BLOG

Are Drug Companies Really out to Kill Us?

Welcome to The Wonderful World of Stu!

Ahhhhh, those evil drug companies.

Why are they so intent on killing us just to score an extra private jet for their personal fleets? Why do they create medications just to slowly incapacitate our bowels and make our pancreas explode? Why do people believe this crap?

Let’s think of the business model of a big drug company for a second. They spend years and years and billions of dollars developing products with no promise or timeline for success. If they discover something that works, they get bogged down in years of bureaucratic red tape. They have a very limited prospective customer base (very few people without irritable bowel syndrome are buying the drugs created to treat it). And when a product finally gets on the market they are flooded both with complaints that they should be giving it away for free, and with lawsuits claiming they never should have made it in the first place.

For the love of your politically correct deity of choice, why do we screw with these people?

Drug companies make their money helping people. That’s the definition of the pinnacle of capitalism.

Take your unbridled greed and sue somebody who isn’t trying to stop flesh-eating bacteria. Go sue starburst for giving you far too few of the pink ones. That’s legitimate. Just stop discouraging the people who want to make grandma’s tumor go away. Let’s use an example so unpopular it can only be attempted by someone as unpopular as me.

Do you remember Fen-phen?

It was a weight loss drug combo produced by drug giant Wyeth, a company since folded into Pfizer. Fen-phen was pulled off the market after a mayo clinic report linked it to heart valve disease. The finding was based on 24 people. In 1996 alone, doctors wrote 18 million prescriptions for it.

How many people had Fen-phen helped avoid obesity? How many heart attacks did it prevent? How many could it have prevented?

A new England journal of medicine editorial estimated the benefit to risk ratio at 20 to 1. For every one person who died, the drugs saved twenty. Also, they found that while the risk of getting heart valve disease was increased, there was a 5,000% better chance of a non-smoker getting lung cancer.

However, not all studies were so optimistic, and the combination of the media, the government, and some real side effects, doomed the drugs. Once they were off the market, the lawsuits started flowing.

To get some cash from Wyeth, you had to show two things: 1) you were sick, and 2) you took the medicine.

What they did not require was for you to provide any indication that the meds actually caused the sickness. If that decision wasn’t bad enough, Wyeth also figured that the constant testing and paperwork would be too much to handle. So they let any “qualified doctor” do the required echocardiogram and submit the forms. The lure of easy class action payouts and quick settlements literally created an entire industry.

Lawyers spent millions in advertising trying to excavate clients. Law firms were created solely to handle Fen-phen cases, some employing sonographers and buying their own echocardiogram equipment. Lawyers began awarding bonuses to doctors for each time they “found” someone they could submit to the class action. Law firm employees trained sonographers on how to set the echocardiograph dials to make the tests look as bad as possible.

One Dallas attorney even set up his own echocardiogram company. Law firms were holding mass echocardiogram sessions in hotel rooms. Companies developed mobile echocardiogram centers, the “meals on wheels” of heart valve testing. Finally, Wyeth was tipped off by a nurse and began to check the work more closely. The fraud they found hasn’t been seen since The Crying Game, which is such an outdated reference, here’s a quick explainer of the relevant scene in the movie.

There’s some really pointless terrorism plot that you don’t need to know about. But there’s a guy and a girl, and they start making out. The guy runs his hand up her skirt, but she stops him and they do some other stuff instead. The next day they get together again. This time, she has a robe on. When he goes to remove it, he finds out that she’s… a dude. And then I think he vomits in the sink or something.

Ok, back to the Fen-phen fraud: one group of 4,600 claims was examined and over 60% were disqualified. Another group of 968 claims was examined, 70% were disqualified. One doctor was mysteriously finding more than twelve times the number of victims than they found in a blind study. Of 1,500 claims in a Mississippi group, less than 50 were legit.

The ringleader of this scam made fake medication labels to prove they took the medication. Investigators found people who had actually been fooled into believing they had heart disease when they didn’t. One was so convinced that she had unnecessary valve replacement surgery to correct a problem that didn’t exist.

But no one beats Cheryl Yvonne Barnett.

She developed her heart valve problems after taking the drugs for about four months in 1989. The only problem was that the drugs weren’t even available until 1996. Also, the doctor she said prescribed the meds didn’t exist. Oh, and the pharmacy she said gave her the medication was a parking lot. The judge ordered Cheryl and her lawyer to pay about $10,000 in damages for filing the bogus claim. However, I doubt her law firm O’quinn, Laminack & Pirtle from Houston was too worried about it. Cheryl was just one of 3,500 clients they had brought to the Fen-phen money party, one of whom won a verdict of $1,013,853,000. Yes… one billllllllllion dollars.

In the end, the whole fiasco cost a reported $21 billion. What was their entire profit on Fen-phen before they pulled it? About $200 million, or less than 1% of the litigation lottery they funded. Now if they can only create 104 consecutive wildly successful drugs with no lawsuits, they’ll be even!!! Damn these evil drug companies.

So to review!

  • Big pharma is not out to gouge you for money and kill you...
  • Profit motives are fine. And helping people is fine. But telling a dude you’re not a dude until they remove your robe and find out that you are a dude - is not fine.
  • And if anyone has any Fen-phen left, I’ll take it off your hands... I could use it. As you can tell.

Follow Stu Burguiere on Facebook to stay up to date on the Wonderful World of Stu.

EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains His FIERY Rejection of Spending Bill
RADIO

EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains His FIERY Rejection of Spending Bill

According to the media, there’s a big fight going on between Republicans over the House’s new slimmed-down continuing resolution spending bill. Some, including President-elect Donald Trump, wanted the bill to pass. But others, like Texas Representative Chip Roy, argued that it still wasn’t ready. However, is the Republican “unity coalition” really crumbling, like the media claims? Rep. Chip Roy joins Glenn to explain what’s really going on. He argues that he IS trying to give Trump and DOGE a 100-day “runway” to fix the country. But he makes the case that, by increasing the debt ceiling by $5 trillion without agreeing on other cuts, this bill gives bad actors the ability to be an “obstacle” to Trump’s agenda further down the line. Plus, he reveals to Glenn that he believes some of these bad actors LEAKED false information about his stance to Mar-a-Lago.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN:

I think we have a great opportunity today. To show you how to have a -- tough conversation, with friends, friends. Where you deeply disagree on something.

But you know that their intent is good. They know my intent is good. Or our intent is good.

And we actually have the same end goal, but we disagree on the path. And we're going to walk away friends.

Chip Roy is joining us today. And, Chip, I love you. And I always will. And I agree with your, we've got to cut spending. We have to. But Liz Wheeler is with me. And we've been talking about it all morning. It's the -- the -- the -- the system of DOGE and Trump, the call-out to the world, in saying, you've got to surrender the Capitol. You know, the bad guys are in and about to take all the money.

Surround, and tell them, come out with your hands up. And that happened. And we scored a massive win, in an entirely new way.

Ask then you stood on principle, one we both agree with.

And it failed!

And so here's -- here's what Liz and I were talking about. Here's what we want to say to you.

And then get your response.

LIZ: Hi, Congressman Roy, this is the way I see it. I want your take on it. I love you. I think you're one of the best members of Congress. I disagree with you on the process that's happening. And I think that is the difference. The process. We elected Donald Trump to be a disruptor. Because Republican members of Congress for decades have been telling they're fiscal conservatives. They want to decrease the debt SEAL. It hasn't happened.

It hasn't -- it hasn't been done. And so Donald Trump comes in with Elon Musk, and uses this DOGE process to first identify these pieces of garbage in the first 1500-page bill. And take those things to the people. We took them to members of Congress. Congress said, okay. We'll listen to you.

So that new process was very effective.

And my question to you is: Once that process was proved to be effective. Which I think is exciting and wonderful.

How do we bridge this divide, with you, to say, okay.

Let's put some faith in this new process. And trust Elon Musk and Donald Trump and the Dow Jones process, to eventually address the debt ceiling, but get this done right now?

GLENN: And not blind trust. Chip.

CHIP: So appreciate you guys. Appreciate being on the show. Particular order. I have to go through a couple of things.

GLENN: Yep.

CHIP: Number one, it's important to remember that my job and my duty is to the Constitution, to God, and the people I represent. I told them, when I came to Washington, I would not -- I would not let the credit card and the debt ceiling and the borrowing of the United States without the spending restraints necessary to offset it.

GLENN: Okay.

CHIP: Right now, all we have are promises and ideas and notions. What I know, that neither of you respectfully no, and that none of your listeners respectfully no are the people that are in the room, that I was in with yesterday. And the day before, who are recalcitrant.

And do not want to do the spending cuts that we need to do.

That I believe the president and the DOGE guys. And everybody want to do.

My job, is to force that through the meat grinder. To demand that we do our damn job. Okay?

GLENN: Okay. So hang on. Okay. So wait. Wait. You're right. You're right. You're right. Go ahead.

CHIP: Number thee, when we were going through the bill, I'm glad the bill dropped from 1,550 pages to 116 pages. Three-quarters of Twitter or X or whatever you want to call it, have been out there spreading false facts that we supported a bad bill and didn't like the better bill.

That's not true. But let's be Lear. The 1400 pages that were cut out. It's a panacea.

There were some good stuff in there. There were some bad stuff in there. There was a lot of disinformation.

There wasn't a $70,000 pay raise. There was a 3,000-dollar pay raise.

I didn't support any pay raise. I didn't support a lot of the stuff in there.

But there's a lot of misinformation. And here's the thing: The 116 pages that were left, and I opposed violently the first bill. I was leading the charge on fighting and killing the first bill.

GLENN: And I love you.

LIZ: The second bill for 116 pages. Turned off -- turned off the pay go requirement. That we slash 1.7 trillion automatically.

And added a 5 trillion that are increase.

My view was, I could not support that, without a clear understanding of what cuts we would get, in mandatory spending next year. And undo any of the Inflation Reduction Act.

The undoing of the student loans. The undoing of the crap with the food stamps.

And everything else. I yield back.

GLENN: Okay. I yield back.

Chip, you're not in a hostile room. We love you. And we agree with your end goals. It's our end goal too. We didn't make that promise that you made to the people that voted for you. So we have more wiggle room here.

But you say -- I think our big difference is, you say, I know the guys in the room.

You're right. You do. And we -- we ceded that earlier today on the show.

You are -- one of us is wrong on trust.

I don't trust any of the weasels in Washington.

But I think Donald Trump and Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have earned enough trust, to get a grace period, here for the first -- maybe the first year.

Or at least six months.

To turn the economy around, and also reduce the size of the government.

And totally flip this thing.

And I know, as somebody who is -- you know, run a company, mainly into a ground. But run a company, and have to switch it, in the middle, and totally reshuffle. That -- that actually costs money, while you're doing it, to bridge the gap.

Because you have to fill up holes while you're filling in the gap.

You don't trust the people in the room. Neither do we.

But we do trust the system that worked on Wednesday with DOGE and Donald Trump.

Where do we disagree?

Can you give them --

CHIP: We don't disagree. And yesterday morning, I was making that precise argument in a room full of conservatives and then a follow-up room with people who will call it, less conservatives.

GLENN: Republican. Yes.

CHIP: And so we were making this argument. And then someone infamously. Something leaked out of the room, somehow out to Mar-a-Lago. That I was being resistant. Because I was negotiating trying to get the agreement to achieve the objective that you just said. I was trying to get, okay. In fact, yesterday morning, I made the argument to a group of conservatives. We need to give the president runway. We need to give him his first 100 days. We need to appreciate JD, and Vivek, and all the people -- and everybody involved. For the president to achieve the objective.

But to get there. We have to make sure that the guys in the room, that are an obstacle to that, don't have the ability to block it.

Because information flow matters. And when those guys tell the president, they can't achieve X.

Then the president will not achieve X. Our job was to force and demand, guys, we need actual understanding of what the cuts will be.

And because otherwise, we're asking us to accept a 5 trillion-dollar limit in our credit card increase. In exchange for nothing!

Literally, in exchange for nothing, but -- but hope.

So our job was to force that change.

Unfortunately, while I was trying to make the argument that we needed something in order to get the votes, someone leaked that down to Mar-a-Lago, and the president reacted.

But now I have to now manage that.

GLENN: Right. I know. I know.

CHIP: They're trying to enforce change in town.

GLENN: So hang on.

We have to leave this. Because I'm going to run against the clock.

I could talk to you all day about this. You were in a meeting this morning about J.D. Vance. Can you tell us anything about that meeting?

CHIP: That meeting happened, because despite what happened yesterday, I'm trying to get this done. Last night, talking to JD, we worked to get this meeting done. We had some good progress this morning.

But there still remains people concerned about spending. That we can work out, what agreement we can reach. On what spending cuts. We can actually get next year, in exchange for giving the vote on a debt ceiling increase.

So it remains fluid. Progress was made. But we have to keep working on it.

And I left that meeting to talk to you. Soil get an update in a minute.

GLENN: Thank you for that, by the way.

I hear there is a new bill that may be coming today.

Is that the one you're talking about?

Or is this another bill that could be another nightmare?

CHIP: Despite other people leaking crap, I refused. I can't say, because it's not been decided by the speaker.

And it's not right to talk about things they're talking about in private meetings.

GLENN: Yeah, but it's -- it's this speaker. I mean, is he really the speaker anymore, Chip, really?

CHIP: We need to hear what bill we need to get forward. And I can't talk about the private meetings. But, look, I'm going to keep fighting for what I promised people that I represent.

I'm going to fight to cut spending. I am going to represent article one.

I'm going to support the president's agenda, but we've got to do that together.

GLENN: Okay.

Chip, thank you.

I think we can -- I think we agree, but I await to see what that means to you. Because we may just have to agree to disagree on this.

But I love you. And I still want you to replace Cornyn.

CHIP: The short version is, for inflation's sake, we cannot increase the debt ceiling $5 trillion without knowing what we're getting for it.

And I don't think anybody should disagree with that.

GLENN: But you don't disagree that Elon Musk and Trump and Vivek are serious about gutting the system.

CHIP: I believe that is their objective. I believe there are obstacles to that objective. And I need to know the sincerity of how we deal with those obstacles, both structural, and human. And we have to figure that out. And that's my job.

America's Favorite Villain Is Ready for Nuclear Fallout. Are You? | Glenn TV | Ep 401
TV

America's Favorite Villain Is Ready for Nuclear Fallout. Are You? | Glenn TV | Ep 401

In this episode of Glenn TV — a theatrical how-to guide to survive the breakdown of society after a nuclear attack, according to the new movie “Homestead” from Angel Studios. Glenn Beck interviews the movie’s star and executive producer, Neal McDonough, who plays the head of a family trying to survive as society is breaking down in a postapocalyptic world. You’ve probably seen Neal in everything from the hit TV shows “Yellowstone,” “Suits,” and “Justified” to movies like “Captain America,” “Minority Report,” and the groundbreaking mini-series “Band of Brothers.” Glenn asks Neal what it’s like to play a villain so often, how TV and movies are changing, and how he survived Hollywood as a devoted Christian and husband who refuses to do onscreen kissing scenes with any of his female co-stars. They also discuss his battle with alcoholism, what it’s like working the legends like Sylvester Stallone and Kevin Costner, and the cultural craving for Western cinema. Note: Angel Studios is a sponsor of “The Glenn Beck Program.” Get your tickets for “Homestead” at https://Angel.com/Beck.

4 MAJOR Cover-Ups EXPOSED In the Latest Jan. 6 Report
RADIO

4 MAJOR Cover-Ups EXPOSED In the Latest Jan. 6 Report

The House Administration Oversight Subcommittee has released its second and final report on its investigation into the House January 6 Committee – and it reveals A LOT. The subcommittee’s chairman, Rep. Barry Loudermilk, joins Glenn to review some of the highlights. Rep. Loudermilk explains why he recommended a criminal investigation into former Rep. Liz Cheney, what crucial information the Jan. 6 Committee left out of its report, and what the government did to cover up “tremendous failures.” He also details why he’s certain the FBI lied about being unable to access phone data that could reveal the identity of the pipe bomber and why the FBI “spent no time looking into who constructed the gallows” that mysteriously appeared at the riot.