BLOG

Here's Why the Second Amendment Is the 'Strongest Right'

In America, we are innocent until proven guilty. In a similar way, we have the right to bear arms with no exception unless a court finds proof that that right will be abused to hurt other people.

As the gun debate rages on, Glenn wanted to make something very clear: The Second Amendment is a fundamental right, and it cannot be infringed upon without endangering all of our other constitutional rights.

“The Second Amendment is the strongest right because there is no ‘unless,’ there is no ifs, and or buts,” Glenn said on today’s show. “According to our system of government, you are born with certain rights, and they can’t ever be taken away from you … unless there’s an exception. But there is one right [the Second Amendment] that says, ‘shall not be infringed.'”

This article provided courtesy of TheBlaze.

GLENN: We have a really inspiring update from the Nazarene Fund coming up in about 35 minutes that you don't want to miss. And your phone calls as well.

I want to go -- I want to go off the last phone call that we had because I think this is really important, to have this conversation. And that is, what is a right? What does it mean?

What does the Constitution and the Bill of Rights mean?

And the Bill of Rights and the constitutional amendments are really clear. And -- and most people -- most people don't think of it this way. But let's start with the 13th Amendment, Stu, that abolished slavery. Did it not?

STU: No, it did not.

GLENN: No. The 13th Amendment said all indentured servants and all slaves, no more -- no more slaves.

STU: It did kind of say that. However, it left an exception out.

GLENN: An exception?

STU: An exception. It can -- you are prohibited from putting someone in involuntarily servitude, or slavery, except for a punishment of -- for a crime. We've seen people on the side of the road collecting trash. You've seen this in every prison movie, going back 100 years.

GLENN: Right. Chain gangs.

STU: That is essentially involuntarily servitude.

GLENN: A form -- right. It's a form of slavery, if you will. You're a slave to the system. You will do and work as the system says. Because -- so the 13th Amendment says theres no slavery or involuntary servitude.

STU: Except --

GLENN: Unless --

GLENN: Yeah. Or except this.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Okay.

We all know the Third Amendment, right? Nobody knows the Third Amendment.

STU: It's my favorite amendment.

GLENN: It is mine too.

STU: I don't know why.

GLENN: You shall not be required to quarter soldiers in your home.

STU: That's what the amendment says, right?

GLENN: No, it doesn't.

It says unless --

STU: Unless it's wartime and they pass a law saying they can put quartered soldiers in your home.

GLENN: Right. So, in other words, you can say, you're not quartering these soldiers in my home. And you can hold up the Third Amendment and say, absolutely, that's against the Constitution. And say, no, actually we're at war. And here's the law that we passed.

Okay. So there are exceptions, and they're written into the Constitution.

Now, most of them don't have the unless. But there is only one that says, and there is no unless. There is no exception.

And you will not infringe on this. The Second Amendment is the strongest right. Because there is no unless. There is no ifs, ands, and buts.

STU: Yeah. Even if you look at the First Amendment, it just talks about Congress making laws. It prohibits Congress from making laws that will -- any law, respecting an establishment of a religion, right? But as we know, the states still had state -- in Massachusetts, had a state religion when this thing was passed. Right?

There are all sorts of exceptions. The second one is really clear. They seem to make that one really important. Hey, you can't infringe on this one.

GLENN: So the reason why you have to understand that this is a right -- this is a right and not a suggestion -- it is something that according to our system of government, you are born with certain rights.

And they can't ever be taken away from you, unless there's an exception. But there is one right that says, shall not be infringed.

So this is a God-given right that nobody can take away. If you understand that it is a right first, then you can understand and tie it into other things.

For instance, voting. Voting. Poll taxes. We all know that that was -- that was an infringement on a right.

Wait a minute. Because I'm African-American I have to pay a tax? Because I'm African-American, I have to take a test? No, I don't have a test that I have to take.

I have a right, unless it's taken away because I'm a criminal. And that's a new addition. So you have a right to vote. We all know, they don't spy on you as the default. Well, I mean, now they do, because we're violating the Fourth Amendment.

STU: Fourth.

GLENN: But we all know the government does not have a right to spy on you.

What they have is no right to spy on you, unless they can go to a court and get a warrant, because they've proved there's enough here that we need to follow and spy on you.

So there is an unless in that right. There isn't with voting. There isn't an unless.

STU: There's just age. Hmm.

GLENN: There isn't an unless in the Second Amendment.

You want all of your rights -- rights are yours by default. What people are talking about now is no. Well, let's make the default, you don't get one, unless you do this.

No, no, no. Rights mean, you have that, unless you do these things.

STU: Yeah. I mean, it goes -- fundamentally, it's -- the constitutionalist argument is you're innocent, unless you're proven guilty.

GLENN: Right.

STU: And the current way of looking at this from the left and others, is you're guilty, unless you can be proven innocent.

GLENN: Right.

STU: That's a huge, massive -- massive --

GLENN: It's a 180-degree different. That is no longer a right. That becomes then a privilege.

Now, with this, we have to talk about responsibilities.

If you are not responsible, you lose your rights. And, quite honestly, that's why we are losing rights now. Because we have shown ourselves irresponsible with those rights. Everybody always says, I have rights, you know. Yeah, yeah, I know. But you also, dude, have responsibilities.

RADIO

Shocking train video: Passengers wait while woman bleeds out

Surveillance footage of the murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska in Charlotte, NC, reveals that the other passengers on the train took a long time to help her. Glenn, Stu, and Jason debate whether they were right or wrong to do so.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: You know, I'm -- I'm torn on how I feel about the people on the train.

Because my first instinct is, they did nothing! They did nothing! Then my -- well, sit down and, you know -- you know, you're going to be judged. So be careful on judging others.

What would I have done? What would I want my wife to do in that situation?


STU: Yeah. Are those two different questions, by the way.

GLENN: Yeah, they are.

STU: I think they go far apart from each other. What would I want myself to do. I mean, it's tough to put yourself in a situation. It's very easy to watch a video on the internet and talk about your heroism. Everybody can do that very easily on Twitter. And everybody is.

You know, when you're in a vehicle that doesn't have an exit with a guy who just murdered somebody in front of you, and has a dripping blood off of a knife that's standing 10 feet away from you, 15 feet away from you.

There's probably a different standard there, that we should all kind of consider. And maybe give a little grace to what I saw at least was a woman, sitting across the -- the -- the aisle.

I think there is a difference there. But when you talk about that question. Those two questions are definitive.

You know, I know what I would want myself to do. I would hope I would act in a way that didn't completely embarrass myself afterward.

But I also think, when I'm thinking of my wife. My advice to my wife would not be to jump into the middle of that situation at all costs. She might do that anyway. She actually is a heck of a lot stronger than I am.

But she might do it anyway.

GLENN: How pathetic, but how true.

STU: Yes. But that would not be my advice to her.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: Now, maybe once the guy has certainly -- is out of the area. And you don't think the moment you step into that situation. He will turn around and kill you too. Then, of course, obviously. Anything you can do to step in.

Not that there was much anyone on the train could do.

I mean, I don't think there was an outcome change, no matter what anyone on that train did.

Unfortunately.

But would I want her to step in?

Of course. If she felt she was safe, yes.

Think about, you said, your wife. Think about your daughter. Your daughter is on that train, just watching someone else getting murdered like that. Would you advise your daughter to jump into a situation like that?

That girl sitting across the aisle was somebody's daughter. I don't know, man.

JASON: I would. You know, as a dad, would I advise.

Hmm. No.

As a human being, would I hope that my daughter or my wife or that I would get up and at least comfort that woman while she's dying on the floor of a train?

Yeah.

I would hope that my daughter, my son, that I would -- and, you know, I have more confidence in my son or daughter or my wife doing something courageous more than I would.

But, you know, I think I have a more realistic picture of myself than anybody else.

And I'm not sure that -- I'm not sure what I would do in that situation. I know what I would hope I would do. But I also know what I fear I would do. But I would have hoped that I would have gotten up and at least tried to help her. You know, help her up off the floor. At least be there with her, as she's seeing her life, you know, spill out in under a minute.

And that's it other thing we have to keep in mind. This all happened so rapidly.

A minute is -- will seem like a very long period of time in that situation. But it's a very short period of time in real life.

STU: Yeah. You watch the video, Glenn. You know, I don't need the video to -- to change my -- my position on this.

But at his seem like there was a -- someone who did get there, eventually, to help, right? I saw someone seemingly trying to put pressure on her neck.

GLENN: Yeah. And tried to give her CPR.

STU: You know, no hope at that point. How long of a time period would you say that was?

Do you know off the top of your head?

GLENN: I don't know. I don't know. I know that we watched the video that I saw. I haven't seen past 30 seconds after she --

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: -- is down. And, you know, for 30 seconds nothing is happening. You know, that is -- that is not a very long period of time.

STU: Right.

GLENN: In reality.

STU: And especially, I saw the pace he was walking. He certainly can't be -- you know, he may have left the actual train car by 30 seconds to a minute. But he wasn't that far away. Like he was still in visual.

He could still turn around and look and see what's going on at that point. So certainly still a threat is my point. He has not, like, left the area. This is not that type of situation.

You know, I -- look, as you point out, I think if I could be super duper sexist for a moment here, sort of my dividing line might just be men and women.

You know, I don't know if it's that a -- you're not supposed to say that, I suppose these days. But, like, there is a difference there. If I'm a man, you know, I would be -- I would want my son to jump in on that, I suppose. I don't know if he could do anything about it. But you would expect at least a grown man to be able to go in there and do something about it. A woman, you know, I don't know.

Maybe I'm -- I hope --

GLENN: Here's the thing I -- here's the thing that I -- that causes me to say, no. You should have jumped in.

And that is, you know, you've already killed one person on the train. So you've proven that you're a killer. And anybody who would have screamed and got up and was with her, she's dying. She's dying. Get him. Get him.

Then the whole train is responsible for stopping that guy. You know. And if you don't stop him, after he's killed one person, if you're not all as members of that train, if you're not stopping him, you know, the person at the side of that girl would be the least likely to be killed. It would be the ones that are standing you up and trying to stop him from getting back to your daughter or your wife or you.

JASON: There was a -- speaking of men and women and their roles in this. There was a video circling social media yesterday. In Sweden. There was a group of officials up on a stage. And one of the main. I think it was health official woman collapses on stage. Completely passes out.

All the men kind of look away. Or I don't know if they're looking away. Or pretending that they didn't know what was going on. There was another woman standing directly behind the woman passed out.

Immediately springs into action. Jumps on top. Grabs her pant leg. Grabs her shoulder. Spins her over and starts providing care.

What did she have that the other guys did not? Or women?

She was a sheepdog. There is a -- this is my issue. And I completely agree with Stu. I completely agree with you. There's some people that do not respond this way. My issue is the proportion of sheepdogs versus people that don't really know how to act. That is diminishing in western society. And American society.

We see it all the time in these critical actions. I mean, circumstances.

There are men and women, and it's actually a meme. That fantasize about hoards of people coming to attack their home and family. And they sit there and say, I've got it. You guys go. I'm staying behind, while I smoke my cigarette and wait for the hoards to come, because I will sacrifice myself. There are men and women that fantasize of block my highway. Go ahead. Block my highway. I'm going to do something about it. They fantasize about someone holding up -- not a liquor store. A convenience store or something. Because they will step in and do something. My issue now is that proportion of sheepdogs in society is disappearing. Just on statistical fact, there should be one within that train car, and there were none.

STU: Yeah. I mean --

JASON: They did not respond.

STU: We see what happens when they do, with Daniel Penny. Our society tries to vilify them and crush their existence. Now, there weren't that many people on that train. Right?

At least on that car. At least it's limited. I only saw three or four people there, there may have been more. I agree with you, though. Like, you see what happens when we actually do have a really recent example of someone doing exactly what Jason wants and what I would want a guy to do. Especially a marine to step up and stop this from happening. And the man was dragged by our legal system to a position where he nearly had to spend the rest of his life in prison.

I mean, I -- it's insanity. Thankfully, they came to their senses on that one.

GLENN: Well, the difference between that one and this one though is that the guy was threatening. This one, he killed somebody.

STU: Yeah. Right. Well, but -- I think -- but it's the opposite way. The debate with Penny, was should he have recognize that had this person might have just been crazy and not done anything?

Maybe. He hadn't actually acted yet. He was just saying things.

GLENN: Yeah. Well --

STU: He didn't wind up stabbing someone. This is a situation where these people have already seen what this man will do to you, even when you don't do anything to try to stop him. So if this woman, who is, again, looks to be an average American woman.

Across the aisle. Steps in and tries to do something. This guy could easily turn around and just make another pile of dead bodies next to the one that already exists.

And, you know, whether that is an optimal solution for our society, I don't know that that's helpful.

In that situation.

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Max Lucado on Overcoming Grief in Dark Times | The Glenn Beck Podcast | Ep 266

Disclaimer: This episode was filmed prior to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. But Glenn believes Max's message is needed now more than ever.
The political world is divided, constantly at war with itself. In many ways, our own lives are not much different. Why do we constantly focus on the negative? Why are we in pain? Where is God amid our anxiety and fear? Why can’t we ever seem to change? Pastor Max Lucado has found the solution: Stop thinking like that! It may seem easier said than done, but Max joins Glenn Beck to unpack the three tools he describes in his new book, “Tame Your Thoughts,” that make it easy for us to reset the way we think back to God’s factory settings. In this much-needed conversation, Max and Glenn tackle everything from feeling doubt as a parent to facing unfair hardships to ... UFOs?! Plus, Max shares what he recently got tattooed on his arm.

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Are Demonic Forces to Blame for Charlie Kirk, Minnesota & Charlotte Killings?

This week has seen some of the most heinous actions in recent memory. Glenn has been discussing the growth of evil in our society, and with the assassination of civil rights leader Charlie Kirk, the recent transgender shooter who took the lives of two children at a Catholic school, and the murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska, how can we make sense of all this evil? On today's Friday Exclusive, Glenn speaks with BlazeTV host of "Strange Encounters" Rick Burgess to discuss the demon-possessed transgender shooter and the horrific assassination of Charlie Kirk. Rick breaks down the reality of demon possession and how individuals wind up possessed. Rick and Glenn also discuss the dangers of the grotesque things we see online and in movies, TV shows, and video games on a daily basis. Rick warns that when we allow our minds to be altered by substances like drugs or alcohol, it opens a door for the enemy to take control. A supernatural war is waging in our society, and it’s a Christian’s job to fight this war. Glenn and Rick remind Christians of what their first citizenship is.

RADIO

Here’s what we know about the suspected Charlie Kirk assassin

The FBI has arrested a suspect for allegedly assassinating civil rights leader Charlie Kirk. Just The News CEO and editor-in-chief John Solomon joins Glenn Beck to discuss what we know so far about the suspect, his weapon, and his possible motives.