Glenn Unveils the Left's Insane Plan to Remove President Trump From Office

Never mind impeachment, members of the left appear to favor the 25th Amendment as a means of removing Donald Trump from office.

"I found an article deep in the left circle of influence yesterday, and I read it and thought, 'Oh, my gosh, look at what they're setting up. Look at what they're doing.'" Glenn said Wednesday on radio.

According to the article, the left has gathered neurologists, psychiatrists and doctors that study mental health and the deterioration of the brain, particularly as it relates Alzheimer's.

"They are analyzing everything that he's saying now off the cuff --- nothing can be read, it has to be off the cuff --- and they're comparing it to everything that he said prior to the year 2000. And I will tell you, the video they have clipped together is quite remarkable," Glenn said.

Earlier this year, Dr. John Gartner, a practicing psychotherapist who previously advised psychiatric residents at Johns Hopkins University Medical School started an online petition to remove Trump based on mental illness.

"These are the same people who say, 'You should never question science because it's not political,'" Co-host Stu Burguiere added.

"Oh, my gosh, that's exactly what I was shouting in the room by myself, the whole time. I thought we weren't supposed to analyze people," Glenn said.

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

GLENN: I know how the left -- I know what a move of the left is going to be, I think. I think they're starting to lay the groundwork for the 20 -- I want to say the 24th Amendment, but I know it's the 25th Amendment on how to -- how to get rid of Donald Trump. And it's not going to be -- I mean, they're going to try impeachment, but I think they're going to go for the 25th Amendment. They're going to start making the case that he's unfit to be president.

And I found an article deep in the left circle of influence yesterday, and I read it, and I thought, "Oh, my gosh, look at what they're setting up. Look at what they're doing." They're now -- they now have neurolinguists. They have neurologists. They have psychiatrists. Doctors, that, you know, study the brain and the deterioration of the brain and Alzheimer's and all this kind of stuff. Now analyzing all of his speeches that are off the cuff. They are analyzing everything that he's saying now off the cuff. Nothing can be read. It has to be off the cuff.

And they're comparing it to everything that he said prior to the year 2000. And I will tell you that the -- the video that they have clipped together is quite remarkable. And you're left with thinking -- and they bring this up. One guy brought up, "This could be an act this could be something that he's doing intentionally because he is trying to appeal who are just -- you know, the barstool Joe."

STU: Again, this is to try to prove that he is incapable of being president. The 25th Amendment would pull him out because he's incapacitated --

GLENN: Because what they're saying, what the doctors are saying is, look at his speech. Remember when he said, I have the best words. I use the best words. If you actually go back and look at what he's said in interviews off the cuff, with Charlie Rose and everything else, prior to 2000, he is very eloquent. Very eloquent. It's quite amazing.

And now, he can't build a sentence. You know, now he gets so distracted. And he'll start talking about something. And then he'll be on to something else.

And they're saying -- this is what they're saying, 25th Amendment. I mean, I think he's -- I think he's -- I think he's suffering from mental deterioration. And he's starting to fail.

STU: These are the same people who say, "You should never question science because it's not political." Oh, is it? It's not, huh?

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. That's exactly what I was shouting in the room by myself, the whole time. I thought we weren't supposed to analyze people.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: But they got the best doctors to do this one.

You read it -- and I want to share it with you because you have to prepare mentally for what's coming. And -- and we better have a good argument and the right argument.

PAT: Can you imagine if we would have thrown this much stuff at the wall trying to get Obama out of office? Within three months of him being in office? We never -- we never said impeachment. We never said 25th Amendment. We didn't do any of that stuff.

GLENN: A lot of people did. And it's the birth certificate. I mean, that birth certificate was this.

PAT: This is insane though. I mean, it is insane. From day one, they've been doing this.

GLENN: Yeah. No, that's -- that's where -- they don't even understand. That's where they've gone wrong.

PAT: You tried to get them not to do this. But, boy, have they ignored all of that advice. Wow.

GLENN: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. But they've decided to do this because I think the press is unaware of their own actions. And they don't care. They just think they're right.

I think the Democrats have done this intentionally. I mean, why would you -- why would you hold a huge protest on the day after the inauguration? Wait a minute. Just wait. Let him do something. You know, don't even -- they didn't even give it a chance to say, "He's all of our presidents."

"Oh, look, he's failing."

And so the entire thing, I believe, is just built to bring their core closer to them. They're not reaching out to anybody. They just want their core closer to them. And angry. And it just doesn't -- it just doesn't lead to any place good. Wait until they start on the 25th Amendment.

PHOTOS: Inside Glenn's private White House tour

Image courtesy of the White House

In honor of Trump's 100th day in office, Glenn was invited to the White House for an exclusive interview with the President.

Naturally, Glenn's visit wasn't solely confined to the interview, and before long, Glenn and Trump were strolling through the majestic halls of the White House, trading interesting historical anecdotes while touring the iconic home. Glenn was blown away by the renovations that Trump and his team have made to the presidential residence and enthralled by the history that practically oozed out of the gleaming walls.

Want to join Glenn on this magical tour? Fortunately, Trump's gracious White House staff was kind enough to provide Glenn with photos of his journey through the historic residence so that he might share the experience with you.

So join Glenn for a stroll through 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with the photo gallery below:

The Oval Office

Image courtesy of the White House

The Roosevelt Room

Image courtesy of the White House

The White House

Image courtesy of the White House

Media cover-up: Why Clinton deported six times more than Trump

Genaro Molina / Contributor | Getty Images

MSNBC and CNN want you to think the president is a new Hitler launching another Holocaust. But the actual deportation numbers are nowhere near what they claim.

Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews, in an interview with CNN’s Jim Acosta, compared Trump’s immigration policies to Adolf Hitler’s Holocaust. He claimed that Hitler didn’t bother with German law — he just hauled people off to death camps in Poland and Hungary. Apparently, that’s what Trump is doing now by deporting MS-13 gang members to El Salvador.

Symone Sanders took it a step further. The MSNBC host suggested that deporting gang-affiliated noncitizens is simply the first step toward deporting black Americans. I’ll wait while you try to do that math.

The debate is about control — weaponizing the courts, twisting language, and using moral panic to silence dissent.

Media mouthpieces like Sanders and Matthews are just the latest examples of the left’s Pavlovian tribalism when it comes to Trump and immigration. Just say the word “Trump,” and people froth at the mouth before they even hear the sentence. While the media cries “Hitler,” the numbers say otherwise. And numbers don’t lie — the narrative does.

Numbers don’t lie

The real “deporter in chief” isn’t Trump. It was President Bill Clinton, who sent back 12.3 million people during his presidency — 11.4 million returns and nearly 900,000 formal removals. President George W. Bush, likewise, presided over 10.3 million deportations — 8.3 million returns and two million removals. Even President Barack Obama, the progressive darling, oversaw 5.5 million deportations, including more than three million formal removals.

So how does Donald Trump stack up? Between 2017 and 2021, Trump deported somewhere between 1.5 million and two million people — dramatically fewer than Obama, Bush, or Clinton. In his current term so far, Trump has deported between 100,000 and 138,000 people. Yes, that’s assertive for a first term — but it's still fewer than Biden was deporting toward the end of his presidency.

The numbers simply don’t support the hysteria.

Who's the “dictator” here? Trump is deporting fewer people, with more legal oversight, and still being compared to history’s most reviled tyrant. Apparently, sending MS-13 gang members — violent criminals — back to their country of origin is now equivalent to genocide.

It’s not about immigration

This debate stopped being about immigration a long time ago. It’s now about control — about weaponizing the courts, twisting language, and using moral panic to silence dissent. It’s about turning Donald Trump into the villain of every story, facts be damned.

If the numbers mattered, we’d be having a very different national conversation. We’d be asking why Bill Clinton deported six times as many people as Trump and never got labeled a fascist. We’d be questioning why Barack Obama’s record-setting removals didn’t spark cries of ethnic cleansing. And we’d be wondering why Trump, whose enforcement was relatively modest by comparison, triggered lawsuits, media hysteria, and endless Nazi analogies.

But facts don’t drive this narrative. The villain does. And in this script, Trump plays the villain — even when he does far less than the so-called heroes who came before him.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Can Trump stop the blackouts that threaten America's future?

Allan Tannenbaum / Contributor | Getty Images

If America wants to remain a global leader in the coming decades, we need more energy fast.

It's no secret that Glenn is an advocate for the safe and ethical use of AI, not because he wants it, but because he knows it’s coming whether we like it or not. Our only option is to shape AI on our terms, not those of our adversaries. America has to win the AI Race if we want to maintain our stability and security, and to do that, we need more energy.

AI demands dozens—if not hundreds—of new server farms, each requiring vast amounts of electricity. The problem is, America lacks the power plants to generate the required electricity, nor do we have a power grid capable of handling the added load. We must overcome these hurdles quickly to outpace China and other foreign competitors.

Outdated Power Grid

Spencer Platt / Staff | Getty Images

Our power grid is ancient, slowly buckling under the stress of our modern machines. AAI’s energy demands could collapse it without a major upgrade. The last significant overhaul occurred under FDR nearly a century ago, when he connected rural America to electricity. Since then, we’ve patched the system piecemeal, but it’s still the same grid from the 1930s. Over 70 percent of the powerlines are 30 years old or older, and circuit breakers and other vital components are in similar condition. Most people wouldn't trust a dishwasher that was 30 years old, and yet much of our grid relies on technology from the era of VHS tapes.

Upgrading the grid would prevent cascading failures, rolling blackouts, and even EMP attacks. It would also enable new AI server farms while ensuring reliable power for all.

A Need for Energy

JONATHAN NACKSTRAND / Stringer | Getty Images

Earlier this month, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt appeared before Congress as part of an AI panel and claimed that by 2030, the U.S. will need to add 96 gigawatts to our national power production to meet AI-driven demand. While some experts question this figure, the message is clear: We must rapidly expand power production. But where will this energy come from?

As much as eco nuts would love to power the world with sunshine and rainbows, we need a much more reliable and significantly more efficient power source if we want to meet our electricity goals. Nuclear power—efficient, powerful, and clean—is the answer. It’s time to shed outdated fears of atomic energy and embrace the superior electricity source. Building and maintaining new nuclear plants, along with upgraded infrastructure, would create thousands of high-paying American jobs. Nuclear energy will fuel AI, boost the economy, and modernize America’s decaying infrastructure.

A Bold Step into the Future

ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / Contributor | Getty Images

This is President Trump’s chance to leave a historic mark on America, restoring our role as global leaders and innovators. Just as FDR’s power grid and plants made America the dominant force of the 20th century, Trump could upgrade our infrastructure to secure dominance in the 21st century. Visionary leadership must cut red tape and spark excitement in the industry. This is how Trump can make America great again.

POLL: Is K2-18b proof of alien LIFE in the cosmos?

Print Collector / Contributor | Getty Images

Are we alone in the universe?

It's no secret that Glenn keeps one eye on the cosmos, searching for any signs of ET. Late last week, a team of astronomers at the University of Cambridge made an exciting discovery that could change how we view the universe. The astronomers were monitoring a distant planet, K2-18b, when the James Webb Space Telescope detected dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide, two atmospheric gases believed only to be generated by living organisms. The planet, which is just over two and a half times larger than Earth, orbits within the "habitable zone" of its star, meaning the presence of liquid water on its surface is possible, further supporting the possibility that life exists on this distant world.

Unfortunately, humans won't be able to visit K2-18b to see for ourselves anytime soon, as the planet is about 124 light-years from Earth. This means that even if we had rockets that could travel at the speed of light, it would still take 124 years to reach the potentially verdant planet. Even if humans made the long trek to K2-18b, they would be faced with an even more intense challenge upon arrival: Gravity. Assuming K2-18b has a similar density to Earth, its increased size would also mean it would have increased gravity, two and a half times as much gravity, to be exact. This would make it very difficult, if not impossible, for humans to live or explore the surface without serious technological support. But who knows, give Elon Musk and SpaceX a few years, and we might be ready to seek out new life (and maybe even new civilizations).

But Glenn wants to know what you think. Could K2-18b harbor life on its distant surface? Could alien astronomers be peering back at us from across the cosmos? Would you be willing to boldly go where no man has gone before? Let us know in the poll below:

Could there be life on K2-18b?

Could there be an alien civilization thriving on K2-18b?

Will humans develop the technology to one day explore distant worlds?

Would you sign up for a trip to an alien world?

Is K2-18b just another cold rock in space?