Blog
LatestArticlesVideos
Radio
LivePodcastSerialsStations
TV
Podcasts
The Glenn Beck ProgramThe Glenn Beck PodcastThe Beck Story
Fine Art
Real Estate
More
AboutCharityBooksSponsorsShopContact
SEARCH
Live Radio

©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Live

Glenn's Show Prep

Glenn and Pat predicts Romney landslide, Stu thinks Obama may get a second term

November 05, 2012
Wilson

Writer

This is it - just one day until the biggest election perhaps in the history of America. After all the debates, all the attacks, all the gaffes -- where does each candidate stand in the polls? What are people predicting just 1 day out? Can Romney actually pull off a landslide?

TheBlaze has posted some of the latest swing state polls:

A new University of Cincinnati poll of undecided voters shows President Obama with 50 percent support and Mitt Romney with 48.5 percent.
A new Rasmussen poll of likely voters shows a slightly closer race with both Obama and Romney at 49 percent.
An NBC-Wall Street Journal-Marist poll of likely voters in Virginia released Sunday shows Obama 48 percent to Romney’s 47 percent.
Public Policy Polling has new numbers today for Nevada and Colorado:
Nevada: Obama 51%, Romney 47%
Colorado: Obama 52%, Romney 46%
With the final polls trickling in, the radio crew gave their predictions for the Electoral College.

"321‑217," Glenn said. "I think that's what we're headed for because I think we're headed for Chick‑fil‑A.  Nobody bused people into Chick‑fil‑A.  And look at what that was.  I think there are millions of Americans who just aren't making a big deal out of it.  They're just going to go.  And they are going to do the right thing.  And nobody has to bus them in, nobody has to organize them.  They are just going to do the right thing.  I think you are going to see a miraculous night tomorrow."

"Either the media is going to be very, very wrong or we're going to be very wrong.  And I don't think either side knows which it is," Glenn explained.

Glenn pointed out the huge and energetic crowds that greeted Mitt Romney over the weekend. Up until recently, many had considered Pennsylvania to be a safe win for Barack Obama. Recently, however, both he and Romney have been pouring money into Pennsylvania.

"They sent Bill Clinton to Pennsylvania.  Why would you do that?  Because they don't believe their poll numbers, either.  They might think, both sides might think they have it locked down.  I don't think the Obama people do," Glenn said.

Pat believes that Romney will win 337-201 in the Electoral College.

Stu, on the other hand, is not as confident in a Romney victory. Stu explained that the Real Clear Politics average gives Romney a 1.4 point lead in Florida. Confidently giving Romney a Florida victory, Stu gave Romney every state where he had a 1.4 point lead in the polls. This does not give Romney a victory in the Electoral College.

"If we're thinking Romney's lead of 1.4% is safe, then we could also apply that same standard to Obama.  So if he leads states by 1.4% or more, they would be safe," Stu explained.

" So if you apply that standard and you give Mitt Romney all the states he leads in no matter how small the lead and all the states Obama leads in up to 1.4%, Obama still wins."

Stu's final Electoral College?  281‑257 Obama.

        3 BIGGEST lies about Trump's plans for deportations
    

         Rebecca Noble / Stringer | Getty Images
    
To the right, Trump's deportation plans seem like a reasonable step to secure the border. For the left, mass deportation represents an existential threat to democracy.
However, the left's main arguments against Trump's deportation plans are not only based on racially problematic lies and fabrications — they are outright hypocritical. 
Here are the three BIGGEST lies about Trump's deportation plans: 
1. Past Deportations
            
            
        
 Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images
The left acts like Donald Trump is the first president in history to oversee mass deportations, but nothing could be further from the truth. Deportations have been a crucial tool for enforcing immigration laws and securing the country from the beginning, and until recently, it was a fairly bipartisan issue. 
Democrat superstar President Obama holds the record for most deportations during his tenure in office, clocking in at a whopping 3,066,457 people over his eight years in office. This compares to the 551,449 people removed during Trump's first term. Obama isn't an anomaly either, President Clinton deported 865,646 people during his eight years, still toping Trump's numbers by a considerable margin. 
The left's sudden aversion to deportations is clearly reactionary propaganda aimed at villainizing Trump.
2. Exploitative Labor
            
            
        
John Moore / Staff | Getty Images
Commentators on the left have insinuated that  President Trump's deportation plan would endanger the agricultural industry due to the large portion of agricultural workers in the U.S. who are illegal aliens. If they are deported, food prices will skyrocket. 
What the left is conveniently forgetting is the reason why many businesses choose to hire illegal immigrants (here's a hint: it's not because legal Americans aren't willing to do the work). It's because it is way easier to exploit people who are here illegally. Farmowners don't have to pay taxes on illegal aliens, pay minimum wage, offer benefits, sign contracts, or do any of the other typical requirements that protect the rights of the worker. 
The left has shown their hand. This was never about some high-minded ideals of "diversity" and "inclusion." It's about cheap, expendable labor and a captive voter base to bolster their party in elections.
3."Undesirable" Jobs
            
            
        
Spencer Platt / Staff | Getty Images
Another common talking point amid the left-wing anti-Trump hysteria is that illegal aliens take "undesirable" jobs that Americans will not do. The argument is that these people fill the "bottom tier" in the U.S. economy, jobs they consider "unfit" for American citizens.
By their logic, we should allow hordes of undocumented, unvetted immigrants into the country so they can work the jobs that the out-of-touch liberal talking heads consider beneath them. It's no wonder why they lost the election.

        Did the Left lay the foundations for election denial?
    

         Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images
    

	Did Glenn predict the future?


	Just a few days after the election and President Trump's historic victory, the New York Times published a noteworthy article titled "How Russia Openly Escalated Its Election Interference Efforts,"  in which they made some interesting suggestions. They brought up several examples of Russian election interference (stop me if you think you've heard this one before) that favored Trump. From there, they delicately approached the "election denial zone" with the following statement:


	 "What impact Russia’s information campaign had on the outcome of this year’s race, if any, remains uncertain"

	Is anyone else getting 2016 flashbacks?


	It doesn't end there. About two weeks before the election (October 23rd), Glenn and Justin Haskins, the co-author of Glenn's new book, Propaganda Wars, discuss a frightening pattern they were observing in the news cycle at the time, and it bears a striking similarity to this New York Times piece. To gain a full appreciation of this situation, let's go back to two weeks before the election when Glenn and Justin laid out this scene:


            
                Bad Eggs in the Intelligence Community
            
            
        
 BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / Contributor | Getty Images
This story begins with a top-secret military intelligence leak. Over the October 19th weekend,  someone within the U.S. Government's intelligence agencies leaked classified information regarding the Israeli military and their upcoming plans to Iran. The man responsible for this leak, Asif William Rahman, a CIA official with top security clearance, was arrested on Tuesday, November 12th. 
Rahman is one of the known "bad eggs" within our intelligence community. Glenn and Justin highlighted another, a man named Robert Malley. Malley is an Iranian envoy who works at the State Department under the Biden/Harris administration and is under investigation by the FBI for mishandling classified information. While Malley was quietly placed on leave in June, he has yet to be fired and still holds security clearance. 
Another suspicious figure is Ariane Tabatabai, a former aide of Mr. Malley and a confirmed Iranian agent. According to a leak by Semafor, Tabatabai was revealed to be a willing participant in an Iranian covert influence campaign run by Tehran's Foreign Ministry. Despite this shocking revelation that an Iranian agent was in the Pentagon with access to top-secret information, Tabatabai has not faced any charges or inquires, nor has she been stripped of her job or clearance. 
If these are the bad actors we know about, imagine how many are unknown to the public or are flying under the radar. In short, our intelligence agencies are full of people whose goals do not align with American security. 

            
                Conspicuous Russian Misinformation
            
            
        
 Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images
The story continues with a video of a man accusing former VP candidate and Minnesota Governor, Tim Walz of sexual assault. The man alleged to be Matthew Metro, a former student of Walz claimed that he was assaulted by the Governor while in High School. The man in the video gave corroborating details that made the claim seem credible on the surface, and it quickly spread across the internet. But after some deeper investigation, it was revealed this man wasnot Matthew Metro and that the entire video was fake. This caught the attention of the Security Director of National Intelligence who claimed the video was a Russian hoax designed to wound the Harris/Walz campaign, and the rest of the intelligence community quickly agreed. 
In the same vein, the State Department put out a $10 million bountyto find the identity of the head of the Russian-owned media company Rybar. According to the State Department, Rybar manages several social media channels that promote Russian governmental political interests targeted at Trump supporters. The content Rybar posts is directed into pro-Trump, and pro-Republican channels, and the content apparently has a pro-Trump spin, alongside its pro-Russia objectives. 

            
                Why Does the Intelligence Community Care?
            
            
        
Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images
So what's the deal? Yes, Russia was trying to interfere with the election, but this is a well-known issue that has unfortunately become commonplace in our recent elections. 
The real concern is the intelligence community's uncharacteristically enthusiastic and fast response. Where was this response in 2016, when Hillary Clinton and the Democrats spent months lying about Donald Trump's "collusion" with Russia? It has since been proven that the  FIB knew the entire story was a Clinton campaign fabrication, and they not only kept quiet about it, but they even played along. Or what about in 2020 when the Left tried to shut down the Hunter Biden laptop story for months by calling it a Russian hoax, only for it to turn out to be true?
Between all the bad actors in the intelligence community and their demonstrated repeated trustworthiness, this sudden concern with "Russian disinformation" that happened to support Trump was just too convenient. 

            
                Laying the Foundations for Election Denial
            
            
        
Brandon Bell / Staff | Getty Images
This is when Glenn and Justin make a startling prediction: the Left was preparing for a potential Trump victory (remember, this was two weeks before the election) so they would have something to delegitimize him with. They were painting Trump as Putin's lapdog who was receiving election assistance in the form of misinformation from the Kremlin by sounding the alarm on these cherry-picked (and in the grand scheme of things, tame) examples of Russian propaganda. They were laying the foundation of the Left's effort to resist and delegitimize a President-elect Trump. 
Glenn and Justin had no idea how right they were.

        Trump's POWERFUL 10-point plan to TEAR DOWN the Deep State
    

        Brandon Bell / Staff | Getty Images
    
Since 2016 President Trump has promised to drain the swamp, but with Trump's new ten-point plan, do we finally have a solid roadmap to dismantle the deep state?
In March 2023, President Trump released a video detailing his plan to shatter the deep state. Now that he is the President-Elect, this plan is slated to launch in January 2025. Recently, Glenn reviewed Trump's plan and was optimistic about what he saw. In fact, he couldn't see how anyone could be against it (not that anything will stop the mainstream media from spinning it in a negative light).
But don't let Glenn tell you what to think! Check out Trump's FULL plan below: 
1. Remove rouge bureaucrats
            
            
        
U.S. Air Force / Handout | Getty Images
Trump's first order of business will be to restore an executive order he issued in 2020 that allowed him to remove rouge bureaucrats. Trump promises to use this power aggressively eliminate corruption. 
2. Clean and overhaul the intelligence apparatus
            
            
        
SAUL LOEB / Contributor | Getty Images
Next, Trump promises to oust corrupt individuals from the national intelligence apparatus. This includes federal bureaucracies like the CIA, NSA, and other agencies that have been weaponized against the left's political opponents. 
3. Reform FISA courts 
            
            
        
 Handout / Handout | Getty Images
Trump's next promise is to reform the FISA courts, which are courts tasked with reviewing and approving requests to gather foreign intelligence, typically through surveillance. These courts have been unaccountable to protections like the 4th Amendment that prohibits the government from unwarranted surveillance, resulting in severe government overreach on American citizens, both on US soil and abroad. 
4. Expose the deep state. 
            
            
        
Drew Angerer / Staff | Getty Images
Trump want to establish a "Truth and Reconciliation" commission that will be tasked with unmasking the deep state. This will be accomplished by publishing and declassifying all documents on deep state spying, corruption, and censorship. 
5. Crackdown on government-media collusion
            
            
        
 Andrew Harnik / Staff | Getty Images
Next, Trump will crack down on government "leakers" who collaborate with the mainstream media to spread misinformation. These collaborators purposefully interject false narratives that derail the democratic process within the country. The plan will also prohibit government actors from pressuring social media to censor content that goes against a particular political narrative, as was done, for example, in the case of the Biden administration pressuring Facebook to crack down on Hunter Biden laptop-related content. 
6. Isolate inspector generals
            
            
        
 MANDEL NGAN / Contributor | Getty Images
Trump promises to physically separate every inspector general from the department they are tasked with overseeing. This way, they don't become entangled with the department and end up protecting them instead of scrutinizing them. 
7. Create a system to monitor the intelligence agencies
            
            
        
 SAUL LOEB / Stringer | Getty Images
To ensure that the intelligence agencies are no longer spying on American citizens, Trump proposed to create an independent auditing system. This auditing system, created by Congress, would keep the intelligence agencies in check from spying on American citizens or political campaigns as they did on Trump's campaign. 
8. Relocate the federal bureaucracy
            
            
        
 SAUL LOEB / Staff | Getty Images
Relocating the federal bureaucracy, Trump argues, will keep the internal politics of the individual bureaucracies out of the influence of DC. He says he will begin by relocating the Bureau of Land Management to Colorado. 
9. Ban federal bureaucrats from taking corporate jobs
            
            
        
 J. David Ake / Contributor | Getty Images
To keep money ties out of politics, Trump proposes that federal bureaucrats should be banned from working at the companies that they are regulating. American taxpayer dollars should not go to agencies run by bureaucrats who cut special deals for corporations, who will later offer them a cushy role and a huge paycheck. 
10. Push for congressional term limits
            
            
        
Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images
Finally, Trump wants to make a constitutional amendment placing term limits on members of Congress. This proposal has been popular on both sides of the political aisle for a while, preventing members of Congress from becoming swamp creatures like Nancy Pelosi who was just re-elected for her 19th term.

        The Democrats are turning on Biden
    

         Mario Tama / Staff | Getty Images
    
The election is over, Kamala Harris has officially conceded, and now the Democrats are doing some serious soul-searching.
After reflecting long and hard (approximately 24 hours), the Democrats have discovered the real reason Harris lost the election. Was it Trump's excellent campaign that resonated with voters? Was it Harris's off-putting personality? Or was it her failure to distinguish herself from the Biden administration's failed policies? 
No, it was Joe Biden. All the blame lies on President Biden's shoulders. The Left sees no need to take any real responsibility for the landslide defeat the Democrats suffered earlier this week; just pass the blame on to 'ole Joe. 
Here are the leading excuses the Left is spinning up to explain Harris's crushing defeat:

            
                "Biden should have dropped out sooner."
            
            
        
 Kevin Dietsch / Staff | Getty Images
This is the crux of the left-wing media's argument against Biden. They claim that if Joe Biden had dropped out earlier, Harris would have had more time to campaign and would not have had to carry around the baggage of Biden's abysmal debate performance. This could make sense, but what these commentators are conveniently forgetting are the years of propaganda these very same people promoted arguing that Biden's declining mental acuity was nothing more than a right-wing conspiracy theory. If Biden had been as sharp as they had told us, why would he have dropped out?
Also, if a lack of time was Harris's biggest issue this election, she sure didn't act like it. She was practically in hiding for the first several weeks of her campaign and she took plenty of days off, including during the last few crucial weeks. More time wouldn't have helped her case.

            
                "Harris failed to distance herself from Biden."
            
            
        
 Kevin Dietsch / Staff | Getty Images
This is media gaslighting at its finest. Yes, Harris failed to distance herself from Biden. However, that's because she, along with the rest of the Left, publically went on record defending Biden's policies and his mental acuity.  By the time Harris became the nominee, she had already said too much in favor of Biden. Don't forget Harris's infamous “There is not a thing that comes to mind,” quote after being asked on The View if she would do anything differently than Biden. In a way, Harris couldn't separate herself from Biden without drawing attention to the greatest flaw in her campaign: if she knew how to fix the country, why hasn't she? 

            
                "Harris did the best anyone could have done in that situation."
            
            
        
 Brandon Bell / Staff | Getty Images
But did she really? As mentioned earlier, she was noticeably absent for much of the campaign. While Trump was busy jumping into interviews, events, and rallies non-stop,  Harris was MIA. Whenever Harris did manage to make an appearance, it almost always did more harm than good by highlighting her lack of a robust policy platform and her inability to string together a coherent sentence. Notable examples include her aforementioned appearance on The View and her disastrous interview on Fox News with Bret Baier. The point is, even considering the limited time to campaign she had, Kamala Harris wasnot the best person for the job and there are undoubtedly many other Democrats who would have run a much more successful campaign.