conservatives. They want to decrease the debt SEAL. It hasn't happened.

It hasn't -- it hasn't been done. And so Donald Trump comes in with Elon Musk, and uses this DOGE process to first identify these pieces of garbage in the first 1500-page bill. And take those things to the people. We took them to members of Congress. Congress said, okay. We'll listen to you.

So that new process was very effective.

And my question to you is: Once that process was proved to be effective. Which I think is exciting and wonderful.

How do we bridge this divide, with you, to say, okay.

Let's put some faith in this new process. And trust Elon Musk and Donald Trump and the Dow Jones process, to eventually address the debt ceiling, but get this done right now?

GLENN: And not blind trust. Chip.

CHIP: So appreciate you guys. Appreciate being on the show. Particular order. I have to go through a couple of things.

GLENN: Yep.

CHIP: Number one, it's important to remember that my job and my duty is to the Constitution, to God, and the people I represent. I told them, when I came to Washington, I would not -- I would not let the credit card and the debt ceiling and the borrowing of the United States without the spending restraints necessary to offset it.

GLENN: Okay.

CHIP: Right now, all we have are promises and ideas and notions. What I know, that neither of you respectfully no, and that none of your listeners respectfully no are the people that are in the room, that I was in with yesterday. And the day before, who are recalcitrant.

And do not want to do the spending cuts that we need to do.

That I believe the president and the DOGE guys. And everybody want to do.

My job, is to force that through the meat grinder. To demand that we do our damn job. Okay?

GLENN: Okay. So hang on. Okay. So wait. Wait. You're right. You're right. You're right. Go ahead.

CHIP: Number thee, when we were going through the bill, I'm glad the bill dropped from 1,550 pages to 116 pages. Three-quarters of Twitter or X or whatever you want to call it, have been out there spreading false facts that we supported a bad bill and didn't like the better bill.

That's not true. But let's be Lear. The 1400 pages that were cut out. It's a panacea.

There were some good stuff in there. There were some bad stuff in there. There was a lot of disinformation.

There wasn't a $70,000 pay raise. There was a 3,000-dollar pay raise.

I didn't support any pay raise. I didn't support a lot of the stuff in there.

But there's a lot of misinformation. And here's the thing: The 116 pages that were left, and I opposed violently the first bill. I was leading the charge on fighting and killing the first bill.

GLENN: And I love you.

LIZ: The second bill for 116 pages. Turned off -- turned off the pay go requirement. That we slash 1.7 trillion automatically.

And added a 5 trillion that are increase.

My view was, I could not support that, without a clear understanding of what cuts we would get, in mandatory spending next year. And undo any of the Inflation Reduction Act.

The undoing of the student loans. The undoing of the crap with the food stamps.

And everything else. I yield back.

GLENN: Okay. I yield back.

Chip, you're not in a hostile room. We love you. And we agree with your end goals. It's our end goal too. We didn't make that promise that you made to the people that voted for you. So we have more wiggle room here.

But you say -- I think our big difference is, you say, I know the guys in the room.

You're right. You do. And we -- we ceded that earlier today on the show.

You are -- one of us is wrong on trust.

I don't trust any of the weasels in Washington.

But I think Donald Trump and Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have earned enough trust, to get a grace period, here for the first -- maybe the first year.

Or at least six months.

To turn the economy around, and also reduce the size of the government.

And totally flip this thing.

And I know, as somebody who is -- you know, run a company, mainly into a ground. But run a company, and have to switch it, in the middle, and totally reshuffle. That -- that actually costs money, while you're doing it, to bridge the gap.

Because you have to fill up holes while you're filling in the gap.

You don't trust the people in the room. Neither do we.

But we do trust the system that worked on Wednesday with DOGE and Donald Trump.

Where do we disagree?

Can you give them --

CHIP: We don't disagree. And yesterday morning, I was making that precise argument in a room full of conservatives and then a follow-up room with people who will call it, less conservatives.

GLENN: Republican. Yes.

CHIP: And so we were making this argument. And then someone infamously. Something leaked out of the room, somehow out to Mar-a-Lago. That I was being resistant. Because I was negotiating trying to get the agreement to achieve the objective that you just said. I was trying to get, okay. In fact, yesterday morning, I made the argument to a group of conservatives. We need to give the president runway. We need to give him his first 100 days. We need to appreciate JD, and Vivek, and all the people -- and everybody involved. For the president to achieve the objective.

But to get there. We have to make sure that the guys in the room, that are an obstacle to that, don't have the ability to block it.

Because information flow matters. And when those guys tell the president, they can't achieve X.

Then the president will not achieve X. Our job was to force and demand, guys, we need actual understanding of what the cuts will be.

And because otherwise, we're asking us to accept a 5 trillion-dollar limit in our credit card increase. In exchange for nothing!

Literally, in exchange for nothing, but -- but hope.

So our job was to force that change.

Unfortunately, while I was trying to make the argument that we needed something in order to get the votes, someone leaked that down to Mar-a-Lago, and the president reacted.

But now I have to now manage that.

GLENN: Right. I know. I know.

CHIP: They're trying to enforce change in town.

GLENN: So hang on.

We have to leave this. Because I'm going to run against the clock.

I could talk to you all day about this. You were in a meeting this morning about J.D. Vance. Can you tell us anything about that meeting?

CHIP: That meeting happened, because despite what happened yesterday, I'm trying to get this done. Last night, talking to JD, we worked to get this meeting done. We had some good progress this morning.

But there still remains people concerned about spending. That we can work out, what agreement we can reach. On what spending cuts. We can actually get next year, in exchange for giving the vote on a debt ceiling increase.

So it remains fluid. Progress was made. But we have to keep working on it.

And I left that meeting to talk to you. Soil get an update in a minute.

GLENN: Thank you for that, by the way.

I hear there is a new bill that may be coming today.

Is that the one you're talking about?

Or is this another bill that could be another nightmare?

CHIP: Despite other people leaking crap, I refused. I can't say, because it's not been decided by the speaker.

And it's not right to talk about things they're talking about in private meetings.

GLENN: Yeah, but it's -- it's this speaker. I mean, is he really the speaker anymore, Chip, really?

CHIP: We need to hear what bill we need to get forward. And I can't talk about the private meetings. But, look, I'm going to keep fighting for what I promised people that I represent.

I'm going to fight to cut spending. I am going to represent article one.

I'm going to support the president's agenda, but we've got to do that together.

GLENN: Okay.

Chip, thank you.

I think we can -- I think we agree, but I await to see what that means to you. Because we may just have to agree to disagree on this.

But I love you. And I still want you to replace Cornyn.

CHIP: The short version is, for inflation's sake, we cannot increase the debt ceiling $5 trillion without knowing what we're getting for it.

And I don't think anybody should disagree with that.

GLENN: But you don't disagree that Elon Musk and Trump and Vivek are serious about gutting the system.

CHIP: I believe that is their objective. I believe there are obstacles to that objective. And I need to know the sincerity of how we deal with those obstacles, both structural, and human. And we have to figure that out. And that's my job.

America's Favorite Villain Is Ready for Nuclear Fallout. Are You? | Glenn TV | Ep 401
TV

America's Favorite Villain Is Ready for Nuclear Fallout. Are You? | Glenn TV | Ep 401

In this episode of Glenn TV — a theatrical how-to guide to survive the breakdown of society after a nuclear attack, according to the new movie “Homestead” from Angel Studios. Glenn Beck interviews the movie’s star and executive producer, Neal McDonough, who plays the head of a family trying to survive as society is breaking down in a postapocalyptic world. You’ve probably seen Neal in everything from the hit TV shows “Yellowstone,” “Suits,” and “Justified” to movies like “Captain America,” “Minority Report,” and the groundbreaking mini-series “Band of Brothers.” Glenn asks Neal what it’s like to play a villain so often, how TV and movies are changing, and how he survived Hollywood as a devoted Christian and husband who refuses to do onscreen kissing scenes with any of his female co-stars. They also discuss his battle with alcoholism, what it’s like working the legends like Sylvester Stallone and Kevin Costner, and the cultural craving for Western cinema. Note: Angel Studios is a sponsor of “The Glenn Beck Program.” Get your tickets for “Homestead” at https://Angel.com/Beck.

4 MAJOR Cover-Ups EXPOSED In the Latest Jan. 6 Report
RADIO

4 MAJOR Cover-Ups EXPOSED In the Latest Jan. 6 Report

The House Administration Oversight Subcommittee has released its second and final report on its investigation into the House January 6 Committee – and it reveals A LOT. The subcommittee’s chairman, Rep. Barry Loudermilk, joins Glenn to review some of the highlights. Rep. Loudermilk explains why he recommended a criminal investigation into former Rep. Liz Cheney, what crucial information the Jan. 6 Committee left out of its report, and what the government did to cover up “tremendous failures.” He also details why he’s certain the FBI lied about being unable to access phone data that could reveal the identity of the pipe bomber and why the FBI “spent no time looking into who constructed the gallows” that mysteriously appeared at the riot.

Biden FLOODED the Government With DEI, But Trump Has ONE Way to Win
RADIO

Biden FLOODED the Government With DEI, But Trump Has ONE Way to Win

With just weeks left in office, President Biden (or whoever’s actually calling the shots) has decided to hire 1,200 DEI officials. Is this part of a plot to undermine Donald Trump’s plans and make it harder for him to rid the government of woke Deep State bureaucrats? Glenn and fellow BlazeTV host ‪@lizwheeler‬ discuss how other Democrats have recently proposed things like this, including a UK-style “shadow cabinet” that would oppose Trump. Liz also gives her advice to Trump on how to deal with these new DEI officials, who will be paid hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to focus on things like “health equity” …

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. Where were we, Liz?

LIZ: The Biden administration. Although, not Biden. Because he can't tell the difference between a nickel and a dime, trying to sabotage the Trump administration.

GLENN: Yeah. So the latest on this is now Biden is hiring 1200. Biden is not doing it.

But he's hiring 1200 DEI officials, and putting them just under the appointed official. So there will be 1200.

Some of these people make almost $400,000 a year. $400,000 a year! That's your tax dollar!

Will you -- in your -- in your life, your average person, I don't know if you'll ever even -- if you'll ever even pay $400,000 in taxes?

So you could be working your whole life, for that one hire.

And he's hired 1200 of them.

And all he's trying to do is make sure the DEI positions just can't get cut.

I've got news for you.

Donald Trump is going to cut those positions.

He's going to. And it's going to get ugly.

I mean, the ACLU was all over this, saying, oh, we've got plans. We're going to -- we're going to -- this is obscene.

This is absolutely obscene. What the Democrats are trying to do. By thwarting the president.

And honestly, thwarting the will of the American people. Remember the speech that was given by I don't know, some boob from -- well, one of the Carolinas.

I don't want to besmirch the other one for electing a boob. But he was -- he was giving a speech in the well of the Senate. And he said, we need a shadow government. What?

Hold it. You mean a Deep State. Because we already have one of those. And he said. This is a quote.

One of the most obscene things I've ever heard from an elected representative. We failed to make our case. That our policies are better.

Now, in my world, growing up in America, the next sentence is: We need to sit down and talk and find out why we're out of step, with the American people.

His was, but we know we're right. So we need a shadow government, to make sure we put our policies in, anyway.

There's nothing more un-American than that.

By the way, Ted Cruz also said, he thinks there's criminal charges that could be lodged against Biden and his administration for the selling of the steel and the walls for the border.

I think so too. I think so too. He'll probably end up blanketing or pardoning everybody that has either lived by a Biden. Or a Democrat.

Worked for the administration. Everybody will get a pardon at the end.

Honestly, it's like, hey. Everybody, Oprah is here.

Look under your seats.

Because you've got a pardon. You've got a pardon. And you've got a pardon.

Ugh!

Now...

PAT: The Department of Health and Human Services on November 15th. This is posted immediately after President Trump has been reelected.

They advertised for the following position. A deputy assistant secretary for Minority Health. With a salary of up to 221 thousand dollars. This is the goal of this position.

Or this is the purpose of this position.

To, quote, promote health equity.

To promote health equity.

What does that mean?

It means racial criminalization in health care.

It means, if you are seeking, I don't know.

Think about during the pandemic. When there was limited resources. Limited beds in the emergency room.

Limited amounts of drugs and therapeutics, that people could access, in order to treat COVID when it's at its worse.

Well, now you will be screened based on the color of your skin.

That's what health equity is. Health equity is a word used to disguise the reality, that it's just -- it's socialism.

It's discrimination.

It requires, a government official to look at you, and make a decision about whether or not you are going to have access to health care that you might need, based on what you look like.

Not based on the severity of your illness. Not based on your ability to pay. Not based on your request for care. But based on the color of your skin. That's not only wrong and immoral and completely absurd, that a bureaucratic in that position would make over $221,000. That's evil. The left likes to pretend, that you're a racist. Or I'm a racist. Just for voting for Donald Trump. This is evil racism. This is the kind of stuff that we eradicated from our country.

And Biden is trying to plant the Trump administration. With these evil little minions before he leaves.

GLENN: I mean, why are we -- why are we surprised?

How many anti-slavery amendments do we have, to the Constitution.

I mean, it's amazing to me. With very few exception, after ten, most of these seem to be like, oh.

Yeah. Okay.

You're so stupid, you don't understand.

Slaves need to be free. Okay.

Then the next amendment is like, okay. All right.

Let me limp up to explain this once more.

That means, they're Americans, and can vote!

How many amendments are -- are just one after another, especially on slavery.

And, by the way, who was it that didn't understand that slaves should be freed? The Democratic Party.

It -- I swear to you, these amendments are just, God, we didn't think you would be this stupid.

It's already covered!

But let's lay it out clearly, for you.

You cannot discriminate by color! By race! By religion.

We thought that had already been covered, but apparently, not.

LIZ: What I would do if I were the Trump transition team. This is obviously a deliberate effort by the Biden administration. Because within the first ten days after the election, 33 of these jobs were posted on government websites.

So this was -- they were like, okay. Trump is coming in. Let's start ceding the deep state with these races. What I would do if I were Trump transition is I would say, we take racial equality, very seriously. We take civil rights very seriously.

In the administration, of the 47th president of the United States, and anybody who engages, especially a government official who engages in racial discrimination will be prosecuted. And prevent these people from even accepting these jobs. Because they will be threatened with legal action if they do.

GLENN: You can make a legal case. A solid, legal case, that that is exactly right. And that's what should be done.

They would be doing that to us, if we were -- if we were discriminating on race. If we were like, you know what, we're only going to hire white people.

We would go to jail.

Oh, you know what. We're just going to shuffle the deck here.

We're going to look at everybody.

But we lean towards white people.

Did you have Wheaties for breakfast?

If you had Wheaties as a childhood, you're in a different category. Okay?

I mean, we would go to jail. We would be shut down.

It's the same thing.

But don't expect the Democrats to get it.

Did you see the new -- or the DNC chair front runner?

The one they're thinking should be the head of the DNC?

He said, the problem with the election is, the convention should have featured pro-Hamas activists.

LIZ: I totally agree. That absolutely should have --
GLENN: At least they would have been honest.
LIZ: Think about how many Democrat voters, and really prominent people too.

I'm talking about Joe Rogan. I'm talking about Elon Musk. I'm talking about RFK Jr. These were fairly hard-core Democrats, who not only converted to being like, okay. We'll tolerate a Republican. Because it's not Joe Biden.

It's not Kamala Harris.

These people are the biggest supporters of President Trump right now, because of that kind of garbage. So DNC, if you are going to be radical, please be honest and tell us.

Thank you. It's just ushering new Republican voters right into our arms.

GLENN: I respect you, more than I respect people like Mike Johnson.

Mike Johnson doesn't tell me what -- he doesn't tell me what he really is.

What he really believes.

He tells me what I want to hear. I don't believe it. Then he's elected. Then he gets in.

And then he rapes you.

You know, I have much more respect for -- for people who are like, yeah. I'm pro-Hamas.

And you should elect me.

Well, I don't think I'm going to do it.

But thank you for telling me who you really are.

LIZ: Yeah. Great. Let's take all of the Democrat members of Congress. And let's Jamaal Bowman them, let's Cori Bush them.

Because as soon as they were honest about being pro-Hamas, voters were like, actually, we're good.

GLENN: Yep. Yep.

By the way, Hochul has come out. And she has now tried to stir up support to end the electoral college.

Because no offense, Wyoming, according to her words, New York voted for Kamala Harris.

You know, it is so dishonest. And this would -- this would have no space, if -- if we were actually teaching you students, what the electoral college is for.

You want to talk about fairness. Here's fairness: Should New York City dictate what all of New York does?

No!

They have representation. Of all the small towns.

All the farming towns.

Everything else.

New York City, should not be the one that tells everyone else, exactly how to live!

I think there should be electoral colleges in states now.

Because the cities are just devouring, all of the communities outside of those mega cities.

The electoral college is to make sure, that New York, California, and let me say, Texas, doesn't run over all of the other states!

And force how they're living in those cities, and those big states. In Wyoming!

Or Idaho!

Or Alabama!

Yeah. I don't have to live like you do in New York City.

I don't want to live like you do in New York City.

And we have completely different values than you do.

We should have a say, and an even, equal seat at the table.

That's why we have the electoral college. And we have the popular vote.

So you can see. And it's usually pretty close.

This time, however, Hochul, you lost the popular vote!

So you don't really have a case here, on the electoral college.

But you don't have a case.

If you're an American, you don't have a case on the electoral college anyway.


LIZ: Wait a second. Have we war gamed the scenario that you just proposed.

If there was an electoral college on the state level in California or on the state level in New York, what would the -- have we actually looked at a map here. If anybody has done this. Tag me on social media.

Because I am fascinated by this idea. I've not thought of this before. But I -- would we actually swing those states Republicans, if there was a state level?

STU: I bet we would. I bet we would.

You know, every time. Look at Wyoming.

Jackson Hole now controls Wyoming. Just controls it.

Who is -- who is so close to controlling Texas?

All the big cities.

You know, you don't have a chance. When these cities grow so large, they tip everything.

That's why we have an electoral college.

And it didn't used to be this way.

But our cities are becoming mega cities.

Almost states in and among themselves.

You -- you have to balance. Otherwise, the farmer and everybody else, that makes your life possible, in a city, gets screwed.

GLENN: And also think about cheating for a second. If you have a popular vote across the whole country, versus an electoral college system, it's a lot easier to impact the outcome of the entire presidential election because you can have one county somewhere with corrupt election officials.

And if they cheat by 10,000 votes, that could change the outcome of the election.

But if you're an electoral college, it doesn't necessarily.