Blog
LatestArticlesVideos
Radio
LivePodcastSerialsStations
TV
Podcasts
The Glenn Beck ProgramThe Glenn Beck PodcastThe Beck Story
Fine Art
Real Estate
More
AboutCharityBooksSponsorsShopContact
SEARCH
Live Radio

©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Live

Glenn's Show Prep

4 times the left-wing media has COMPLETELY destroyed its credibility

October 16, 2024
Dom Emmert/AFP | Getty Images
Katarina Bradford

The mainstream media no longer pursues truth. It is a puppet of the political establishment and will demonize anyone who dares question their establishment-approved narratives. Labeling everyday Americans as “conspiracy theorists” and purveyors of “disinformation,” the media has weaponized its platforms to shield political elites rather than holding them accountable. From silencing critical stories like Hunter Biden’s laptop to ridiculing valid concerns about COVID vaccines, the mainstream media has consistently acted as the enforcer of the political machine, not a champion of truth.

As the facts came to light, many of the stories they dismissed and suppressed have been vindicated—exposing not only the media’s bias but also the lengths they’ll go to discredit those who challenge their carefully constructed narratives. Here are four of the most shocking lies the mainstream media purported to protect their leftist political elites that absolutely destroy their credibility:

Lie #1: The Hunter Biden laptop theory is Russian disinformation

When the Hunter Biden laptop story first emerged in October 2020, the mainstream media, along with tech giants like Twitter and Facebook, quickly moved to suppress its circulation, framing it as Russian disinformation. Major left-leaning outlets, such as the New York Times and CNN, dismissed the New York Post’s bombshell report ’s bombshell report exposing the discovery of the infamous laptop belonging that was left at a computer repair shop in Delaware. The owner of the computer shop put the laptop's contents on a hard drive, which he gave to Rudy Giuliani's lawyer, who then gave it to the New York Post.

In addition to containing damning evidence of Hunter's purchases of crack, prostitutes, and other illegal activities, the laptop also contained direct correspondence with foreign actors, most notably with executives from the Ukrainian energy company, Burisma. According to evidence obtained on the laptop, then-vice president Joe Biden pressured then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk into getting rid of Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin who was investigating Burisma by threatening to withhold a $1 billion US loan guarantee. Shokin was conveniently fired shortly after, and a large sum of money was transferred to one of Hunter's many shell accounts, which also lined Joe Biden's pockets.

The New York Times purported a theory that, according to intelligence officials, Russia was using Rudy Giuliani, whose lawyer was originally given the hard drive by the Delaware computer shop owner, is "a conduit for disinformation aimed at undermining Mr. Biden’s presidential run."

According to CNN, the FBI was investigating the claims as a potential "disinformation campaign [...] aimed at tying the former vice president to his son’s dealings with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma."

However, by 2022, the narrative was completely upended when several mainstream outlets, including the New York Times, admitted the laptop and its contents were indeed legitimate, but only after the media had obtained their goal: Joe Biden winning the 2020 election. This reversal raised serious questions about the ethical standards of the media during a heated political season. Their initial dismissal of the story, despite verifiable evidence, demonstrated an overt bias that prioritized political outcomes over journalistic integrity, further damaging the credibility of the left-wing media.

Lie #2: The COVID lab-leak theory is a conspiracy theory

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the "lab leak theory," which claimed that the virus originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, who has received massive NIH endowments, was swiftly dismissed by many in the mainstream media as a fringe conspiracy theory. Outlets like The Washington Post and The New York Times, along with prominent voices on the Left, ridiculed the idea, associating it with anti-science rhetoric and even racism. The overwhelming consensus in the Left-leaning media was to accept the natural origin theory, with any deviation framed as "dangerous misinformation."

By 2021, however, this consensus began to unravel when investigations led by scientists and government agencies admitted that the lab leak theory was true. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci conceded that it warranted serious investigation in an attempt to gaslight the nation into believing that he never suppressed the lab-leak theory. The Left’s knee-jerk dismissal of the lab-leak theory, without substantial evidence, and its use of the media to enforce that narrative, demonstrated a bias that suppressed genuine scientific inquiry in favor of political optics. The Left-wing media’s coverage once again eroded trust, as they were forced to acknowledge that what was initially labeled as "conspiracy" had legitimate merit all along.

Lie #3: COVID vaccines are safe and effective 

At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, left-wing media and social media platforms worked in tandem to suppress what they labeled as “vaccine disinformation.” Any claims questioning the safety or effectiveness of the vaccines, particularly those suggesting links to myocarditis, menstrual issues, or reduced efficacy over time, were swiftly censored. The Twitter Files, released in 2022, exposed the Biden White House's direct pressure on social media companies to remove or throttle posts that cast doubt on the vaccines. According to these revelations, the administration specifically targeted individuals and doctors who raised concerns about potential side effects, dismissing them as dangerous misinformation.

Mainstream outlets, including the Washington Post and the New York Times, followed this line aggressively. In one instance, a New York Times article downplayed the risk of myocarditis as "very small" and "temporary" and rather "Covid-19 is much more likely to cause heart problems compared with vaccination." The Washington Post similarly featured a doctor who said that "vaccine disinformation are criminals."

However, over time, these claims—once labeled as disinformation—proved to have merit. By 2023, health authorities such as the CDC confirmed that myocarditis, especially among young males, "is a serious and potentially fatal complication of COVID-19." Similarly, multiple studies acknowledged disruptions to menstrual cycles, though further research is ongoing. The acknowledgment of these risks, once aggressively suppressed, now stands in stark contrast to the early media portrayal. The Twitter Files revealed a deliberate effort to silence voices that were raising legitimate concerns, exposing a dangerous precedent where political narratives overruled scientific transparency. The media's blind alignment with government censorship, only to be proven wrong, has further discredited their standing as objective arbiters of truth.

Lie #4: Joe Biden's mental state is "not" declining

During the 2020 presidential campaign and throughout Joe Biden’s presidency, any suggestion that the president was suffering from cognitive decline was quickly dismissed by the mainstream media as baseless “disinformation.” Left-leaning outlets like CNN and the Washington Post painted Biden’s critics as spreading conspiracy theories and using ageist rhetoric. In October 2020, The Washington Post called theories about Joe Biden's mental decline a part of a right-wing "elaborate virtual war room, tasked with ferreting out volatile information in the dark recesses of the Web." In 2024, the Post also published a piece accusing Republicans of using "cheap fakes" to spread misinformation about Joe Biden's senility. In a piece defending Biden's disastrous Vietnam news conference in 2023, the New York Times accused Trump of incessant rambling, and "by that standard, Mr. Biden was more capable." Any public stumbles or verbal gaffes were downplayed or ignored, while the media emphasized Biden’s long record of public service as evidence of his competence.

However, the first 2020 presidential debate with Donald Trump made it increasingly difficult for the media to maintain this narrative. Biden struggled to stay focused, frequently losing his train of thought, and appeared visibly confused at several moments. His performance, marked by stammering and an inability to respond coherently to some of Trump's criticisms, made it clear to viewers that Biden’s cognitive issues couldn’t be hidden any longer. It was only then that the New York Times changed its tune, publishing pieces about Biden's clear cognitive decline, something we all have witnessed and they have defended since 2020.

Drone mystery exposes GLARING government incompetence

Gary Hershorn / Contributor | Getty Images

The drone issue is getting way out of hand.

Earlier this month, Glenn first reported on the mysterious drones stalking the night sky over New Jersey, but the situation is increasingly concerning as the sightings have escalated. Not only have drones been seen across the Northeast Coast, including over New York City, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, but recently, they have been spotted over the night skies of San Diego and other parts of Southern California.

It doesn't take an expert to identify the potential dangers and risks that dozens of undetectable, unidentified six-foot or larger drones pose to national security. Yet, our government's response has been one of unimaginable incompetence, leaving us to speculate on the origin and intention of these drones and wonder in astonishment at the government's ineptitude. Here are three examples of the government's lackluster response to the mystery drones:

Iranian Mothership and Missing Nuclear Warheads

- / Stringer | Getty Images

After several weeks of hubbub, New Jersey Representative, Jeff Van Drew gave an interview on Fox News where he claimed that the drones originated from an Iranian "mothership" off the East Coast of the United States. This theory has since been disproven by satellite images, which show that all Iranian drone carriers are far from U.S. shores. Another theory suggests that drones may be equipped with sensors capable of detecting nuclear material and that they are looking for a nuclear warhead that recently went missing! With these apocalyptic theories gaining traction in the absence of any real answer from our government, one can't help but question the motive behind the silence.

Pentagon's Limp Wristed Response

Alex Wong / Staff | Getty Images

In a recent press conference, national security spokesman John Kirby responded to reporters demanding answers about the government's lack of transparency, which has caused increasing public anxiety. He insisted that the drones did not pose a threat and were not assets of a foreign power, such as from Iran or China--even though he is still uncertain about their identity and origin. He also claimed that many of the sightings were simply misidentifications of normal aircraft.

This lackluster answer has only further inflamed national anxieties and raised even more questions. If the government is unsure of the identity of the drones, how do they know if they are a threat or if they aren't foreign assets? If they aren't foreign, does that mean they are U.S. assets? If so, why not just say so?

The Pentagon has also stated that they are leaving it up to local law enforcement to spearhead the investigation after concluding that these drones pose no threat to any military installation. This has left many feeling like the federal government has turned a blind eye to a serious issue that many Americans are very concerned about.

Where's Pete Buttigieg?

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

We are in the closing weeks of the Biden administration, and with the finish line in sight, Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg probably figured nothing else could go wrong on his watch—but boy was he wrong. As Secretary of Transportation, Buttigieg is in charge of the FAA, the agency responsible for managing all air traffic across the nation. One would think that mysterious, 6-foot-long, seemingly intractable drones are invisible on radar and flying above major cities would pose a serious threat to the myriad of legal aircraft that traverse our skies. Yet, Buttigieg has been silent on the issue, adding another failure to his resume which includes: malfunctioning airplanes, the train derailment in Ohio, and the Baltimore Key Bridge collapse, just to name a few.

Glenn: How Alvin Bragg turned hero Daniel Penny into a villain

Michael M. Santiago / Staff | Getty Images

We cannot allow corrupt institutions to punish those who act to protect life and liberty.

America no longer has a single, shared understanding of justice. Two Americas now exist, each applying justice differently depending on who you are and where you live. One America, ruled by common sense and individual courage, praises heroes who stand up to protect others. The other, driven by political agendas and corrupted institutions, punishes those same heroes for daring to act.

This stark division couldn’t be clearer than in the case of Daniel Penny, the Marine whose trial in New York City this week drew strong reactions from both sides across the divided line of justice.

If we let this slide, we accept a world in which heroes are treated as criminals and the law is a weapon for ideological warfare.

Penny was on a subway train last year when Jordan Neely — a man suffering from severe mental illness and reportedly high on drugs — began threatening passengers, saying, “I’m going to kill you all.” The fear on that subway car was palpable, but nobody moved. Nobody, that is, until Penny did what needed to be done. He took action to protect innocent lives.

In the America many of us used to believe in, Penny’s response would be heralded as heroic. His actions mirrored the courage of Todd Beamer on Flight 93, who, on September 11, 2001, rallied others with the words, “Let’s roll,” to prevent further tragedy. But in New York, courage doesn’t seem to count anymore. There, the system turns heroes into villains.

Penny subdued Neely using a chokehold, intending only to restrain him, not kill him. Tragically, Neely died. Penny, filled with remorse, told the police he never meant to hurt anyone. Yet, instead of being recognized for protecting others from a clear and present threat, Penny stood trial for criminally negligent homicide.

In Alvin Bragg’s New York, justice bends to ideology. The Manhattan district attorney has made a career of weaponizing the law, selectively prosecuting those who don’t fit his narrative. He’s the same prosecutor who twisted legal precedent to go after Donald Trump on business charges no one had ever faced before. Then, he turned his sights on Daniel Penny.

A jury may have acquitted Penny, but what happened in New York City this week isn’t justice. When the rule of law changes depending on the defendant’s identity or the prosecutor's political motives, we’re no longer living in a free country. We’re living in a state where justice is a game, and ordinary Americans are the pawns.

The system failed Jordan Neely

It’s worth asking: Where were activists like Alvin Bragg when Neely was suffering on the streets? Jordan Neely was a tragic figure — a man with a long history of mental illness and over 40 arrests, including violent assaults. The system failed him long before he stepped onto that subway train. Yet rather than confront that uncomfortable truth, Bragg’s office decided to target the man who stepped in to prevent a tragedy.

This isn’t about justice. It’s about power. It’s about advancing a narrative where race and identity matter more than truth and common sense.

It’s time to demand change

The Daniel Penny case — and others like it — is a wake-up call. We cannot allow corrupt institutions to punish those who act to protect life and liberty. Americans must demand an end to politically driven prosecutions, hold DAs like Alvin Bragg accountable, and stand up for the principle that true justice is blind, consistent, and fair.

If we let this slide, we accept a world in which heroes are treated as criminals and the law is a weapon for ideological warfare. It’s time to choose which America we want to live in.

Editor's Note: This article was originally published on TheBlaze.com.

CEO Brian Thompson's killer reveals COWARDICE of the far-left death cult

Jeff Swensen / Stringer | Getty Images

Early on the chilly morning of Wednesday, December 4th, Brian Thompson, CEO of health insurance giant, UnitedHealthcare, was walking through Midtown Manhattan on his way to a company conference. Suddenly, a masked and hooded figure silently allegedly stepped onto the sidewalk behind Thompson, drew a 3-D printed, silenced pistol, and without warning fired multiple shots into Thompson's back before fleeing the scene on an electric bicycle. After a multiple-day manhunt, a 26-year-old lead suspect was arrested at a McDonald's in Altoona, Pennsylvania after being recognized by an employee.

This was not "vigilante justice." This was cold-blooded murder.

As horrific as the murder of a husband and father in broad daylight in the center of New York City is, the story only gets worse. Even before the murder suspect was arrested, left-wing extremists were already taking to X to call him a "hero" and a "vigilante" who "took matters into his own hands." Even the mainstream media joined in on the glorification, as Glenn pointed out on air recently, going out of the way to show how physically attractive the murder suspect was. This wave of revolting and nihilistic fanfare came in response to the findings of online investigators who surmised the murder suspect's motives to retaliate against healthcare companies for corruption and denied coverage. The murder suspect supposedly underwent a major back surgery that left him with back pain, and some of his internet fans apparently viewed his murder of Thompson as retribution for the mistreatment that he and many other Americans have suffered from healthcare companies.

The murder suspect and his lackeys don't seem to understand that, other than depriving two children of their father right before Christmas, he accomplished nothing.

The murder suspect failed to achieve his goal because he was too cowardly to try.

If the murder suspect's goals were truly to "right the wrongs" of the U.S. healthcare system, he had every tool available to him to do so in a constructive and meaningful manner. He came from a wealthy and prominent family in the Baltimore area, became the valedictorian at a prestigious all-boys prep school, and graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a master's in engineering. Clearly, the murder suspect was intelligent and capable, and if he had put his talent into creating solutions for the healthcare industry, who knows what he could have accomplished?

This is the kind of behavior the far-left idolizes, like communists on college campuses who wear shirts that celebrate the brutal Cuban warlord, Che Guevara. Merchandise celebrating the UnitedHealthcare CEO murder suspect is already available, including shirts, hoodies, mugs, and even Christmas ornaments. Will they be sporting his face on their T-shirts too?

This macabre behavior does not breed creation, achievement, success, or life. It only brings death and risks more Americans falling into this dangerous paradigm. But we still have a chance to choose life. We just have to wake up and take it.

Is Trump repealing the 14th Amendment? Here's the truth.

NBC / Contributor | Getty Images

Did Trump really promise to put an end to the 14th Amendment, or is this just another mainstream spin?

This past weekend, President-elect Donald Trump sat down on NBC's "Meet the Press" for his first interview since the election. As one might expect, it was a particularly hostile interview, but Trump handled it with grace. The biggest takeaway from the interview was when the interviewer, Kristen Welker, pressed Trump on his immigration plans, specifically his plans to end birthright citizenship.

Despite Walker's claim that the 14th Amendment protected birthright citizenship, Trump defended his stance with the backing of legal scholars, who argue that birthright citizenship has to be granted within the proper "jurisdictional scope." As Glenn reiterated on his show this week, the 14th Amendment was enacted in the context of slavery "not illegal immigration. The 14th Amendment doesn't say, "Come over here, get into a hospital, have a baby, and congratulations, everybody is a citizen."

The media still pushed the narrative that Trump is trying to overstep the 14th Amendment.

But what is the truth? What is birthright citizenship, and what does the 14th Amendment actually say about it? Here is everything you need to know about the "birthright citizenship debacle" below:

The media outrage

NBC / Contributor | Getty Images

If you have glanced through any mainstream media articles, they would convince you that Trump will repeal the 14th Amendment altogether and catapult the country back 200 years before slavery was abolished when Congress passed the Constitutional Amendment. But how do these accusations stack up to reality?

What the 14th amendment actually says

NBC / Contributor | Getty Images

To get to the bottom of this, we have to understand what the 14th Amendment actually says and the context in which it was created.

During Trump's NBC interview, Welker "quoted" the 14th Amendment as "all persons born in the United States are citizens," but anyone who took a government class in high school can tell you that is wrong. The actual14th Amendment says:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Notice that Welker conveniently left out "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." This was no simple oversight.

First, let's define what birthright citizenship actually is and how it relates to the 14th Amendment. Birthright citizenship is an interpretation of the previously quoted section of the 14th Amendment: that by simply being born on U.S. soil, you are automatically granted U.S. citizenship. This has been the historic interpretation of the amendment. However, the border crisis has been incentivized by an abuse of birthright citizenship, which is colloquially called "anchor babies." This refers to when a pregnant woman crosses the border, gives birth, and is granted residency since her child is automatically given U.S. citizenship.

However, Trump says the clause "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" could enable the federal government to crack down on this abuse of birthright citizenship. If a person is here illegally, then they are not under the jurisdiction of the U.S., and therefore, their child would not be given automatic citizenship. This would not apply to legal immigrants who have secured citizenship, despite any claims to the contrary.

What Trump actually said

NBC / Contributor | Getty Images

When questioned about the constitutionality of ending birthright citizenship and the possibility of using executive orders to get around the 14th Amendment, Trump's first suggestion was to pose a potential amendment to the 14th Amendment as a national vote. When Welker pushed back, Trump stressed the importance of ending birthright citizenship and conceded that, if necessary, he would use an executive order.

As usual, the mainstream media has spun a mountain out of a molehill and blown the entire issue out of proportion. They have spun Trump's reasonable and legal proposition into a dictatorial decree that would send the country back 200 years.