Brad Thor's War Gaming on North Korea Might Keep You Up All Night

Author Brad Thor has done his fair share of war gaming for research on books like Use of Force, his latest thriller. What does he think about the situation brewing in North Korea? He joined Glenn on Tuesday to war game scenarios. Grab a teddy bear, this might keep you up all night.

"A lot of people scoffed and laughed when they did their nuke tests, when they detonated underground, and said, wow, these are relatively small, low-yield things. Ha, ha, ha, they can't really build a serious big bomb," Thor joked.

"Well, if you think they're going to put them on top of a missile, you may not be worried about, you know, this thing being equivalent to what the Russians have. But, you know, the North Koreans have put a couple of satellites into outer space. And if they put one of these low-yield bombs into a satellite and detonate it over the United States, the electromagnetic pulse is going to wipe us out. We're going to go back to the 1800s in the blink of an eye."

Glenn reacted with surprise.

"Jeez, I haven't even thought of a satellite. Thank you, Brad. Thank you for that," Glenn said.

"Yeah, you're welcome. Sleep well tonight. Tania, I'm sorry," Thor responded.

So, how does this whole thing end with North Korea?

"My money would be on actually some sort of a coup and China being the brains behind it. That would be what I hope," Thor said.

Now what about Russia and the Middle East?

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

GLENN: Welcome to the program, Mr. Brad Thor.

BRAD: Hello, Glenn.

GLENN: How are you, Brad?

BRAD: How are you, my friend?

GLENN: I'm good. How are you?

BRAD: I'm excellent. And thank you for your praise of this book.

You know, the entire time I was writing it with my Navy SEAL protagonist who was working for the CIA. I just said, "You know what, what might Pat do in this situation, you know, or Stu or Jeffy?

GLENN: Right. Right.

BRAD: Dropped in a dangerous foreign country, what might they do? And they were really my North Star.

GLENN: It was the --

PAT: That's understandable.

JEFFY: You're welcome. I know.

GLENN: Because I read the book. It was to point you in the direction of, don't go there, right?

BRAD: Right. Right. It was kind of the George Costanza thriller this year. Just go the opposite direction. Opposite direction.

GLENN: Right. Right.

Brad, I want to talk to you about a lot of things. How much time do we have? Do we have quite a bit of time?

BRAD: I'm as you need. No. Let's -- everybody else can wait. I want to do this --

GLENN: We had such a good conversation yesterday. And it happens to people -- I know. It happens to people all the time where they're on Jimmy Kimmel or something. And Jimmy will just stall and stall and stall then the guest walks out halfway through and is like, "Oh, sorry. I forgot." You know. So --

BRAD: Hey, man. Sorry. Thanks for coming on, man. That's all the time we have today.

GLENN: Brad -- what did you say?

BRAD: No, that's what Jimmy says to Matt, when he cheats him out of time. But we'll have you back.

GLENN: Yeah, yeah. We'll have you back.

Brad, in reading the book, there's a couple of things that I'd like to talk about and not really give away the plot of the book. Because everybody has to discover it themselves

But you are talking at the beginning about the -- the way these -- I guess what you call refugee ships are being packaged over in the Middle East. Who is packaging them? And how they're doing it. And it is obscene.

BRAD: Yeah, it's bad.

GLENN: I mean, I have not yet -- and you would think with liberals, you would see these kinds of reports. I have not seen reporting like this at all. Is that really the way it happens?

BRAD: It is. And I have to tell you, there is a lovely, lovely reporter at the Daily Beast. I give her a big shout-out. Two big shout-outs actually in the acknowledgments of this book, that is the Rome Bureau Chief for the Daily Best.

And I reached out to her. Befriended her on social media. And she was incredibly helpful. Because I was reading her articles about the refugees, the connection with the Mafia and ISIS. And you're the one that coined the term faction, Glenn. And what I do is faction. Where you don't know where the facts end and the fiction begins. But the refugee crisis and how ISIS is using it and how the Mafia is even involved, and how they're smuggling weapons into Europe for terrorist attacks is amazing. But this person, Barbie, at the Daily Beast in Rome couldn't have been nicer. She really was terrific.

GLENN: And she has to be brave. Really brave.

BRAD: Oh, yeah.

GLENN: Explain a little -- without giving, you know, any of this away, because it's so great the way you lay it out, but explain what's happening with the refugees.

BRAD: So in -- in my thriller, the way it kicks off is, in real life, we discovered a laptop in a terrorist safe house. And when they opened it up, it looked like it had just come from Best Buy. Never been used. But when they drilled down, they found real life all of these chilling plots, things they had planned for Dallas and New York and Rome and Paris and London. And the CIA never caught the guy.

And so I had been reading Barbie's stuff on the Daily Beast about the refugee crisis. I'm concerned. ISIS has threatened to sneak people into Europe -- terrorists in via the refugee crisis on these boats.

And I started reading about it and looking. And these smugglers are bad. I mean, they are putting people -- I mean, people are suffocating in the holds of these fishing boats that are not even seaworthy. It's bad.

GLENN: It is -- it is worse than the slave trade ever was.

BRAD: Yes. They are torturing and raping people. They are splitting families up and deciding, you get to go to Europe. But we're going to keep your daughter and your wife here. There are people that have never captained a boat before. And they're putting a Kalashnikov to guys' heads saying, okay. You, who paid us your life savings to go to Europe, you're going to pilot this boat. And they give them enough fuel to just get outside the territorial waters of Libya, and then they hand them -- they've given them a satellite phone with one phone number preprogrammed into it. And that is the Italian Coast Guard. And these boats are sinking. And thousands of people are dying -- it is a humanitarian -- I mean, it is beyond barbaric, beyond horrific what is going on.

And I just thought, you know, this to me was fascinating. And if I can, through my thriller, bring a little light to this and how evil these smugglers are and how well-connected they are with ISIS and the Mafia, I might be doing some good with it.

GLENN: So why are they putting these boats are that are just not seaworthy, not giving them enough fuel? Is it just to cause massive chaos on the seas so the boats and the refugees that are working with them get in?

BRAD: Well, it -- that is a big -- that is a big part of it. So they -- it's Libya, right? So they don't have like a great shipbuilding infrastructure there, and they're taking boats that even these poor fishermen won't use to go out and fish on anymore. And they're filling them full as many as they can, and they're just shoving them out. It is a money-making operation.

I mean, these -- you know, these guys are the scum of the earth. They are trading in human misery the things that these people go through -- and these refugees are trying to escape their countries to get a better life. We can argue about what the best way is to do it. But, you know, you've got these people -- women. If God forbid a woman is pregnant or menstruating with some of these Muslim men, they have thrown women over. I mean, bad stuff. Very, very bad.

GLENN: Horrible.

So you go -- and I don't -- I don't want to give the story away. But I want to take you to one place that I just thought was riveting. Is when Scot comes in, the main character -- what is this, the 17th book with him?

BRAD: My 17th thriller. Yeah, yeah. And you can read them in any order. If you haven't read a Brad Thor book, you can start with Use of Force. You don't need to have read anything of mine before.

GLENN: So Scot is the main character. And he's going in to get a really bad guy. And he -- he goes into a store. I don't even remember where it was. Is it Libya. Where is it --

BRAD: With the satellite phones. Yeah, that would be the way you would track a smuggler down. Is if you found a satellite phone. You would want to know who sold it to whom, and you would pick up the trail there.

GLENN: Now, is -- just explain the store scene. Is that from real life?

BRAD: There's a lot of this that's real. So these smugglers all buy their satellite phones from the same company in the Emirates, because they have the best coverage over the Mediterranean. So give them that piece of humanity, that they actually want the satellite phone to work when the boat is sinking and these people are being fed upon by sharks. You know, you hope that the Italian Coast Guard, which is hours away, can find a way to rescue them.

So the scene with my guy -- so a terrorist mastermind's body washes ashore in Italy. The CIA panics, and they send Scot Harvath, my protagonist, out to retrace this guy's steps to say, what was he up to? And are we going to see some mega attacks in the US this summer? Go retrace his footsteps. And Harvath, knowing that these guys used the same satellite company, figures out who bought this satellite phone, and it tracks to a small electronic shop in Libya, which is based on a real little shop that was trafficking in these phones. And Harvath goes in to try to bribe this guy, give him cash first. And the guy won't take it. And in the middle of trying to convince this guy to give up the smuggler, Libya is overrun with different militia groups. I mean, they are a failed state. It is bad in Libya. Three militia members pull up outside to actually do a transaction with this guy. Now, Harvath is stuck. He's got three militia guys coming in. And what's he going to do? And it devolves very quickly, as these scenes do. And that scene was actually based on something one of my former special operation guys told me about.

GLENN: It was -- it's a pretty terrifying scene, the way Americans take charge. And then they take him out to get some information. And the technology that you describe is in some ways comforting. In other ways, absolutely horrifying. And I want to get to that here in just a second with Brad Thor.

The book is use of force. I want to talk to him about this. I want to talk to him about the assassination attempt in the ballpark a couple of weeks ago. Perhaps some of the cloak-and-dagger stuff that is happening now in Washington, DC. We'll get to that in just a second, when we come back.

[break]

GLENN: Welcome back with Brad Thor. Brad, explain the technology that you -- that you show in use of force. And I don't think this is going to surprise anyone. But it is the way your character uses it. Has it been used this way? What else -- what -- else is it used for? And explain it. Start there first.

BRAD: Okay. Are you referring to the way that Harvath breaks the satellite phone salesman?

GLENN: Uh-huh.

BRAD: All right. So this is real. And this has been used by somebody that I know. And essentially, what he did was open up a laptop in front of the suspect -- he wasn't going to drill him through the kneecaps or anything. But positioned a drone over this guy's house and did a split screen that showed the guy's wife and kids basically in the backyard. And then showed a screen that's got the underbelly of the drone with the weapon's package so that he could say, "All right. Activate this hellfire missile," if you will. And basically terrified this guy into, if you don't give up the really bad dude you're working with, then we're going to kill your family. That was the threat, that we know where you live, we've got your wife and children in the cross-hairs, and you better give us this bad guy we want, or there's going to be trouble.

GLENN: So the way you wrote it -- that just doesn't sound -- that sounds amazing. But when you read it and the way he didn't believe it at first and then he went over -- the drone flew over his house -- flew over his store and he saw that it had been burned to the ground and he saw in realtime --

BRAD: Right.

GLENN: And then the drone starts to fly over to the house and he starts to sweat, and he then sees his wife and his child step out on the back patio. It is -- it's quite terrifying.

How do you feel about that ethically?

BRAD: Well, I'll tell you, the guy in question -- and readers will get this. The guy in question is a really, really bad guy.

And the main character that's doing this to him has no intention to harm his wife or children. It's a psychological ploy here. And that's what we -- our men and women are away doing some of the country's most dangerous business. They have to make calls and have to decide how to do things.

GLENN: So hang on just a second. I don't have a problem if we are using that and we don't kill his family. But then how do you have any credibility -- I mean, he has to die at that point. If he says no, he has to die. Because he'll go back and say, "Hey, they used this ploy on me. They'll never use it."

BRAD: Right. It doesn't work. They don't follow through on it. They draw a line in the sand, and I jumped right over it, and there were no consequences.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

BRAD: Yeah, I mean, you would have to. And that's the benefit I get as a fiction author. I get to ultimately choose how the guy is going to react to this. But, again, it was from talking to someone who had done something similar and was able to assess what -- I mean, that's what they do. They look at these people that they have to interrogate and decide what's going to work with them. That -- the more information you can have about a subject before you even sit down to talk to them, the better off you're going to be.

GLENN: Right.

BRAD: And sometimes, desperate times call for desperate measures. That's a big thing I talk about in the book. It's like, okay. We're a nation of laws, not a nation of men. And we put rules on our intelligence services and our special operations community. And should they be allowed to cut corners?

And, you know, how desperate do things have to be? Is it worth it for one American life?

You and I talked about Benghazi. I don't care that they couldn't refuel jets. They should have been going supersonic with American jets from Italy over Benghazi, breaking every piece of glass in that town, and then run them until they run out of fuel and dump them in the med. And we'll pick up the pilots. We can build more planes.

GLENN: Yeah.

BRAD: So I'm a big believer. And I think that's the fun part of my books, is you read these, and you're like, okay. Not only does that make sense, but I really hope that's what we're doing out there with the bad guys.

GLENN: So, Brad, we are looking at a much more dangerous world than we were when we first started talking. You and I were much more hypothetical, really, you know, when we started talking ten years ago on what this world could be like.

BRAD: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Your book is now absolutely, these things are going on. And we are facing these kinds of threats. No doubt in mind that what you talk about with the refugees, what you show happening in Paris in your book, is absolutely happening right now.

Are you more optimistic or less optimistic than you were five or ten years ago on the state of the western world?

BRAD: I'm actually more optimistic on how we're going to combat it. Okay? I actually think -- and you know. I was not a Trump supporter. I worked on Rick Perry's campaign. My family and I pray for Donald Trump and the people around him on a daily basis, that they are going to be successful, because we'll all be successful.

GLENN: So are we. So are we. Yep.

BRAD: I actually think that that administration can take the big leaps and do the hard work that needs to be done. I number one think -- you know, we hear after the Orlando massacre, that this guy was on the FBI's radar. There wasn't enough to get him. So they had to let him go. Our intelligence services in the western world are drowning. We've got open ISIS cases in all 50 states in the US. It's happening in Brussels and in Great Britain. There's just not enough intelligence officers and police officers to follow these guys. And I think we need to lower the prosecutorial bar. We have a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to child porn. If you're surfing that stuff on the internet, you're going to jail. And I think we ought to identify the gateway drugs, the on-ramps for jihadism. I think we ought to make it a lot easier to prosecute these guys.

And if somebody even sleeps on your couch and you know that they're planning an attack, you ought to go away, not for years, but for decades. And if people die in that attack, you ought to go away for your entire life. Let's raise the price.

GLENN: Okay. I want to continue our conversation with Brad Thor. His new book is Use of Force. We're going to talk about what the Supreme Court did yesterday about bringing in refugees from other countries. We talk about that and so much more when we come back with Brad Thor.

(OUT AT 10:33AM)

GLENN: I honestly think that the -- the best thinkers on the planet for geopolitical consequences and moves and countermoves, are the guys who write what I call faction. Fiction that is driven by the facts of today. People like Tom Clancy was, when I was growing up -- that's Brad Thor today.

You know, people -- the Russians actually thought he was a CIA plant, that they were -- that the CIA was trying to get Russia to think that that's how the Americans will move, because he was so accurate and spot-on.

Brad has been a good friend and adviser of mine for a while because the fiction writers -- this is what they have to do. And they have to make sense.

Real life doesn't have to make sense. Fiction has to make sense.

So, Brad, with that, let's war game a couple of things because I can't find a way out that I'm comfortable on a lot of these things. Let's start with North Korea. We have three carrier battle groups out now. The only time in history that that has ever happened, where we've had three. We've always gone to war.

We have Otto Warmbier, being drugged and beaten now, according to one general, that they used Sodium Pentothal on him so much, it addled his brain. They were beating him. They dumped him on our doorstep like a mob hit. And we -- they're also putting into production long-range missiles. And we don't really seem to have a line because the -- crossing that line for us is all bad stuff. What do we do?

BRAD: Well, I'll take it up another notch for you, to add to your anxiety over North Korea.

GLENN: Thank you.

BRAD: You know, a lot of people scoffed and laughed when they did their nuke tests, when they detonated underground. And said, wow, these are relatively small, low-yield things. Ha-ha-ha. They can't really build a serious big bomb.

Well, if you think they're going to put them on top of a missile, you may not be worried about, you know, this thing being equivalent to what the Russians have. But, you know, the North Koreans have put a couple of satellites into outer space. And if they put one of these low-yield bombs into a satellite and detonate it over the United States, the electromagnetic pulse is going to wipe us out. It's going to -- we're going to go back to the 1800s in the blink of an eye.

GLENN: Jeez, I haven't even thought of a satellite. Thank you, Brad. Thank you for that.

BRAD: Yeah. You're welcome. Sleep well tonight.

Tania, I'm sorry.

GLENN: I know. I don't sleep as it is. Now you give me that.

BRAD: As it is. I know. I know.

GLENN: Okay. So what do we do? What should we do?

BRAD: Well, so Kim Jong-un isn't the problem. It's the military and political structure that holds him up as a figurehead. The reason he's got that stupid haircut, is it's supposed to hearken back to the days of his grandfather.

GLENN: Correct.

BRAD: Which, interesting for me, is that they decided to assassinate his older half brother in an airport where they put up those two dupes, those massage -- masseuses or whatever it was, and they killed the older half-brother, which is a really interesting move. I don't know why they did that. What they were worried about, what kind of chess pieces were being moved.

GLENN: Weren't they sending a message to the West, first sending a message to their own people, look at what the West has done, but also maybe sending a message to his -- the people he's afraid of. That I'll get you wherever you are. And also, a message to the West, I don't care if you have it on tape. I'm not afraid. Possibility?

BRAD: Yeah, that's possible. No, it's totally possible. And it's possible that they were worried there was some plot afoot to overthrow things and to use the older half brother as somebody to install a new, more democratic regime there. I mean, it's hard to understand. They're nuts. They're absolutely nuts. And there isn't a good way out of this, particularly because you've got Seoul sitting on the other side of the DMZ. And Seoul -- when you think about it, with 11 million people there, they are the Israel of that area. There's bunkers underneath everything because they're worried about incoming from the North Koreans.

There is not a good way out of this. And it's another place -- you know, you would have thought that we had Saddam Hussein's inner circle very well penetrated before we went into the Gulf War scenario, and we didn't. And we're even more blind when it comes to North Korea. We need to get inside -- these guys all have skeletons in their closet, the generals and the politicos behind them. We need to work it from the inside out.

GLENN: Okay. So are a -- I've got a gun to your head. I'm forcing you to put your house down on the betting table. You bet this ends in our favor, or it ends with war?

BRAD: I think China goes in and does something. I think the Chinese are better equipped to overthrow that government. But the problem for China is they don't want the mass of humanity running in. That's the big thing. South Korea and the Chinese want to contain it. But my money would be on actually some sort of a coup and China being the brains behind it. That would be what I hope.

GLENN: Okay. All right. Next scenario. I've got two scenarios left here. Next one, Russia. The election. We know -- we've known forever they were going to try to influence our election. They are looking for chaos. They weren't trying to get Trump in. Although, they didn't like Hillary Clinton. That was an extra bonus. What they're trying to do is cause chaos and have us lose faith in our own system. And be able to manipulate.

We are arguing about politics. We're not really facing the problem, and that is that Russia -- Romney was right. Russia is our biggest geopolitical foe right now and is a direct threat to the United States.

How does this one end?

BRAD: Well, I'll tell you, I know what we should do, and it was Bill O'Reilly's idea. I don't think we should be -- I don't think American credit card companies should be honoring any transactions inside Russia. That would be devastating for them. Absolutely devastating. And if we can help drive down oil prices by flooding the market, that will also hurt Putin. He's only got the energy --

GLENN: We really are -- you know, our fracking, it was too late to stop -- the Saudis tried to stop us from fracking. It's already too late for that. And we are a big reason that oil prices are as low. They are in deep trouble, economically. Does that not make them more desperate?

BRAD: It's going to make them more desperate. But I think that with the internet and the ability of good Russian people to see stories about liberty and freedom from around the world, I think we should be fomenting unrest in Russia. We should be doing everything we can. You know what, you're going to do it to us? It's like the whole Untouchables thing. They send one of yours to the hospital, you send two of theirs to the morgue. I think we ought to outmanipulate them. But do it with the truth.

I think we should ignite the lamp of liberty in the hearts of the Russian people. Because once those lamps are lit, there is no extinguishing it. And let's beat them with the truth. Because there's a lot of bad things in Russia. And the more we can do to help expose it and get those people to rise up, the better it will be for the rest of the world. Putin needs to go and all of those sleazy corrupt people around him.

GLENN: Do we actually come to our senses as -- as Republicans and Democrats and actually deal with the fact that they're already here and infiltrating and working on 2018 and 2020? Do see us actually getting there or just using all of these investigations to hurt one side or the other?

BRAD: Listen, I know that there are good people on both sides of the aisle that are concerned about this -- because the shoe can be on the other foot tomorrow. It can be a Republican today, a Democrat tomorrow, that's being either helped or hurt by these efforts. This is an American issue, and that's the way we need to focus on it. You know, Trump is -- it's the one issue he will not touch. He will not condemn the Russians, to come right out and say, "If this happens again, you know, this is going to be the consequence." I don't know why he won't.

GLENN: Why?

BRAD: I don't know. I think he -- I think -- listen, I think he felt a lot more comfortable in Saudi Arabia than he did at the NATO summit. I think he admires what he thinks are strong leaders. And dictators are not leaders. They are despots. They are tyrants.

And for some reason, he feels an affinity with them. He likes tough guys. I think that's a mistake. I think real American leadership would be saying, you know what, you did some pretty bad stuff. And, no, we're not going to ease sanctions on you.

I mean, it's insane that Congress has got to do what's best for the country, by blocking the loosening of sanctions, and the president is lobbying for that. That's insane. If I had written this in a book, I would have been tossed out of my editor's office.

GLENN: Brad Thor is the author of the new book, Use of Force. If you've never read a Brad Thor book, start with this one, Use of Force. It's really, really good. 11.3 million copies of his books in print today, which is a staggering number.

Brad, last scenario. The Middle East. We are now siding with the Syrian Kurds who are Marxist revolutionaries and terrorists. We are using them as proxies to fight the Russians and the Iranians and the Syrians. It's going to come and bite us in the ass. Iran is now trying to sweep into a crescent, to start their own caliphate. Turkey wants theirs. ISIS is kind of on the run, but they're more of a global operation now. And we seem to have our head in the sand, still, although we are getting better. How does this one end?

BRAD: Well, I think that the current administration has opened up good channels of communication with the Saudis. The Saudis hate the Iranians. And I think we need to continue to -- listen, this doesn't end well. This is a long, protracted lukewarm war, if you will, where we're not necessarily firing the shots, but we're actively supporting people that are.

So we're going to see a lot more of this proxy stuff. This does not end well. But the one thing, again, that I think the Trump administration can do is every time there's an act of Islamic terrorism somewhere in the West, I think we ought to ring another concession out of the Muslim world. So another drop of Western blood is spilled, we are merciless in having Trump hammer them publicly for this backwards ideology. And not only to condemn radical Islamism, but to say, okay. By the way, when are you guys going to start allowing women to vote in Saudi Arabia? And just to hammer that, to just bring unrelenting pressure for reform in the Muslim world. Because until that point, we're going to be playing Whack-A-Mole with terrorists. And we really need -- Judaism has been reformed. Christianity has undergone a reformation. Islam has not. And it's long past due.

GLENN: Brad, the Supreme Court ruled that the president can say for the safety of Americans, we're not going to take these refugees until we've worked this out. Is there an honest effort to try to figure out a way to bring people into the country and -- and have an idea of whether they're good or bad? You know, we've worked it out with Mercury One and the Nazarene Fund. But it would be politically incorrect to do that, as a nation. How do you do it? Is there a way to do it?

BRAD: Well, there's a couple of different ways. And one of the things is -- bad communication on part of the Trump administration. These six countries were identified by the Obama administration because they couldn't even tell you people getting on planes had parking tickets or overdue library books. And we need to screen -- I mean, you get on a plane in London, anywhere else in the world, your name is sent to the United States. They know before that plane takes off who is getting on the plane. And that's important. So that's not an anti-Muslim thing. You need that from any country in the world, to know who's getting on these planes. That's number one.

Number two, the refugees come through UN intake centers. They are like -- they're like Brad prison yards. Okay? If you ID as a Christian when you check into these places, you're going to get killed. Bad things are going to happen in these refugee camps, which is why Christians don't self-identify there. And I want everybody who is a good, honest person, be it a Muslim, Christian, whatever, to have an opportunity to get to the US. I want you to be a productive citizen.

But we need this idea -- again, Bill O'Reilly, another great idea when he talked about setting up safe zones within Syria, within the Muslim world, so that we don't have to take people here, so that they can remain culturally where they are most comfortable. Because they're running away from something. They're not running to the United States. They're running away from their own problems. And I think we need to keep them in that region where they're culturally adept. They understand the culture.

If you want to come to America, that's a separate story. But if you're coming to America just because we've thrown open the doors and you're getting away from something, that's not exactly a tier one refugee that we -- that we want, if that makes sense.

I'm not saying we shouldn't take people in times of war and in strife and things like that. But I want to make sure that we're making plenty of room for people who are, you know, standing in line and have devoted themselves fully to being here. But I look at the faces of those children, and you want to help those people as much as you can. I want anybody who wants to be a good American, I want them here and I want to help them. But we need to vet people. We need to vet them.

So I actually think Stu, Pat, Jeffy -- I think all those guys, I think we ought to put them on the front lines. Just sit down, have a Coke with these guys. Kind of like five bullet points.

GLENN: And bring your vest. Bring your vest. It's a three-piece suit list --

BRAD: I trust them. You know, Glenn, you've been carrying these guys for years. I think the show would be fine without them. Let them go do some good for the country --

GLENN: Right. Right.

(laughter)

BRAD: The guy that claims he got you out of the mullet haircut, you know, I think there's some guys that could do some good work over there, starting with your show.

GLENN: Got me into the mullet haircut.

Brad, thank you so much. God bless you. The name of the book is Use of Force. Pick it up. Available today. Bookstores everywhere. Use of Force. Another thriller from America's favorite writer, Brad Thor.

The Deep State's NEW plan to backstab Trump

Brandon Bell / Staff | Getty Images

We cannot make the same mistake we made in 2016 — celebrating victory while the deep state plots its next move.

In 2016, Donald Trump shocked the world by defeating Hillary Clinton. Conservatives cheered, believing we’d taken back the reins of our country. But we missed the bigger battle. We failed to recognize the extent of the damage caused by eight years of Barack Obama and decades of progressive entrenchment. The real war isn’t won at the ballot box. It’s being waged against an insidious force embedded deep within our institutions: the administrative state, or the “deep state.”

This isn’t a new problem. America’s founders foresaw it, though they didn’t have a term for “deep state” back in the 1700s. James Madison, in Federalist 48, warned us that combining legislative, executive, and judicial powers in the same hands is “the very definition of tyranny.” Yet today, that’s exactly where we stand. Unelected bureaucrats in agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Justice hold more power than the officials we vote for. They control the levers of government with impunity, dictating policies and stifling change.

This is the fight for the soul of our nation. The founders’ vision of a constitutional republic is under siege.

We’ve felt the consequences of this growing tyranny firsthand. During COVID-19, so-called experts ran our lives, crushing civil liberties under the guise of public safety. Our intelligence agencies and justice system turned into weapons of political warfare, targeting a sitting president and his supporters. Meanwhile, actual criminals were given a pass, turning American cities into lawless war zones.

Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1816 that “the functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty and property of their constituents.” Today, we see Jefferson’s prophecy fulfilled. The deep state exercises unchecked power over our freedoms, and information itself is controlled by the fourth branch of government: the legacy media.

Even when we win elections, the deep state doesn’t concede defeat. It switches to survival mode. Trump’s first term proved this. Despite a historic mandate to dismantle the bureaucracy, the deep state fought back with everything it had: leaks, investigations, court rulings, and obstruction at every turn. And now, with the possibility of Trump returning to office, the deep state is preparing to do it again.

Progressives are laying out their attack plan — and they’re not even hiding it.

U.S. Rep. Wiley Nickel (D-N.C.) recently boasted about forming a “shadow cabinet” to govern alongside the deep state, regardless of who’s in the White House. Nickel called it “democracy’s insurance policy.” Let’s be clear: This isn’t insurance. It’s sabotage.

They’ll employ a “top down, bottom up, inside out” strategy to overwhelm and collapse any effort to reform the system. From the top, federal judges and shadow officials will block Trump’s every move. Governors in blue states like California and New York are gearing up to resist federal authority. During Trump’s first term, California filed over 100 lawsuits against his administration. Expect more of the same starting January 20.

From the bottom, progressive groups like the American Civil Liberties Union will flood the streets with protesters, much as they did to oppose Trump’s first-term immigration reforms. They’ve refined their tactics since 2016 and are prepared to unleash a wave of civil unrest. These aren’t spontaneous movements; they’re coordinated assaults designed to destabilize the administration.

Finally, from the inside, the deep state will continue its mission of self-preservation. Agencies will drag their feet, leak sensitive information, and undermine policies from within. Their goal is to make everything a chaotic mess, so the heart of their power — the bureaucratic core — remains untouched and grows stronger.

We cannot make the same mistake we made in 2016 — celebrating victory while the deep state plots its next move. Progressives never see themselves as losing. When they’re out of power, they simply shift tactics, pumping more blood into their bureaucratic heart. We may win elections, but the war against the deep state will only intensify. As George Washington warned in his Farewell Address, “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force; and force, like fire, is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”

This is the fight for the soul of our nation. The founders’ vision of a constitutional republic is under siege. The deep state has shown us its plan: to govern from the shadows, circumventing the will of the people. But now that the shadows have been exposed, we have a choice. Will we accept this silent tyranny, or will we demand accountability and reclaim our nation’s heart?

The battle is just beginning. We can’t afford to lose.

Editor's Note: This article was originally published on TheBlaze.com.

Drone mystery exposes GLARING government incompetence

Gary Hershorn / Contributor | Getty Images

The drone issue is getting way out of hand.

Earlier this month, Glenn first reported on the mysterious drones stalking the night sky over New Jersey, but the situation is increasingly concerning as the sightings have escalated. Not only have drones been seen across the Northeast Coast, including over New York City, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, but recently, they have been spotted over the night skies of San Diego and other parts of Southern California.

It doesn't take an expert to identify the potential dangers and risks that dozens of undetectable, unidentified six-foot or larger drones pose to national security. Yet, our government's response has been one of unimaginable incompetence, leaving us to speculate on the origin and intention of these drones and wonder in astonishment at the government's ineptitude. Here are three examples of the government's lackluster response to the mystery drones:

Iranian Mothership and Missing Nuclear Warheads

- / Stringer | Getty Images

After several weeks of hubbub, New Jersey Representative, Jeff Van Drew gave an interview on Fox News where he claimed that the drones originated from an Iranian "mothership" off the East Coast of the United States. This theory has since been disproven by satellite images, which show that all Iranian drone carriers are far from U.S. shores. Another theory suggests that drones may be equipped with sensors capable of detecting nuclear material and that they are looking for a nuclear warhead that recently went missing! With these apocalyptic theories gaining traction in the absence of any real answer from our government, one can't help but question the motive behind the silence.

Pentagon's Limp Wristed Response

Alex Wong / Staff | Getty Images

In a recent press conference, national security spokesman John Kirby responded to reporters demanding answers about the government's lack of transparency, which has caused increasing public anxiety. He insisted that the drones did not pose a threat and were not assets of a foreign power, such as from Iran or China--even though he is still uncertain about their identity and origin. He also claimed that many of the sightings were simply misidentifications of normal aircraft.

This lackluster answer has only further inflamed national anxieties and raised even more questions. If the government is unsure of the identity of the drones, how do they know if they are a threat or if they aren't foreign assets? If they aren't foreign, does that mean they are U.S. assets? If so, why not just say so?

The Pentagon has also stated that they are leaving it up to local law enforcement to spearhead the investigation after concluding that these drones pose no threat to any military installation. This has left many feeling like the federal government has turned a blind eye to a serious issue that many Americans are very concerned about.

Where's Pete Buttigieg?

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

We are in the closing weeks of the Biden administration, and with the finish line in sight, Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg probably figured nothing else could go wrong on his watch—but boy was he wrong. As Secretary of Transportation, Buttigieg is in charge of the FAA, the agency responsible for managing all air traffic across the nation. One would think that mysterious, 6-foot-long, seemingly intractable drones are invisible on radar and flying above major cities would pose a serious threat to the myriad of legal aircraft that traverse our skies. Yet, Buttigieg has been silent on the issue, adding another failure to his resume which includes: malfunctioning airplanes, the train derailment in Ohio, and the Baltimore Key Bridge collapse, just to name a few.

Glenn: How Alvin Bragg turned hero Daniel Penny into a villain

Michael M. Santiago / Staff | Getty Images

We cannot allow corrupt institutions to punish those who act to protect life and liberty.

America no longer has a single, shared understanding of justice. Two Americas now exist, each applying justice differently depending on who you are and where you live. One America, ruled by common sense and individual courage, praises heroes who stand up to protect others. The other, driven by political agendas and corrupted institutions, punishes those same heroes for daring to act.

This stark division couldn’t be clearer than in the case of Daniel Penny, the Marine whose trial in New York City this week drew strong reactions from both sides across the divided line of justice.

If we let this slide, we accept a world in which heroes are treated as criminals and the law is a weapon for ideological warfare.

Penny was on a subway train last year when Jordan Neely — a man suffering from severe mental illness and reportedly high on drugs — began threatening passengers, saying, “I’m going to kill you all.” The fear on that subway car was palpable, but nobody moved. Nobody, that is, until Penny did what needed to be done. He took action to protect innocent lives.

In the America many of us used to believe in, Penny’s response would be heralded as heroic. His actions mirrored the courage of Todd Beamer on Flight 93, who, on September 11, 2001, rallied others with the words, “Let’s roll,” to prevent further tragedy. But in New York, courage doesn’t seem to count anymore. There, the system turns heroes into villains.

Penny subdued Neely using a chokehold, intending only to restrain him, not kill him. Tragically, Neely died. Penny, filled with remorse, told the police he never meant to hurt anyone. Yet, instead of being recognized for protecting others from a clear and present threat, Penny stood trial for criminally negligent homicide.

In Alvin Bragg’s New York, justice bends to ideology. The Manhattan district attorney has made a career of weaponizing the law, selectively prosecuting those who don’t fit his narrative. He’s the same prosecutor who twisted legal precedent to go after Donald Trump on business charges no one had ever faced before. Then, he turned his sights on Daniel Penny.

A jury may have acquitted Penny, but what happened in New York City this week isn’t justice. When the rule of law changes depending on the defendant’s identity or the prosecutor's political motives, we’re no longer living in a free country. We’re living in a state where justice is a game, and ordinary Americans are the pawns.

The system failed Jordan Neely

It’s worth asking: Where were activists like Alvin Bragg when Neely was suffering on the streets? Jordan Neely was a tragic figure — a man with a long history of mental illness and over 40 arrests, including violent assaults. The system failed him long before he stepped onto that subway train. Yet rather than confront that uncomfortable truth, Bragg’s office decided to target the man who stepped in to prevent a tragedy.

This isn’t about justice. It’s about power. It’s about advancing a narrative where race and identity matter more than truth and common sense.

It’s time to demand change

The Daniel Penny case — and others like it — is a wake-up call. We cannot allow corrupt institutions to punish those who act to protect life and liberty. Americans must demand an end to politically driven prosecutions, hold DAs like Alvin Bragg accountable, and stand up for the principle that true justice is blind, consistent, and fair.

If we let this slide, we accept a world in which heroes are treated as criminals and the law is a weapon for ideological warfare. It’s time to choose which America we want to live in.

Editor's Note: This article was originally published on TheBlaze.com.

CEO Brian Thompson's killer reveals COWARDICE of the far-left death cult

Jeff Swensen / Stringer | Getty Images

Early on the chilly morning of Wednesday, December 4th, Brian Thompson, CEO of health insurance giant, UnitedHealthcare, was walking through Midtown Manhattan on his way to a company conference. Suddenly, a masked and hooded figure silently allegedly stepped onto the sidewalk behind Thompson, drew a 3-D printed, silenced pistol, and without warning fired multiple shots into Thompson's back before fleeing the scene on an electric bicycle. After a multiple-day manhunt, a 26-year-old lead suspect was arrested at a McDonald's in Altoona, Pennsylvania after being recognized by an employee.

This was not "vigilante justice." This was cold-blooded murder.

As horrific as the murder of a husband and father in broad daylight in the center of New York City is, the story only gets worse. Even before the murder suspect was arrested, left-wing extremists were already taking to X to call him a "hero" and a "vigilante" who "took matters into his own hands." Even the mainstream media joined in on the glorification, as Glenn pointed out on air recently, going out of the way to show how physically attractive the murder suspect was. This wave of revolting and nihilistic fanfare came in response to the findings of online investigators who surmised the murder suspect's motives to retaliate against healthcare companies for corruption and denied coverage. The murder suspect supposedly underwent a major back surgery that left him with back pain, and some of his internet fans apparently viewed his murder of Thompson as retribution for the mistreatment that he and many other Americans have suffered from healthcare companies.

The murder suspect and his lackeys don't seem to understand that, other than depriving two children of their father right before Christmas, he accomplished nothing.

The murder suspect failed to achieve his goal because he was too cowardly to try.

If the murder suspect's goals were truly to "right the wrongs" of the U.S. healthcare system, he had every tool available to him to do so in a constructive and meaningful manner. He came from a wealthy and prominent family in the Baltimore area, became the valedictorian at a prestigious all-boys prep school, and graduated from the University of Pennsylvania with a master's in engineering. Clearly, the murder suspect was intelligent and capable, and if he had put his talent into creating solutions for the healthcare industry, who knows what he could have accomplished?

This is the kind of behavior the far-left idolizes, like communists on college campuses who wear shirts that celebrate the brutal Cuban warlord, Che Guevara. Merchandise celebrating the UnitedHealthcare CEO murder suspect is already available, including shirts, hoodies, mugs, and even Christmas ornaments. Will they be sporting his face on their T-shirts too?

This macabre behavior does not breed creation, achievement, success, or life. It only brings death and risks more Americans falling into this dangerous paradigm. But we still have a chance to choose life. We just have to wake up and take it.