GLENN

Republican Sen. Tim Scotts Reads Tweets From the Tolerant Left: 'You Are a Disgrace to the Black Race'

Too many, particularly on the right, are found guilty until proven innocent on issues of race, issue of fairness.

That's what Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) recently had to say from the floor of the Senate prior to reading hateful and racists tweets levied at him for his support of newly appointed Attorney General Jeff Sessions. One tweet urged people to "think for themselves." And yet, when someone does just that --- Sen. Tim Scott in this case --- he's vilified for not following in lockstep with liberal groupthink.

WATCH: Tim Scott Reads Bigoted Insults Tweeted to Him for Supporting Sessions Nomination

"That's ironic. Think for yourself. When you're talking about a group of people that votes 96 percent the same way every time. That's an amazing thing to throw around to somebody else. When I think it's pretty evident that Tim Scott thinks for himself," Co-host Pat Gray said Thursday on radio.

Enjoy the complimentary clip above or read the transcript below for details.

PAT: So Senator Tim Scott got some interesting feedback because he supported Jeff Sessions as attorney general.

STU: Oh, no. How dare he.

PAT: And yesterday, it was kind of interesting because he read some of the tweets he's been receiving. And this is why reason number 7,862, I don't have Twitter, because what -- what good comes from it? This is the kind of stuff you get. So Tim Scott has been getting this kind of feedback. He's a black senator from South Carolina. So here's what -- here's what he's been seeing and hearing from people because he supported Jeff Sessions.

TIM: Sessions, you are a disgrace to the black race. Anthony Burnum @BurnumR says...

STU: Can we stop this?

PAT: I like that he's naming names.

STU: Not only is he saying their name, he's giving their specific Twitter handle so you can go online and tell them exactly how you feel about them.

PAT: You got to love that.

TIM: You're an Uncle Tom Scott. You're for Sessions. How does a black man turn on his own.

Anthony B. from @politicalarts says: Senator Tim Scott is not an Uncle Tom. He doesn't have a shred of honor. He's a house Negro, like the one in Django.

He also writes -- I guess Anthony Burnum has been fairly active recently on my Twitter feed.

I'm a complete horror. A black man who is a racist against black people. A big Uncle Tom piece of fertilizer.

PAT: Hmm.

TIM: Think for yourselves. You're --

PAT: That's ironic. Think for yourself, when you're talking about a group of people that votes 96 percent the same way every time. That's an amazing thing to throw around to somebody else. When I think it's pretty evident that Tim Scott thinks for himself.

STU: Absolutely.

PAT: I mean, he's gone against the mainstream of black thought for the last 60 years.

JEFFY: Yeah.

STU: Yeah. It's a very difficult thing to do. I'm sure he gets pressure like this all the time.

PAT: Ugh, it's ugly.

STU: And it's funny too. It's like Sessions is such a ridiculous one to do this on. It's like Betsy DeVos, for example, is someone that most people are completely unfamiliar with, coming into this process. Right? So you can kind of assign whatever crazy view you want to her, and it's her job to try to disprove it. I'm not saying that's right. I'm just saying that's the way politics works. With Sessions, you've been working with the guy. You've been voting with him this entire time. Everyone knows he's not that nuts. Like you can't act as if he's this crazy person. He's been working with you in the same room for the past how many terms.

PAT: Right. They all know him. They all know him. They know he's not a racist.

STU: They know he's not. It's just theater. It is just theater. And, I mean, this is what people hate about politics. It really is.

PAT: And it didn't work out anyway because he is our attorney general now. So that part is done.

Next up -- who is next up on the confirmation hearings?

STU: Price, I believe. Tom Price for HHS. Which is --

PAT: And I don't think there is much opposition to him, is there?

STU: They're trying to get him on this financial -- insider trading type of stuff. But they expect that to be done tonight or tomorrow. So that should be pretty much done.

I mean, most of these are going to get through. I mean, he's going to be able to get every nominee he wants through.

JEFFY: Really, Sessions was only held up a little bit because they needed his vote, right?

STU: Yeah. DeVos was interesting, I guess because Pence had to cast the vote.

JEFFY: Right.

STU: Because there's two senators.

PAT: Oh, yeah, two Republican senators jumped the other side of the aisle and voted with the Democrats. So it was 50-50.

STU: Collins and Murkowski, right? Were the two.

PAT: Yes.

STU: There really has been no leaving Trump with these nominees because, generally speaking with, he's picked not only good people --

PAT: Good people.

STU: -- but people who are in the Republican mainstream. I mean, he's picked people who -- you know, General Mattis. You know, General Kelly. You know, Price is obviously a congressman. Pompeo is a congressman. Sessions is a senator. This is not like -- Trump, for all the drain the swamp talk, he picked a bunch of people who, generally speaking, come from the Republican mainstream. Which is, I mean, honestly like I think there is very little to complain about.

PAT: Other than Tillerson because he was the head of Exxon.

STU: Tillerson was a little bit unexpected, though I think he did well in his confirmation.

PAT: Yeah, he did.

STU: There are a few I don't like at all. But still, generally speaking, there's a bunch of good picks there. And they're not picks that you can come out and say, "Oh, these people are all crazy. They're all nuts." I mean, Gorsuch is another example of this. It's hard to oppose a guy like that. And if these statements are true, which I think they are from Gorsuch saying that he is -- it was not a good idea, essentially for Trump to start tweeting criticism of the judicial branch.

If it's true, it actually I think helps his confirmation. If you're on the borderline of whether you're going to vote for this guy or not, you have a piece of evidence that says he'll stand up to Trump if he thinks he's wrong.

And that's what you should want. I don't know if that's what Trump wants. But I think that's what you should want if you're a Republican or a Democrat. And if you're a Democrat, you say, well, maybe we have a shot with this guy. Maybe he'll stand up against the administration when he has to.

So if anything -- who knows what the truth is here. But it's a smart piece of strategy, to come out and be critical of Trump at this point, if you're Gorsuch. Because it probably helps you get confirmed.

PAT: Right. And he did do that. So that will be interesting. Somebody else that was somewhat critical of the White House and Republicans in general who hasn't been for a long time, Matt Drudge tweeted out something yesterday that I found somewhat interesting. We'll get into that, coming up.

EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains His FIERY Rejection of Spending Bill
RADIO

EXCLUSIVE: Chip Roy Explains His FIERY Rejection of Spending Bill

According to the media, there’s a big fight going on between Republicans over the House’s new slimmed-down continuing resolution spending bill. Some, including President-elect Donald Trump, wanted the bill to pass. But others, like Texas Representative Chip Roy, argued that it still wasn’t ready. However, is the Republican “unity coalition” really crumbling, like the media claims? Rep. Chip Roy joins Glenn to explain what’s really going on. He argues that he IS trying to give Trump and DOGE a 100-day “runway” to fix the country. But he makes the case that, by increasing the debt ceiling by $5 trillion without agreeing on other cuts, this bill gives bad actors the ability to be an “obstacle” to Trump’s agenda further down the line. Plus, he reveals to Glenn that he believes some of these bad actors LEAKED false information about his stance to Mar-a-Lago.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN:

I think we have a great opportunity today. To show you how to have a -- tough conversation, with friends, friends. Where you deeply disagree on something.

But you know that their intent is good. They know my intent is good. Or our intent is good.

And we actually have the same end goal, but we disagree on the path. And we're going to walk away friends.

Chip Roy is joining us today. And, Chip, I love you. And I always will. And I agree with your, we've got to cut spending. We have to. But Liz Wheeler is with me. And we've been talking about it all morning. It's the -- the -- the -- the system of DOGE and Trump, the call-out to the world, in saying, you've got to surrender the Capitol. You know, the bad guys are in and about to take all the money.

Surround, and tell them, come out with your hands up. And that happened. And we scored a massive win, in an entirely new way.

Ask then you stood on principle, one we both agree with.

And it failed!

And so here's -- here's what Liz and I were talking about. Here's what we want to say to you.

And then get your response.

LIZ: Hi, Congressman Roy, this is the way I see it. I want your take on it. I love you. I think you're one of the best members of Congress. I disagree with you on the process that's happening. And I think that is the difference. The process. We elected Donald Trump to be a disruptor. Because Republican members of Congress for decades have been telling they're fiscal conservatives. They want to decrease the debt SEAL. It hasn't happened.

It hasn't -- it hasn't been done. And so Donald Trump comes in with Elon Musk, and uses this DOGE process to first identify these pieces of garbage in the first 1500-page bill. And take those things to the people. We took them to members of Congress. Congress said, okay. We'll listen to you.

So that new process was very effective.

And my question to you is: Once that process was proved to be effective. Which I think is exciting and wonderful.

How do we bridge this divide, with you, to say, okay.

Let's put some faith in this new process. And trust Elon Musk and Donald Trump and the Dow Jones process, to eventually address the debt ceiling, but get this done right now?

GLENN: And not blind trust. Chip.

CHIP: So appreciate you guys. Appreciate being on the show. Particular order. I have to go through a couple of things.

GLENN: Yep.

CHIP: Number one, it's important to remember that my job and my duty is to the Constitution, to God, and the people I represent. I told them, when I came to Washington, I would not -- I would not let the credit card and the debt ceiling and the borrowing of the United States without the spending restraints necessary to offset it.

GLENN: Okay.

CHIP: Right now, all we have are promises and ideas and notions. What I know, that neither of you respectfully no, and that none of your listeners respectfully no are the people that are in the room, that I was in with yesterday. And the day before, who are recalcitrant.

And do not want to do the spending cuts that we need to do.

That I believe the president and the DOGE guys. And everybody want to do.

My job, is to force that through the meat grinder. To demand that we do our damn job. Okay?

GLENN: Okay. So hang on. Okay. So wait. Wait. You're right. You're right. You're right. Go ahead.

CHIP: Number thee, when we were going through the bill, I'm glad the bill dropped from 1,550 pages to 116 pages. Three-quarters of Twitter or X or whatever you want to call it, have been out there spreading false facts that we supported a bad bill and didn't like the better bill.

That's not true. But let's be Lear. The 1400 pages that were cut out. It's a panacea.

There were some good stuff in there. There were some bad stuff in there. There was a lot of disinformation.

There wasn't a $70,000 pay raise. There was a 3,000-dollar pay raise.

I didn't support any pay raise. I didn't support a lot of the stuff in there.

But there's a lot of misinformation. And here's the thing: The 116 pages that were left, and I opposed violently the first bill. I was leading the charge on fighting and killing the first bill.

GLENN: And I love you.

LIZ: The second bill for 116 pages. Turned off -- turned off the pay go requirement. That we slash 1.7 trillion automatically.

And added a 5 trillion that are increase.

My view was, I could not support that, without a clear understanding of what cuts we would get, in mandatory spending next year. And undo any of the Inflation Reduction Act.

The undoing of the student loans. The undoing of the crap with the food stamps.

And everything else. I yield back.

GLENN: Okay. I yield back.

Chip, you're not in a hostile room. We love you. And we agree with your end goals. It's our end goal too. We didn't make that promise that you made to the people that voted for you. So we have more wiggle room here.

But you say -- I think our big difference is, you say, I know the guys in the room.

You're right. You do. And we -- we ceded that earlier today on the show.

You are -- one of us is wrong on trust.

I don't trust any of the weasels in Washington.

But I think Donald Trump and Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have earned enough trust, to get a grace period, here for the first -- maybe the first year.

Or at least six months.

To turn the economy around, and also reduce the size of the government.

And totally flip this thing.

And I know, as somebody who is -- you know, run a company, mainly into a ground. But run a company, and have to switch it, in the middle, and totally reshuffle. That -- that actually costs money, while you're doing it, to bridge the gap.

Because you have to fill up holes while you're filling in the gap.

You don't trust the people in the room. Neither do we.

But we do trust the system that worked on Wednesday with DOGE and Donald Trump.

Where do we disagree?

Can you give them --

CHIP: We don't disagree. And yesterday morning, I was making that precise argument in a room full of conservatives and then a follow-up room with people who will call it, less conservatives.

GLENN: Republican. Yes.

CHIP: And so we were making this argument. And then someone infamously. Something leaked out of the room, somehow out to Mar-a-Lago. That I was being resistant. Because I was negotiating trying to get the agreement to achieve the objective that you just said. I was trying to get, okay. In fact, yesterday morning, I made the argument to a group of conservatives. We need to give the president runway. We need to give him his first 100 days. We need to appreciate JD, and Vivek, and all the people -- and everybody involved. For the president to achieve the objective.

But to get there. We have to make sure that the guys in the room, that are an obstacle to that, don't have the ability to block it.

Because information flow matters. And when those guys tell the president, they can't achieve X.

Then the president will not achieve X. Our job was to force and demand, guys, we need actual understanding of what the cuts will be.

And because otherwise, we're asking us to accept a 5 trillion-dollar limit in our credit card increase. In exchange for nothing!

Literally, in exchange for nothing, but -- but hope.

So our job was to force that change.

Unfortunately, while I was trying to make the argument that we needed something in order to get the votes, someone leaked that down to Mar-a-Lago, and the president reacted.

But now I have to now manage that.

GLENN: Right. I know. I know.

CHIP: They're trying to enforce change in town.

GLENN: So hang on.

We have to leave this. Because I'm going to run against the clock.

I could talk to you all day about this. You were in a meeting this morning about J.D. Vance. Can you tell us anything about that meeting?

CHIP: That meeting happened, because despite what happened yesterday, I'm trying to get this done. Last night, talking to JD, we worked to get this meeting done. We had some good progress this morning.

But there still remains people concerned about spending. That we can work out, what agreement we can reach. On what spending cuts. We can actually get next year, in exchange for giving the vote on a debt ceiling increase.

So it remains fluid. Progress was made. But we have to keep working on it.

And I left that meeting to talk to you. Soil get an update in a minute.

GLENN: Thank you for that, by the way.

I hear there is a new bill that may be coming today.

Is that the one you're talking about?

Or is this another bill that could be another nightmare?

CHIP: Despite other people leaking crap, I refused. I can't say, because it's not been decided by the speaker.

And it's not right to talk about things they're talking about in private meetings.

GLENN: Yeah, but it's -- it's this speaker. I mean, is he really the speaker anymore, Chip, really?

CHIP: We need to hear what bill we need to get forward. And I can't talk about the private meetings. But, look, I'm going to keep fighting for what I promised people that I represent.

I'm going to fight to cut spending. I am going to represent article one.

I'm going to support the president's agenda, but we've got to do that together.

GLENN: Okay.

Chip, thank you.

I think we can -- I think we agree, but I await to see what that means to you. Because we may just have to agree to disagree on this.

But I love you. And I still want you to replace Cornyn.

CHIP: The short version is, for inflation's sake, we cannot increase the debt ceiling $5 trillion without knowing what we're getting for it.

And I don't think anybody should disagree with that.

GLENN: But you don't disagree that Elon Musk and Trump and Vivek are serious about gutting the system.

CHIP: I believe that is their objective. I believe there are obstacles to that objective. And I need to know the sincerity of how we deal with those obstacles, both structural, and human. And we have to figure that out. And that's my job.

America's Favorite Villain Is Ready for Nuclear Fallout. Are You? | Glenn TV | Ep 401
TV

America's Favorite Villain Is Ready for Nuclear Fallout. Are You? | Glenn TV | Ep 401

In this episode of Glenn TV — a theatrical how-to guide to survive the breakdown of society after a nuclear attack, according to the new movie “Homestead” from Angel Studios. Glenn Beck interviews the movie’s star and executive producer, Neal McDonough, who plays the head of a family trying to survive as society is breaking down in a postapocalyptic world. You’ve probably seen Neal in everything from the hit TV shows “Yellowstone,” “Suits,” and “Justified” to movies like “Captain America,” “Minority Report,” and the groundbreaking mini-series “Band of Brothers.” Glenn asks Neal what it’s like to play a villain so often, how TV and movies are changing, and how he survived Hollywood as a devoted Christian and husband who refuses to do onscreen kissing scenes with any of his female co-stars. They also discuss his battle with alcoholism, what it’s like working the legends like Sylvester Stallone and Kevin Costner, and the cultural craving for Western cinema. Note: Angel Studios is a sponsor of “The Glenn Beck Program.” Get your tickets for “Homestead” at https://Angel.com/Beck.

4 MAJOR Cover-Ups EXPOSED In the Latest Jan. 6 Report
RADIO

4 MAJOR Cover-Ups EXPOSED In the Latest Jan. 6 Report

The House Administration Oversight Subcommittee has released its second and final report on its investigation into the House January 6 Committee – and it reveals A LOT. The subcommittee’s chairman, Rep. Barry Loudermilk, joins Glenn to review some of the highlights. Rep. Loudermilk explains why he recommended a criminal investigation into former Rep. Liz Cheney, what crucial information the Jan. 6 Committee left out of its report, and what the government did to cover up “tremendous failures.” He also details why he’s certain the FBI lied about being unable to access phone data that could reveal the identity of the pipe bomber and why the FBI “spent no time looking into who constructed the gallows” that mysteriously appeared at the riot.