Blog
LatestArticlesVideos
Radio
LivePodcastSerialsStations
TV
Podcasts
The Glenn Beck ProgramThe Glenn Beck PodcastThe Beck Story
Fine Art
Real Estate
More
AboutCharityBooksSponsorsShopContact
SEARCH
Live Radio

©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Live

Glenn's Show Prep

20 Delusional Conspiracy Theories Floated by Alex Jones

June 13, 2017
Staff

WRITER

Is Megyn Kelly legitimizing Alex Jones by giving him air time during an interview? That's what many are saying, including the family members of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims. The truth, though, is that he's already been legitimized.

"The president of the United States has legitimized Alex Jones. Roger Stone, by being a fill-in host for Alex Jones, has legitimized Alex Jones. Donald Trump, Jr., who has been on his show several times, has legitimized Alex Jones. Alex Jones is not this fringe character. The New York Magazine, New York Times, The New Yorker, they have also done profiles of Alex Jones," Glenn said.

Megyn Kelly is not doing a puff piece on Jones. As her released promo shows, she's holding his feet to the fire and exposing him to the American people.

RELATED: WATCH: Megyn Kelly Promo Shows She Won’t Be Giving Alex Jones a Free Pass

What will Kelly expose? Alex Jones' delusional conspiracy theories which --- whether real or pretend --- have harmed the media, companies and, most importantly, the victims of horrible crimes.

Here are twenty of this most outrageous claims:

1. Sandy Hook Hoax

The Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting was completely fake and manufactured with actors. "They have staged events before. But then you learn the school had been closed and reopened. And you got video of the kids going in circles, in and out of the building, and they don't call the rescue choppers for two hours. And then they tear the building down and seal it. And they get caught using blue screens. And an email by Bloomberg comes out in the lawsuit, where he's telling his people, get ready in the next 24 hours to capitalize on a shooting. Yeah, so Sandy Hook is a synthetic, completely fake, with actors, in my view, manufactured. I couldn't believe it at first. I knew they had actors there, clearly, but I thought they killed some real kids. And it just shows how bold they are, that they clearly used actors. I mean, they even ended up using photos of kids killed in mass shootings here in a fake mass shooting in Turkey."

2. Animal-Human Hybrids

The government is breeding animals and humans together.

3. Aurora Mass Shooting

There's a "100 percent chance that the mass murder committed in Aurora, Colorado, was a false flag, a mind control event."

4. Columbine High School Shooting

The 1999 school shooting was an "extremely suspicious event that had globalist operations written all over it. Columbine, as we know it, was a false flag. I'd say 100 percent false flag."

5. Tucson Shooting

"The whole thing stinks to high heaven."

6. San Bernardino Shooting

A false flag because governments want to "blame the Second Amendment."

7. Orlando Pulse Nightclub Shooting

A "false flag to take your guns and speech."

8: Boston Marathon Bombing

This thing "stinks to high heaven, #falseflag."

9. Obama Married a Man

Obama married a man, Michelle Obama, "because he's obsessed with transgender rights."

10. Vaccines

If you take vaccines, "you'll become disabled or you will die."

RELATED: Megyn Kelly Wants to EXPOSE Alex Jones, Not Legitimize Him

11. Weather Control

The government has "a weather weapon that can create and steer natural disasters."

12. Las Vegas Police Shooting

It was "absolutely staged by the government."

13. Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster

Globalists caused the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster to serve as "a distraction from Iraq."

14. 9/11

9/11 was an inside job. Popular Mechanics debunked it, but only because they are part of the CIA.

15. Bilderberg

Bilderberg people go to the Bohemian Grove "to eat gold-wrapped, roasted babies." He offered a police officer $10,000 to disprove it.

16. Comet Ping Pong

Comet Ping Pong pizza "has a labyrinth of tunnels where children are used as sex slaves." He had to apologize for that.

17. Chobani Yogurt

Chobani Yogurt is importing rapists. He had to pay a settlement for that one.

18. Fluoride Poison

Fluoride is poison and it's killing us all.

19. Oklahoma City Bombing

Oklahoma City Bombing was "an inside job and a total false flag."

20. Fetus-Flavored Pepsi

Pepsi has tested new flavorings of fetuses. "I know that there are fetal tissues in a lot of the medical treatments in the vaccines, and they are in a lot of the cosmetics. That's confirmed. We know Pepsi is involved with companies that do use the fetal parts, and we do know that it's been tested in flavor enhancement."

"How can you you do an interview with this guy and normalize him?" Glenn asked. "You're not normalizing him, you're exposing him."

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

GLENN: Megyn Kelly is getting hit for this piece that she has done with Alex Jones. Now, what's happening? Well, the families of Sandy Hook are complaining that you're legitimizing Alex Jones. No, the president of the United States has legitimized Alex Jones. Roger Stone, by being a fill-in host for Alex Jones, has legitimized Alex Jones. Donald Trump Jr, who has been on his show several times, has legitimized Alex Jones. Alex Jones is not this fringe character. The New York Magazine, New York Times, the New Yorker, they have also done profiles of Alex Jones.

PAT: And nobody wanted to shut them down for it.

GLENN: Nobody wants to shut them down. But NBC and Megyn Kelly -- Megyn does an interview, where we play the audio. It comes up on Sunday. We played the audio yesterday. She's not doing a puff piece. She's not grabbing him by the throat and squeezing. But she is holding his feet to the fire, and she is allowing himself to hang himself with the American people, if that's even possible anymore.

In the interview, he says, "You know what story you're not covering is the animal human hybrid story, where the government is breeding animals and humans together." Okay. Thank you.

He also says in this -- and this is what's causing the controversy, that he has done -- you know, he's played devil's advocate and said that, "No, Sandy Hook victims, they weren't real victims. They were actors." But he says on the show that he was just playing devil's advocate.

STU: Right.

GLENN: Let's play the actual audio of what he said.

ALEX: They have staged events before. But then you learn the school had been closed and reopened. And you got video of the kids going in circles, in and out of the building, and they don't call the rescue choppers for two hours. And then they tear the building down and seal it. And they get caught using blue screens. And an email by Bloomberg comes out in the lawsuit, where he's telling his people, get ready in the next 24 hours to capitalize on a shooting.

Yeah, so Sandy Hook is a synthetic, completely fake, with actors, in my view, manufactured. I couldn't believe it at first. I knew they had actors there, clearly, but I thought they killed some real kids. And it just shows how bold they are, that they clearly used actors. I mean, they even ended up using photos of kids killed in mass shootings here in a fake mass shooting in Turkey.

PAT: Unreal. Let me tell you something, that is not playing devil's advocate. That is not devil's advocate. That is his opinion. And he's pushing that theory forward.

GLENN: If I were a family member --

PAT: Man.

GLENN: And I don't know if you could do this for a public shooting, but I would mad enough that I would be with an attorney saying, "Can we sue him? Can we sue him? My child is dead. My child is dead."

PAT: And you're accusing me of faking it. That my child doesn't exist. Wow.

GLENN: That's absolutely incredible. That's not playing devil's advocate. Let me give you what else he has said. But he's now asking NBC, who is getting heat from both the right and the left and the families, getting heat for running this interview.

Alex Jones --

PAT: He's demanding they not run it.

GLENN: Alex Jones himself is demanding they don't run it.

STU: Which is evidence why you should run it.

GLENN: Why you should run it. He says that they need to cancel it because it's a hit piece. Because he's been taken out of context. Well, there's the context. Right there.

PAT: Yeah. That was in context.

GLENN: That's what he said. Okay.

He's also said, 100 percent chance that the mass murder committed in Aurora, Colorado, was a false flag, a mind control event.

PAT: So it's not just this shooting.

GLENN: Quoting: 1999 Columbine: School shooting was, quote, extremely suspicious event that had globalist operations written all over it. End quote.

Quote, Columbine, as we know it, was a false flag. I'd say 100 percent, false flag. Tucson shooting, quote, the whole thing stinks to high heaven. San Bernardino, shooting a false flag because governments want to, quote, blame the Second Amendment, end quote. Orlando --

PAT: Jeez.

GLENN: -- false flag to take your guns and speech. Boston Marathon, this thing stinks to high heaven, #falseflag, end quote.

PAT: Jeez.

GLENN: He said that Obama had married a man, Michelle Obama, because he's obsessed with transgender rights, end quote.

If you take vaccines, quote, you'll become disabled or you will die, end quote. The government has, quote, a weather weapon that can create and steer natural disasters, end quote. He claimed --

PAT: You're not claiming you don't believe that.

GLENN: He claimed Las Vegas cop shooting was absolutely staged by the government. Quoting: Globalists caused the space shuttle Columbia disaster to serve as, quote, a distraction from Iraq.

And, of course, his all-time classic: 9/11 was an inside job. Popular Mechanics debunked it, but they only debunked it because they are part of the CIA.

He also believes that the Bilderberg people go to the Bohemian Grove, quote, to eat gold-wrapped roasted babies.

PAT: He actually offered a cop $10,000 if he could disprove that.

STU: How would you disprove --

PAT: I don't know. I don't know.

GLENN: Pizza place -- comic pizza --

PAT: They have gold all over their lips after they do it. It's impossible to disprove.

GLENN: What's the name of the place?

STU: Comet Ping Pong.

GLENN: Comet Ping Pong pizza, quote, has a labyrinth of tunnels where children are used as sex slaves. He's had to apologize for that.

The latest is Chobani yogurt is importing rapists. He had to pay a settlement on that. He said fluoride is poison and it's killing us all. That the Oklahoma City bombing was, quote, an inside job and a total false flag. The Gulf of Tonkin is a false flag.

STU: Of course. It all starts there, Pat.

PAT: It does.

GLENN: And my favorite, Pepsi has tested new flavorings of fetuses.

PAT: Well, listen to his case though, you haven't heard his case.

GLENN: All right.

ALEX: I know that there are fetal tissues in a lot of the medical treatments in the vaccines, and they are in a lot of the cosmetics. That's confirmed.

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: That's confirmed.

ALEX: We know Pepsi is involved with companies that do use the fetal parts, and we do know that it's been tested in flavor enhancement.

PAT: Because there's nothing more delicious than a fetus. I mean, that's pretty well-known. Right? What is that?

GLENN: No. When you have an aborted baby, you think to yourself, I wonder if we can mix this in a drink to make it taste better. That's what you think.

PAT: If I combine this with some nutmeg, it's going to be delicious.

GLENN: Again, he said in there because they're training us to be cannibals.

Now, how can you you do an interview with this guy and normalize him? How can you do -- when the president has been on his show. The president's son has been on his show.

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: The president's advisers have been on his show. You're not normalizing him, you're exposing him.

STU: Of course. We have gone -- this is a country that has -- its journalists go and interview Assad and Ahmadinejad. And Putin.

GLENN: Putin.

STU: She just interviewed Putin.

PAT: They go to prison and interview people on Death Row who have murdered --

GLENN: Charlie Manson.

PAT: Charlie Manson has been interviewed multiple times.

STU: Why on -- I mean, look, Alex Jones I think is terrible for the country. But why on earth can she not --

GLENN: Okay. Because -- I have an answer to this. And it goes to why I am thrilled to have this audience and to be able to talk to you every single day. Because there is something different about this audience. And this audience is growing. This hunger is growing. And I'll tell you what it is, coming up in a second.

Did Democrats just betray fair elections? The SAVE Act controversy explained

DOMINIC GWINN / Contributor | Getty Images

One of President Trump’s key campaign promises, the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, faces fierce opposition from Democrats in the Senate.

The SAVE Act recently passed Congress for the second time and is now headed to the Senate. This voter security bill mandates proof of U.S. citizenship for all federal elections. It garnered unanimous Republican support in Congress but was backed by only four Democrats, consistent with last year’s Senate rejection of the bill.

Glenn has repeatedly emphasized the urgency of securing our elections, warning that without reform in the next four years, free and fair elections may become a thing of the past. However, the SAVE Act faces significant hurdles. Republicans lack the Senate votes to overcome a filibuster, meaning the bill’s fate hinges on bipartisan support—something Democrats have been reluctant to offer.

So, what exactly does the SAVE Act do? Why are Democrats opposing it? And how can you help ensure its passage?

What the SAVE Act Entails

Stefan Zaklin / Stringer | Getty Images

The SAVE Act is straightforward: it requires voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship before casting a ballot in federal elections. This measure responds to reports of voter fraud, including allegations of noncitizens, such as illegal immigrants, voting in past presidential elections. Acceptable forms of identification include a REAL ID, U.S. passport, military ID, birth certificate, or other specified documents.

Additionally, the bill mandates that states remove noncitizens from voter rolls and lists of eligible voters. It also establishes criminal penalties for officials who fail to comply with these new guidelines.

Democrats’ Opposition to the SAVE Act

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Democrats have strongly criticized the SAVE Act, arguing it discriminates against women, transgender individuals, and minorities. They claim that people who have changed their names—such as women after marriage or transgender individuals—may struggle to vote if their current ID doesn’t match their birth certificate. However, the bill allows multiple forms of identification beyond birth certificates, meaning affected individuals can use updated IDs like a REAL ID or passport.

The argument that minorities are disproportionately harmed is slightly more substantiated. A recent survey showed that 93 percent of voting-age Black Americans, 94 percent of voting-age Hispanics, and 95 percent of voting-age Native Americans have valid photo IDs, compared to 97% of voting-age whites and 98 percent of voting-age Asians. However, in 2024, only about 58 percent of the voting-age population cast ballots—a trend that has been consistent for decades. There’s little evidence that Americans are prevented from voting due to a lack of ID. Instead of opposing the bill, a more constructive approach would be to assist the small percentage of Americans without IDs in obtaining proper documentation.

How You Can Make a Difference

Melissa Sue Gerrits / Stringer | Getty Images

The stakes couldn’t be higher—free and fair elections are the cornerstone of our democracy. Conservatives must rally to ensure the SAVE Act becomes law. Contact your Senators to express your support for the bill and highlight its importance in safeguarding electoral integrity. Grassroots efforts, such as sharing accurate information about the SAVE Act on social media or discussing it with friends and family, can amplify its visibility. Local advocacy groups may also offer opportunities to organize or participate in campaigns that pressure lawmakers to act. Every voice counts, and collective action could tip the scales in favor of this critical legislation.

Glenn unveils CIA’s grim Dire Wolf conspiracy

"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should."

-Ian Malcolm, Jurassic Park

The monstrous Dire Wolf, extinct for 10,000 years, has returned. This larger, ancient wolf species—popularized by HBO’s Game of Thrones—was resurrected by Colossal Laboratories, a Dallas-based bioscience company. Colossal utilized both preserved ancient Dire Wolf DNA and modern gray wolf DNA combined with some clever gene-crafting and a healthy pinch of hubris to create three approximations of the ancient canine.

While the wolves posed for a photoshoot alongside Game of Thrones props and its creator, Colossal’s broader plans remain unclear. However, what Glenn recently uncovered about the company is far more monstrous than the wolves will ever be. Glenn revealed that the CIA, through a nonprofit group known as In-Q-Tel, is funding Colossal's endeavors to bring back all sorts of extinct beasts. With the recently released JFK Files exposing the CIA’s unchecked power, Glenn warns of the dangerous potential behind this genetic manipulation—and the rogue agency’s possible motives.

Here are the top three most horrifying uses the CIA could have for this technology:

Dual-Use Technology

Xinhua News Agency / Contributor | Getty Images

Colossal and other biotech firms advertise a variety of "civilian" uses for bioengineered beasts, including research subjects, exotic zoos, and even climate restoration. As dubious as those uses are, Glenn revealed that the CIA could be cooking up something much worse. Gene-editing tools like CRISPR are inherently dual-purpose and easily adaptable for military use. As one of Colossal’s major investors, the CIA gains prime access to cutting-edge biotech, likely eyeing its potential for warfare.

Frankenstein’s Spy Lab

Like AI, one can only guess at the maximum capabilities of this gene-editing technology. On air, Glenn speculated about bioengineered resilient organisms, animals with tweaked senses designed for espionage or combat in areas inaccessible to drones or humans. Playing God to create new weapons of war sounds right up the CIA's alley.

Even worse than man-made mutant mutts, Glenn pointed out that these augmentations are by no means limited to animals. We could see (or rather, hear unverified rumors of) the rise of the next generation of super soldier projects. Human experimentation is not outside of the CIA's scope (think MKUltra), and genetically or chemically augmented humans have been a pipe dream for many a clandestine organization for decades. Is there anything more horrifying than an agency with as little oversight as the CIA in control of something as powerful and potentially devastating as gene-augmentation?

Eco-Warfare Unleashed

MARCELO MANERA / Contributor | Getty Images

Why attack a single target when you could attack an entire ecosystem instead?

Anyone who has had to deal with the destructive effects of fire ants knows how dangerous an invasive species can be to the human, plant, and animal inhabitants of any given region. Now imagine genetically engineered Dire Wolves or Woolly Mammoths unleashed by the CIA to cripple an enemy’s agriculture or environment. Such a weapon could inflict irreparable damage from a distance. Even the mere threat of eco-warfare might serve as a deterrent, though its unpredictability could reshape the world in ways we can’t control or repair.

Trump’s Liberation day unveiled: 3 shocking takeaways you need to know

Andrew Harnik / Staff | Getty Images

President Trump’s new tariffs have sparked global outrage, and even conservatives are divided over the merits of his plan.

On Wednesday, April 2, 2025, President Trump declared "Liberation Day" to usher in a new era for the American economy. This bold initiative began with the introduction of sweeping tariffs on most—if not all—countries trading with the United States. These tariffs are reciprocal, meaning the percentage charged to each country mirrors the tariffs they impose on U.S. goods. The goal was to level the playing field between America and its trade partners.

As Glenn predicted, these tariffs have caused some immediate damage to the economy; the stock market has been hit hard, and China has already imposed a retaliatory tariff. While many fear that a recession is inbound, along with a global trade war, others are trusting in Trump's plan, keeping their head and preparing to ride out this rough patch.

So, what exactly are these "Liberation Day" tariffs, and what happened on April 2? Here are the top three takeaways:

Baseline Tariff

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

To kick off Liberation Day, the White House unveiled a baseline tariff affecting all imports to the U.S. Starting April 5, 2025, every good entering the United States will face a 10% tariff, regardless of its country of origin. While some nations face additional tariffs on top of this baseline, others—like the UK, Australia, and Argentina—only pay the 10% rate. These countries enjoy this leniency because they impose relatively low tariffs on American goods.

Reciprocal Tariffs

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

For the countries that levied heavy tariffs against America, Trump hit them back hard. Cambodia, for instance, now faces a steep 49% tariff, while China contends with 34%, the EU with 20%, and Iraq with 39%. While these tariff rates may seem steep, they are all a good bit lower than the rates they apply against the U.S (see the full chart here). Trump’s strategy is to make foreign goods prohibitively expensive, encouraging manufacturing and jobs to return to American soil. Whether this gamble succeeds remains to be seen.

Canada and Mexico

Aaron M. Sprecher / Contributor, Chris Jackson / Staff | Getty Images

Notably absent from the "Liberation Day" tariff list are Canada and Mexico, America’s closest neighbors. That’s because Trump already imposed tariffs on them earlier this year. In February 2025, he slapped a 25% tariff on most goods imported from both countries to pressure them into curbing the flow of fentanyl across U.S. borders. Exceptions include agricultural products, textiles, apparel, and other items protected under NAFTA.

Does France's latest move PROVE lawfare is on the rise?

Sam Tarling / Stringer | Getty Images

An all-too-familiar story unfolded in France this week: the is law being weaponized against a "far-right" candidate. Does that ring a bell?

Glenn was taken aback earlier this week when he learned that Marine Le Pen, a popular French conservative, had been banned from the 2027 election following a controversial conviction. The ruling shocked French conservatives and foreign politicians alike, many of whom saw Le Pen as France’s best conservative hope. President Trump called it a "very big deal," a view shared by French commentators who fear this marks the end of Le Pen’s political career.

But this isn’t just about France—it’s a symptom of a larger threat looming over the West.

A double standard?

Fmr. President Sarkozy (left) and Fmr. Prime Minister Fillon (right)

BERTRAND GUAY / Contributor, Chesnot / Contributor | Getty Images

As of Sunday, March 30, 2025, Marine Le Pen led the polls with a commanding edge over her rivals, offering French conservatives their strongest shot at the presidency in years. Hours later, that hope crumbled. Found guilty of embezzling EU funds, Le Pen was sentenced to two years of house arrest, fined €100,000 ($108,200), and banned from public office for five years, effective immediately.

Glenn quickly highlighted an apparent double standard. Former President Nicolas Sarkozy and former Prime Minister François Fillon faced similar—or worse—corruption charges, yet neither was barred from office during their political runs. So why Le Pen, and why now? Similar to Trump’s "hush money" trial, legal troubles this late in the election cycle reek of interference. The decision should belong to voters—France’s largest jury—not a courtroom. This appears to be a grave injustice to the French electorate and another crack in democracy’s foundation.

This is NOT about France

Andrei Pungovschi / Stringer | Getty Images

This pattern stretches far beyond France; it’s a tactic we’ve seen before.

In early 2025, Bucharest’s streets erupted in protest after Romania’s Constitutional Court annulled the first round of its presidential election. Călin Georgescu, a rising conservative, had clinched an unexpected victory, only to have it stripped away amid baseless claims of Russian interference. His supporters raged against the decision, seeing it as a theft of their voice.

Both Georgescu and Le Pen echo the legal barrage President Trump endured before his 2024 win. The Left hurled every weapon imaginable at him, unleashing unprecedented lawfare. In America, the Constitution held, and the people’s will prevailed.

Now, with Tesla vandalism targeting Elon Musk’s free-speech stance, a coordinated pushback against freedom is clear—spanning France, Romania, the U.S., and beyond.

The war on free will

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

Trump’s 2024 victory doesn’t mean lawfare is dead; Europe shows it’s thriving.

France and Romania prove its effectiveness, sidelining candidates through courts rather than ballots. Glenn warned us about this years ago—when the powerful can’t win at the polls, they turn to the gavel. It’s a chilling trend of stripping voters of their choice and silencing dissent, all the while pawning it off as justice. The playbook is polished and ready, and America’s turn could come sooner than we think.