Navy SEAL Pete Scobell discusses Junior Seau, the latest in string of ex-NFL suicides

This morning Glenn opened the radio show on a topic he rarely dwells into, sports. Glenn brought on Navy SEAL Pete Scobell to discuss the tragedy of the suicide of Junior Seau and the implications of concussions playing a role.

“Let me start an unusual place for me – a guy who doesn't know anything about sports. Junior Seau, we were talking about this in the meeting before the broadcast. I don't know anything at all about sports. I was listening to the conversation between Pat and Stu, and what struck me is he shot himself in the heart, and I've been talking to some military guys and Navy SEAL guys, and finding new technology about concussions and the way the brain works.

Junior Seau is an all-pro linebacker who played in the NFL for twenty years. He grew up in San Diego, played for USC in college, and played for the Chargers, the Dolphins, and the Patriots.

Pat explained that there is some speculation, because of the way Dave Duerson died last year, that there may be a connection to brain injury and concussions. Duerson also shot himself in the chest, but he left a note asked that he wanted his brain to be studied at Boston University because of all the concussions he got.

“So people are thinking, some are speculating, that this could be the same thing with Junior Seau, because nobody I’ve heard knew he was even depressed, nobody knew he was anything but incredibly happy and energetic like he was his whole life. He was only forty-three years old,” Pat said.

“Tragically sad story,” Glenn said, “but, I’m really saddened by the part of the story where he never shared his pain with anybody.”

“According to one of his close friends from the Chargers, he never showed any kind of weakness,” Pat said. “When he had an injury he would take it outside the locker room, and not go to the team's doctor. He would use his own personal physician, so he didn't show any weakness to his teammates, and he would deal with it that way. What his teammate and friend realized is that he was probably doing that in his personal life too, and not showing any of his pain to anybody.”

Navy SEAL Pete Scobell who has experience blast exposure and multiple concussions due to his line of high impact lifestyle from his career and sports, has had to deal with the complications and long term impact that this can have on your life. Pete joined the show this morning to talk to Glenn about this very issue and some ground breaking therapy that is being studied now that can help people deal with and recover from these brain injuries.

Pete explained that, “it doesn't have to be one event. It becomes – overtime things start happening, and you notice little things here and there. I'm having difficulty taking information out of an email; I'm having difficulty remembering articles that I needed for work. You know, if you leave for work six times, and you leave your keys and your wallet and your badge, you start wondering if this is a trend. You get frustrated to the point of the anger, and because of that you start questioning yourself, and what if you have everything all together.”

Pete explained that his wife, who he has known since they were children, started noticing a major difference in him, and eventually drew the line and made him get checked out. Pete came to Dallas to the Center for Brain Health, which was built to study brain disease, and has a system specially used to treat veterans for PTSD and traumatic brain injuries. Unlike most therapy centers, the Center for Brain Health takes a unique approach – they don’t start with the basics. Like other physical injuries in the body, from severe physical injuries to bumps and bruises, increased blood flow to the brain increases the amount of oxygen reaching the brain, speeding up the healing process.

To do this, instead of starting at the basics, they start at the highest level of thinking, increasing the blood flow and level of oxygen reaching your brain. They make you answer the question: Why? “You’re wired to reason for yourself,” Pete explained. “You’re wired to ask these questions, and build context from memory.”

Pete explained that it’s a system that makes you figure things out on your own. He compared it to how most people asked their teachers or at least wondered in school, ‘why are we doing that?’ or ‘Why do we need to know that?’ and were often told that we didn’t need to know why or we needed to know how, which put up a road block for our brain. This system pushes you to do the opposite. “It gave me confidence,” Pete said.

“I’ve been thinking that way my whole life, let’s keep going, let’s figure this out on my own. Once you have that information you can start using it – the directions for your brain. It’s a fantastic system.”

This system is still in the research phase and not available yet for the general public, but so far the results for Pete have been great.

“Every day is a little bit better, and that’s the thing with any kid of rehab,” Pete told Glenn. “For the longest time they thought you were born with the same brain you died with – that it is what it is and the brain can’t regenerate. But the plasticity of the brain continually astonishes these researchers. This is amazing. It can regenerate. It can overcome so much.”

Pete explained that once you start seeing an improvement in the types of problems he was experiencing, life starts getting better, and that he’s really looking forward to this system becoming more available to the public.

“With all of this stuff going on – and there’s been thousands of players that have been affected in the NFL – that something like this, just that element of hope, you’ve got to think that it is an ingredient that gets people past what happened,” Stu said.

Glenn added that the researches at the Center for BrainHealth at UT Dallas have found that a lot of the current techniques we are using to treat and diagnose brain injuries are some of the worst things you can do. He explained that they’re finding if you have someone who has just been knocked out or experienced brain trauma that putting them in an isolation chamber for sensory deprivation is one of the best ways to heal your brain. It isolates your brain from other activity, isolating blood flow to the injured part of your brain, and it heals much faster.

Below is a video from The Center for BrainHealth UT Dallas about this research:

“It’s an amazing thing, this this new technology,” Glenn said. “Our thoughts and prayers are with San Diego and Seau’s mom.”

POLL: What topics do YOU want Trump and Harris to debate?

Montinique Monroe / Stringer, Win McNamee / Staff | Getty Images

Does Kamala Harris stand a chance against Donald Trump in a debate?

Next week, during the second presidential debate, we will find out. The debate is scheduled for September 10th and will be hosted by ABC anchors David Muir and Linsey Davis. This will be the second presidential debate, but the first for VP Kamala Harris, and will feature the same rules as the first debate. The rules are: no notes, no chairs, no live audience, and the debater's microphone will only be turned on when it is his or her turn to speak.

This will be the first time Trump and Harris clash face-to-face, and the outcome could have a massive effect on the outcome of the election. Trump has been preparing by ramping up his campaign schedule. He plans to hold multiple rallies and speak at several events across the next several days. He wants to be prepared to face any question that might come his way, and meeting and interacting with both voters and the press seems to be Trump's preferred preparation approach.

With the multitude of issues plaguing our nation, there are a lot of potential topics that could be brought up. From the economy to the ongoing "lawfare" being waged against the former president, what topics do YOU want Harris and Trump to debate?

The economy (and why the Biden-Harris administration hasn't fixed it yet)

The Southern Border crisis (and Kamala's performance as border czar)

Climate change (and how Trump pulled out of the Paris Agreement)

The "lawfare" being waged against Trump (and what Trump would do if he were thrown in prison) 

Voting and election security (and how to deal with the possibility that illegal immigrants are voting)

3 ways the Constitution foils progressive authoritarianism

ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / Contributor, Kevin Dietsch / Staff, Pool / Pool | Getty Images

This is why it is important to understand our history.

Over the weekend, the New York Times published a controversial article claiming the Constitution is a danger to the country and a threat to democracy. To those who have taken a high school American government class or have followed Glenn for a while, this claim might seem incongruent with reality. That's because Jennifer Szalai, the author the piece, isn't thinking of the Constitution as it was intended to be—a restraint on government to protect individual rights—but instead as a roadblock that is hindering the installation of a progressive oligarchy.

Glenn recently covered this unbelievable article during his show and revealed the telling critiques Szalai made of our founding document. She called it an "anti-democratic" document and argued it is flawed because Donald Trump used it to become president (sort of like how every other president achieved their office). From here, Szalai went off the deep end and made some suggestions to "fix" the Constitution, including breaking California and other blue states away from the union to create a coastal progressive utopia.

Here are three of the "flaws" Szalai pointed out in the Constitution that interfere with the Left's authoritarian dreams:

1. The Electoral College

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

The New York Times article brought up the fact that in 2016 President Trump lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College, and thus won the election. This, as Szalai pointed out, is not democratic. Strictly speaking, she is right. But as Glenn has pointed out time and time again, America is not a democracy! The Founding Fathers did not want the president to be decided by a simple majority of 51 percent of the population. The Electoral College is designed to provide minority groups with a voice, giving them a say in the presidential election. Without the Electoral College, a simple majority would dominate elections and America would fall under the tyranny of the masses.

2. The Supreme Court

OLIVIER DOULIERY / Contributor | Getty Images

President Biden and other progressives have thrown around the idea of reforming the Supreme Court simply because it has made a few rulings they disagree with. Glenn points out that when a country decides to start monkeying around with their high courts, it is usually a sign they are becoming a banana republic. Szalai complained that Trump was allowed to appoint three justices. Two of them were confirmed by senators representing just 44 percent of the population, and they overturned Roe v. Wade. All of this is Constitutional by Szalai's admission, and because she disagreed with it, she argued the whole document should be scrapped.

3. Republicanism

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

To clarify, were not talking about the Republican Party Republicanism, but instead the form of government made up of a collection of elected representatives who govern on the behalf of their constituents. This seems to be a repeat sticking point for liberals, who insist conservatives and Donald Trump are out to destroy "democracy" (a system of government that never existed in America). This mix-up explains Szalai's nonsensical interpretation of how the Constitution functions. She criticized the Constitution as "anti-democratic" and a threat to American democracy. If the Constitution is the nation's framework, and if it is "anti-democratic" then how is it a threat to American democracy? This paradox is easily avoided with the understanding that America isn't a democracy, and it never has been.

Kamala Harris' first interview as nominee: Three SHOCKING policy flips

Anadolu / Contributor | Getty Images

On Thursday, Kamala Harris gave her first interview since Joe Biden stepped down from the race, and it quickly becameclear why she waited so long.

Harris struggled to keep her story straight as CNN's Dana Bash questioned her about recent comments she had made that contradicted her previous policy statements. She kept on repeating that her "values haven't changed," but it is difficult to see how that can be true alongside her radical shift in policy. Either her values have changed or she is lying about her change in policy to win votes. You decide which seems more likely.

During the interview, Harris doubled down on her policy flip on fracking, the border, and even her use of the race card. Here are her top three flip-flops from the interview:

Fracking

Citizens of the Planet / Contributor | Getty Images

In 2019, during the 2020 presidential election, Harris pledged her full support behind a federal ban on fracking during a town hall event. But, during the DNC and again in this recent interview, Harris insisted that she is now opposed to the idea. The idea of banning fracking has been floated for a while now due to environmental concerns surrounding the controversial oil drilling method. Bans on fracking are opposed by many conservatives as it would greatly limit the production of oil in America, thus driving up gas prices across the nation. It seems Harris took this stance to win over moderates and to keep gas prices down, but who knows how she will behave once in office?

Border

PATRICK T. FALLON / Contributor | Getty Images

In her 2020 presidential bid, Harris was all for decriminalizing the border, but now she is singing a different tune. Harris claimed she is determined to secure the border—as if like she had always been a stalwart defender of the southern states. Despite this policy reversal, Harris claimed her values have not changed, which is hard to reconcile. The interviewer even offered Kamala a graceful out by suggesting she had learned more about the situation during her VP tenure, but Kamala insisted she had not changed.

Race

Tasos Katopodis / Stringer | Getty Images

When asked to respond to Trump's comments regarding the sudden emergence of Kamala's black ancestry Kamala simply answered "Same old tired playbook, next question" instead of jumping on the opportunity to play the race card as one might expect. While skipping the critical race theory lecture was refreshing, it came as a shock coming from the candidate representing the "everything is racist" party. Was this just a way to deflect the question back on Trump, or have the Democrats decided the race card isn't working anymore?

The REAL questions that CNN should ask Kamala tonight

KAMIL KRZACZYNSKI / Contributor | Getty Images

The Democrats don't want the American people to know who they are voting for. It has been well over a month since Biden dropped out of the presidential race and Kamala was hastily installed in his place. During that time, Kamala has not given a single interview.

The Democrats' intention is clear: they have spent the last month gaslighting the American left into believing that Kamala is their new "super-candidate." Now that they've taken the bait, they can allow Kamala to take a softball interview to combat accusations from the Right.

Kamala's first interview will be hosted by Dana Bash on CNN and is scheduled for 9:00 p.m. ET tonight. Kamala will be joined by her running mate, Tim Walz, for an unusual interview. Between the tag-team approach and the more-than-sympathetic interviewer, it's almost certain that this will not be a particularly substantial interview full of easy, soft-ball, questions.

The American people deserve to know who is on the ballot, and that means that they should be able to see how their candidates stand up against tough questions. Here are five questions that CNN should ask Kamala tonight:

Will she build a border wall?

SOPA Images / Contributor | Getty Images

After years of bashing Trump for his proposed border wall, Kamala has suddenly changed her mind. During the DNC, Kamala pledged to support a bill that included money for a border wall and other border security measures. This change seems like a knee-jerk response to recent criticisms made about her abysmal performance as the "border czar." The question is: how genuine is it?

What is her stance on the Israel-Hamas war?

BASHAR TALEB / Contributor | Getty Images

Kamala has been mushy on the issue of the Israel-Hamas war so far. She said that she would support Israel while simultaneously expressing sympathy for the Palestinians in Gaza. With mounting pro-Hamas support within the American left, just how far is Kamala willing to go?

How does she explain defending Biden against allegations that he was too old for office now that those allegations have proven true?

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

For the last four years, Kamala and the entire mainstream media have vehemently defended President Biden's mental fitness, despite countless incidents that indicated otherwise. After Biden's senile performance at the June presidential debate, the truth couldn't be hidden any longer, and Kamala was quickly swapped into his place. Now that the cat's out of the bag, how does Kamala justify her lies to protect the incompetent president?

How does she plan on fixing the economy, and why hasn't she already done it?

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

Kamala has claimed that she could lower consumer prices starting on the first day of her administration, accompanied by other promises to fix the economy. So why the wait? If she knows how to fix the economy that is causing so many Americans to suffer, can't she do something right now as the Vice President? Why has the economy only gotten worse within her three-year tenure in the White House?

Why does she keep flipping on her policies? Where does it stop?

Andrew Harnik / Staff | Getty Images

As mentioned above, Kamala has already changed her stance on a border wall, but it doesn't end there. During her 2019 presidential campaign, Kamala vowed to end fracking, a controversial method of drilling for oil, in the name of climate change. But now it seems her position has softened, with no mention of a fracking ban. Why does she keep changing her stance on these major policies? What other policies has she changed without any indication? Why has she so far failed to produce a clear campaign platform?